Files
msd-core/tests/assumption-delta-checkpoint-e2e.test.cjs
Tom Boucher 03b7125293 enhance(#3909): a probe that could not run no longer asserts a verdict (#3944)
* test(#3909): failing-first suite for the fabricated probe fallbacks

Binds the four fabrication sites found by executing the surfaces (ADR-3889
failure class (c)), each with a positive control so an over-firing fix goes red:

- the blocking api-coverage.verify-pre gate certifying "no external-API
  integration" from a zero-byte phase scope
- the assumption-delta query route scanning an unresolvable phase section as
  the empty string and reporting it as an examined negative
- both capability fragments' probe fallbacks, which append a fabricated
  verdict rather than replacing, and fire on the legitimate exit-1 negative

Verification runs on the remote runner.

Refs #3909

* enhance(#3909): a probe that could not run no longer asserts a verdict

ADR-3889 Phase 5. Four sites turned a failed or unexamined probe into a
confident negative; each now reports what it could not establish.

- check api-coverage.verify-pre: a phase with no plan body and no roadmap
  section ran detection over zero bytes and PASSED the blocking seal gate,
  certifying "no external-API integration" from input it never read. It now
  holds with scope_unavailable. The discriminator is bytes examined, never
  signals found, so a phase whose plans are real and simply carry no API
  vocabulary passes exactly as before.
- query assumption-delta scan: an unresolvable phase section was scanned as
  the empty string and reported as an examined negative. It now returns
  {skipped, reason: phase_unresolved}, still at exit 0 — an ADR-2980 degraded
  result in the payload, leaving the gsd-tools exit projection to P8.
- both capability fragments: `|| echo '{"detected":false}'` appended rather
  than replaced, and fired on the legitimate exit-1 negative, so a correct
  answer and an honest skip both arrived as two concatenated objects. They now
  keep the probe's own payload and manufacture only an explicit
  probe_unavailable skip when the probe produced nothing at all.

Every registered outcome is more restrictive on a blocking gate, so this can
turn a false green red and never a red green.

Docs: FEATURES 156, CONFIGURATION (both keys), references/api-coverage.md
seal-time outcome table, and a new how-to for the reason-code vocabulary.

Verification runs on the remote runner.

Closes #3909

* test(#3909): correct the stale unknown-phase assertion

`unknown phase → detected:false, no throw (graceful)` scanned phase 999
against a two-phase roadmap and asserted `detected === false`. That pinned
the fabrication as intended behavior: the phase does not exist, so the
detector was handed the empty string and its "no core assumption changed"
answer described nothing that was ever read.

It now asserts the skipped-with-reason shape. The graceful-degradation
contract the test was actually protecting — the query succeeds and does not
throw on an unknown phase — is unchanged.

Found by code review, not by the author.

Refs #3909

* docs(#3909): author the FEATURES entry in its generator source

`docs/FEATURES.md` is generated by `scripts/gen-features.cjs` from the
per-feature fragments in `docs/features/`. The API-coverage entry was edited
in the generated file, so the next regeneration silently dropped it.

The text now lives in `docs/features/api-coverage-gate.md` and
`docs/FEATURES.md` is regenerated from it, leaving the shipped file
byte-identical and its content actually derivable.

Caught by `lint:generated-sync`.

Refs #3909

* test(#3909): bind the skip to "not found", and pin the discriminator

The first verification run went red on one case, and the case was wrong
rather than the code.

`getRoadmapPhaseWithFallback` returns `null` for an unknown phase and for a
missing ROADMAP.md, but for a section whose body is whitespace-only it returns
the heading line alone — which is not empty. So a body-less section WAS found,
and reporting `detected:false` over its heading is a real negative, not a
fabrication. The test had assumed the resolver yielded `''` there.

Correcting the test rather than the resolver keeps `skipped` bound to the
distinction the issue asks for — found versus not found — and avoids diverging
`assumption-delta scan` from `roadmap.get-phase`, which the fragment documents
as sharing one resolver.

Also adds the seeded property the test matrix had promised: for any plan body,
the scope read back is whitespace-only exactly when the body was. That pins the
gate's discriminator to bytes examined, so it cannot quietly become "no signals
found", across unicode whitespace and CRLF.

`docs/INVENTORY.md` picks up the reference doc's new seal-time outcome table —
surfaced by the co-change gate, not by a lint failure.

