06845717fe
* test(#4740): pin the per-step role-family partition Failing-first coverage for the Loop Host Contract role partition. At this commit crossCheckRoleFamilies does not exist, so the rows throw "crossCheckRoleFamilies is not a function" -- the RED proof they bind to behavior rather than restating it. ADR-894 section 3 assigns roles per step but parenthesises the assignment as "(illustrative roles)", and nothing enforced it. The only thing standing in the way was a single deepEqual in this same file, which is editable prose. Rows cover: each step's own family accepted; a strict subset accepted; a foreign role rejected at every step; an unknown role rejected; an unknown step failing CLOSED; capitalization not silently matched; every offending role reported rather than only the first; and purity, because buildContract puts the same array into the generated contract. Two rows exist because an earlier cut of this suite was vacuous. The purity fixture is deliberately UNSORTED -- an alphabetically-sorted fixture cannot fail an in-place sort(), and the mutant was being killed by three unrelated rows instead. A parity row asserts ROLE_FAMILY and ROLE_TO_AGENT cover the exact same role-name domain, both directions: they are parallel constants over one domain, so divergence is the generative-fix class CLAUDE.md names. Every negative row asserts the offending ROLE NAME and the STEP NAME appear in the message. A count-only assertion survives a mutant that reports the wrong role, which the 80% Stryker gate would surface only after a full CI round-trip. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(#4740): reject a cross-family agent-role declaration Orchestration and execution are distinct functions of the loop and must not drift into one another. That partition was real but unenforced: ADR-894 section 3 calls its own role assignment "illustrative", and the generator accepted anything. Adding orchestrator to execute-phase.md's agent-roles line compiled, --check passed once regenerated, and capability-validator.cjs then began accepting into:"orchestrator" at every execute point. ROLE_FAMILY maps every role to one of orchestration, planning or execution. EXPECTED_FAMILY_BY_STEP gives each of the five steps exactly one family. crossCheckRoleFamilies rejects a cross-family role, a role outside the vocabulary, and an unknown step. It reports every offender, not the first. It fails CLOSED on an unknown step, deliberately diverging from assertPointsCoverage's "unknown step -- caught elsewhere". For points that is true: the canonical-set and duplicate checks catch it. For roles there is no second net, so failing open would leave an unknown step as the one input that bypasses the gate. crossCheckRoles' orchestrator exemption is untouched. ROLE_TO_AGENT maps roles to agent FILES and the orchestrator is the host, owning none -- admissibility and agent-file presence are separate concerns with separate checks. Additive to section 3's existing rule that contribution.into must be a member of the step's agentRoles, which is unchanged. That governs what a CAPABILITY may target; this governs what a WORKFLOW may declare. No capability is affected, and all five workflows already declare single-family sets, so the gate is green on the commit that introduces it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#4740): make the ADR-894 role assignment normative Section 3 parenthesises its per-step role assignment as "(illustrative roles)". That word was accurate about the list's PURPOSE -- it illustrated the shape of a generated contract entry -- and wrong about its STATUS, because the assignment was load-bearing from the moment the generator consumed it. Read literally it makes the partition an example rather than a rule. Appended as a dated in-place section per docs/contributor-standards.md, which records that an accepted ADR is never rewritten and names this the default pattern. Section 3's original body is untouched. The amendment states the three disjoint families, the one family each step admits, that a step may declare a strict subset but never outside it, and why this is a clarification rather than a new decision: the contract is generated from the workflow markers "so it cannot drift into a lie", and all five workflows have always declared single-family sets. What was absent was any statement that it is required, and any check that it holds. It also pins the distinction that is easy to re-merge: contribution.into being a member of agentRoles governs what a CAPABILITY may target and is unchanged; the family rule governs what a WORKFLOW may declare. The CONTEXT.md glossary entry for the Loop Host Contract records the same, beside the agent-reference drift guard it already documented. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#4740): add changeset fragment pr:0 placeholder is backfilled with the real number once the PR exists. