Files
msd-core/docs/reference/plan-md.md
Tom Boucher ffd5370464 fix(#2903): use the command form that actually works in reader-facing docs (#3047)
* fix(#2903): use the command form that actually works in reader-facing docs

Docs told readers to type the colon form, which no runtime registers -- 18 of
19 runtimes use slash-hyphen and the 19th uses shell-var -- so anyone copying an
example got an unrecognized command. Swept 178 occurrences across 53 files,
locale mirrors included so they do not re-diverge from English.

The colon form is a source-authoring token, not a user-facing one: install-time
converters key on it to produce the hyphen form runtimes actually register. So
the sweep is scoped, and three things are deliberately left alone:

- ADRs, which are a historical record; editing their prose falsifies what was
  written at the time.
- The legacy release-notes archive, pending a maintainer decision on whether it
  follows the same historical carve-out. Excluding it keeps a later reversal
  additive rather than a revert.
- Source artifacts under commands, workflows and agents, where the colon form is
  load-bearing. Rewriting those would break the installed-skill guarantee across
  every runtime -- the single largest hazard here.

The plugin namespace form is a real, separate token and survives untouched.

Adds a lint enforcing exactly that boundary, since the correct form genuinely
differs by directory and nothing previously caught the drift.

Also fixes a hardcoded colon form in the capability-matrix generator. The sweep
alone would have left the generated matrix disagreeing with the template that
produces it, so the fix is at the source and the output regenerated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2903): stop the sweep misquoting source frontmatter

Adversarial review caught three lines where the sweep rewrote a citation of the
literal YAML name: key from a source command file. That key genuinely is the
colon form -- this change's own carve-out logic says source-authoring tokens keep
it -- so the docs ended up misquoting the real files. One of the three is an
acceptance-checklist assertion, which the sweep turned into a false statement.

Restored the three citations to match their sources verbatim, surgically: where a
line carried both a name: citation and a real reader-facing slash command, only
the citation reverted and the command stayed corrected.

The guard needed the same distinction, or it would have flagged the restoration
and reddened the build: a gsd:<cmd> token preceded by name: is a citation of a
source token and is now permitted. The exemption is deliberately narrow -- a bare
gsd:<cmd> anywhere else still fails -- with a test pinning that narrowness.

Also makes the detection case-insensitive. Review found /GSD:next slipped through
silently; no such casing exists in the tree today, so this closes a latent gap
rather than fixing a live one.

Swept the whole tree for further corrupted citations: none beyond the three.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2903): retire the stale-next invariant and sweep next like every other command

Maintainer decision on a genuine conflict between two contracts.

Invariant #3054 banned the literal /gsd-next from user-facing docs because it
named a retired workflow-advance command. But commands/gsd/next.md is a live
command -- the state-aware smart-entry launcher -- and this issue requires docs
to use the hyphen form every runtime actually registers. Both could not hold for
this one command, so docs had been sidestepping the ban by keeping the colon
form, which is exactly the defect this issue exists to remove.

FEATURES.md already recorded the reassignment: the hyphen form "is not the
retired workflow-advance command; it is reserved for the state-aware smart-entry
launcher. Workflow advancement remains under /gsd-progress --next." With that
reassignment the invariant's premise is obsolete and the guard now contradicts
the documented command form, so it is retired with a comment recording why
rather than deleted silently.

next is now swept like every other command, and the earlier exemption added to
the new guard is removed so nothing is special-cased.

Four citations of the literal name: frontmatter key stay in colon form, because
the source file really does carry name: gsd:next and a doc quoting it must
reproduce it verbatim. Two of those lines were reworded to say which side is the
frontmatter key and which is the slash command, since they previously conflated
the two.

Verified the retired scan would now genuinely fail against this tree -- the
conflict was real and resolved, not dodged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2903): backfill changeset pr number

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 13:23:44 -04:00

21 KiB
Raw Blame History

PLAN.md schema reference

A per-plan PLAN.md is GSD Core's executable unit of work — a structured document that tells an executor agent exactly what to build and how to verify it was built correctly. This page documents its structure. See docs index.


Overview

Plans live inside phase directories at:

.planning/phases/<NN>-<slug>/<NN>-<PP>-PLAN.md

For example: .planning/phases/03-post-feed/03-02-PLAN.md (Phase 3, Plan 2).