Refs #3909

* chore(#3909): backfill the changeset PR number

Refs #3909

---------

Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
2026-08-27 15:50:12 -04:00

318 lines
14 KiB
JavaScript

'use strict';
/**
* E2E capability-wiring tests for the assumption-delta checkpoint (#1561).
*
* Drives the real `loop render-hooks plan:pre` CLI subprocess against temp
* projects with different config values and asserts on the typed envelope's
* activeHooks — proving the capability contribution activates/deactivates by
* config (acceptance criteria #4 non-blocking advisory + #6 capability hook).
*
* CONTENT/E2E only: every test drives a real CLI subprocess. No readFileSync
* source-grep. Genuine assertions: each case asserts the SPECIFIC differing
* value (capId presence/absence), not a count (plan:pre carries other
* default-on contributions owned by other capabilities).
*/
const { describe, test, afterEach } = require('node:test');
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
const fs = require('node:fs');
const os = require('node:os');
const path = require('node:path');
const { execFileSync } = require('node:child_process');
const { cleanup, TEST_ENV_BASE } = require('./helpers.cjs');
const TOOLS_PATH = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'gsd-core', 'bin', 'gsd-tools.cjs');
function runTools(args, cwd) {
const argv = Array.isArray(args)
? args
: (args.match(/(?:[^\s"']+|"[^"]*"|'[^']*')+/g) || [])
.map((t) => t.replace(/"([^"]*)"/g, '$1').replace(/'([^']*)'/g, '$1'));
try {
const stdout = execFileSync(process.execPath, [TOOLS_PATH, ...argv], {
cwd,
encoding: 'utf-8',
env: { ...process.env, ...TEST_ENV_BASE },
timeout: 60000,
});
return { success: true, output: stdout.trim(), exitCode: 0, error: '' };
} catch (err) {
return {
success: false,
output: err.stdout?.toString().trim() || '',
error: err.stderr?.toString().trim() || err.message,
exitCode: err.status ?? 1,
};
}
}
function makeProject(config) {
const tmpDir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'gsd-adelta-'));
fs.mkdirSync(path.join(tmpDir, '.planning'), { recursive: true });
fs.writeFileSync(
path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'config.json'),
JSON.stringify(config),
'utf8'
);
return tmpDir;
}
function planPreHooks(cwd) {
const result = runTools('loop render-hooks plan:pre --raw', cwd);
assert.ok(result.success, `render-hooks plan:pre should succeed. stderr: ${result.error}`);
const envelope = JSON.parse(result.output);
assert.strictEqual(envelope.point, 'plan:pre', 'point field must be plan:pre');
assert.ok(Array.isArray(envelope.activeHooks), 'activeHooks must be an array');
return envelope;
}
function findCap(envelope, capId) {
return envelope.activeHooks.find((h) => h.capId === capId) || null;
}
// ─── ROADMAP fixture for the scan query ──────────────────────────────────────
const ROADMAP = [
'# Roadmap',
'',
'## v1.0.0',
'',
'### Phase 1: Add a second auth method alongside passwords',
'**Goal:** Users can authenticate via SSO in addition to passwords',
'**Success Criteria**:',
'1. SSO login works',
'2. Password login still works',
'',
'### Phase 2: Refactor the parser for readability',
'**Goal:** Smaller functions, no behavior change',
'**Success Criteria**:',
'1. All existing tests still pass',
'',
].join('\n');
function makeRoadmapProject() {
const tmpDir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'gsd-adelta-rm-'));
fs.mkdirSync(path.join(tmpDir, '.planning'), { recursive: true });
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'ROADMAP.md'), ROADMAP, 'utf8');
return tmpDir;
}
function scanQuery(cwd, phase, extra) {
const argv = ['query', 'assumption-delta', 'scan', String(phase)];
if (extra) argv.push(...extra);
return runTools(argv, cwd);
}
describe('assumption-delta scan query — phase-section detection (#1561)', () => {
let tmpDir;
afterEach(() => { if (tmpDir) { cleanup(tmpDir); tmpDir = null; } });
test('phase with a pluralization signal → detected:true', () => {
tmpDir = makeRoadmapProject();
const r = scanQuery(tmpDir, 1, ['--json']);
assert.ok(r.success, `scan should succeed. stderr: ${r.error}`);
const parsed = JSON.parse(r.output);
assert.strictEqual(parsed.detected, true);
assert.ok(parsed.signals.some((s) => s.kind === 'pluralization'), 'phase 1 must trip pluralization');
});
test('phase with no signal → detected:false (low false-positive)', () => {
tmpDir = makeRoadmapProject();
const r = scanQuery(tmpDir, 2, ['--json']);
assert.ok(r.success, `scan should succeed. stderr: ${r.error}`);
const parsed = JSON.parse(r.output);
assert.strictEqual(parsed.detected, false);
assert.deepStrictEqual(parsed.signals, []);
});