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#4740): backfill changeset pr number Replaces the pr:0 placeholder with 4742 now that the PR exists. Verified with GITHUB_BASE_REF=next, the way CI runs them: changeset lint and lint:docs both go from invalid_pr(0) to ok. Without that env both report success without evaluating the branch at all. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#4740): stop injecting the orchestrator procedure into executors claude-orchestration declared a contribution at execute:wave:pre with into:"executor". loop-hook-dispatch.md defines a contribution as "inject fragment.inline verbatim into the context for the role named in into", so its 267 lines were injected into EXECUTOR prompts whenever the capability was enabled. Those lines are orchestration end to end -- construct a wave manifest, resolve the dispatch backend, invoke the Workflow tool to spawn executors, bridge per-agent results into the merge chain. An executor can act on none of it. Retargeting to into:"orchestrator" would not have been a fix. ROLE_TO_AGENT carries no orchestrator entry by design: the orchestrator IS the host, and the host's procedure lives in execute-phase.md. A step's agentRoles enumerates agents a capability may inject context INTO, so adding orchestrator there would model the host as an injectable agent -- the same category error pointed the other way, and it would need an exception carved into the partition the same issue just made normative. So the defect is the mechanism, not the label. A contribution injects into an agent's context; "replace step 3's inline dispatch loop" is a change to what the HOST does. The contribution channel was serving as a host-behaviour directive because it was the only channel available at an execute point. The entry is removed. plan:post into:"planner" is correct and untouched. The procedure is preserved verbatim at docs/workflow-backend-dispatch.md inside the capability -- it is the only copy in the repo -- and is no longer injected anywhere. Consequence, not softened: the Workflow backend now has no loop wiring. Detection, emission and config remain and the design is intact, but nothing dispatches it. Under the separation ADR-1143 itself asserts it never had a legitimate channel; ADR-1143's own audit already records the end-to-end path has never been exercised. Wiring it properly needs a host-level mechanism that does not exist today. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#4740): invert the stale execute:wave:pre registry assertions Removing the contribution left four surfaces asserting or describing the old state. Caught by an isolated review before a verification run was spent, which is the point of reviewing first: the first of these was a guaranteed CI red. execute-wave-post-gate-pipeline-e2e asserted against the REAL generated registry that byLoopPoint['execute:wave:pre'] held exactly one contribution with capId claude-orchestration. It now holds zero. Inverted to assert exactly 0 -- not a vague >= 0 -- and the #2285 comment above it now explains the current state rather than the one it was written for. CONTEXT.md's Claude Orchestration entry claimed two contributions at wired points. It is now one, and the entry's execute:wave:post label was already wrong before this change: the manifest said execute:wave:pre. Rewritten to one plan:post contribution, why the execute-point one was removed, and where the procedure now lives. One assertion in claude-orchestration.test.cjs could not fail. It tested for the prose "(into the executor)" while the doc says "(`into: executor`)", so no plausible wording matched it and the paired plan:post assertion was carrying the row. Replaced with a check on the structural claim, and proved RED by restoring the two-contribution wording before reverting. The moved procedure keeps section headings that speak as a live contribution -- "When this contribution is active", "Why execute:wave:pre". Preserving the body verbatim was deliberate, so the headings stay and an editor's note under the header explains why they read that way. A sweep of all 17 files referencing byLoopPoint found no further siblings: the remaining hits are a synthetic capability fixture and an empty-points test that already expected no active hooks, both correct before and after. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
11 KiB
11 KiB
Capability matrix reference
Generated file — do not edit by hand. This matrix is generated from the capability registry by
scripts/gen-capability-matrix.cjsand kept honest by a drift guard (tests/capability-matrix-sync.test.cjsruns--check). Any manual edit is overwritten on the next generation run. To change a capability's declared metadata, edit the correspondingcapabilities/<id>/capability.jsonand runnode scripts/gen-capability-matrix.cjs --write.
