msd-core/get-shit-done/workflows/plan-phase.md

Create executable phase prompts (PLAN.md files) for a roadmap phase with integrated research and verification. Default flow: Research (if needed) -> Plan -> Verify -> Done. Orchestrates gsd-phase-researcher, gsd-planner, and gsd-plan-checker agents with a revision loop (max 3 iterations).

<required_reading> Read all files referenced by the invoking prompt's execution_context before starting.

@/.claude/get-shit-done/references/ui-brand.md @/.claude/get-shit-done/references/revision-loop.md @/.claude/get-shit-done/references/gate-prompts.md @/.claude/get-shit-done/references/agent-contracts.md @~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/gates.md </required_reading>

<available_agent_types> Valid GSD subagent types (use exact names — do not fall back to 'general-purpose'):

• gsd-phase-researcher — Researches technical approaches for a phase
• gsd-pattern-mapper — Analyzes codebase for existing patterns, produces PATTERNS.md
• gsd-planner — Creates detailed plans from phase scope
• gsd-plan-checker — Reviews plan quality before execution </available_agent_types>

1. Initialize

Load all context in one call (paths only to minimize orchestrator context):

INIT=$(gsd-sdk query init.plan-phase "$PHASE")
if [[ "$INIT" == @file:* ]]; then INIT=$(cat "${INIT#@file:}"); fi
AGENT_SKILLS_RESEARCHER=$(gsd-sdk query agent-skills gsd-researcher 2>/dev/null)
AGENT_SKILLS_PLANNER=$(gsd-sdk query agent-skills gsd-planner 2>/dev/null)
AGENT_SKILLS_CHECKER=$(gsd-sdk query agent-skills gsd-checker 2>/dev/null)
CONTEXT_WINDOW=$(gsd-sdk query config-get context_window 2>/dev/null || echo "200000")
TDD_MODE=$(gsd-sdk query config-get workflow.tdd_mode 2>/dev/null || echo "false")

When TDD_MODE is true, the planner agent is instructed to apply type: tdd to eligible tasks using heuristics from references/tdd.md. The planner's <required_reading> is extended to include @~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/tdd.md so gate enforcement rules are available during planning.

When CONTEXT_WINDOW >= 500000, the planner prompt includes the 3 most recent prior phase CONTEXT.md and SUMMARY.md files PLUS any phases explicitly listed in the current phase's Depends on: field in ROADMAP.md. Explicit dependencies always load regardless of recency (e.g., Phase 7 declaring Depends on: Phase 2 always sees Phase 2's context). Bounded recency keeps the planner's context budget focused on recent work.

Parse JSON for: researcher_model, planner_model, checker_model, research_enabled, plan_checker_enabled, nyquist_validation_enabled, commit_docs, text_mode, phase_found, phase_dir, phase_number, phase_name, phase_slug, padded_phase, has_research, has_context, has_reviews, has_plans, plan_count, planning_exists, roadmap_exists, phase_req_ids, response_language.

If response_language is set: Include response_language: {value} in all spawned subagent prompts so any user-facing output stays in the configured language.

File paths (for <files_to_read> blocks): state_path, roadmap_path, requirements_path, context_path, research_path, verification_path, uat_path, reviews_path. These are null if files don't exist.

If planning_exists is false: Error — run /gsd-new-project first.

2. Parse and Normalize Arguments

Extract from $ARGUMENTS: phase number (integer or decimal like 2.1), flags (--research, --skip-research, --gaps, --skip-verify, --skip-ui, --prd <filepath>, --reviews, --text, --bounce, --skip-bounce).

Set TEXT_MODE=true if --text is present in $ARGUMENTS OR text_mode from init JSON is true. When TEXT_MODE is active, replace every AskUserQuestion call with a plain-text numbered list and ask the user to type their choice number. This is required for Claude Code remote sessions (/rc mode) where TUI menus don't work through the Claude App.

Extract --prd <filepath> from $ARGUMENTS. If present, set PRD_FILE to the filepath.

If no phase number: Detect next unplanned phase from roadmap.

If phase_found is false: Validate phase exists in ROADMAP.md. If valid, create the directory using phase_slug and padded_phase from init:

mkdir -p ".planning/phases/${padded_phase}-${phase_slug}"

Existing artifacts from init: has_research, has_plans, plan_count.

2.5. Validate --reviews Prerequisite

Skip if: No --reviews flag.

If --reviews AND --gaps: Error — cannot combine --reviews with --gaps. These are conflicting modes.

If --reviews AND has_reviews is false (no REVIEWS.md in phase dir):

Error:

No REVIEWS.md found for Phase {N}. Run reviews first:

/gsd-review --phase {N}

Then re-run /gsd-plan-phase {N} --reviews

Exit workflow.

3. Validate Phase

PHASE_INFO=$(gsd-sdk query roadmap.get-phase "${PHASE}")

If found is false: Error with available phases. If found is true: Extract phase_number, phase_name, goal from JSON.

3.5. Handle PRD Express Path

Skip if: No --prd flag in arguments.

If --prd <filepath> provided:

1. Read the PRD file:

PRD_CONTENT=$(cat "$PRD_FILE" 2>/dev/null)
if [ -z "$PRD_CONTENT" ]; then
  echo "Error: PRD file not found: $PRD_FILE"
  exit 1
fi

2. Display banner:

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► PRD EXPRESS PATH
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Using PRD: {PRD_FILE}
Generating CONTEXT.md from requirements...

