* fix(#3297): project --gaps mode onto next-up execute command * chore(#3297): set changeset pr to 3453 --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
298 lines
12 KiB
JavaScript
298 lines
12 KiB
JavaScript
// allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product
|
|
// Workflow .md / agent .md / command .md / reference .md files — their text
|
|
// IS what the runtime loads. Testing text content tests the deployed contract.
|
|
// Per CONTRIBUTING.md exception matrix.
|
|
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Next Up /clear Order Tests (#1623)
|
|
*
|
|
* Validates that /clear always appears BEFORE the command in Next Up blocks,
|
|
* not as a <sub> footnote after the command. Users should see /clear first
|
|
* so they run it before copy-pasting the actual command.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const { test, describe } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('fs');
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
|
|
const GSD_ROOT = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'gsd-core');
|
|
const UI_BRAND = path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'references', 'ui-brand.md');
|
|
const CONTINUATION_FORMAT = path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'references', 'continuation-format.md');
|
|
const WORKFLOWS_DIR = path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'workflows');
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Recursively collect all .md files in a directory.
|
|
*/
|
|
function collectMarkdownFiles(dir) {
|
|
const results = [];
|
|
if (!fs.existsSync(dir)) return results;
|
|
for (const entry of fs.readdirSync(dir, { withFileTypes: true })) {
|
|
const full = path.join(dir, entry.name);
|
|
if (entry.isDirectory()) {
|
|
results.push(...collectMarkdownFiles(full));
|
|
} else if (entry.name.endsWith('.md')) {
|
|
results.push(full);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return results;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe('ui-brand.md — Next Up template has /clear before command', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(UI_BRAND, 'utf-8');
|
|
|
|
test('Next Up block template does not use <sub>/clear pattern', () => {
|
|
const subClearPattern = /<sub>[^<]*\/clear[^<]*<\/sub>/gi;
|
|
const matches = content.match(subClearPattern);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
matches,
|
|
null,
|
|
'ui-brand.md must not contain <sub>/clear</sub> pattern — /clear should appear before the command'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('Next Up block template shows /clear then: before {copy-paste command}', () => {
|
|
// Extract the Next Up Block section
|
|
const nextUpSection = content.slice(
|
|
content.indexOf('## Next Up Block'),
|
|
content.indexOf('## Error Box')
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(nextUpSection.length > 0, 'Should find Next Up Block section');
|
|
|
|
const clearIndex = nextUpSection.indexOf('/clear');
|
|
const commandIndex = nextUpSection.indexOf('{copy-paste command}');
|
|
assert.ok(clearIndex > -1, 'Should contain /clear');
|
|
assert.ok(commandIndex > -1, 'Should contain {copy-paste command}');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
clearIndex < commandIndex,
|
|
`/clear (at ${clearIndex}) must appear before {copy-paste command} (at ${commandIndex})`
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('continuation-format.md — Next Up examples have /clear before commands', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(CONTINUATION_FORMAT, 'utf-8');
|
|
|
|
test('no <sub>/clear patterns remain', () => {
|
|
const subClearPattern = /<sub>[^<]*\/clear[^<]*<\/sub>/gi;
|
|
const matches = content.match(subClearPattern);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
matches,
|
|
null,
|
|
'continuation-format.md must not contain <sub>/clear</sub> pattern'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('workflow files — no <sub>/clear patterns in Next Up blocks', () => {
|
|
const workflowFiles = collectMarkdownFiles(WORKFLOWS_DIR);
|
|
|
|
test('found workflow .md files to scan', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
workflowFiles.length > 0,
|
|
`Expected workflow .md files in ${WORKFLOWS_DIR}`
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('no workflow file contains <sub> with /clear', () => {
|
|
const subClearPattern = /<sub>[^<]*\/clear[^<]*<\/sub>/gi;
|
|
const failures = [];
|
|
|
|
for (const filePath of workflowFiles) {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(filePath, 'utf-8');
|
|
const matches = content.match(subClearPattern);
|
|
if (matches) {
|
|
failures.push({
|
|
file: path.relative(GSD_ROOT, filePath),
|
|
matches: matches.length,
|
|
examples: matches.slice(0, 3),
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
