Files
msd-core/gsd-core/workflows/do.md
Tom Boucher d29b50d696 fix(#4051): route specific intents first and confirm before dispatch in --do (#4289)
* test(#4051): pin freeform routing specificity contract in do.md

* fix(#4051): order freeform routing specific-first, confirm before dispatch, argument-aware forwarding

* fix(#4051): regenerate FEATURES.md, satisfy docs-guard on new routing test

Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: do.md — deliberate growth: specific-first routing table (code-review, plan review, ui-review, secure-phase, audit, docs-update, phase CRUD rows), a REQ-DO-03 confirm step, and argument-hint-aware dispatch.

* chore(#4051): fold regression into non-bug-prefixed test filename per lint-regression-test-names

* fix(#4051): review fixes — em-dash description style, split audit-fix route

* chore(#4051): sync skill mirrors of execute-phase/phase descriptions

* chore(#4051): add changeset (pr backfill to follow)

* chore(#4051): backfill PR 4289 in changeset

---------

Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
2026-09-04 17:19:16 -04:00

11 KiB

Analyze freeform text from the user and route to the most appropriate GSD command. This is a dispatcher — it never does the work itself. Match user intent to the best command, confirm the routing, and hand off.

<required_reading> Read all files referenced by the invoking prompt's execution_context before starting. </required_reading>

_GSD_SHIM_NAME="gsd-tools.cjs"; _GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT="${RUNTIME_DIR:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)}"; GSD_TOOLS="${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; _gsd_at() { for _p; do if [ -f "$_p" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="$_p"; return 0; fi; done; return 1; }; if _gsd_at "${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" "${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.claude/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" "${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.codex/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; then gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif unset -f gsd_run; _G="$(command -v gsd_run)"; then GSD_TOOLS="$_G"; gsd_run() { "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif _gsd_at "${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.claude}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" "${HERMES_HOME:-$HOME/.hermes}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" "${CURSOR_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.cursor}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" "${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" "${GEMINI_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.gemini}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" "${COPILOT_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.copilot}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" "${WINDSURF_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.codeium/windsurf}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" "${AUGMENT_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.augment}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" "${TRAE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.trae}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" "${QWEN_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.qwen}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" "${CODEBUDDY_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.codebuddy}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" "${CLINE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.cline}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" "${GROK_AGENTS_HOME:-$HOME/.agents}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" "${ANTIGRAVITY_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.gemini/antigravity}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" "${OPENCODE_CONFIG_DIR:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/opencode}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" "${KILO_CONFIG_DIR:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/kilo}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; then gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; else echo "ERROR: gsd-tools.cjs not found at $GSD_TOOLS and gsd_run is not on PATH. Run: npx -y @opengsd/gsd-core@latest --claude --local" >&2; exit 1; fi; GSD_IDENTITY_STATUS=unverified; case "$(gsd_run runtime-identity --raw 2>/dev/null || true)" in '{"packageName":"@opengsd/gsd-core"'*'}') GSD_IDENTITY_STATUS=ok;; esac; export GSD_IDENTITY_STATUS; [ "$GSD_IDENTITY_STATUS" = ok ] || echo "WARNING: \"$GSD_TOOLS\" did not prove it is @opengsd/gsd-core - it is either a different package or an @opengsd/gsd-core older than the runtime-identity verb. See docs/how-to/diagnose-a-foreign-gsd-tools.md" >&2; if [ -n "${CLAUDE_ENV_FILE:-}" ] && [ -n "${GSD_TOOLS:-}" ]; then printf "export PATH='%s':\"\$PATH\"\n" "${GSD_TOOLS%/*}" >> "$CLAUDE_ENV_FILE" 2>/dev/null || true; fi
RESPONSE_LANGUAGE=$(gsd_run query config-get response_language --raw --default "" 2>/dev/null || echo "")

If response_language is set: All user-facing questions, prompts, and explanations in this workflow MUST be presented in {response_language}. Technical terms, code, file paths, and subagent prompts stay in English — only user-facing output is translated.

**Check for input.**

Text mode (workflow.text_mode: true in config or --text flag): Set TEXT_MODE=true if --text is present in $ARGUMENTS OR text_mode from init JSON is true. When TEXT_MODE is active, replace every AskUserQuestion call with a plain-text numbered list and ask the user to type their choice number. This is required for non-Claude runtimes (OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, etc.) where AskUserQuestion is not available. If $ARGUMENTS is empty, ask via AskUserQuestion:

What would you like to do? Describe the task, bug, or idea and I'll route it to the right GSD command.

Wait for response before continuing.

**Check if project exists.**
INIT=$(gsd_run query state.load 2>/dev/null)

Track whether .planning/ exists — some routes require it, others don't.

**Match intent to command.**

Evaluate $ARGUMENTS against these routing rules. Rules are ordered most-specific first: apply the first matching rule, and never let a generic keyword rule ("set up", "spike", "review") preempt a more specific operation that also matches ("set up this existing codebase", "wrap up the spike findings", "review the changed source code").