3. Parse the PRD content and generate CONTEXT.md. The orchestrator should:

   • Extract all requirements, user stories, acceptance criteria, and constraints from the PRD
   • Map each to a locked decision (everything in the PRD is treated as a locked decision)
   • Identify any areas the PRD doesn't cover and mark as "Claude's Discretion"
   • Extract canonical refs from ROADMAP.md for this phase, plus any specs/ADRs referenced in the PRD — expand to full file paths (MANDATORY)
   • Create CONTEXT.md in the phase directory

4. Write CONTEXT.md:

# Phase [X]: [Name] - Context

**Gathered:** [date]
**Status:** Ready for planning
**Source:** PRD Express Path ({PRD_FILE})

<domain>
## Phase Boundary

[Extracted from PRD — what this phase delivers]

</domain>

<decisions>
## Implementation Decisions

{For each requirement/story/criterion in the PRD:}
### [Category derived from content]
- [Requirement as locked decision]

### Claude's Discretion
[Areas not covered by PRD — implementation details, technical choices]

</decisions>

<canonical_refs>
## Canonical References

**Downstream agents MUST read these before planning or implementing.**

[MANDATORY. Extract from ROADMAP.md and any docs referenced in the PRD.
Use full relative paths. Group by topic area.]

### [Topic area]
- `path/to/spec-or-adr.md` — [What it decides/defines]

[If no external specs: "No external specs — requirements fully captured in decisions above"]

</canonical_refs>

<specifics>
## Specific Ideas

[Any specific references, examples, or concrete requirements from PRD]

</specifics>

<deferred>
## Deferred Ideas

[Items in PRD explicitly marked as future/v2/out-of-scope]
[If none: "None — PRD covers phase scope"]

</deferred>

---

*Phase: XX-name*
*Context gathered: [date] via PRD Express Path*

5. Commit:

gsd-sdk query commit "docs(${padded_phase}): generate context from PRD" "${phase_dir}/${padded_phase}-CONTEXT.md"

6. Set context_content to the generated CONTEXT.md content and continue to step 5 (Handle Research).

Effect: This completely bypasses step 4 (Load CONTEXT.md) since we just created it. The rest of the workflow (research, planning, verification) proceeds normally with the PRD-derived context.

4. Load CONTEXT.md

Skip if: PRD express path was used (CONTEXT.md already created in step 3.5).

Check context_path from init JSON.

If context_path is not null, display: Using phase context from: ${context_path}

If context_path is null (no CONTEXT.md exists):

Read discuss mode for context gate label:

DISCUSS_MODE=$(gsd-sdk query config-get workflow.discuss_mode 2>/dev/null || echo "discuss")

If TEXT_MODE is true, present as a plain-text numbered list:

No CONTEXT.md found for Phase {X}. Plans will use research and requirements only — your design preferences won't be included.

1. Continue without context — Plan using research + requirements only
[If DISCUSS_MODE is "assumptions":]
2. Gather context (assumptions mode) — Analyze codebase and surface assumptions before planning
[If DISCUSS_MODE is "discuss" or unset:]
2. Run discuss-phase first — Capture design decisions before planning

Enter number:

Otherwise use AskUserQuestion:

• header: "No context"
• question: "No CONTEXT.md found for Phase {X}. Plans will use research and requirements only — your design preferences won't be included. Continue or capture context first?"
• options:
  • "Continue without context" — Plan using research + requirements only If DISCUSS_MODE is "assumptions":
  • "Gather context (assumptions mode)" — Analyze codebase and surface assumptions before planning If DISCUSS_MODE is "discuss" (or unset):
  • "Run discuss-phase first" — Capture design decisions before planning

If "Continue without context": Proceed to step 5. If "Run discuss-phase first": IMPORTANT: Do NOT invoke discuss-phase as a nested Skill/Task call — AskUserQuestion does not work correctly in nested subcontexts (#1009). Instead, display the command and exit so the user runs it as a top-level command:

Run this command first, then re-run /gsd-plan-phase {X} ${GSD_WS}:

/gsd-discuss-phase {X} ${GSD_WS}

Exit the plan-phase workflow. Do not continue.

4.5. Check AI-SPEC

Skip if: ai_integration_phase_enabled from config is false, or --skip-ai-spec flag provided.

AI_SPEC_FILE=$(ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-AI-SPEC.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
AI_PHASE_CFG=$(gsd-sdk query config-get workflow.ai_integration_phase 2>/dev/null || echo "true")

Skip if AI_PHASE_CFG is false.

If AI_SPEC_FILE is empty: Check phase goal for AI keywords:

echo "${phase_goal}" | grep -qi "agent\|llm\|rag\|chatbot\|embedding\|langchain\|llamaindex\|crewai\|langgraph\|openai\|anthropic\|vector\|eval\|ai system"

If AI keywords detected AND no AI-SPEC.md:

◆ Note: This phase appears to involve AI system development.
  Consider running /gsd-ai-integration-phase {N} before planning to:
  - Select the right framework for your use case
  - Research its docs and best practices
  - Design an evaluation strategy

  Continue planning without AI-SPEC? (non-blocking — /gsd-ai-integration-phase can be run after)

Use AskUserQuestion with options:

• "Continue — plan without AI-SPEC"
• "Stop — I'll run /gsd-ai-integration-phase {N} first"

If "Stop": Exit with /gsd-ai-integration-phase {N} reminder. If "Continue": Proceed. (Non-blocking — planner will note AI-SPEC is absent.)

If AI_SPEC_FILE is non-empty: Extract framework for planner context:

FRAMEWORK_LINE=$(grep "Selected Framework:" "${AI_SPEC_FILE}" | head -1)

Pass ai_spec_path and framework_line to planner in step 7 so it can reference the AI design contract.

5. Handle Research

Skip if: --gaps flag or --skip-research flag or --reviews flag.

If has_research is true (from init) AND no --research flag: Use existing, skip to step 6.

If RESEARCH.md missing OR --research flag:

If no explicit flag (--research or --skip-research) and not --auto: Ask the user whether to research, with a contextual recommendation based on the phase:

If TEXT_MODE is true, present as a plain-text numbered list:

Research before planning Phase {X}: {phase_name}?

1. Research first (Recommended) — Investigate domain, patterns, and dependencies before planning. Best for new features, unfamiliar integrations, or architectural changes.
2. Skip research — Plan directly from context and requirements. Best for bug fixes, simple refactors, or well-understood tasks.