failures.length,
|
|
0,
|
|
`Found <sub>/clear</sub> pattern in ${failures.length} workflow file(s):\n` +
|
|
failures
|
|
.map(
|
|
(f) =>
|
|
` ${f.file}: ${f.matches} match(es) — e.g. ${f.examples[0]}`
|
|
)
|
|
.join('\n')
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('reference files — no <sub>/clear patterns', () => {
|
|
const referencesDir = path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'references');
|
|
const refFiles = collectMarkdownFiles(referencesDir);
|
|
|
|
test('found reference .md files to scan', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
refFiles.length > 0,
|
|
`Expected reference .md files in ${referencesDir}`
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('no reference file contains <sub> with /clear', () => {
|
|
const subClearPattern = /<sub>[^<]*\/clear[^<]*<\/sub>/gi;
|
|
const failures = [];
|
|
|
|
for (const filePath of refFiles) {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(filePath, 'utf-8');
|
|
const matches = content.match(subClearPattern);
|
|
if (matches) {
|
|
failures.push({
|
|
file: path.relative(GSD_ROOT, filePath),
|
|
matches: matches.length,
|
|
examples: matches.slice(0, 3),
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
failures.length,
|
|
0,
|
|
`Found <sub>/clear</sub> pattern in ${failures.length} reference file(s):\n` +
|
|
failures
|
|
.map(
|
|
(f) =>
|
|
` ${f.file}: ${f.matches} match(es) — e.g. ${f.examples[0]}`
|
|
)
|
|
.join('\n')
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
// ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
// Folded from tests/bug-3083-resume-route-clear.test.cjs — consolidation epic #1969 (B4 #1973)
|
|
// ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
{
|
|
const { describe: __foldDescribe } = require('node:test');
|
|
__foldDescribe("folded:bug-3083-resume-route-clear (consolidation epic #1969 B4 #1973)", () => {
|
|
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
const { test, describe } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('node:fs');
|
|
const path = require('node:path');
|
|
|
|
describe('bug #3083: resume-project next-step routing should not include /clear then:', () => {
|
|
test('route_to_workflow block omits /clear then: in resume templates', () => {
|
|
const workflowPath = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'gsd-core', 'workflows', 'resume-project.md');
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
const routeStart = content.indexOf('<step name="route_to_workflow">');
|
|
const routeEnd = content.indexOf('</step>', routeStart);
|
|
const routeBlock = content.slice(routeStart, routeEnd);
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(routeBlock.includes('/clear` then:'), false, 'resume route templates must not include `/clear` then:');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('route_to_workflow block includes exception note explaining resume behavior', () => {
|
|
const workflowPath = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'gsd-core', 'workflows', 'resume-project.md');
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
const routeStart = content.indexOf('<step name="route_to_workflow">');
|
|
const routeEnd = content.indexOf('</step>', routeStart);
|
|
const routeBlock = content.slice(routeStart, routeEnd);
|
|
|
|
assert.match(routeBlock, /resume.*exception|exception.*resume/i);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
// #3297: plan-phase --gaps Next Up must project --gaps-only onto execute-phase
|
|
// ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('bug #3297: --gaps planning mode projects --gaps-only onto the Next Up execute command', () => {
|
|
const WORKFLOW = path.join(WORKFLOWS_DIR, 'plan-phase.md');
|
|
|
|
function offerNextBlock(content) {
|
|
// Anchor on the line-start tag: the prose reference `` `<offer_next>` ``
|
|
// ("Route to <offer_next>") earlier in the file would otherwise match a
|
|
// bare indexOf('<offer_next>') first.
|
|
const start = content.indexOf('\n<offer_next>');
|
|
const end = content.indexOf('\n</offer_next>', start);
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(start, -1, 'plan-phase.md must have an <offer_next> block at line start');
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(end, -1, 'plan-phase.md <offer_next> must close at line start');
|
|
return content.slice(start, end);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW, 'utf-8');
|
|
const offerNext = offerNextBlock(content);
|
|
|
|
test('preamble captures --gaps planning mode into a persistent variable', () => {
|
|
// Precondition for any conditional render: the gap mode must survive from
|
|
// argument parsing to the completion screen. The file already captures
|
|
// --reviews / --chunked / --research-phase this way; --gaps must too.
