Files
msd-core/.changeset
Tom Boucher ac3668e4b7 fix(#3797): make the roadmapper's role, output, and checklist match its write-first execution flow (#4008)
* test(#3797): the roadmapper must follow one write-first contract

* fix(#3797): make the roadmapper's role, output, and checklist match its write-first execution flow

The roadmapper contradicted itself: role blurb, output format, and
completion checklist described an approve-first flow while its execution
flow said "Write Files Immediately" with reactive-only revision (#3797).
The approval gate belongs to the ORCHESTRATOR — both callers read the
written ROADMAP.md, present it, and gate on approval (with an auto-mode
bypass a subagent cannot host) — so write-first is the contract.

All approve-first text now describes the write-then-return reality, the
old "Draft Presentation Format" (whose ## ROADMAP DRAFT header matched no
orchestrator branch) is folded into the ## ROADMAP CREATED structured
return as a preview block, and the duplicate checklist lines are merged.
A structural guard pins the single contract.

Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-roadmapper.md — #3797: +bytes — approve-first wording replaced with write-first descriptions; the DRAFT presentation template folded into the ROADMAP CREATED return as a preview block

* chore(#3797): changeset fragment (pr number backfilled after PR creation)

* chore(#3797): backfill changeset PR number (4008)

---------

Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
2026-08-28 15:55:55 -04:00
..

Changeset Fragments

This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.

Why

Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.

See #2975 for the full rationale.

Adding a fragment

node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
  --type Fixed \
  --pr 1234 \
  --body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"

This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.

Format

---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.

Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.

Opting out

PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.

At release time

Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:

node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty

This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.

Archived fragments

.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.