Plans are produced by the gsd-planner agent (spawned by /gsd-plan-phase) and consumed by execute-phase. A phase typically contains between one and four plans; plans within a phase are assigned to execution waves so that independent work runs in parallel.


YAML frontmatter

Every PLAN.md opens with a YAML frontmatter block between --- delimiters.

Annotated example

---
phase: 03-post-feed
plan: 02
type: execute
wave: 2
depends_on: ["03-01"]
files_modified:
  - src/components/PostFeed.tsx
  - src/components/PostCard.tsx
  - src/app/feed/page.tsx
autonomous: true
requirements: ["FEED-01", "FEED-03"]
user_setup: []

must_haves:
  truths:
    - "User can scroll through posts from followed accounts"
    - "Each post shows author avatar, name, timestamp, and content"
    - "Empty state appears when no posts exist"
  artifacts:
    - path: "src/components/PostFeed.tsx"
      provides: "Scrollable post list"
      min_lines: 40
    - path: "src/components/PostCard.tsx"
      provides: "Individual post card"
      exports: ["PostCard"]
  key_links:
    - from: "src/components/PostFeed.tsx"
      to: "src/app/api/feed/route.ts"
      via: "fetch in useEffect — calls /api/feed endpoint"
      pattern: "fetch.*api/feed"
---

Frontmatter field reference

Field Required Type Purpose
phase Yes string Phase identifier, e.g. 03-post-feed.
plan Yes string Plan number within the phase, e.g. 02.
type Yes execute or tdd execute for standard plans; tdd for test-driven plans where tests are written before implementation.
wave Yes integer Execution wave. Plans in wave 1 run in parallel (no dependencies). Plans in wave 2+ wait for all plans in the previous wave to complete. Pre-computed at plan time by gsd-planner.
depends_on Yes array of plan IDs Plans this plan must wait for. Empty array = wave 1. Example: ["03-01"] means this plan runs after Plan 01 in Phase 3.
files_modified Yes array of paths Every file this plan creates or modifies. Used by the plan-checker to detect same-wave file conflicts and by execute-phase for merge tracking.
autonomous Yes boolean true when all tasks are type auto. false when the plan contains any checkpoint:* task that requires human interaction.
requirements Yes array of IDs Requirement IDs from ROADMAP.md that this plan addresses. Every phase requirement ID must appear in at least one plan's requirements field. Empty arrays are a BLOCKER.
user_setup No array of objects External-service setup steps that Claude cannot automate (account creation, secret retrieval, dashboard configuration). When present, execute-phase generates a USER-SETUP.md checklist for the developer.
status No superseded Marks a plan that was deliberately reassigned or abandoned mid-phase and will never be executed. A status: superseded plan is excluded from the phase's plan and summary counts, so it never holds the phase below 100%. See Superseded plans. Any other value (or the field's absence) has no effect on counting.
estimate No object Projected execution cost: {tokens, raw_tokens, tasks, confidence} (#2631, ADR-2629). tokens is an estimateTokens-scale projection with the project's calibration factor already applied (which is why the plan-checker passes --calibrated to estimate-check — re-applying it would square the correction); confidence (low/med/high) is derived from the calibration sample count, never self-rated. Additive and optional — a plan without it behaves exactly as before. A plan estimated above workflow.smart_zone_tokens is flagged with a split recommendation at plan time; the flag is advisory and never blocks.
must_haves Yes object Goal-backward verification criteria. See below.
gap_closure Only in gap-closure mode string, exact match Must be exactly the literal lowercase true — validated as a string comparison, not a YAML boolean, so True, TRUE, yes, and 1 are all rejected. Required on every plan generated by /gsd-plan-phase --gaps, checked by the plan-gap-closure schema (src/frontmatter.cts) rather than plan. /gsd-execute-phase --gaps-only filters strictly on this field, so an omitted or wrong-valued gap_closure on a gap-closure plan means it is silently skipped — zero executors spawned, no error (#2847). Standard and reviews-mode plans validate against the unmodified plan schema, which neither requires nor checks this field (nothing rejects it as an extra field either, if present).

