Batch 15 of the ad hoc timeout literal migration (epic #4445). Replaces every bare numeric timeout/timeoutMs object-literal property in tests/check-predicate.test.cjs, tests/gate-predicate-evaluator.test.cjs, tests/policy-160-route0-resume.test.cjs, tests/phase6-capstone-conformance.test.cjs, and tests/prohibition-enforcement.test.cjs with a named constant, per eslint-rules/no-adhoc-timeout-literal.cjs. Removes these 5 files from the rule's allowlist. Ground truth via eslint found 17 sites, not the issue's stated 16 -- prohibition-enforcement.test.cjs has 2 sites, not 1 -- disclosed in the PR body. Reuses QUICK_SPAWN_TIMEOUT_MS and LOOP_HOOK_POINT_CLI_TIMEOUT_MS across 1 file; no new shared constants needed. Adds file-local constants for a real bounded-shell subprocess class (including one deliberately non-generous value to force a timeout), a predicate's own declarative timeout FIELD as fixture/validation data (including a deliberately-invalid zero/negative pair proving rejection), a heavier gsd-tools.cjs check CLI dispatch tier, and two distinct deliberately-short enforcement bounds forcing a fast hang-timeout path. No src/bin file touched, no numeric value changed anywhere. Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
391 lines
15 KiB
JavaScript
391 lines
15 KiB
JavaScript
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Integration tests for the `check predicate` subcommand wiring (#2008).
|
|
*
|
|
* These exercise the PRODUCTION stack: the real `buildPredicateDeps()` binding
|
|
* (which wraps shell-command-projection.execTool → bounded `sh -c` spawnSync) and
|
|
* the `parsePredicateFlags` arg parser. The pure evaluator logic is covered by
|
|
* gate-predicate-evaluator.test.cjs; this file proves the wiring holds against
|
|
* real subprocess exit codes and a real timeout kill.
|
|
*
|
|
* Commands run are instant (`true` / `false` / `exit 3`) or tightly bounded
|
|
* (a 100ms timeout killing `sleep 1`), so there is no orphan/leak risk.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const { describe, test, beforeEach, afterEach } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('fs');
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
const os = require('os');
|
|
|
|
const { evaluatePredicate } = require('../gsd-core/bin/lib/gate-predicate-evaluator.cjs');
|
|
const { buildPredicateDeps, parsePredicateFlags } = require('../gsd-core/bin/lib/check-command-router.cjs');
|
|
const { runGsdTools, createTempProject, cleanup } = require('./helpers.cjs');
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* A real, bounded `sh -c` subprocess spawned via the production
|
|
* runBoundedShell dependency -- the describe block's own name is "real
|
|
* bounded sh -c subprocess."
|
|
*/
|
|
const BOUNDED_SHELL_PROBE_TIMEOUT_MS = 5000;
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* The same runBoundedShell call as BOUNDED_SHELL_PROBE_TIMEOUT_MS, but
|
|
* deliberately tiny (not generous headroom) to force a `sleep 1` command
|
|
* past the bound within this test's own lifetime, proving "timeout kills
|
|
* the subprocess (SIGTERM => timedOut:true)."
|
|
*/
|
|
const BOUNDED_SHELL_FORCED_TIMEOUT_MS = 100;
|
|
|
|
// ─── buildPredicateDeps: real subprocess exit mapping ─────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('buildPredicateDeps — real bounded sh -c subprocess', () => {
|
|
const deps = buildPredicateDeps();
|
|
const cwd = process.cwd();
|
|
|
|
test('`true` => exitCode 0, not timed out', () => {
|
|
const r = deps.runBoundedShell({ command: 'true', cwd, timeoutMs: BOUNDED_SHELL_PROBE_TIMEOUT_MS });
|
|
assert.equal(r.exitCode, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(r.timedOut, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('`false` => exitCode 1, not timed out', () => {
|
|
const r = deps.runBoundedShell({ command: 'false', cwd, timeoutMs: BOUNDED_SHELL_PROBE_TIMEOUT_MS });
|
|
assert.equal(r.exitCode, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(r.timedOut, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('`exit 3` => exitCode 3', () => {
|
|
const r = deps.runBoundedShell({ command: 'exit 3', cwd, timeoutMs: BOUNDED_SHELL_PROBE_TIMEOUT_MS });
|
|
assert.equal(r.exitCode, 3);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('stderr is captured from the subprocess', () => {
|
|
const r = deps.runBoundedShell({ command: 'echo oops >&2; exit 4', cwd, timeoutMs: BOUNDED_SHELL_PROBE_TIMEOUT_MS });
|
|
assert.equal(r.exitCode, 4);
|
|
assert.match(r.stderr, /oops/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('timeout kills the subprocess (SIGTERM => timedOut:true)', () => {
|
|
const r = deps.runBoundedShell({ command: 'sleep 1', cwd, timeoutMs: BOUNDED_SHELL_FORCED_TIMEOUT_MS });
|
|
assert.equal(r.timedOut, true);
|
|
assert.equal(r.signal, 'SIGTERM');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── evaluatePredicate + production deps: end-to-end exit mapping ─────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('evaluatePredicate + production deps — command-exit-zero e2e', () => {
|
|
const deps = buildPredicateDeps();
|
|
const ctx = { cwd: process.cwd() };