Enter number:

Otherwise use AskUserQuestion:

AskUserQuestion([
  {
    question: "Research before planning Phase {X}: {phase_name}?",
    header: "Research",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Research first (Recommended)", description: "Investigate domain, patterns, and dependencies before planning. Best for new features, unfamiliar integrations, or architectural changes." },
      { label: "Skip research", description: "Plan directly from context and requirements. Best for bug fixes, simple refactors, or well-understood tasks." }
    ]
  }
])

If user selects "Skip research": skip to step 6.

If --auto and research_enabled is false: Skip research silently (preserves automated behavior).

Display banner:

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► RESEARCHING PHASE {X}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

◆ Spawning researcher...

Spawn gsd-phase-researcher

PHASE_DESC=$(gsd-sdk query roadmap.get-phase "${PHASE}" --pick section)

Research prompt:

<objective>
Research how to implement Phase {phase_number}: {phase_name}
Answer: "What do I need to know to PLAN this phase well?"
</objective>

<files_to_read>
- {context_path} (USER DECISIONS from /gsd-discuss-phase)
- {requirements_path} (Project requirements)
- {state_path} (Project decisions and history)
</files_to_read>

${AGENT_SKILLS_RESEARCHER}

<additional_context>
**Phase description:** {phase_description}
**Phase requirement IDs (MUST address):** {phase_req_ids}

**Project instructions:** Read ./CLAUDE.md if exists — follow project-specific guidelines
**Project skills:** Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory (if either exists) — read SKILL.md files, research should account for project skill patterns
</additional_context>

<output>
Write to: {phase_dir}/{phase_num}-RESEARCH.md
</output>

Task(
  prompt=research_prompt,
  subagent_type="gsd-phase-researcher",
  model="{researcher_model}",
  description="Research Phase {phase}"
)

Handle Researcher Return

• ## RESEARCH COMPLETE: Display confirmation, continue to step 6
• ## RESEARCH BLOCKED: Display blocker, offer: 1) Provide context, 2) Skip research, 3) Abort

5.5. Create Validation Strategy

Skip if nyquist_validation_enabled is false OR research_enabled is false.

If research_enabled is false and nyquist_validation_enabled is true: warn "Nyquist validation enabled but research disabled — VALIDATION.md cannot be created without RESEARCH.md. Plans will lack validation requirements (Dimension 8)." Continue to step 6.

But Nyquist is not applicable for this run when all of the following are true:

• research_enabled is false
• has_research is false
• no --research flag was provided

In that case: skip validation-strategy creation entirely. Do not expect RESEARCH.md or VALIDATION.md for this run, and continue to Step 6.

grep -l "## Validation Architecture" "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-RESEARCH.md 2>/dev/null || true

If found:

1. Read template: ~/.claude/get-shit-done/templates/VALIDATION.md
2. Write to ${PHASE_DIR}/${PADDED_PHASE}-VALIDATION.md (use Write tool)
3. Fill frontmatter: {N} → phase number, {phase-slug} → slug, {date} → current date
4. Verify:

test -f "${PHASE_DIR}/${PADDED_PHASE}-VALIDATION.md" && echo "VALIDATION_CREATED=true" || echo "VALIDATION_CREATED=false"

5. If VALIDATION_CREATED=false: STOP — do not proceed to Step 6
6. If commit_docs: commit "docs(phase-${PHASE}): add validation strategy"

If not found: Warn and continue — plans may fail Dimension 8.

5.55. Security Threat Model Gate

Skip if workflow.security_enforcement is explicitly false. Absent = enabled.

SECURITY_CFG=$(gsd-sdk query config-get workflow.security_enforcement --raw 2>/dev/null || echo "true")
SECURITY_ASVS=$(gsd-sdk query config-get workflow.security_asvs_level --raw 2>/dev/null || echo "1")
SECURITY_BLOCK=$(gsd-sdk query config-get workflow.security_block_on --raw 2>/dev/null || echo "high")

If SECURITY_CFG is false: Skip to step 5.6.

If SECURITY_CFG is true: Display banner:

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► SECURITY THREAT MODEL REQUIRED (ASVS L{SECURITY_ASVS})
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Each PLAN.md must include a <threat_model> block.
Block on: {SECURITY_BLOCK} severity threats.
Opt out: set security_enforcement: false in .planning/config.json

Continue to step 5.6. Security config is passed to the planner in step 8.

5.6. UI Design Contract Gate

Skip if workflow.ui_phase is explicitly false AND workflow.ui_safety_gate is explicitly false in .planning/config.json. If keys are absent, treat as enabled.

UI_PHASE_CFG=$(gsd-sdk query config-get workflow.ui_phase 2>/dev/null || echo "true")
UI_GATE_CFG=$(gsd-sdk query config-get workflow.ui_safety_gate 2>/dev/null || echo "true")

If both are false: Skip to step 6.

Check if phase has frontend indicators:

PHASE_SECTION=$(gsd-sdk query roadmap.get-phase "${PHASE}" 2>/dev/null)
echo "$PHASE_SECTION" | grep -iE "UI|interface|frontend|component|layout|page|screen|view|form|dashboard|widget" > /dev/null 2>&1
HAS_UI=$?

If HAS_UI is 0 (frontend indicators found):

Check for existing UI-SPEC:

UI_SPEC_FILE=$(ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-UI-SPEC.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)

If UI-SPEC.md found: Set UI_SPEC_PATH=$UI_SPEC_FILE. Display: Using UI design contract: ${UI_SPEC_PATH}

If UI-SPEC.md missing AND --skip-ui flag is present in $ARGUMENTS: Skip silently to step 6.

If UI-SPEC.md missing AND UI_GATE_CFG is true:

Read auto-chain state:

AUTO_CHAIN=$(gsd-sdk query config-get workflow._auto_chain_active 2>/dev/null || echo "false")

If AUTO_CHAIN is true (running inside a --chain or --auto pipeline):

Auto-generate UI-SPEC without prompting:

Skill(skill="gsd-ui-phase", args="${PHASE} --auto ${GSD_WS}")

After gsd-ui-phase returns, re-read:

UI_SPEC_FILE=$(ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-UI-SPEC.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
UI_SPEC_PATH="${UI_SPEC_FILE}"

Continue to step 6.