Superseded plans

A phase reads complete when every *-PLAN.md has a matching *-SUMMARY.md. When a plan is reassigned or dropped mid-phase — its work folded into a later plan — it will never gain a summary, and without a marker it would pin the phase below 100% forever (the plan-level analogue of a retired phase). Add status: superseded to that plan's frontmatter to exclude it from both the plan count (denominator) and the summary count (numerator):

---
phase: 05-api
plan: "12"
type: execute
status: superseded
---

A phase with 13 plans, two of them superseded, then reads 11/11 → complete — no fabricated summary required. The match is case-insensitive. Plans without the marker are counted exactly as before.


must_haves field

must_haves captures what must be observably true for the phase goal to be achieved. It is derived during planning and verified after execution by the gsd-verifier agent.

Sub-fields

Sub-field Type Purpose
truths array of strings Observable behaviours from the user's perspective. Each must be verifiable. Example: "User can send a message", not "WebSocket library installed".
artifacts array of objects Files that must exist with substantive implementation (not stubs).
artifacts[].path string File path relative to project root.
artifacts[].provides string What capability this file delivers.
artifacts[].min_lines integer (optional) Minimum line count to be considered non-stub.
artifacts[].exports array of strings (optional) Expected named exports to verify.
artifacts[].contains string (optional) Regex or literal pattern that must appear in the file.
key_links array of objects Critical connections between artifacts — the wiring that makes the system work end-to-end.
key_links[].from string Source file (relative path from project root). Must be a literal file path — describe components or symbols in via:.
key_links[].to string Target file (relative path from project root). Must be a literal file path — describe endpoints, modules, or APIs in via:.
key_links[].via string Description of how they connect, including any endpoint, component, or symbol name (e.g. fetch in useEffect — calls /api/feed, Prisma query via prisma.message, import).
key_links[].pattern string (optional) Regex to verify the connection exists in source.

Body structure

After frontmatter, the plan body uses named XML-style blocks read by the executor agent.

<objective>

States what the plan delivers and why it matters for the project:

<objective>
Implement the post feed as a scrollable card list.

Purpose: Core display feature for the social feed phase.
Output: PostFeed and PostCard components wired to /api/feed.
</objective>

<execution_context>

Lists the workflow files associated with executing the plan. Always includes the execute-plan workflow; adds the checkpoints reference when the plan contains checkpoint tasks:

<execution_context>
@~/.claude/gsd-core/workflows/execute-plan.md
@~/.claude/gsd-core/templates/summary.md
</execution_context>

These @ paths point at the local GSD install, not at repository files. The prefix shown here (~/.claude/gsd-core/…) is the Claude global-install location; other runtimes and local installs resolve to their own install directory — for example .cursor/gsd-core/…, or an absolute project path for a --local install. Because the prefix is install-relative, this block is not clone-portable: a committed plan carries whichever prefix the authoring install had. Execution does not depend on it — /gsd-execute-phase loads the execute-plan workflow from its own installed copy — so the block records the execution context rather than resolvable repository references. Contrast <context> (below), whose repository-relative @ paths resolve after a git clone.

<context>

References source files the executor needs to read. Includes project-level planning docs and any source files whose patterns or types the plan must replicate. Prior plan SUMMARY.md files are included only when there is a genuine dependency (imported types, shared decision) — not reflexively:

<context>
@.planning/PROJECT.md
@.planning/ROADMAP.md
@.planning/STATE.md
@src/components/UserCard.tsx
</context>

<tasks>

Contains one or more <task> elements. Every task element must carry <name>, <files>, <read_first>, <action>, <verify>, <acceptance_criteria>, and <done> for type="auto" and type="tracer" tasks. Optional <precondition> (see Preconditions) and <reversibility> (see Reversibility) elements may sit between <name> and <files>.


Preconditions

<precondition> is an optional element on <task> (issue #1949, The Pragmatic Programmer Topic 23 — Design by Contract). It states, in a single line of runnable/checkable prose, what must already be true for the task to begin safely. It closes the front-of-task side of the contract triad — preconditions (before) ↔ postconditions (<verify>/<done>/<acceptance_criteria>, after) ↔ invariants (must_haves.truths, across the whole plan).

<task type="auto">
  <name>Add /reveal endpoint handler</name>
  <precondition>server bootstraps and responds to GET /health (from the tracer slice)</precondition>
  <files>server/reveal.ts</files>
  <action>…</action>
  <verify>curl /reveal?path=… opens the OS file manager</verify>
  <done>Endpoint committed and manually verified</done>
</task>

Optional and back-compat: a plan that omits <precondition> on every task behaves exactly as today — the executor skips the check with no visible change. Adding <precondition> to a task tells the executor to assert it before any other task work (read-only checks only: file existence, env var presence, idempotent health pings; no side-effecting checks — halt and surface a checkpoint if one seems required) and halt (returning a checkpoint:human-verify, no partial commit) on an unmet precondition. Plans that include <precondition> pass verify plan-structure unchanged — the structural validator checks for the presence of required tags and does not reject unknown optional tags.