test('unknown phase → skipped, no throw (graceful) (#3909)', () => {
tmpDir = makeRoadmapProject();
const r = scanQuery(tmpDir, 999, ['--json']);
assert.ok(r.success, `scan should succeed on unknown phase. stderr: ${r.error}`);
const parsed = JSON.parse(r.output);
// This asserted `detected:false` until #3909. That was the fabrication
// itself pinned as intended behavior: phase 999 does not exist, so the
// detector was handed the empty string and its "no core assumption
// changed" answer described nothing. The graceful-degradation contract
// the test was protecting (succeeds, does not throw) is unchanged.
assert.strictEqual(parsed.skipped, true);
assert.strictEqual(parsed.reason, 'phase_unresolved');
assert.strictEqual(parsed.detected, undefined);
});
test('--terms override narrows the vocabulary (custom cue fires, default cue does not)', () => {
tmpDir = makeRoadmapProject();
// phase 1 trips "second" by default; override to "xyzzy" → must NOT fire
const r = scanQuery(tmpDir, 1, ['--json', '--terms', 'xyzzy']);
assert.ok(r.success, `scan should succeed. stderr: ${r.error}`);
assert.strictEqual(JSON.parse(r.output).detected, false);
});
test('missing phase arg → non-zero exit (usage error)', () => {
tmpDir = makeRoadmapProject();
const r = runTools(['query', 'assumption-delta', 'scan'], tmpDir);
assert.notStrictEqual(r.exitCode, 0, 'scan with no phase must exit non-zero');
});
// ── Hardening (Codex Step-4 review): malformed args ──────────────────────
test('flag-shaped phase (scan --json) → non-zero exit, not treated as phase', () => {
tmpDir = makeRoadmapProject();
const r = runTools(['query', 'assumption-delta', 'scan', '--json'], tmpDir);
assert.notStrictEqual(r.exitCode, 0, '"--json" must not be accepted as a phase number');
});
test('empty --terms restores curated defaults (detected, not disabled)', () => {
tmpDir = makeRoadmapProject();
const r = scanQuery(tmpDir, 1, ['--terms', '', '--json']);
assert.ok(r.success, `scan should succeed. stderr: ${r.error}`);
const parsed = JSON.parse(r.output);
assert.strictEqual(parsed.detected, true, 'phase 1 must still trip defaults under empty --terms');
assert.ok(parsed.terms.pluralization.includes('second'));
});
test('flag-shaped --terms value (--terms --json) falls back to defaults, not treated as a term', () => {
tmpDir = makeRoadmapProject();
const r = scanQuery(tmpDir, 1, ['--terms', '--json']);
assert.ok(r.success, `scan should succeed. stderr: ${r.error}`);
const parsed = JSON.parse(r.output);
// 'json' must NOT have been consumed as a pluralization cue; defaults apply.
assert.ok(!parsed.terms.pluralization.includes('json'), '"--json" must not become a trigger term');
assert.ok(parsed.terms.pluralization.includes('second'), 'defaults restored');
});
});
describe('assumption-delta capability — plan:pre render-hooks wiring (#1561)', () => {
let tmpDir;
afterEach(() => { if (tmpDir) { cleanup(tmpDir); tmpDir = null; } });
test('default config (no toggle): assumption-delta contribution is ACTIVE', () => {
tmpDir = makeProject({});
const env = planPreHooks(tmpDir);
const hook = findCap(env, 'assumption-delta');
assert.ok(hook, 'assumption-delta contribution must be active under default config');
assert.strictEqual(hook.kind, 'contribution', 'must be a non-blocking contribution, not a gate');
assert.strictEqual(hook.into, 'planner', 'contribution injects into the planner role');
assert.strictEqual(hook.when, 'workflow.assumption_delta', 'when must gate on workflow.assumption_delta');
assert.strictEqual(hook.onError, 'skip', 'onError must be skip (advisory, never halts)');
// The fragment body must be inlined so the planner receives concrete prose.
const frag = hook.fragment && hook.fragment.inline ? hook.fragment.inline : hook.fragment;
assert.ok(typeof frag === 'string' && frag.length > 0, 'fragment must be inlined as non-empty text');
assert.ok(
/Assumption-Delta Architecture Checkpoint/i.test(frag),
'inlined fragment must carry the checkpoint heading'
);
});
test('workflow.assumption_delta=true: contribution is ACTIVE', () => {
tmpDir = makeProject({ workflow: { assumption_delta: true } });
const env = planPreHooks(tmpDir);
assert.ok(findCap(env, 'assumption-delta'), 'must be active when explicitly true');
});
test('workflow.assumption_delta=false: contribution is INACTIVE (absent from activeHooks)', () => {
tmpDir = makeProject({ workflow: { assumption_delta: false } });
const env = planPreHooks(tmpDir);
assert.strictEqual(
findCap(env, 'assumption-delta'),
null,
'must NOT appear in activeHooks when disabled — other default-on plan:pre hooks may still be present'
);
});
test('non-blocking guarantee: no assumption-delta entry is ever a blocking gate', () => {
