af822a8024
* fix(#4776): resolve the artifact-exists prompt under --auto /gsd-ui-phase <phase> --auto stopped at 'UI-SPEC.md already exists for Phase {N}. What would you like to do?' whenever the file was on disk — which is most often after an earlier run wrote the contract as a draft and ended before its checker ran, exactly the state a re-run exists to verify. Step 4 had no --auto arm; step 9.5 in the same file has had one since it was added, which is how the drift went unnoticed. Step 4 now auto-selects Skip: the existing UI-SPEC is left untouched and the run proceeds to the checker. Skip is the only non-destructive choice — Update re-runs the researcher, which rewrites the whole contract and drops answers a person already recorded in it, and View exits without verifying anything. spec-phase.md's artifact-exists arm auto-selected 'Update it', which is the same defect with the opposite sign: an unattended run regenerating a spec nobody is watching. Per the decision recorded on #4776 — an unattended run reuses an existing artifact rather than regenerating it — it now auto-selects Skip and leaves the spec unchanged. The max-revision-iterations escalation (Force approve / Edit manually / Abandon) is deliberately untouched and pinned by a test: accepting blocking findings is a decision a person makes. Closes #4776 * chore(#4776): add changeset fragment Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: ui-phase.md — --auto arm added to the existing-UI-SPEC branch (#4776) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: spec-phase.md — --auto arm reworded to reuse the existing SPEC (#4776) * fix(#4776): extend the reuse-as-is --auto fix to the 3 sibling files The PR's original scope claim -- that ai-integration-phase.md, eval-review.md and ui-review.md were "scoped by triage to their own issues" -- was false; no such issues existed, and it contradicted #4776's own most recent (2026-09-16) triage comment, which explicitly widened the fix to require all 5 files under one recommended fix. Applies the same reuse-as-is pattern: ai-integration-phase.md mirrors ui-phase.md's 3-way Update/View/Skip shape (auto-selects Skip); eval-review.md and ui-review.md have only Re-audit/View (auto-selects View, the only non-regenerating choice). None of the three had any prior --auto handling at all -- each has exactly one AskUserQuestion call site total, and it is the one this fix resolves, so an --auto run through any of them no longer stalls anywhere. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: ai-integration-phase.md — the --auto arm reusing an existing AI-SPEC is the deliverable (#4776) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: eval-review.md — the --auto arm reusing an existing EVAL-REVIEW is the deliverable (#4776) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: ui-review.md — the --auto arm reusing an existing UI-REVIEW is the deliverable (#4776) --------- Co-authored-by: Tom Boucher <trekkie@nomorestars.com>
1.0 KiB
type, pr
| type | pr |
|---|---|
| Fixed | 4832 |
--auto no longer stops on an artifact that already exists — /gsd-ui-phase <phase> --auto blocked on "UI-SPEC.md already exists for Phase {N}" whenever the file was on disk, which is most often after an earlier run left an unverified draft, so a headless or board run stalled on a question nobody could answer. It now reuses the existing UI-SPEC untouched and proceeds to the checker. /gsd-spec-phase --auto had the opposite failure — it auto-selected "Update it" and regenerated a spec nobody was watching, discarding answers already recorded in it — and now also reuses it as-is. The same gap existed in three sibling commands with no prior --auto handling at all: /gsd-ai-integration-phase --auto now auto-selects Skip for an existing AI-SPEC, and /gsd-eval-review --auto / /gsd-ui-review --auto now auto-select View for an existing EVAL-REVIEW/UI-REVIEW instead of re-auditing. The max-revision-iterations escalation (Force approve / Edit manually / Abandon) still stops for a person under --auto, by design. (#4776)