msd-core/docs/TESTING-SUITES.md

Testing Suites

This project's tests/ directory uses filename suffix markers to group tests into named suites. The harness scripts/run-tests.cjs filters by suite when given --suite <name>. Without a flag it runs every *.test.cjs file (the historical default — unchanged).

Tracked by issue #3597.

Suites

Suite	Filename pattern	What goes here
unit	*.test.cjs (no other marker)	Default fast lane. Pure logic, no network, no external processes beyond gsd-tools. Most tests live here.
integration	*.integration.test.cjs	Cross-module flows: full installer end-to-end, multi-tool orchestration, anything that crosses two or more bin entry points.
install	*.install.test.cjs	Tests that perform a real install/uninstall against a sandbox project. Slower; PR CI skips these on PRs and runs them on main push only.
security	*.security.test.cjs	Adversarial input, prompt-injection guards, fixture-driven hostile-payload sweeps.
slow	*.slow.test.cjs	Anything that routinely takes >5s wall-clock or holds significant memory.
all	(any)	Explicit alias for "no filter". Equivalent to running with no --suite flag.

How to place a new test

1. Pick the most specific bucket above.
2. Name the file with the matching suffix: tests/<feature>.<suite>.test.cjs.
3. If unsure, leave the suffix off — the file lands in unit, the default fast lane.

Examples:

• tests/agent-frontmatter.test.cjs — unit
• tests/prompt-injection-guards.security.test.cjs — security
• tests/installer-end-to-end.install.test.cjs — install
• tests/sdk-mutation-stress.slow.test.cjs — slow

The suite-suffix convention was chosen over a directory layout (tests/security/) so the 545+ existing test files don't need to move. Existing files all classify as unit until someone explicitly retags them.

Regression tests

Do not create new top-level tests/bug-NNNN-*.test.cjs files. Add the regression case to the owning module's main test file instead (e.g. a describe('regressions') block in tests/<module>.test.cjs).

node --test spawns one child process per FILE, so file count — not test count — is the unit of CI overhead, and it is worst on Windows lanes where every spawn is Defender-scanned. The 2026-06 CI audit found 244 one-off bug-* files (~38% of the suite). That population is grandfathered in scripts/lint-regression-test-names.allowlist.json and enforced by an identity ratchet (npm run lint:regression-names, part of npm run lint:ci):

• A new bug-* file fails CI — fold it into the owning module's file.
• Deleting/consolidating a grandfathered file requires pruning its allowlist entry, so the baseline only ever shrinks.
• Inherited drift (the failure names files your PR didn't add — e.g. the base branch merged bug-* files without feeding the allowlist, or you rebased and carried a pre-rebase allowlist): run node scripts/lint-regression-test-names.cjs --update and commit the regenerated allowlist. Snapshot artifacts like this allowlist (and docs/INVENTORY.md) must be regenerated after rebasing, never carried through a rebase.

The ratchet deliberately covers only bug-*. Files named feat-NNNN-* / enh-NNNN-* are feature test files — one (or one per suite) per feature is the sanctioned layout (see the #443 strategy below), not a one-off regression pattern. If issue-*/perf-* one-offs start accumulating the same way bug-* did, extend the ratchet's regex and regenerate the allowlist.

Workflow size budget

Tracked by issue #1074. Bytes (not lines) per #717; LF-normalized per #683.

Workflow files (gsd-core/workflows/*.md) ship in the installed runtime and are loaded into the agent's context, so their byte size is a real cost. The size guard in tests/workflow-size-budget.test.cjs keeps that cost from creeping up invisibly. It is an anti-creep ratchet, sibling to the regression-name ratchet above — three layers, ordered from day-to-day to last-resort:

Layer	What it does	Where
Per-file baseline (primary)	Pins every workflow's exact current size in a committed snapshot. Any growth, shrink, add, or removal fails until the snapshot is regenerated — so sub-ceiling creep is caught by name and delta, not just at the tier's single largest file.	tests/workflow-size-baseline.json
Loose tier hard caps (backstop)	Absolute outer red lines per tier — XL ≤ 98304, LARGE ≤ 61440, DEFAULT ≤ 40960 bytes. Unlike the old tighten-only ceiling, a cap is never raised when a file approaches it: crossing it means extract, not bump.	XL/LARGE/DEFAULT_CAP
New-file cap	A workflow not yet in the baseline must stay under 32768 bytes (the Codex project_doc_max_bytes anchor) unless explicitly tiered into XL_WORKFLOWS/LARGE_WORKFLOWS in the same PR. Keeps net-new orchestrators from being born oversized.	NEW_FILE_CAP

discuss-phase.md additionally has a thin-dispatcher target of < 32000 bytes (issue #2551).

How-to: a workflow grew and CI is red

The baseline guard reports the file and the byte delta. To resolve:

1. Regenerate the snapshot and inspect the one-line diff:

   npm run size:baseline
   git diff tests/workflow-size-baseline.json
   

2. Justify the growth in your PR (a sentence in the description is enough) — the committed baseline diff is the review record that the larger size was a deliberate, seen decision, not silent drift.
3. Or shrink it instead of baselining. Prefer extraction when the growth is incidental: move per-mode bodies to workflows/<name>/modes/, templates to workflows/<name>/templates/, and shared prose to gsd-core/references/ — then load them LAZILY. Do not convert them to eager @-required_reading includes: that shrinks the file's bytes without shrinking loaded context, so it games the guard while making the real cost worse. See workflows/discuss-phase/ for the progressive-disclosure pattern.

If a hard cap (not the baseline) is what failed, regeneration will not help — that is the signal to extract, per step 3.

Reference

Artifact	Role
scripts/workflow-size.cjs	Single source of truth — LF-normalized byte counter (lfByteCount) plus workflow enumeration (listWorkflowStems, measureWorkflows). Imported by both the guard and the generator so they can never measure or enumerate differently.
scripts/update-size-baseline.cjs (npm run size:baseline)	Regenerates tests/workflow-size-baseline.json — sorted keys, trailing newline, idempotent.
tests/workflow-size-baseline.json	The committed per-file snapshot (one entry per workflow).
tests/workflow-size-budget.test.cjs	The three guards above, plus the discuss-phase progressive-disclosure checks.

Running suites locally

npm test                    # everything (backcompat — same as before)
npm run test:unit           # only unit
npm run test:integration    # only integration
npm run test:install        # only install
npm run test:security       # only security
npm run test:slow           # only slow

npm run test:coverage       # backcompat — coverage over EVERY test
npm run test:coverage:unit  # fast coverage signal — only unit suite
npm run test:coverage:all   # alias for test:coverage

Direct harness invocation also works:

node scripts/run-tests.cjs --suite security
node scripts/run-tests.cjs --suite=security
node scripts/run-tests.cjs --files "tests/command-contract.test.cjs tests/core.test.cjs"
node scripts/run-tests.cjs --files-from .ci-selected-tests.txt

npm run test:affected (scripts/run-affected-tests.cjs) is a local-only convenience that selects tests via the require() dependency graph of your working-tree diff. CI does not use it — CI selection is the rule table in scripts/ci-test-scope.cjs, which is the authoritative mapping. If the two disagree, trust (and fix) the rule table.

Unknown suites exit non-zero with the list of valid suites. Empty suites (e.g. --suite security before any security-tagged file exists) exit 0 with a no tests in suite "..." notice on stderr so CI lanes don't go red while a suite is being populated.

CI matrix

The Tests workflow runs every PR through a scoped gate generated by scripts/ci-test-scope.cjs.

Lane	Node 22	Node 24
ubuntu-latest	scoped tests	unit + integration + security
windows-latest	—	scoped Windows/path/shell tests
macos-latest	full parity when required	full parity when required

• Node 22 is the engines.node floor (>=22.0.0) — must stay green.
• Node 24 is the default development lane.
• Scoped tests are selected from the changed paths, plus a small CLI/package smoke set. They are for confidence on the affected surface, not for counting tests.