|
|
|
|
test('command `true` => block:false', () => {
|
|
const res = evaluatePredicate({ kind: 'command-exit-zero', command: 'true' }, ctx, deps);
|
|
assert.equal(res.block, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('command `false` => block:true', () => {
|
|
const res = evaluatePredicate({ kind: 'command-exit-zero', command: 'false' }, ctx, deps);
|
|
assert.equal(res.block, true);
|
|
assert.match(res.message, /1/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('interpolation reaches the real shell ($PHASE_NUMBER via flag context)', () => {
|
|
const res = evaluatePredicate(
|
|
{ kind: 'command-exit-zero', command: 'test "${PHASE_NUMBER}" = "07" && true || false' },
|
|
{ cwd: process.cwd(), phaseNumber: '07' },
|
|
deps,
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(res.block, false);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── parsePredicateFlags ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('parsePredicateFlags', () => {
|
|
test('extracts --flag value pairs, skips positional + bare --flags', () => {
|
|
const out = parsePredicateFlags(['check', 'predicate', '--predicate', '{"kind":"x"}', '--phase-number', '03', '--raw']);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(out, { predicate: '{"kind":"x"}', 'phase-number': '03' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('last write wins for repeated flags', () => {
|
|
const out = parsePredicateFlags(['--phase-number', '01', '--phase-number', '02']);
|
|
assert.equal(out['phase-number'], '02');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('value that starts with -- is not consumed (treated as a flag)', () => {
|
|
const out = parsePredicateFlags(['--predicate', '--phase-number']);
|
|
assert.equal('predicate' in out, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('empty args => empty map', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parsePredicateFlags([]), {});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── #4130 follow-up: partitionPredicateArgs (flags + positionals, one parser) ─
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* `partitionPredicateArgs` is the single pass behind `parsePredicateFlags`:
|
|
* it returns BOTH the --flag value map AND the non-consumed positional tokens
|
|
* under the exact same skip/consume/last-wins semantics. `check
|
|
* decision-coverage-plan --context <path>` uses it so the flag and the
|
|
* positional surface share one parser with `check predicate` — the two
|
|
* parsers cannot diverge because there is only one.
|
|
*/
|
|
describe('partitionPredicateArgs (#4130 follow-up)', () => {
|
|
const { partitionPredicateArgs } = require('../gsd-core/bin/lib/check-command-router.cjs');
|
|
|
|
test('splits --flag value pairs from positionals', () => {
|
|
const { flags, positionals } = partitionPredicateArgs(
|
|
['check', 'decision-coverage-plan', '--context', '/tmp/CONTEXT.md', 'phases/01-init'],
|
|
);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(flags, { context: '/tmp/CONTEXT.md' });
|
|
assert.deepEqual(positionals, ['check', 'decision-coverage-plan', 'phases/01-init']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('parsePredicateFlags is exactly the flags half (one source of truth)', () => {
|
|
const vectors = [
|
|
['check', 'predicate', '--predicate', '{"kind":"x"}', '--phase-number', '03', '--raw'],
|
|
['--phase-number', '01', '--phase-number', '02'],
|
|
['--predicate', '--phase-number'],
|
|
[],
|
|
['--context'],
|
|
['a', '--context', 'b', '--context', 'c', 'd'],
|
|
];
|
|
for (const v of vectors) {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(partitionPredicateArgs(v).flags, parsePredicateFlags(v),
|
|
`flags half must equal parsePredicateFlags for ${JSON.stringify(v)}`);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('value that starts with -- is not consumed: both stay flags, neither becomes positional', () => {
|
|
const { flags, positionals } = partitionPredicateArgs(['--context', '--other']);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(flags, {});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(positionals, ['--context', '--other']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('last write wins; flag values never leak into positionals', () => {
|
|
const { flags, positionals } = partitionPredicateArgs(['p1', '--context', 'a', 'p2', '--context', 'b', 'p3']);
|
|
assert.equal(flags.context, 'b');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(positionals, ['p1', 'p2', 'p3']);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── #4354: `check predicate --phase-dir` containment boundary ───────────────
|
|
//
|
|
// cmdCheckPredicate passes the `--phase-dir` flag VERBATIM into PredicateContext
|
|
// (src/check-command-router.cts) with no containment validation. Both predicate
|
|
// kinds read/interpolate that value: `artifact-frontmatter-equals` resolves it
|
|
// as `targetDir` for `findPhaseArtifact`, and `command-exit-zero` interpolates
|
|
// it into `${PHASE_DIR}` in the shelled-out command. These tests reproduce the
|
|
// issue's exact repro and prove the boundary is currently unconfined.