If AUTO_CHAIN is false (manual invocation):

Output this markdown directly (not as a code block):

## ⚠ UI-SPEC.md missing for Phase {N}
▶ Recommended next step:
`/gsd-ui-phase {N} ${GSD_WS}` — generate UI design contract before planning
───────────────────────────────────────────────
Also available:
- `/gsd-plan-phase {N} --skip-ui ${GSD_WS}` — plan without UI-SPEC (not recommended for frontend phases)

Exit the plan-phase workflow. Do not continue.

If HAS_UI is 1 (no frontend indicators): Skip silently to step 5.7.

5.7. Schema Push Detection Gate

Detects schema-relevant files in the phase scope and injects a mandatory [BLOCKING] schema push task into the plan. Prevents false-positive verification where build/types pass because TypeScript types come from config, not the live database.

Check if any files in the phase scope match schema patterns:

PHASE_SECTION=$(gsd-sdk query roadmap.get-phase "${PHASE}" --pick section 2>/dev/null)

Scan PHASE_SECTION, CONTEXT.md (if loaded), and RESEARCH.md (if exists) for file paths matching these ORM patterns:

ORM	File Patterns
Payload CMS	src/collections/**/*.ts, src/globals/**/*.ts
Prisma	prisma/schema.prisma, prisma/schema/*.prisma
Drizzle	drizzle/schema.ts, src/db/schema.ts, drizzle/*.ts
Supabase	supabase/migrations/*.sql
TypeORM	src/entities/**/*.ts, src/migrations/**/*.ts

Also check if any existing PLAN.md files for this phase already reference these file patterns in files_modified.

If schema-relevant files detected:

Set SCHEMA_PUSH_REQUIRED=true and SCHEMA_ORM={detected_orm}.

Determine the push command for the detected ORM:

ORM	Push Command	Non-TTY Workaround
Payload CMS	npx payload migrate	CI=true PAYLOAD_MIGRATING=true npx payload migrate
Prisma	npx prisma db push	npx prisma db push --accept-data-loss (if destructive)
Drizzle	npx drizzle-kit push	npx drizzle-kit push
Supabase	supabase db push	Set SUPABASE_ACCESS_TOKEN env var
TypeORM	npx typeorm migration:run	npx typeorm migration:run -d src/data-source.ts

Inject the following into the planner prompt (step 8) as an additional constraint:

<schema_push_requirement>
**[BLOCKING] Schema Push Required**

This phase modifies schema-relevant files ({detected_files}). The planner MUST include
a `[BLOCKING]` task that runs the database schema push command AFTER all schema file
modifications are complete but BEFORE verification.

- ORM detected: {SCHEMA_ORM}
- Push command: {push_command}
- Non-TTY workaround: {env_hint}
- If push requires interactive prompts that cannot be suppressed, flag the task for
  manual intervention with `autonomous: false`

This task is mandatory — the phase CANNOT pass verification without it. Build and
type checks will pass without the push (types come from config, not the live database),
creating a false-positive verification state.
</schema_push_requirement>

Display: Schema files detected ({SCHEMA_ORM}) — [BLOCKING] push task will be injected into plans

If no schema-relevant files detected: Skip silently to step 6.

6. Check Existing Plans

ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-PLAN.md 2>/dev/null || true

If exists AND --reviews flag: Skip prompt — go straight to replanning (the purpose of --reviews is to replan with review feedback).

If exists AND no --reviews flag: Offer: 1) Add more plans, 2) View existing, 3) Replan from scratch.

7. Use Context Paths from INIT

Extract from INIT JSON:

_gsd_field() { node -e "const o=JSON.parse(process.argv[1]); const v=o[process.argv[2]]; process.stdout.write(v==null?'':String(v))" "$1" "$2"; }
STATE_PATH=$(_gsd_field "$INIT" state_path)
ROADMAP_PATH=$(_gsd_field "$INIT" roadmap_path)
REQUIREMENTS_PATH=$(_gsd_field "$INIT" requirements_path)
RESEARCH_PATH=$(_gsd_field "$INIT" research_path)
VERIFICATION_PATH=$(_gsd_field "$INIT" verification_path)
UAT_PATH=$(_gsd_field "$INIT" uat_path)
CONTEXT_PATH=$(_gsd_field "$INIT" context_path)
REVIEWS_PATH=$(_gsd_field "$INIT" reviews_path)
PATTERNS_PATH=$(_gsd_field "$INIT" patterns_path)

7.5. Verify Nyquist Artifacts

Skip if nyquist_validation_enabled is false OR research_enabled is false.

Also skip if all of the following are true:

• research_enabled is false
• has_research is false
• no --research flag was provided

In that no-research path, Nyquist artifacts are not required for this run.

VALIDATION_EXISTS=$(ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-VALIDATION.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)

If missing and Nyquist is still enabled/applicable — ask user:

1. Re-run: /gsd-plan-phase {PHASE} --research ${GSD_WS}
2. Disable Nyquist with the exact command: gsd-sdk query config-set workflow.nyquist_validation false
3. Continue anyway (plans fail Dimension 8)

Proceed to Step 7.8 (or Step 8 if pattern mapper is disabled) only if user selects 2 or 3.

7.8. Spawn gsd-pattern-mapper Agent (Optional)

Skip if workflow.pattern_mapper is explicitly set to false in config.json (absent key = enabled). Also skip if no CONTEXT.md and no RESEARCH.md exist for this phase (nothing to extract file lists from).

Check config:

PATTERN_MAPPER_CFG=$(gsd-sdk query config-get workflow.pattern_mapper 2>/dev/null || echo "true")

If PATTERN_MAPPER_CFG is false: Skip to step 8.

If PATTERNS.md already exists (PATTERNS_PATH is non-empty from step 7): Skip to step 8 (use existing).

Display banner:

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► PATTERN MAPPING PHASE {X}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

◆ Spawning pattern mapper...