Emission cases (planner-side): emit <precondition> only when a task relies on state the plan's own depends_on ordering does not already guarantee. Three cases cover every legitimate use:

  1. External service setup (user_setup frontmatter) — the consuming task ties a specific setup step to itself so the executor halts if the setup was skipped.
  2. Prior-phase artifact dependency — a generated schema, a migration's dist output, a contract file from an earlier phase. Cross-phase depends_on does not cross phase boundaries, so <precondition> is the explicit pointer.
  3. Environment variable / runtime configuration — a tool, API, or script the task invokes requires an env var or runtime config that exists now, not at plan time.

Full emission rules, anti-patterns ("the system is ready" is not checkable; do not use <precondition> for intra-plan sequencing — that is what depends_on is for), and the contract triad mapping: see gsd-core/references/planner-preconditions.md.


Reversibility

<reversibility> is an optional element on <task> (issue #1951, The Pragmatic Programmer Topic 15 — "Reversibility"). It records how costly the decision the task implements would be to undo, so a one-way-door choice gets a human beat before the agent walks through it. The rating attribute carries the classification; the body carries a one-line rationale.

<task type="auto">
  <name>Define the on-disk event log format</name>
  <reversibility rating="one-way">Phases 4-6 read this file; changing the
  format after they land requires a migration for every existing project.</reversibility>
  <files>src/event-log.cts</files>
  <action>…</action>
  <verify><automated>npm run test:unit -- event-log</automated></verify>
  <done>Format documented and written by the writer under test</done>
</task>
Rating Meaning Effect on the plan
reversible Undo is local and cheap. None. This is the default when no rating is given.
costly Undo touches many call sites or needs a coordinated change. Flagged in the plan so the reader sees the weight. Never blocks.
one-way Undo requires a migration, breaks a published contract, or is impossible. The planner inserts a checkpoint:decision immediately before the dependent task.

Optional and back-compat: a plan that omits <reversibility> on every task behaves exactly as today — no flag, no checkpoint. Plans that include it pass verify plan-structure unchanged; the structural validator checks for the presence of required tags and does not reject unknown optional tags.

Autonomy: inserting a checkpoint:decision means the plan contains a checkpoint, so its frontmatter must set autonomous: false.

Override: /gsd-plan-phase --no-reversibility-gates (REVERSIBILITY_GATES=false) suppresses checkpoint insertion for intentionally-unattended runs. Ratings are still recorded and costly items are still flagged — the override changes what stops the run, not what the plan remembers.

Full taxonomy, emission rules, and anti-patterns (chiefly: rating everything one-way produces checkpoint fatigue; prefer removing irreversibility over gating it): see gsd-core/references/planner-reversibility.md.


Task types

Type Use Autonomy
auto Everything the executor can do independently. Fully autonomous.
tracer The leading thin end-to-end slice a plan starts with by default (tracer-first) — production-quality, wired through every layer, with a real end-to-end <verify>. Fully autonomous; after committing, the executor runs the tracer's <verify> as an early integration gate — autonomous runs halt on failure before expansion, interactive runs present a checkpoint:human-verify.
checkpoint:human-verify Visual or functional verification that requires a human to look at a running UI or service. Pauses execution; presents to the developer; resumes on approval.
checkpoint:decision Implementation choices that arose during execution and require the developer's input. Pauses execution; presents options; resumes on selection.
checkpoint:human-action Truly unavoidable manual steps (account creation, hardware interaction). Used sparingly. Pauses execution; resumes on confirmation.