See also: ADR-1244 — Capability manifest fields — The capability trust model
Column definitions
| Column | Description |
|---|---|
| id | Canonical capability identifier; unique across first- and third-party capabilities. Reserved prefixes: gsd-, gsd-core-, anthropic-. |
| role | feature — extends what the loop does; runtime — adapts GSD to a specific AI runtime/IDE; reviewer — declares a cross-AI reviewer lane (ADR-2782). A capability may be both a runtime and a reviewer. |
| tier | core — always active; standard — active when the runtime supports it; full — opt-in or runtime-specific. |
| engines.gsd | Semver RANGE expressing host-version compatibility. A hard gate at install and at load. — means the capability declares no range. |
| extension points | The loop points this capability registers hooks into (from the registry's byLoopPoint index). — means it registers none (typical for runtime capabilities, whose job is surface emission). |
| hook kinds | Which of step, contribution, gate the capability's hooks use. — means none. |
| source | first-party — ships with GSD Core; third-party — installed from an external source via gsd capability install. |
On versions. This matrix intentionally omits a per-capability
versioncolumn. First-party capabilities are versioned in lockstep with the GSD Core package (theircapability.jsonversionalways equals the GSD release version), so a per-row version would simply repeat the package version and churn the committed file on every release. The stable host-compatibility signal —engines.gsd— is shown instead. A third-party capability's exact version is recorded in the per-runtime ledger (.gsd-capabilities.json) at install time.
Native (first-party) capabilities
First-party capabilities are implicitly trusted: they ship as part of the GSD Core package and are stamped with the package version at release (per ADR-1244 D6). They are not subject to the consent or integrity-pin flow applied to third-party capabilities.
Feature capabilities (role: feature) — 22
Feature capabilities extend what the loop does — contributing research, planning, execution, verification, or ship artefacts at the loop extension points.
| id | role | tier | engines.gsd | extension points | hook kinds | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ai-integration |
feature | full | >=1.6.0 |
plan:pre, verify:pre |
step, contribution, gate | first-party |
assumption-delta |
feature | full | >=1.6.0 |
plan:pre |
contribution | first-party |
audit |
feature | full | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
broken-windows |
feature | full | >=1.7.0 |
ship:pre |
gate | first-party |
claude-orchestration |
feature | full | >=1.7.0 |
plan:post |
contribution | first-party |
code-review |
feature | full | >=1.6.0 |
execute:wave:post, execute:post |
step | first-party |
drift |
feature | full | >=1.6.0 |
plan:pre, execute:wave:post |
gate | first-party |
external-job |
feature | full | >=1.7.0 |
plan:post, execute:wave:post |
contribution | first-party |
gap-analysis |
feature | standard | >=1.6.0 |
plan:post |
gate | first-party |
graphify |
feature | full | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
intel |
feature | full | >=1.6.0 |
plan:pre |
step | first-party |
live-dom-uat |
feature | full | >=1.11.0 |
execute:wave:post |
step | first-party |
mempalace |
feature | full | >=1.6.0 |
discuss:pre, discuss:post, plan:pre, plan:post, execute:wave:post, verify:post, ship:post |
step, contribution | first-party |
nyquist |
feature | full | >=1.6.0 |
verify:post |
step | first-party |
pattern-mapper |
feature | full | >=1.6.0 |
plan:pre |
step | first-party |
profile-pipeline |
feature | full | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
refactor-trigger |
feature | full | >=1.10.0 |
execute:post |
step | first-party |
research |
feature | standard | >=1.6.0 |
plan:pre |
step | first-party |
schema-gate |
feature | full | >=1.6.0 |
plan:pre |
contribution | first-party |
security |
feature | full | >=1.6.0 |
plan:pre, verify:post, ship:pre |
step, contribution, gate | first-party |
tdd |
feature | full | >=1.6.0 |
plan:pre, execute:post |
contribution, gate | first-party |
ui |
feature | full | >=1.6.0 |
plan:pre, execute:wave:post, verify:post |
step, gate | first-party |
Runtime capabilities (role: runtime) — 19
Runtime capabilities adapt GSD to a specific AI runtime or IDE — emitting
skills, agents, hooks configuration, and surface files for that host. They
typically register no loop hooks (their primary responsibility is surface
emission), so their extension-point and hook-kind cells are —.