Pattern mapper prompt:

<pattern_mapping_context>
**Phase:** {phase_number} - {phase_name}
**Phase directory:** {phase_dir}
**Padded phase:** {padded_phase}

<files_to_read>
- {context_path} (USER DECISIONS from /gsd-discuss-phase)
- {research_path} (Technical Research)
</files_to_read>

**Output file:** {phase_dir}/{padded_phase}-PATTERNS.md

Extract the list of files to be created/modified from CONTEXT.md and RESEARCH.md. For each file, classify by role and data flow, find the closest existing analog in the codebase, extract concrete code excerpts, and produce PATTERNS.md.
</pattern_mapping_context>

Spawn with:

Task(
  prompt="{above}",
  subagent_type="gsd-pattern-mapper",
  model="{researcher_model}",
)

Handle return:

• ## PATTERN MAPPING COMPLETE: Update PATTERNS_PATH to the created file path, continue to step 8.
• Any error or empty return: Log warning, continue to step 8 without patterns (non-blocking).

After pattern mapper completes, update the path variable:

PATTERNS_PATH="${PHASE_DIR}/${PADDED_PHASE}-PATTERNS.md"

8. Spawn gsd-planner Agent

Display banner:

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► PLANNING PHASE {X}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

◆ Spawning planner...

Planner prompt:

<planning_context>
**Phase:** {phase_number}
**Mode:** {standard | gap_closure | reviews}

<files_to_read>
- {state_path} (Project State)
- {roadmap_path} (Roadmap)
- {requirements_path} (Requirements)
- {context_path} (USER DECISIONS from /gsd-discuss-phase)
- {research_path} (Technical Research)
- {PATTERNS_PATH} (Pattern Map — analog files and code excerpts, if exists)
- {verification_path} (Verification Gaps - if --gaps)
- {uat_path} (UAT Gaps - if --gaps)
- {reviews_path} (Cross-AI Review Feedback - if --reviews)
- {UI_SPEC_PATH} (UI Design Contract — visual/interaction specs, if exists)
${CONTEXT_WINDOW >= 500000 ? `
**Cross-phase context (1M model enrichment):**
- CONTEXT.md files from the 3 most recent completed phases (locked decisions — maintain consistency)
- SUMMARY.md files from the 3 most recent completed phases (what was built — reuse patterns, avoid duplication)
- CONTEXT.md and SUMMARY.md from any phases listed in the current phase's "Depends on:" field in ROADMAP.md (regardless of recency — explicit dependencies always load, deduplicated against the 3 most recent)
- Skip all other prior phases to stay within context budget
` : ''}
</files_to_read>

${AGENT_SKILLS_PLANNER}

**Phase requirement IDs (every ID MUST appear in a plan's `requirements` field):** {phase_req_ids}

**Project instructions:** Read ./CLAUDE.md if exists — follow project-specific guidelines
**Project skills:** Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory (if either exists) — read SKILL.md files, plans should account for project skill rules

${TDD_MODE === 'true' ? `
<tdd_mode_active>
**TDD Mode is ENABLED.** Apply TDD heuristics from @~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/tdd.md to all eligible tasks:
- Business logic with defined I/O → type: tdd
- API endpoints with request/response contracts → type: tdd
- Data transformations, validation, algorithms → type: tdd
- UI, config, glue code, CRUD → standard plan (type: execute)
Each TDD plan gets one feature with RED/GREEN/REFACTOR gate sequence.
</tdd_mode_active>
` : ''}
</planning_context>

<downstream_consumer>
Output consumed by /gsd-execute-phase. Plans need:
- Frontmatter (wave, depends_on, files_modified, autonomous)
- Tasks in XML format with read_first and acceptance_criteria fields (MANDATORY on every task)
- Verification criteria
- must_haves for goal-backward verification
</downstream_consumer>

<deep_work_rules>
## Anti-Shallow Execution Rules (MANDATORY)

Every task MUST include these fields — they are NOT optional:

1. **`<read_first>`** — Files the executor MUST read before touching anything. Always include:
   - The file being modified (so executor sees current state, not assumptions)
   - Any "source of truth" file referenced in CONTEXT.md (reference implementations, existing patterns, config files, schemas)
   - Any file whose patterns, signatures, types, or conventions must be replicated or respected

2. **`<acceptance_criteria>`** — Verifiable conditions that prove the task was done correctly. Rules:
   - Every criterion must be checkable with grep, file read, test command, or CLI output
   - NEVER use subjective language ("looks correct", "properly configured", "consistent with")
   - ALWAYS include exact strings, patterns, values, or command outputs that must be present
   - Examples:
     - Code: `auth.py contains def verify_token(` / `test_auth.py exits 0`
     - Config: `.env.example contains DATABASE_URL=` / `Dockerfile contains HEALTHCHECK`
     - Docs: `README.md contains '## Installation'` / `API.md lists all endpoints`
     - Infra: `deploy.yml has rollback step` / `docker-compose.yml has healthcheck for db`

3. **`<action>`** — Must include CONCRETE values, not references. Rules:
   - NEVER say "align X with Y", "match X to Y", "update to be consistent" without specifying the exact target state
   - ALWAYS include the actual values: config keys, function signatures, SQL statements, class names, import paths, env vars, etc.
   - If CONTEXT.md has a comparison table or expected values, copy them into the action verbatim
   - The executor should be able to complete the task from the action text alone, without needing to read CONTEXT.md or reference files (read_first is for verification, not discovery)

**Why this matters:** Executor agents work from the plan text. Vague instructions like "update the config to match production" produce shallow one-line changes. Concrete instructions like "add DATABASE_URL=postgresql://... , set POOL_SIZE=20, add REDIS_URL=redis://..." produce complete work. The cost of verbose plans is far less than the cost of re-doing shallow execution.
</deep_work_rules>

<quality_gate>
- [ ] PLAN.md files created in phase directory
- [ ] Each plan has valid frontmatter
- [ ] Tasks are specific and actionable
- [ ] Every task has `<read_first>` with at least the file being modified
- [ ] Every task has `<acceptance_criteria>` with grep-verifiable conditions
- [ ] Every `<action>` contains concrete values (no "align X with Y" without specifying what)
- [ ] Dependencies correctly identified
- [ ] Waves assigned for parallel execution
- [ ] must_haves derived from phase goal
</quality_gate>