|
|
|
|
describe('check predicate --phase-dir — containment boundary (#4354)', () => {
|
|
let projDir;
|
|
let outsideDir;
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
projDir = createTempProject();
|
|
fs.mkdirSync(path.join(projDir, '.planning', 'phases', '05-x'), { recursive: true });
|
|
outsideDir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'gsd-predicate-outside-'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
afterEach(() => {
|
|
cleanup(projDir);
|
|
cleanup(outsideDir);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('[RED #4354] the issue\'s exact repro: artifact-frontmatter-equals against a foreign SECURITY.md via an outside --phase-dir must be rejected, not evaluated', () => {
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(
|
|
path.join(outsideDir, 'SECURITY.md'),
|
|
'---\nstatus: passed\n---\n# Security\n',
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const predicate = JSON.stringify({
|
|
kind: 'artifact-frontmatter-equals',
|
|
artifact: 'SECURITY.md',
|
|
field: 'status',
|
|
equals: 'passed',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = runGsdTools(
|
|
['--json-errors', 'check', 'predicate', '--predicate', predicate, '--phase-dir', outsideDir, '--raw'],
|
|
projDir,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// CURRENT BUG (documented, not asserted as desired): this command today
|
|
// succeeds and prints {"block":false,...} — a BLOCKING gate passing on
|
|
// foreign evidence read from OUTSIDE the project. REQUIRED behavior:
|
|
// the outside --phase-dir must be rejected before evaluation.
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
result.success,
|
|
false,
|
|
`an outside --phase-dir must be rejected before evaluating the predicate ` +
|
|
`(currently: ${result.success ? `SUCCEEDED with output ${result.output}` : 'failed for an unrelated reason'})`,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('[RED #4354] a command-exit-zero predicate interpolating ${PHASE_DIR} with an outside --phase-dir must also be rejected', () => {
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(outsideDir, 'marker.txt'), 'outside-marker\n');
|
|
|
|
const predicate = JSON.stringify({
|
|
kind: 'command-exit-zero',
|
|
command: 'test -f "${PHASE_DIR}/marker.txt"',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = runGsdTools(
|
|
['--json-errors', 'check', 'predicate', '--predicate', predicate, '--phase-dir', outsideDir, '--raw'],
|
|
projDir,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
result.success,
|
|
false,
|
|
`a command-exit-zero predicate interpolating an outside --phase-dir must be rejected ` +
|
|
`(currently: ${result.success ? `SUCCEEDED with output ${result.output}` : 'failed for an unrelated reason'})`,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('[regression] a valid in-project --phase-dir still evaluates', () => {
|
|
const phaseDir = path.join(projDir, '.planning', 'phases', '05-x');
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(
|
|
path.join(phaseDir, 'SECURITY.md'),
|
|
'---\nstatus: passed\n---\n# Security\n',
|
|
);
|
|
const predicate = JSON.stringify({
|
|
kind: 'artifact-frontmatter-equals',
|
|
artifact: 'SECURITY.md',
|
|
field: 'status',
|
|
equals: 'passed',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = runGsdTools(
|
|
['check', 'predicate', '--predicate', predicate, '--phase-dir', phaseDir, '--raw'],
|
|
projDir,
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(result.success, `Command failed: ${result.error}`);
|
|
const parsed = JSON.parse(result.output);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(parsed.block, false, 'in-project phase-dir evaluation must still pass');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('[regression #4652] a relative --phase-dir must resolve against --cwd, not the real process cwd, and must not leak the outside file', () => {
|
|
// The real process cwd (outsideDir) contains a foreign SECURITY.md; the
|
|
// CLI is told --cwd projDir with a relative --phase-dir '.'. Before #4652,
|
|
// cmdCheckPredicate validated the joined (projDir + '.') path but passed
|
|
// the RAW, un-joined '.' into ctx.phaseDir, which findPhaseArtifact then
|
|
// resolved against the real process cwd (outsideDir) — leaking foreign
|
|
// frontmatter. The fix must reject this, and the leaked value must never
|
|
// appear in the output.