If the text describes... Route to Why
First-time setup for an existing codebase, brownfield onboarding, "onboard this codebase" /gsd:onboard Safe map → docs ingest → project setup sequence
Starting a new greenfield project, "set up", "initialize" (no existing codebase named) /gsd:new-project Needs full project initialization
Mapping or analyzing an existing codebase map /gsd:map-codebase Codebase discovery or refresh
A bug, error, crash, failure, or something broken /gsd:debug Needs systematic investigation
Wrapping up spikes, "package the spikes", "consolidate spike findings" /gsd:spike --wrap-up Package spike findings into reusable skill
Wrapping up sketches, "package the designs", "consolidate sketch findings" /gsd:sketch --wrap-up Package sketch findings into reusable skill
Spiking, "test if", "will this work", "experiment", "prove this out", validate feasibility /gsd:spike Throwaway experiment to validate feasibility
Sketching, "mockup", "what would this look like", "prototype the UI", "design this", explore visual direction /gsd:sketch Throwaway HTML mockups to explore design
Reviewing changed source code for bugs, security issues, or code quality ("code review the changes") /gsd:code-review Source review of phase-changed files
Requesting peer review of phase plans from another AI CLI ("plan review", "review the plan") /gsd:review Cross-AI plan review
Reviewing or hardening implemented UI ("visual audit", "review the UI") /gsd:ui-review Retroactive 6-pillar visual audit
Verifying security mitigations of a completed phase ("security check", "secure phase N") /gsd:secure-phase Retroactive threat-mitigation verification
Auditing milestone completion against original intent ("audit the milestone") /gsd:audit-milestone Milestone audit against original intent
An autonomous audit-to-fix pass ("audit and fix", "audit the repo and fix what it finds") /gsd:audit-fix Audit-to-fix pipeline
Generating or updating project documentation ("update the docs", "documentation update") /gsd:docs-update Docs verified against the codebase
Exploring, researching, comparing, or "how does X work" /gsd:explore Socratic ideation and idea routing
Discussing vision, "how should X look", brainstorming /gsd:discuss-phase Needs context gathering
Planning a specific phase or "plan phase N" /gsd:plan-phase Direct planning request
Executing a phase or "build phase N", "run phase N" (SDD dependency-aware wave execution) /gsd:execute-phase Direct execution request
Adding, inserting, removing, or editing phases in the roadmap ("multi-phase", roadmap phase management) /gsd:phase Roadmap phase CRUD
A complex task: refactoring, migration, multi-file architecture, system redesign /gsd:plan-phase Needs a full phase with plan/build cycle
Running all remaining phases automatically /gsd:autonomous Full autonomous execution
A review or quality concern about existing work /gsd:verify-work Needs verification
Checking progress, status, "where am I" /gsd:progress Status check
Resuming work, "pick up where I left off" /gsd:resume-work Session restoration
A note, idea, or "remember to..." /gsd:capture Capture for later
Adding tests, "write tests", "test coverage" /gsd:add-tests Test generation
Completing a milestone, shipping, releasing /gsd:complete-milestone Milestone lifecycle
A specific, actionable, small task (add feature, fix typo, update config) /gsd:quick Self-contained, single executor

Requires .planning/ directory: All routes except /gsd:new-project, /gsd:onboard, /gsd:map-codebase, /gsd:spike, /gsd:sketch, and /gsd:help. If the project doesn't exist and the route requires it, suggest /gsd:onboard for existing codebases or /gsd:new-project for greenfield projects.

Ambiguity handling: If the text could reasonably match multiple routes, ask the user via AskUserQuestion with the top 2-3 options. For example:

"Refactor the authentication system" could be:
1. /gsd:plan-phase — Full planning cycle (recommended for multi-file refactors)
2. /gsd:quick — Quick execution (if scope is small and clear)

Which approach fits better?
**Show the routing decision.**
### GSD ► ROUTING

**Input:** {first 80 chars of $ARGUMENTS}
**Routing to:** {chosen command}
**Reason:** {one-line explanation}
**Confirm the route before dispatching (REQ-DO-03).**

Before invoking anything, ask the user to confirm the displayed route via AskUserQuestion:

Route to {chosen command}?
1. Yes — proceed with {chosen command} (recommended)
2. Choose a different command
3. Cancel — do not dispatch
  • Yes / proceed: continue to the dispatch step.
  • Choose a different command: present the 2-3 next-best routes from the routing table as options and loop back through display + confirm with the new selection.
  • Cancel: stop. Do not invoke any command.

TEXT_MODE: present the same choices as a plain-text numbered list and ask the user to type their choice number, exactly like other AskUserQuestion calls in this workflow.

**Invoke the chosen command with only the arguments it accepts.**

Read the chosen command's frontmatter argument-hint (in commands/gsd/<name>.md) and forward only arguments that command accepts. Do NOT pass the full freeform sentence wholesale.

  • If the command expects a phase number or flags only (e.g. /gsd:verify-work [phase number], /gsd:plan-phase, /gsd:execute-phase), extract the phase number / flags from the input; if none was provided, extract it from context or ask via AskUserQuestion. Drop the surrounding prose.
  • If the command explicitly accepts a freeform task description (e.g. /gsd:quick, /gsd:debug, /gsd:spike, /gsd:sketch), forward the relevant portion of $ARGUMENTS as the description.
  • If the command takes no arguments, invoke it without arguments.

After invoking the command, stop. The dispatched command handles everything from here.

<success_criteria>

  • Input validated (not empty)
  • Intent matched to exactly one GSD command
  • Ambiguity resolved via user question (if needed)
  • Project existence checked for routes that require it
  • Routing decision displayed before dispatch
  • Route confirmed by the user before dispatch (REQ-DO-03), with TEXT_MODE equivalent
  • Command invoked with only the arguments it accepts (argument-hint aware; freeform text only where the command takes a freeform description)
  • No work done directly — dispatcher only </success_criteria>