Task(
  prompt=filled_prompt,
  subagent_type="gsd-planner",
  model="{planner_model}",
  description="Plan Phase {phase}"
)

9. Handle Planner Return

• ## PLANNING COMPLETE: Display plan count. If --skip-verify or plan_checker_enabled is false (from init): skip to step 13. Otherwise: step 10.
• ## PHASE SPLIT RECOMMENDED: The planner determined the phase exceeds the context budget for full-fidelity implementation of all source items. Handle in step 9b.
• ## ⚠ Source Audit: Unplanned Items Found: The planner's multi-source coverage audit found items from REQUIREMENTS.md, RESEARCH.md, ROADMAP goal, or CONTEXT.md decisions that are not covered by any plan. Handle in step 9c.
• ## CHECKPOINT REACHED: Present to user, get response, spawn continuation (step 12)
• ## PLANNING INCONCLUSIVE: Show attempts, offer: Add context / Retry / Manual

9b. Handle Phase Split Recommendation

When the planner returns ## PHASE SPLIT RECOMMENDED, it means the phase's source items exceed the context budget for full-fidelity implementation. The planner proposes groupings.

Extract from planner return:

• Proposed sub-phases (e.g., "17a: processing core (D-01 to D-19)", "17b: billing + config UX (D-20 to D-27)")
• Which source items (REQ-IDs, D-XX decisions, RESEARCH items) go in each sub-phase
• Why the split is necessary (context cost estimate, file count)

Present to user:

## Phase {X} exceeds context budget for full-fidelity implementation

The planner found {N} source items that exceed the context budget when
planned at full fidelity. Instead of reducing scope, we recommend splitting:

**Option 1: Split into sub-phases**
- Phase {X}a: {name} — {items} ({N} source items, ~{P}% context)
- Phase {X}b: {name} — {items} ({M} source items, ~{Q}% context)

**Option 2: Proceed anyway** (planner will attempt all, quality may degrade past 50% context)

**Option 3: Prioritize** — you choose which items to implement now,
rest become a follow-up phase

Use AskUserQuestion with these 3 options.

If "Split": Use /gsd-insert-phase to create the sub-phases, then replan each. If "Proceed": Return to planner with instruction to attempt all items at full fidelity, accepting more plans/tasks. If "Prioritize": Use AskUserQuestion (multiSelect) to let user pick which items are "now" vs "later". Create CONTEXT.md for each sub-phase with the selected items.

9c. Handle Source Audit Gaps

When the planner returns ## ⚠ Source Audit: Unplanned Items Found, it means items from REQUIREMENTS.md, RESEARCH.md, ROADMAP goal, or CONTEXT.md decisions have no corresponding plan.

Extract from planner return:

• Each unplanned item with its source artifact and section
• The planner's suggested options (A: add plan, B: split phase, C: defer with confirmation)

Present each gap to user. For each unplanned item:

## ⚠ Unplanned: {item description}

Source: {RESEARCH.md / REQUIREMENTS.md / ROADMAP goal / CONTEXT.md}
Details: {why the planner flagged this}

Options:
1. Add a plan to cover this item (recommended)
2. Split phase — move to a sub-phase with related items
3. Defer — add to backlog (developer confirms this is intentional)

Use AskUserQuestion for each gap (or batch if multiple gaps).

If "Add plan": Return to planner (step 8) with instruction to add plans covering the missing items, preserving existing plans. If "Split": Use /gsd-insert-phase for overflow items, then replan. If "Defer": Record in CONTEXT.md ## Deferred Ideas with developer's confirmation. Proceed to step 10.

10. Spawn gsd-plan-checker Agent

Display banner:

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► VERIFYING PLANS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

◆ Spawning plan checker...

Checker prompt:

<verification_context>
**Phase:** {phase_number}
**Phase Goal:** {goal from ROADMAP}

<files_to_read>
- {PHASE_DIR}/*-PLAN.md (Plans to verify)
- {roadmap_path} (Roadmap)
- {requirements_path} (Requirements)
- {context_path} (USER DECISIONS from /gsd-discuss-phase)
- {research_path} (Technical Research — includes Validation Architecture)
</files_to_read>

${AGENT_SKILLS_CHECKER}

**Phase requirement IDs (MUST ALL be covered):** {phase_req_ids}

**Project instructions:** Read ./CLAUDE.md if exists — verify plans honor project guidelines
**Project skills:** Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory (if either exists) — verify plans account for project skill rules
</verification_context>

<expected_output>
- ## VERIFICATION PASSED — all checks pass
- ## ISSUES FOUND — structured issue list
</expected_output>

Task(
  prompt=checker_prompt,
  subagent_type="gsd-plan-checker",
  model="{checker_model}",
  description="Verify Phase {phase} plans"
)

11. Handle Checker Return

• ## VERIFICATION PASSED: Display confirmation, proceed to step 13.
• ## ISSUES FOUND: Display issues, check iteration count, proceed to step 12.

Thinking partner for architectural tradeoffs (conditional): If features.thinking_partner is enabled, scan the checker's issues for architectural tradeoff keywords ("architecture", "approach", "strategy", "pattern", "vs", "alternative"). If found:

The plan-checker flagged an architectural decision point:
{issue description}

Brief analysis:
- Option A: {approach_from_plan} — {pros/cons}
- Option B: {alternative_approach} — {pros/cons}
- Recommendation: {choice} aligned with {phase_goal}

Apply this to the revision? [Yes] / [No, I'll decide]

If yes: include the recommendation in the revision prompt. If no: proceed to revision loop as normal. If thinking_partner disabled: skip this block entirely.

12. Revision Loop (Max 3 Iterations)

Track iteration_count (starts at 1 after initial plan + check). Track prev_issue_count (initialized to Infinity before the loop begins). Track stall_reentry_count (starts at 0; incremented each time "Adjust approach" re-enters step 8).

If iteration_count < 3:

Parse issue count from checker return: count BLOCKER + WARNING entries in the YAML issues block (structured output from gsd-plan-checker). If the checker's return contains no YAML issues block (i.e., the plan was approved with no issues), treat issue_count as 0 and skip the stall check — the plan passed. Proceed to step 13.