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(
|
|
path.join(outsideDir, 'SECURITY.md'),
|
|
'---\nstatus: LEAKED_VALUE\n---\n# Security\n',
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const predicate = JSON.stringify({
|
|
kind: 'artifact-frontmatter-equals',
|
|
artifact: 'SECURITY.md',
|
|
field: 'status',
|
|
equals: 'NOPE',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = runGsdTools(
|
|
['--json-errors', 'check', 'predicate', '--cwd', projDir, '--predicate', predicate, '--phase-dir', '.', '--raw'],
|
|
outsideDir,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const combinedOutput = `${result.output || ''}${result.error || ''}`;
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!combinedOutput.includes('LEAKED_VALUE'),
|
|
`the outside file's frontmatter value must never leak into the output (got: ${combinedOutput})`,
|
|
);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
result.success && JSON.parse(result.output).block === false,
|
|
false,
|
|
`a relative --phase-dir must not resolve against the real process cwd and must not pass ` +
|
|
`(currently: ${combinedOutput})`,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('[#4652] a --phase-dir that is a symlink inside the project resolving outside the project is rejected', (t) => {
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(
|
|
path.join(outsideDir, 'SECURITY.md'),
|
|
'---\nstatus: passed\n---\n# Security\n',
|
|
);
|
|
const linkPath = path.join(projDir, '.planning', 'phases', 'linked-out');
|
|
try {
|
|
fs.symlinkSync(outsideDir, linkPath, 'dir');
|
|
} catch (e) {
|
|
if (e.code === 'EPERM') {
|
|
t.skip('symlink creation is not permitted on this platform (EPERM)');
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
throw e;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const predicate = JSON.stringify({
|
|
kind: 'artifact-frontmatter-equals',
|
|
artifact: 'SECURITY.md',
|
|
field: 'status',
|
|
equals: 'passed',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = runGsdTools(
|
|
['--json-errors', 'check', 'predicate', '--predicate', predicate, '--phase-dir', linkPath, '--raw'],
|
|
projDir,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
result.success,
|
|
false,
|
|
`a --phase-dir symlink resolving outside the project must be rejected ` +
|
|
`(currently: ${result.success ? `SUCCEEDED with output ${result.output}` : 'failed for an unrelated reason'})`,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('[#4652] a relative --phase-dir interpolates ${PHASE_DIR} as the resolved ABSOLUTE path, not the relative value', () => {
|
|
const phaseDir = path.join(projDir, '.planning', 'phases', '05-x');
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(phaseDir, 'marker.txt'), 'marker\n');
|
|
|
|
const predicate = JSON.stringify({
|
|
kind: 'command-exit-zero',
|
|
command: 'echo "${PHASE_DIR}" > "${PHASE_DIR}/interpolated.txt"',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = runGsdTools(
|
|
['check', 'predicate', '--predicate', predicate, '--phase-dir', '.planning/phases/05-x', '--raw'],
|
|
projDir,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(result.success, `Command failed: ${result.error}`);
|
|
const interpolated = fs.readFileSync(path.join(phaseDir, 'interpolated.txt'), 'utf-8').trim();
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
interpolated,
|
|
fs.realpathSync(phaseDir),
|
|
`${'${PHASE_DIR}'} must interpolate the resolved absolute path, not the relative --phase-dir value`,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('[regression] no --phase-dir at all still falls back to cwd and evaluates', () => {
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(
|
|
path.join(projDir, 'SECURITY.md'),
|
|
'---\nstatus: passed\n---\n# Security\n',
|
|
);
|
|
const predicate = JSON.stringify({
|
|
kind: 'artifact-frontmatter-equals',
|
|
artifact: 'SECURITY.md',
|
|
field: 'status',
|
|
equals: 'passed',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = runGsdTools(
|
|
['check', 'predicate', '--predicate', predicate, '--raw'],
|
|
projDir,
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(result.success, `Command failed: ${result.error}`);
|
|
const parsed = JSON.parse(result.output);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(parsed.block, false, 'cwd-fallback evaluation must still pass');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|