The default PR gate runs the broad unit (under the c8 coverage gate), integration, and security suites once on Ubuntu / Node 24, scoped tests on Ubuntu / Node 22, and scoped tests on Windows / Node 24. "Scoped" means the diff-selected list from the rule table — not the full suite and not a fixed smoke set (the fixed smoke list is only the empty-selection fallback). The Windows lane's list is the Windows-sensitive subset of the selection, plus every changed test file, unconditionally (the #494 invariant, narrowed): a modified test is exercised on the divergent OS before merge at per-file cost, without paying for the three full parity lanes.

PRs touching workflow, package, test-runner, install, release, or Windows-sensitive surfaces also run the full parity matrix on macOS and the older Windows runtime, plus install and slow on the primary Ubuntu lane. Everything (including the full parity matrix) runs on every push to next, which covers the residual macOS / Windows-Node-22 cross-product for scoped PRs.

Coverage runs inside the Ubuntu / Node 24 full lane (not a separate job — that duplicated the entire unit run) and stays single-lane because multiplying coverage across OS/runtime lanes adds cost without improving the threshold signal. Note the gate's deliberate blind spot: it measures gsd-core/bin/lib/*.cjs only — scripts/, hooks/, and bin/ are unenforced, and stryker.config.mjs additionally excludes ~48% of lib lines from mutation testing (see the UNMUTATED list there). Widening either gate is tracked work, not an accident to "fix" silently by raising thresholds.

To inspect the scope locally:

npm run ci:test-scope -- --files "commands/gsd/plan-phase.md"
node scripts/ci-test-scope.cjs --base origin/next --head HEAD

Best practices for forward-compat (Node 24/26)

• Use process.execPath when spawning Node in tests so each matrix lane exercises the lane's Node version.
• Avoid stack-trace or error-message prose assertions. Assert err.code, structured JSON fields, or enums — Node minor releases routinely tweak error wording.
• Prefer node:test, node:assert/strict, and node:test mocks. No external test frameworks.
• Coverage uses c8 and propagates NODE_V8_COVERAGE through the harness's child process.

---

Test strategy: #443 effort + fast_mode engine

Feature: unified cross-provider effort and fast_mode knobs (issue #443). Test files: tests/feat-443-effort-fast-mode.test.cjs (unit), tests/feat-443-effort-fast-mode.integration.test.cjs (integration).

Testing pyramid

Layer	File	What it covers
Unit	feat-443-effort-fast-mode.test.cjs	Pure logic: cascade rules, clamping, escalation math, malformed config handling, schema key validation. No CLI subprocess.
Integration	feat-443-effort-fast-mode.integration.test.cjs	Architecture-level invariants: cross-provider validity, totality across the 33-agent registry, CLI JSON contract, config round-trip, fast-mode honesty. Real subprocesses via runGsdTools.
E2E (pending)	(not yet wired)	Propagation layer: effort frontmatter / CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL env actually reaching a spawned Claude Code subagent. See "Gaps" below.

Architectural invariants

Each invariant exists to prevent a specific class of production failure.

(a) Cross-provider validity

What: renderEffortForRuntime(runtime, universalEffort).value must always be a member of the runtime's real provider enum. Ground-truth enums are defined as local constants in the test — not sourced from the implementation.

PROVIDER_EFFORT_ENUMS = {
  claude: Set { 'low', 'medium', 'high', 'xhigh', 'max' }   // Anthropic output_config.effort
  codex:  Set { 'minimal', 'low', 'medium', 'high', 'xhigh' } // OpenAI model_reasoning_effort
}

Why: Passing a value outside these sets results in a 400 from the real API. The clamping logic (max -> xhigh for codex; minimal -> low for claude) must hold for every cell of the VALID_EFFORTS × runtimes matrix.

(b) Param/channel contract

What: Each runtime exposes a stable param string (the native API field name) and channel (how the value is propagated). Unknown runtimes return param: null, channel: null and pass the effort value through unchanged.

