Files
msd-core/commands/msd/code-review.md
Jakub Zych a9a7a328e6 refactor: hard-fork GSD -> MSD (Make Software Done)
Mechanical rename produced by scripts/msd-rename.cjs: gsd/Gsd/GSD -> msd/Msd/MSD
across contents and paths, upstream package/repo coordinates -> @golem15/msd-core
and golem15com/msd-core. Deep links into upstream history, sibling upstream
packages, the GSD-2 import feature, CHANGELOG.md and .changeset/ are kept as-is.

Hand edits on top: MSD block-letter banner and logos, LICENSE copyright line,
package/plugin identity, regenerated lockfile, install-tree fixtures, derived
registries and benchmark baseline; migration checksum baseline re-locked
(MSD keeps its own install state, so no install had applied the old sums);
sort-order and regex-escaped expectations in tests adjusted.
2026-10-06 01:47:40 +02:00

3.3 KiB

name, description, argument-hint, allowed-tools, requires
name description argument-hint allowed-tools requires
msd:code-review Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems <phase-number> [--depth=quick|standard|deep] [--files file1,file2,...] [--fix [--all] [--auto]] [reviewer-lane flags]
Read
Bash
Glob
Grep
Write
Agent
config
import
phase
quick
review
Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality problems.

Spawns the msd-code-reviewer agent to analyze code at the specified depth level. Produces REVIEW.md artifact in the phase directory with severity-classified findings.

Arguments:

  • Phase number (required) — which phase's changes to review (e.g., "2" or "02")
  • --depth=quick|standard|deep (optional) — review depth level, overrides workflow.code_review_depth config
    • quick: Pattern-matching only (~2 min)
    • standard: Per-file analysis with language-specific checks (~5-15 min, default)
    • deep: Cross-file analysis including import graphs and call chains (~15-30 min)
  • --files file1,file2,... (optional) — explicit comma-separated file list, skips SUMMARY/git scoping (highest precedence for scoping)
  • --fix (optional) — after review completes (or if REVIEW.md already exists), auto-apply fixes found. Spawns msd-code-fixer agent. Accepts sub-flags:
    • --all — include Info findings in fix scope (default: Critical + Warning only)
    • --auto — enable fix + re-review iteration loop, capped at 3 iterations
  • Optional reviewer-lane flags (#4209) — any flag returned by msd_run review-lane flags (the canonical reviewer-lane roster; e.g. --codex, --agy) requests that lane independently review the same already-resolved scope alongside the internal msd-code-reviewer agent. Its findings are corroborating evidence only — msd-code-reviewer alone verifies each claim against the actual source and writes REVIEW.md; there is exactly one REVIEW.md schema. No reviewer-lane flag (the default) reviews with only the internal agent, byte-for-byte unchanged from before #4209.

Output: {padded_phase}-REVIEW.md in phase directory + inline summary of findings

<execution_context> @~/.claude/msd-core/workflows/code-review.md </execution_context>

Phase: $ARGUMENTS (first positional argument is phase number)

Optional flags parsed from $ARGUMENTS:

  • --depth=VALUE — Depth override (quick|standard|deep). If provided, overrides workflow.code_review_depth config.
  • --files=file1,file2,... — Explicit file list override. Has highest precedence for file scoping per D-08. When provided, workflow skips SUMMARY.md extraction and git diff fallback entirely.

Context files (CLAUDE.md, SUMMARY.md, phase state) are resolved inside the workflow via msd-tools query init.phase-op and delegated to agent via <required_reading> blocks.

This command is a thin dispatch layer. It parses arguments and delegates to the workflow.

Execute end-to-end.

The workflow (not this command) enforces these gates:

  • Phase validation (before config gate)
  • Config gate check (workflow.code_review)
  • File scoping (--files override > SUMMARY.md > git diff fallback)
  • Empty scope check (skip if no files)
  • Agent spawning (msd-code-reviewer)
  • Result presentation (inline summary + next steps)