// Advisory contract (acceptance #4): the checkpoint informs; it never blocks.
// Across both on/off states the capability must never surface as kind=gate
// with blocking=true.
tmpDir = makeProject({ workflow: { assumption_delta: true } });
const env = planPreHooks(tmpDir);
const gates = env.activeHooks.filter((h) => h.kind === 'gate');
assert.ok(
gates.every((g) => g.capId !== 'assumption-delta'),
'assumption-delta must never register a blocking gate at plan:pre'
);
});
});
// ─── An unresolved phase section is not a negative verdict (#3909, P5) ────────
// `routeAssumptionDelta` fed `detectAssumptionDelta(section ?? '')`, so a phase
// section that could not be resolved at all (no ROADMAP.md, unknown phase
// number) was scanned as the empty string and reported as an examined-and-
// negative result. That is a fabricated verdict: the probe never had input.
// The route now reports the skipped-with-reason shape instead. Exit code stays
// 0 — this is an ADR-2980 degraded result reported through the payload, and
// ADR-3889 P8 pins the gsd-tools projection at v1.
describe('query assumption-delta scan — unresolved phase reports skipped (#3909)', () => {
let tmpDir;
afterEach(() => { if (tmpDir) { cleanup(tmpDir); tmpDir = null; } });
function writeRoadmap(dir, body) {
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, '.planning', 'ROADMAP.md'), body, 'utf8');
}
function scan(cwd, phase, extra = []) {
const r = runTools(['query', 'assumption-delta', 'scan', phase, '--json', ...extra], cwd);
return { raw: r, json: JSON.parse(r.output) };
}
test('CONTROL: a resolved section with no cues still reports detected:false', () => {
tmpDir = makeProject({ workflow: { assumption_delta: true } });
writeRoadmap(tmpDir, '# Roadmap\n\n### Phase 01: Cleanup\n\nRefactor the internal state machine.\n');
const { raw, json } = scan(tmpDir, '01');
assert.strictEqual(raw.exitCode, 0);
assert.strictEqual(json.detected, false, 'an examined section with no cues is a real negative');
assert.strictEqual(json.skipped, undefined, 'a real scan must NOT be reported as skipped');
});
test('CONTROL: a resolved section with a pluralization cue still detects', () => {
tmpDir = makeProject({ workflow: { assumption_delta: true } });
writeRoadmap(tmpDir, '# Roadmap\n\n### Phase 01: Auth\n\nAdd a second authentication method.\n');
const { json } = scan(tmpDir, '01');
assert.strictEqual(json.detected, true);
assert.strictEqual(json.skipped, undefined);
});
test('no ROADMAP.md at all reports skipped, not detected:false', () => {
tmpDir = makeProject({ workflow: { assumption_delta: true } });
const { raw, json } = scan(tmpDir, '01');
assert.strictEqual(json.skipped, true, 'a probe with no input must not assert a verdict');
assert.strictEqual(json.reason, 'phase_unresolved');
assert.strictEqual(
json.detected,
undefined,
'a skipped payload must carry no detected key — that is what makes it distinguishable',
);
assert.strictEqual(raw.exitCode, 0, 'degraded result stays exit 0 (ADR-2980; P8 pins v1)');
});
test('a ROADMAP.md that does not contain the phase reports skipped', () => {
tmpDir = makeProject({ workflow: { assumption_delta: true } });
writeRoadmap(tmpDir, '# Roadmap\n\n### Phase 01: Auth\n\nAdd a second authentication method.\n');
const { json } = scan(tmpDir, '99');
assert.strictEqual(json.skipped, true, 'an unknown phase number resolves to nothing');
assert.strictEqual(json.reason, 'phase_unresolved');
});
test('BOUNDARY: a resolved but body-less section is EXAMINED, not skipped', () => {
tmpDir = makeProject({ workflow: { assumption_delta: true } });
writeRoadmap(tmpDir, '# Roadmap\n\n### Phase 01: Empty\n\n \n\t\n\n### Phase 02: Next\n\nBody.\n');
const { json } = scan(tmpDir, '01');
// The resolver returns the heading line alone for a body-less section, so
// the phase WAS found and the detector did examine what the roadmap holds
// for it. `skipped` is reserved for the cases where the resolver returns
// null — an unknown phase number, or no ROADMAP.md at all. Pinning that
// line here keeps the distinction the issue actually asks for (found vs
// not found) from drifting into a vaguer "looks empty to me".
assert.strictEqual(json.skipped, undefined, 'a resolved section is not a skip');
assert.strictEqual(json.detected, false, 'the heading alone carries no cues — a real negative');
});
test('--terms does not rescue an unresolved phase', () => {
tmpDir = makeProject({ workflow: { assumption_delta: true } });
const { json } = scan(tmpDir, '01', ['--terms', 'second,alternative']);
assert.strictEqual(json.skipped, true, 'a vocabulary override cannot manufacture a scan');
assert.strictEqual(json.reason, 'phase_unresolved');
});
});