Plans that contain any checkpoint task must set autonomous: false in frontmatter.


auto task structure

<task type="auto">
  <name>Task 1: Create PostCard component</name>
  <files>src/components/PostCard.tsx</files>
  <read_first>src/components/UserCard.tsx, src/types/post.ts</read_first>
  <action>Create PostCard component accepting a Post prop (id, authorId, content, createdAt,
    reactionCount). Render author avatar using UserAvatar from UserCard pattern. Show timestamp
    using date-fns formatDistanceToNow. Export as named export PostCard.</action>
  <verify>npx tsc --noEmit</verify>
  <acceptance_criteria>
    - src/components/PostCard.tsx exports named export PostCard
    - PostCard.tsx contains "reactionCount" prop usage
    - npx tsc --noEmit exits 0
  </acceptance_criteria>
  <done>PostCard renders post content with author and timestamp</done>
</task>

Required fields for auto tasks

Field Rule
<files> Every file the task creates or modifies. The executor writes only these files.
<read_first> Files the executor must read before touching anything — the file being modified, any source-of-truth pattern file, any file whose types or conventions must be replicated.
<action> Concrete instructions with exact identifiers, file paths, function signatures, and expected values. Never says "align X with Y" without specifying the target state. Never contains fenced code blocks or full implementations.
<verify> A runnable command or check that proves the task succeeded. Must distinguish pass from fail — echo "done" is not valid.
<acceptance_criteria> Verifiable conditions: grep-verifiable strings, command exit codes, observable behaviours. No subjective language ("looks correct", "properly configured"). Negative greps (! grep -Eq 'PAT' file) are file-scoped — region-scope them (sed -n/awk range, then grep) when a sibling task needs the construct elsewhere in the same file (#968).
<done> A short measurable statement of the completed outcome.

Plan quality dimensions

The gsd-plan-checker agent reviews every PLAN.md across 12 dimensions before execution begins. A plan that fails any BLOCKER-severity check is returned to gsd-planner for revision (up to 3 iterations):

Dimension What it checks
1 — Requirement Coverage Every phase requirement ID from ROADMAP.md appears in at least one plan's requirements frontmatter field and has covering task(s).
2 — Task Completeness Every auto task carries all required fields (<files>, <action>, <verify>, <acceptance_criteria>, <done>). No vague or empty fields.
3 — Dependency Correctness depends_on references are valid, acyclic, and consistent with wave numbers. Wave N plan depends only on plans in waves < N.
4 — Key Links Planned Artifacts in must_haves.key_links have corresponding tasks that implement the wiring — not just the artifact creation.
5 — Scope Sanity Plans stay within context budget: 2–3 tasks per plan (4 = warning, 5+ = BLOCKER), ≤ 8–10 files per plan (15+ = BLOCKER).
6 — Verification Derivation must_haves.truths are user-observable behaviours, not implementation details. Artifacts map to truths. Key links cover critical wiring.
7 — Context Compliance Every D-NN decision from CONTEXT.md is addressed by at least one task. No task implements anything from <deferred>.
7b — Scope Reduction Detection Task actions do not silently reduce a locked decision to a "v1", "stub", or "future enhancement" without delivering the full decision scope. Always a BLOCKER when found.
7c — Architectural Tier Compliance Tasks assign capabilities to the correct tier per the RESEARCH.md Architectural Responsibility Map (when present). Security-sensitive capabilities in the wrong tier are BLOCKERs.
8 — Nyquist Compliance When workflow.nyquist_validation is enabled and RESEARCH.md exists, every task has an <automated> verify command, no consecutive window of 3 tasks lacks coverage, and VALIDATION.md is present.
9 — Cross-Plan Data Contracts When plans share data pipelines, their transformations are compatible — no plan strips data that another plan needs in original form.
10 — CLAUDE.md Compliance Plans respect project-specific conventions, forbidden patterns, required tools, and security requirements from ./CLAUDE.md.
11 — Research Resolution When RESEARCH.md exists, its ## Open Questions section is marked (RESOLVED) before planning proceeds.
12 — Pattern Compliance When PATTERNS.md exists, tasks reference the correct analog patterns for each new or modified file.

Wave execution model

Wave numbers are pre-computed during planning. Execute-phase groups plans by wave number and runs each wave's plans in parallel:

Wave 1: Plan 01, Plan 02, Plan 03  (all run simultaneously — no dependencies)
Wave 2: Plan 04                    (waits for Wave 1 to complete)
Wave 3: Plan 05                    (waits for Wave 2 to complete)

Plans within a wave that modify overlapping files must not be in the same wave — the plan-checker's Dimension 3 flags this as a BLOCKER.


Plan output

After a plan executes successfully, the executor writes a SUMMARY.md at:

.planning/phases/<NN>-<slug>/<NN>-<PP>-SUMMARY.md

The SUMMARY.md is the canonical record of what was built. Subsequent plans in the same phase may reference it when they have a genuine dependency on its types or decisions.