b848b23861
* feat(#3778): dispatch plan:pre planner contributions in quick.md - Add plan:pre capability gate to quick.md Step 5, mirroring plan-phase.md's existing render + generic contribution dispatch pattern - Inject planner-targeted contribution fragments into the planner prompt, after AGENT_SKILLS_PLANNER, matching D-08 ordering - Add tests/quick-plan-pre-capabilities.test.cjs proving the dispatch is generic (D-01) via real scanWiredKinds/coveredKindsInRegion functions - Record quick.md's byte-growth rationale in this commit trailer for every gsd-core-verbatim runtime Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: quick.md — #3778: Step 5 (Spawn planner, quick mode) gains a `plan:pre` capability gate, mirroring `plan-phase.md:420-424` and `:797`. This is shipped shell and prose read by an agent at runtime, not compiled, so the reasoning has to travel with the feature rather than being deferred to a reference doc: (1) the dispatch paragraph phrases role routing possessively ("the role each entry's `into` names") rather than as an `into ==` equality, because `coveredKindsInRegion` (scripts/gen-loop-host-contract.cjs) voids a segment's `kind == "contribution"` coverage credit when a role or capability equality shares that same segment — an equality phrasing here would silently fail the generic-dispatch proof required by D-01; (2) `activeHooks` is read directly in-context from `PLAN_PRE_HOOKS_JSON`/`HOOKS_JSON` and the unfiltered `rendered` digest is explicitly forbidden from being pasted, because `rendered` carries every kind and role — including non-planner-targeted contributions such as a `into: "checker"` twin — and pasting it would leak checker-scoped guidance into the planner's prompt (T-01-02 in the threat model); (3) the injection block sits inside `<planning_context>` AFTER `${AGENT_SKILLS_PLANNER}` and after the Project skills line, matching plan-phase's `:741` -> `:797` ordering (D-08), so agent-skills content is never shadowed by capability-contributed prose. No prose was moved into an eagerly `@`-imported reference to shrink the measured file — @gsd-core/references/loop-hook-dispatch.md already existed before this change and is deferred to for the generic contract only, exactly as plan-phase.md already does. * test(#3778): expand quick.md plan:pre dispatch coverage to all nine locked conditions Extend tests/quick-plan-pre-capabilities.test.cjs with D-02 (silent omit-when-empty), D-03 (single shared planner spawn), D-06 (array-order dispatch phrasing), D-07 (planner-only into filter), and D-08 (render call < agent-skills placeholder < injection block < spawn ordering) assertions, all extracted via a brace-bounded slice anchored on the literal injection instruction rather than a naive first-brace scan (${AGENT_SKILLS_PLANNER} and the surrounding prompt's ${VALIDATE_MODE ? ...} ternaries also contain brace pairs). Add a capability-registry.test.cjs describe block proving the registry-wide D-07 exclusion is meaningful: at least one plan:pre contribution exists, every plan:pre contribution has a non-empty into/fragment.inline, and the registry as a whole carries at least one non-planner-into contribution. Add a loop-host-contract.test.cjs regression pin for D-09: quick.md stays absent from STEP_WORKFLOWS, parseLoopHostBlock still throws on quick.md's real content, and buildContract() still yields exactly 5 entries. Verified red-without-Task-1 by temporarily reverting quick.md to its pre-f30de9cc content and re-running these three suites (D-08 failed as expected), then restored via git checkout and re-confirmed green. * docs(#3778): note quick planning also renders plan:pre in the tutorial The tutorial's Step 6 named only /gsd-plan-phase as the trigger for the plan:pre hook set. Since quick.md now dispatches the same hook set (f30de9cc), the sentence understated the capability's real reach. * feat(#3778): add changeset fragment * chore(#3778): reference the upstream issue in the changeset fragment The fragment was the only one of 81 in .changeset/ without a trailing (#NNNN) reference or a bold lead-in. serializeChangelog auto-appends only the pr: field, so the rendered CHANGELOG entry carried no link back to issue #3778. * test(#3778): scope the D-07 registry assertion to what it actually proves The registry-wide non-planner check was named "D-07 exclusion is meaningful", which overclaims: it proves only that `into` takes non-planner values somewhere in the registry, not that anything is excluded at plan:pre. Every plan:pre contribution is currently into: "planner", so the filter is a forward-looking safeguard there. Narrowing the assertion to plan:pre (as review suggested) would fail today. Asserting plan:pre is all-planner would be brittle — it would break the day a legitimate non-planner plan:pre contribution lands, which is exactly when the safeguard starts doing work. So the assertion is unchanged and only the name and comment are corrected. * chore(#3778): point the changeset fragment at the upstream PR The fragment carried pr: 3, the fork staging PR. changeset lint derives the real PR number from GITHUB_EVENT_PATH, so on the upstream PR that would read as pr-field drift. Point it at open-gsd/gsd-core#3934. * test(#3778): require contributions in Quick revision prompts * test(loop-host): require Quick auxiliary registration * fix(#3778): preserve contributions in Quick plan revisions * fix(#3778): validate Quick as a planner contribution host * fix(#3778): tighten Quick contribution contract * test(#3778): drop unnecessary source-contract exemption * fix(#3778): require Quick planner target coverage * docs(#3778): describe targeted auxiliary coverage --------- Co-authored-by: davdittrich <davdittrich@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: CI Rebase Check <ci@gsd-redux> Co-authored-by: Tom Boucher <trekkie@nomorestars.com>
Changeset Fragments
This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.
Why
Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.
See #2975 for the full rationale.
Adding a fragment
node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
--type Fixed \
--pr 1234 \
--body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"
This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.
Format
---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.
Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.
Opting out
PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.
At release time
Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:
node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty
This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.
Archived fragments
.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.