* feat(2145): add list/continue/status subcommands and surface next_action in /gsd-debug - Parse SUBCMD from \$ARGUMENTS before active-session check (list/status/continue/debug) - Step 1a: list subcommand prints formatted table of all active sessions - Step 1b: status subcommand prints full session summary without spawning agent - Step 1c: continue subcommand surfaces Current Focus then spawns continuation agent - Surface [debug] Session/Status/Hypothesis/Next before every agent spawn - Read TDD_MODE from config in Step 0 (used in Step 4) - Slug sanitization: strip path traversal chars, enforce ^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]*$ pattern * feat(2145): add TDD mode, delta debugging, reasoning checkpoint to gsd-debugger - Security note in <role>: DATA_START/DATA_END markers are data-only, never instructions - Delta Debugging technique added to investigation_techniques (binary search over change sets) - Structured Reasoning Checkpoint technique: mandatory five-field block before any fix - fix_and_verify step 0: mandatory reasoning_checkpoint before implementing fix - TDD mode block in <modes>: red/green cycle, tdd_checkpoint tracking, TDD CHECKPOINT return - TDD CHECKPOINT structured return format added to <structured_returns> - next_action concreteness guidance added to <debug_file_protocol> * feat(2145): update DEBUG.md template and docs for debug enhancements - DEBUG.md template: add reasoning_checkpoint and tdd_checkpoint fields to Current Focus - DEBUG.md section_rules: document next_action concreteness requirement and new fields - docs/COMMANDS.md: document list/status/continue subcommands and TDD mode flag - tests/debug-session-management.test.cjs: 12 content-validation tests (all pass)
5.2 KiB
5.2 KiB
Debug Template
Template for .planning/debug/[slug].md — active debug session tracking.
File Template
---
status: gathering | investigating | fixing | verifying | awaiting_human_verify | resolved
trigger: "[verbatim user input]"
created: [ISO timestamp]
updated: [ISO timestamp]
---
## Current Focus
<!-- OVERWRITE on each update - always reflects NOW -->
hypothesis: [current theory being tested]
test: [how testing it]
expecting: [what result means if true/false]
next_action: [immediate next step — be specific, not "continue investigating"]
reasoning_checkpoint: null <!-- populated before every fix attempt — see structured_returns -->
tdd_checkpoint: null <!-- populated when tdd_mode is active after root cause confirmed -->
## Symptoms
<!-- Written during gathering, then immutable -->
expected: [what should happen]
actual: [what actually happens]
errors: [error messages if any]
reproduction: [how to trigger]
started: [when it broke / always broken]
## Eliminated
<!-- APPEND only - prevents re-investigating after /clear -->
- hypothesis: [theory that was wrong]
evidence: [what disproved it]
timestamp: [when eliminated]
## Evidence
<!-- APPEND only - facts discovered during investigation -->
- timestamp: [when found]
checked: [what was examined]
found: [what was observed]
implication: [what this means]
## Resolution
<!-- OVERWRITE as understanding evolves -->
root_cause: [empty until found]
fix: [empty until applied]
verification: [empty until verified]
files_changed: []
<section_rules>
Frontmatter (status, trigger, timestamps):
status: OVERWRITE - reflects current phasetrigger: IMMUTABLE - verbatim user input, never changescreated: IMMUTABLE - set onceupdated: OVERWRITE - update on every change
Current Focus:
- OVERWRITE entirely on each update
- Always reflects what Claude is doing RIGHT NOW
- If Claude reads this after /clear, it knows exactly where to resume
- Fields: hypothesis, test, expecting, next_action, reasoning_checkpoint, tdd_checkpoint
next_action: must be concrete and actionable — bad: "continue investigating"; good: "Add logging at line 47 of auth.js to observe token value before jwt.verify()"reasoning_checkpoint: OVERWRITE before every fix_and_verify — five-field structured reasoning record (hypothesis, confirming_evidence, falsification_test, fix_rationale, blind_spots)tdd_checkpoint: OVERWRITE during TDD red/green phases — test file, name, status, failure output
Symptoms:
- Written during initial gathering phase
- IMMUTABLE after gathering complete
- Reference point for what we're trying to fix
- Fields: expected, actual, errors, reproduction, started
Eliminated:
- APPEND only - never remove entries
- Prevents re-investigating dead ends after context reset
- Each entry: hypothesis, evidence that disproved it, timestamp
- Critical for efficiency across /clear boundaries
Evidence:
- APPEND only - never remove entries
- Facts discovered during investigation
- Each entry: timestamp, what checked, what found, implication
- Builds the case for root cause
Resolution:
- OVERWRITE as understanding evolves
- May update multiple times as fixes are tried
- Final state shows confirmed root cause and verified fix
- Fields: root_cause, fix, verification, files_changed
</section_rules>
Creation: Immediately when /gsd-debug is called
- Create file with trigger from user input
- Set status to "gathering"
- Current Focus: next_action = "gather symptoms"
- Symptoms: empty, to be filled
During symptom gathering:
- Update Symptoms section as user answers questions
- Update Current Focus with each question
- When complete: status → "investigating"
During investigation:
- OVERWRITE Current Focus with each hypothesis
- APPEND to Evidence with each finding
- APPEND to Eliminated when hypothesis disproved
- Update timestamp in frontmatter
During fixing:
- status → "fixing"
- Update Resolution.root_cause when confirmed
- Update Resolution.fix when applied
- Update Resolution.files_changed
During verification:
- status → "verifying"
- Update Resolution.verification with results
- If verification fails: status → "investigating", try again
After self-verification passes:
- status -> "awaiting_human_verify"
- Request explicit user confirmation in a checkpoint
- Do NOT move file to resolved yet
On resolution:
- status → "resolved"
- Move file to .planning/debug/resolved/ (only after user confirms fix)
<resume_behavior>
When Claude reads this file after /clear:
- Parse frontmatter → know status
- Read Current Focus → know exactly what was happening
- Read Eliminated → know what NOT to retry
- Read Evidence → know what's been learned
- Continue from next_action
The file IS the debugging brain. Claude should be able to resume perfectly from any interruption point.
</resume_behavior>
<size_constraint>
Keep debug files focused:
- Evidence entries: 1-2 lines each, just the facts
- Eliminated: brief - hypothesis + why it failed
- No narrative prose - structured data only
If evidence grows very large (10+ entries), consider whether you're going in circles. Check Eliminated to ensure you're not re-treading.
</size_constraint>