| id | role | tier | engines.gsd | extension points | hook kinds | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
antigravity |
runtime | core | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
augment |
runtime | core | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
claude |
runtime | core | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
cline |
runtime | core | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
codebuddy |
runtime | core | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
codex |
runtime | core | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
copilot |
runtime | core | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
cursor |
runtime | core | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
hermes |
runtime | core | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
kilo |
runtime | core | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
kimi |
runtime | core | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
kimi-code |
runtime | core | >=1.7.0 |
— | — | first-party |
opencode |
runtime | core | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
pi |
runtime | core | >=1.7.0 |
— | — | first-party |
qwen |
runtime | core | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
trae |
runtime | core | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
vscode |
runtime | core | >=1.7.0 |
— | — | first-party |
windsurf |
runtime | core | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
zcode |
runtime | core | >=1.6.0 |
— | — | first-party |
Reviewer capabilities (role: reviewer) — 4
Reviewer capabilities declare a cross-AI reviewer lane — one external CLI or
model endpoint /gsd-review hands a plan to (ADR-2782 D3). They are not install
targets: they emit no skills, agents, hooks or surface files, so their
extension-point and hook-kind cells are —. A host that is also a reviewer
(Claude, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Qwen, Antigravity) keeps one manifest and
appears under runtime above, carrying its lane alongside its runtime body;
only lanes that GSD never installs into appear here.
Because a lane receives the plan text, requirements, research findings and
CONTEXT.md decisions, it is a disclosed executable surface and is consent-gated
at install like any other — see
the trust model.
| id | role | tier | engines.gsd | extension points | hook kinds | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
coderabbit |
reviewer | full | >=1.8.0 |
— | — | first-party |
llama-cpp |
reviewer | full | >=1.8.0 |
— | — | first-party |
lm-studio |
reviewer | full | >=1.8.0 |
— | — | first-party |
ollama |
reviewer | full | >=1.8.0 |
— | — | first-party |
Third-party capabilities
This matrix is the first-party catalogue: it is generated from the committed
registry and therefore lists only the capabilities that ship with GSD Core.
Installed third-party capabilities are NOT written into this committed file. Once a
user installs one via gsd capability install <spec> it enters the runtime
registry overlay (ADR-1244 D2); the overlay-aware view of what is installed on a
given machine is gsd capability list (see the
gsd capability command reference), which reports
first-party and installed third-party capabilities together using the same column
fields described below, with source = third-party.
Column values for third-party rows
| Column | Value |
|---|---|
| id | As declared in capability.json. Must not use reserved prefixes (gsd-, gsd-core-, anthropic-). |
| role | feature, runtime, or reviewer, as declared. |
| tier | core, standard, or full, as declared. |
| engines.gsd | Range from capability.json; verified at install and at each load. |
| extension points | The loop points the capability registers into, validated against the known 12 identifiers. |
| hook kinds | step, contribution, and/or gate as declared. Disclosed in the consent summary at install. |
| source | third-party |
Community registry
Whether GSD operates or advertises a central community registry of third-party capabilities is TBD/TBA (PRD). The matrix mechanic and all manifest fields ship regardless of that decision; URL/git/npm/tarball import does not depend on a central registry.
Manifest field reference
The fields below are defined in capability.json and govern how a capability
appears in this matrix. For the full schema, see
ADR-1244 D1
and the capability manifest reference.
| Field | Required | Type | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
version |
Yes | semver string | Capability version. The registry rejects manifests without it. |
engines.gsd |
Recommended | semver range | Host-version compatibility gate. Enforced at install and load. |
compatVersions |
No | object: cap-version → gsd-range | Graceful-downgrade table for sources that enumerate versions (git tags, registry, npm). |
integrity |
No | sha512-<base64> |
SHA-512 digest of the fetched bundle. Verified before extraction when present; mismatch aborts. |
provenance |
No | { sourceRepo, commit } |
Source provenance; populated in CI for first-party/curated capabilities. |
Related documents
- ADR-1244 — Capability Ecosystem
- The capability trust model — why the trust rules are structured as they are
- The phase loop — the 12 loop extension points in context
- Capability manifest reference — the full
capability.jsonschema - ADR-857 — the original capability architecture (D7/D8 extended by ADR-1244)