Display: Revision iteration {N}/3 -- {blocker_count} blockers, {warning_count} warnings

Stall detection: If issue_count >= prev_issue_count: Display: Revision loop stalled — issue count not decreasing ({issue_count} issues remain after {N} iterations)

If stall_reentry_count < 2: Ask user: Question: "Issues remain after {N} revision attempts with no progress. Proceed with current output?" Options: "Proceed anyway" | "Adjust approach" If "Proceed anyway": accept current plans and continue to step 13. If "Adjust approach": increment stall_reentry_count, open freeform discussion, then re-enter step 8 (full replanning). Note: re-entry resets iteration_count and prev_issue_count but stall_reentry_count persists across re-entries and is capped at 2.

If stall_reentry_count >= 2: Display: Stall persists after 2 re-planning attempts. The following issues could not be resolved automatically: List the remaining issues from the checker. Suggest: "Consider resolving these issues manually or running /gsd-debug to investigate root causes." Options: "Proceed anyway" | "Abandon" If "Proceed anyway": accept current plans and continue to step 13. If "Abandon": stop workflow.

Set prev_issue_count = issue_count.

Revision prompt:

<revision_context>
**Phase:** {phase_number}
**Mode:** revision

<files_to_read>
- {PHASE_DIR}/*-PLAN.md (Existing plans)
- {context_path} (USER DECISIONS from /gsd-discuss-phase)
</files_to_read>

${AGENT_SKILLS_PLANNER}

**Checker issues:** {structured_issues_from_checker}
</revision_context>

<instructions>
Make targeted updates to address checker issues.
Do NOT replan from scratch unless issues are fundamental.
Return what changed.
</instructions>

Task(
  prompt=revision_prompt,
  subagent_type="gsd-planner",
  model="{planner_model}",
  description="Revise Phase {phase} plans"
)

After planner returns -> spawn checker again (step 10), increment iteration_count.

If iteration_count >= 3:

Display: Max iterations reached. {N} issues remain: + issue list

Offer: 1) Force proceed, 2) Provide guidance and retry, 3) Abandon

12.5. Plan Bounce (Optional External Refinement)

Skip if: --skip-bounce flag, --gaps flag, or bounce is not activated.

Activation: Bounce runs when --bounce flag is present OR workflow.plan_bounce config is true. The --skip-bounce flag always wins (disables bounce even if config enables it). The --gaps flag also disables bounce (gap-closure mode should not modify plans externally).

Prerequisites: workflow.plan_bounce_script must be set to a valid script path. If bounce is activated but no script is configured, display warning and skip:

⚠ Plan bounce activated but no script configured.
Set workflow.plan_bounce_script to the path of your refinement script.
Skipping bounce step.

Read pass count:

BOUNCE_PASSES=$(gsd-sdk query config-get workflow.plan_bounce_passes 2>/dev/null || echo "2")
BOUNCE_SCRIPT=$(gsd-sdk query config-get workflow.plan_bounce_script 2>/dev/null | jq -r '.' 2>/dev/null || true)

Display banner:

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► BOUNCING PLANS (External Refinement)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Script: ${BOUNCE_SCRIPT}
Max passes: ${BOUNCE_PASSES}

For each PLAN.md file in the phase directory:

1. Backup: Copy *-PLAN.md to *-PLAN.pre-bounce.md

cp "${PLAN_FILE}" "${PLAN_FILE%.md}.pre-bounce.md"

2. Invoke bounce script:

"${BOUNCE_SCRIPT}" "${PLAN_FILE}" "${BOUNCE_PASSES}"

3. Validate bounced plan — YAML frontmatter integrity: After the script returns, check that the bounced file still has valid YAML frontmatter (opening and closing --- delimiters with parseable content between them). If the bounced plan breaks YAML frontmatter validation, restore the original from the pre-bounce.md backup and continue to the next plan:

⚠ Bounced plan ${PLAN_FILE} has broken YAML frontmatter — restoring original from pre-bounce backup.

4. Handle script failure: If the bounce script exits non-zero, restore the original plan from the pre-bounce.md backup and continue to the next plan:

⚠ Bounce script failed for ${PLAN_FILE} (exit code ${EXIT_CODE}) — restoring original from pre-bounce backup.

After all plans are bounced:

5. Re-run plan checker on bounced plans: Spawn gsd-plan-checker (same as step 10) on all modified plans. If a bounced plan fails the checker, restore original from its pre-bounce.md backup:

⚠ Bounced plan ${PLAN_FILE} failed checker validation — restoring original from pre-bounce backup.

6. Commit surviving bounced plans: If at least one plan survived both the frontmatter validation and the checker re-run, commit the changes:

gsd-sdk query commit "refactor(${padded_phase}): bounce plans through external refinement" "${PHASE_DIR}/*-PLAN.md"

Display summary:

Plan bounce complete: {survived}/{total} plans refined

Clean up: Remove all *-PLAN.pre-bounce.md backup files after the bounce step completes (whether plans survived or were restored).

13. Requirements Coverage Gate

After plans pass the checker (or checker is skipped), verify that all phase requirements are covered by at least one plan.

Skip if: phase_req_ids is null or TBD (no requirements mapped to this phase).

Step 1: Extract requirement IDs claimed by plans

# Collect all requirement IDs from plan frontmatter
PLAN_REQS=$(grep -h "requirements_addressed\|requirements:" ${PHASE_DIR}/*-PLAN.md 2>/dev/null | tr -d '[]' | tr ',' '\n' | sed 's/^[[:space:]]*//' | sort -u)

Step 2: Compare against phase requirements from ROADMAP

For each REQ-ID in phase_req_ids:

• If REQ-ID appears in PLAN_REQS → covered ✓
• If REQ-ID does NOT appear in any plan → uncovered ✗

Step 3: Check CONTEXT.md features against plan objectives

Read CONTEXT.md <decisions> section. Extract feature/capability names. Check each against plan <objective> blocks. Features not mentioned in any plan objective → potentially dropped.