Why: Callers read .param to construct the dispatch payload. A regression here would silently drop effort from subagent invocations.

(c) Resolve-execution JSON contract

What: The gsd-tools resolve-execution <agent> command emits a JSON object with all eight keys present and typed correctly: model (string), profile (string), effort (VALID_EFFORTS member), effort_rendered (string), effort_param (string|null), effort_propagation (string|null), fast_mode (boolean), fast_mode_supported (boolean).

Why: Orchestrators and workflow dispatchers parse this JSON. A missing or mistyped field silently breaks downstream consumers.

(d) Totality across the real registry

What: For every agent in the 33-agent registry, resolveEffortInternal returns a VALID_EFFORTS member (never undefined/null), resolveFastModeInternal returns a strict boolean, and renderEffortForRuntime('claude', effort) stays within the claude provider enum.

Why: A catalog addition that introduces a missing routingTier mapping would otherwise produce undefined and propagate silently.

(e) Fast-mode honesty invariant

What: When the runtime is claude, fast_mode_supported in resolve-execution output is always false, regardless of the fast_mode config. RUNTIMES_WITH_FAST_MODE contains only 'api'.

Why: Claude Code's /fast toggle is session-level only. Emitting fast_mode: true as frontmatter on a Claude subagent is a silent no-op. Advertising fast_mode_supported: true for claude would cause orchestrators to believe the knob was wired when it is not.

(f) Precedence first-valid-wins

What: Both effort and fast_mode use a layered cascade. The test table covers all four effort layers (invocation override → agent_overrides → routing_tier_defaults → default) and all five fast_mode layers, including the case where an invalid value at a higher layer correctly falls through.

Why: Silent precedence bugs (e.g., a numeric value in agent_overrides not being rejected) would override intentional user config.

(g) Dynamic-routing composition

What: resolveEffortForTier escalates effort by attempt number independently of the model tier mapping. The test verifies the effort ladder (low -> medium -> high -> xhigh -> max), the max clamp, the max_escalations cap, and that escalate_on_failure: false suppresses escalation entirely.

Why: Effort escalation and model escalation share configuration (dynamic_routing) but must operate independently; coupling them would cause over-escalation or under-escalation.

(h) Config-tooling round-trip

What: gsd-tools config-set accepts all new key namespaces (effort.default, effort.routing_tier_defaults.<tier>, effort.agent_overrides.<agent>, fast_mode.enabled, fast_mode.routing_tier_defaults.<tier>, fast_mode.agent_overrides.<agent>) without an "Unknown config key" error, and values set via config-set are reflected in resolve-execution output.

Why: The schema validation gate (VALID_CONFIG_KEYS + DYNAMIC_KEY_PATTERNS) is separate from the resolver logic. A key missing from the schema would produce a silent write failure and appear as a bug only at runtime.

Coverage targets

Suite	Target
Unit	Every cascade rule, every fallthrough, every clamp. All function branches in resolveEffortInternal, resolveFastModeInternal, resolveEffortForTier, renderEffortForRuntime.
Integration	All 8 architectural invariants. All 33 registered agents. All 6 provider × effort combinations for the valid-enum check. Full config-set key namespace.

Gaps / not yet covered

E2E orchestrator-spawn-propagation layer (pending follow-up wiring): The integration tests verify that GSD resolves and renders effort values correctly. They do NOT verify that the rendered values actually reach a spawned Claude Code or Codex subagent at runtime. Specifically uncovered:

• CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL env var being set and read by a spawned claude subprocess
• output_config.effort frontmatter key surviving the AGENTS.md template substitution
• model_reasoning_effort field surviving serialization into a Codex API request body
• Fast-mode speed: "fast" field reaching an api-runtime request when fast_mode_supported: true

These require spawning real subagents (or stubs thereof) and asserting on the process environment / request payload — a scope that belongs in a future E2E suite under *.slow.test.cjs or dedicated fixture-driven integration work.