Files
msd-core/docs
Tom Boucher bb4f3073c0 docs(#3984): give every §8 rule its delivered status and its measured executor (#3986)
Surfaced by an /adr-phase-coverage audit of epic #3473 after its last sub-issue
merged. §8 is the epic's declared source of truth - "where this section and the
code disagree, the code is the defect" - and line 136 defines a per-rule status
vocabulary.

Not one of the nine rules was ever advanced past its pre-implementation status.
The word Enforced appeared exactly ONCE in the document: in the sentence that
defines it. Three rules read "Required - phase unassigned" for work that Phases
5, 7 and 8 demonstrably delivered, so a reader auditing coverage today would
conclude three of the nine contract rules had no owner. That is the orphan shape
this epic exists to eliminate, sitting in the epic's own contract, and it is the
same defect class as B6's guard ledger: a status column is a claim, and it was
false.

Flipping all nine to Enforced would have repeated the mistake inverted. Decision
2 says a declared policy with no executor is a loud failure, so Enforced asserts
an executor EXISTS - and measurement found the nine are not equally enforced. The
vocabulary is now three values:

  Enforced              a standing guard wired into lint:ci or CI fails the
                        build; a new wrong call site cannot land
  Enforced (structural) the wrong call site is unrepresentable
  Shipped - test-covered  delivered and regression-tested, but NO standing
                        guard; a regression in covered code is caught, a new
                        wrong call site elsewhere is not

Measured per rule, with the executor cited:

  8.1 Enforced             lint-vendored-deps + no-external-require-in-bin
  8.2 Enforced (partial)   phase-enumeration-drift covers the sentinel arm; the
                           #3357 resolver arm is test-covered only
  8.3 Shipped              NO guard for slug or marker re-derivation
  8.4 Shipped              structural for argv; no guard for the general rule
  8.5 Shipped              the delivering change added zero guard scripts
  8.6 Enforced (structural) the transaction type; state-write-path-drift
  8.7 Shipped              structural via reconcileReportedFields; no guard
  8.8 Enforced             gen-state-md-docs --check in lint:generated-sync
  8.9 Enforced (prospective) lint-fix-has-regression-tests fires on NEW fix
                           commits; it does not assert the 19 children are
                           covered. 17 of 19 have a test citing their number;
                           #3364 and #3812 have none - a text match, not proof
                           the behavior is uncovered, but not evidence it is
                           covered either

The third status value is not a euphemism for done. It names precisely where this
epic's own thesis - make the wrong call site unrepresentable - is NOT yet
achieved. §8.3 and §8.5 are the thinnest: nothing today stops a twelfth inline
slug copy or a second silent swallow.

Also corrects a claim this ADR made three days ago and #3977 has since overtaken.
The ledger amendment concluded #3426/#3239 "need new detectors". The measurement
behind that was right - the glob widening structurally could not reach them - but
the prescription was not the best available: #3977 rerouted the test's parsers
onto the ADR-2143 seam, so there is no ad-hoc parse left for a detector to find.
Removing the violation beat teaching the rule to see it. Both issues are CLOSED;
the roster row and the amendment now say so, and say why the earlier conclusion
should not be built on.

Closes #3984

Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 08:20:58 -04:00
..

GSD Core documentation

Documentation is organised into four quadrants: tutorials help you learn by doing, how-to guides solve specific tasks, reference states authoritative facts, and explanation explores concepts and design decisions.

Language versions: English · Português (pt-BR) · 日本語 · 简体中文


Tutorials


How-to guides


Reference

  • Commands — every command with flags and examples
  • Configuration — full config schema, model profiles, git branching strategies
  • CLI tools — gsd-tools.cjs programmatic API for workflows and agents
  • JSON error mode — gsd-tools failure channels: faults (stderr, exit 1) vs degraded results (stdout, exit 0), and the reason-code taxonomy
  • Features — complete feature index
  • Inventory — installed skills and surface map
  • STATE.md schema — field-by-field reference for .planning/STATE.md
  • CONTEXT.md schema — field-by-field reference for .planning/phases/<N>/CONTEXT.md
  • PLAN.md schema — field-by-field reference for .planning/phases/<N>/PLAN.md
  • Planning artifacts — all .planning/ files and their roles
  • Review and verification capabilities — code review, security, and Nyquist capability ownership and hook contracts
  • Gate predicates — canonical specification of the phase-gate predicate vocabulary
  • Capability matrix — generated catalogue of every capability's role, tier, extension points, hook kinds, and engines.gsd
  • Capability manifest — the full capability.json schema and validation rules
  • gsd capability command — install / update / remove / list reference for third-party capabilities
  • Workflow fragments — in-file <!-- gsd:section --> marker grammar for fragmentizing workflow markdown at emission time
  • Reviewer Lane Registry — generated catalogue of third-party reviewer lanes, with their flags, transport, and install commands

Explanation