|
|
assert.match(
|
|
content,
|
|
/GAPS_MODE=false[\s\S]*\$ARGUMENTS[\s\S]{0,80}?--gaps[\s\S]{0,40}?GAPS_MODE=true/,
|
|
'plan-phase.md preamble must set GAPS_MODE from $ARGUMENTS --gaps (so the mode reaches <offer_next>)'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('preamble derives the execute-side --gaps-only flag (not the plan-side --gaps)', () => {
|
|
// The handoff must point at execute-phase's scope flag, which is --gaps-only
|
|
// (execute-phase.md:72/339/1426), NOT the plan-side --gaps. Asserting the
|
|
// literal guards against a copy-the-wrong-flag regression.
|
|
assert.match(
|
|
content,
|
|
/GAPS_EXEC_FLAG=""[\s\S]*GAPS_MODE[\s\S]{0,60}?GAPS_EXEC_FLAG="--gaps-only"/,
|
|
'plan-phase.md preamble must derive GAPS_EXEC_FLAG="--gaps-only" from GAPS_MODE'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('the --gaps-only derivation is gated on GAPS_MODE alone (reviews mode unaffected)', () => {
|
|
// Acceptance: a --reviews planning run's Next Up is unchanged. The execute
|
|
// flag must be derived ONLY from --gaps, never from --reviews. Assert the
|
|
// derivation statement references GAPS_MODE and does NOT reference reviews.
|
|
const derivMatch = content.match(/GAPS_EXEC_FLAG=""[\s\S]{0,200}?GAPS_EXEC_FLAG="--gaps-only"/);
|
|
assert.ok(derivMatch, 'expected a GAPS_EXEC_FLAG derivation block');
|
|
const deriv = derivMatch[0];
|
|
assert.match(deriv, /GAPS_MODE/, 'derivation must be gated on GAPS_MODE');
|
|
assert.doesNotMatch(
|
|
deriv,
|
|
/reviews/i,
|
|
'derivation must not reference --reviews — reviews-mode Next Up stays unchanged'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('Next Up execute command substitutes the projected flag (${GAPS_EXEC_FLAG})', () => {
|
|
// The headline fix: the command line carries the flag placeholder so it
|
|
// renders --gaps-only in gap mode and the bare command otherwise.
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/\/gsd:execute-phase\s+\{X\}\s+\$\{GAPS_EXEC_FLAG\}/.test(offerNext),
|
|
'<offer_next> execute-phase command must substitute ${GAPS_EXEC_FLAG} after {X}. Got:\n' +
|
|
offerNext.split('\n').filter((l) => /execute-phase/.test(l)).join('\n')
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('Next Up still renders the bare command for standard runs (plain path unchanged)', () => {
|
|
// Acceptance: a standard (non-gap) run's Next Up is unchanged. The var is
|
|
// empty in the standard path, so the rendered command is byte-identical to
|
|
// today. Asserting the command still begins /gsd:execute-phase {X} (the bare
|
|
// form) and still carries ${GSD_WS} — the standard shape is preserved.
|
|
assert.match(
|
|
offerNext,
|
|
/\/gsd:execute-phase\s+\{X\}\s+\$\{GAPS_EXEC_FLAG\}\s+\$\{GSD_WS\}/,
|
|
'<offer_next> command must keep the bare /gsd:execute-phase {X} form with ${GSD_WS}'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('Next Up block documents the --gaps-only projection (literal reaches the handoff)', () => {
|
|
// The gap-scoped flag literal must appear inside <offer_next> (via the
|
|
// rendering note that explains what ${GAPS_EXEC_FLAG} expands to), so a
|
|
// reader of the handoff sees the intended gap-closure scope.
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
offerNext.includes('--gaps-only'),
|
|
'<offer_next> must reference the --gaps-only execute-phase scope (the literal must reach the handoff)'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|