Step 4: Report

If all requirements covered and no dropped features:

✓ Requirements coverage: {N}/{N} REQ-IDs covered by plans

→ Proceed to step 14.

If gaps found:

## ⚠ Requirements Coverage Gap

{M} of {N} phase requirements are not assigned to any plan:

| REQ-ID | Description | Plans |
|--------|-------------|-------|
| {id} | {from REQUIREMENTS.md} | None |

{K} CONTEXT.md features not found in plan objectives:
- {feature_name} — described in CONTEXT.md but no plan covers it

Options:
1. Re-plan to include missing requirements (recommended)
2. Move uncovered requirements to next phase
3. Proceed anyway — accept coverage gaps

If TEXT_MODE is true, present as a plain-text numbered list (options already shown in the block above). Otherwise use AskUserQuestion to present the options.

13b. Record Planning Completion in STATE.md

After plans pass all gates, record that planning is complete so STATE.md reflects the new phase status:

gsd-sdk query state.planned-phase --phase "${PHASE_NUMBER}" --name "${PHASE_NAME}" --plans "${PLAN_COUNT}"

This updates STATUS to "Ready to execute", sets the correct plan count, and timestamps Last Activity.

14. Present Final Status

Route to <offer_next> OR auto_advance depending on flags/config.

15. Auto-Advance Check

Check for auto-advance trigger using values already loaded in step 1:

1. Parse --auto and --chain flags from $ARGUMENTS
2. Use auto_chain_active and auto_advance from the INIT JSON parsed in step 1 — do not issue additional config-get calls for these values (they are already present in the init output). Issuing redundant config-get calls for values already in INIT can cause infinite read loops on some runtimes.
3. Sync chain flag with intent — if user invoked manually (no --auto and no --chain), clear the ephemeral chain flag from any previous interrupted --auto chain. This does NOT touch workflow.auto_advance (the user's persistent settings preference):

   if [[ ! "$ARGUMENTS" =~ --auto ]] && [[ ! "$ARGUMENTS" =~ --chain ]]; then
     gsd-sdk query config-set workflow._auto_chain_active false 2>/dev/null
   fi
   

Set local variables from INIT (parsed once in step 1):

• AUTO_CHAIN = auto_chain_active from INIT JSON (boolean, default false)
• AUTO_CFG = auto_advance from INIT JSON (boolean, default false)

If --auto or --chain flag present AND AUTO_CHAIN is not true: Persist chain flag to config (handles direct invocation without prior discuss-phase):

if ([[ "$ARGUMENTS" =~ --auto ]] || [[ "$ARGUMENTS" =~ --chain ]]) && [[ "$AUTO_CHAIN" != "true" ]]; then
  gsd-sdk query config-set workflow._auto_chain_active true
fi

If --auto or --chain flag present OR AUTO_CHAIN is true OR AUTO_CFG is true:

Display banner:

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► AUTO-ADVANCING TO EXECUTE
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Plans ready. Launching execute-phase...

Launch execute-phase using the Skill tool to avoid nested Task sessions (which cause runtime freezes due to deep agent nesting):

Skill(skill="gsd-execute-phase", args="${PHASE} --auto --no-transition ${GSD_WS}")

The --no-transition flag tells execute-phase to return status after verification instead of chaining further. This keeps the auto-advance chain flat — each phase runs at the same nesting level rather than spawning deeper Task agents.

Handle execute-phase return:

• PHASE COMPLETE → Display final summary:

  ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
   GSD ► PHASE ${PHASE} COMPLETE ✓
  ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
  
  Auto-advance pipeline finished.
  
  Next: /gsd-discuss-phase ${NEXT_PHASE} --auto ${GSD_WS}
  

• GAPS FOUND / VERIFICATION FAILED → Display result, stop chain:

  Auto-advance stopped: Execution needs review.
  
  Review the output above and continue manually:
  /gsd-execute-phase ${PHASE} ${GSD_WS}
  

If neither --auto nor config enabled: Route to <offer_next> (existing behavior).

<offer_next> Output this markdown directly (not as a code block):

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ GSD ► PHASE {X} PLANNED ✓ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Phase {X}: {Name} — {N} plan(s) in {M} wave(s)

Wave	Plans	What it builds
1	01, 02	[objectives]
2	03	[objective]

Research: {Completed | Used existing | Skipped} Verification: {Passed | Passed with override | Skipped}

───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}

Execute Phase {X} — run all {N} plans

/clear then:

/gsd-execute-phase {X} ${GSD_WS}

───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Also available:

• cat .planning/phases/{phase-dir}/*-PLAN.md — review plans
• /gsd-plan-phase {X} --research — re-research first
• /gsd-review --phase {X} --all — peer review plans with external AIs
• /gsd-plan-phase {X} --reviews — replan incorporating review feedback

─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── </offer_next>

<windows_troubleshooting> Windows users: If plan-phase freezes during agent spawning (common on Windows due to stdio deadlocks with MCP servers — see Claude Code issue anthropics/claude-code#28126):

1. Force-kill: Close the terminal (Ctrl+C may not work)
2. Clean up orphaned processes:

   # Kill orphaned node processes from stale MCP servers
   Get-Process node -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | Where-Object {$_.StartTime -lt (Get-Date).AddHours(-1)} | Stop-Process -Force
   

3. Clean up stale task directories:

   # Remove stale subagent task dirs (Claude Code never cleans these on crash)
   Remove-Item -Recurse -Force "$env:USERPROFILE\.claude\tasks\*" -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
   

4. Reduce MCP server count: Temporarily disable non-essential MCP servers in settings.json
5. Retry: Restart Claude Code and run /gsd-plan-phase again

If freezes persist, try --skip-research to reduce the agent chain from 3 to 2 agents:

/gsd-plan-phase N --skip-research

</windows_troubleshooting>

<success_criteria>

• .planning/ directory validated
• Phase validated against roadmap
• Phase directory created if needed
• CONTEXT.md loaded early (step 4) and passed to ALL agents
• Research completed (unless --skip-research or --gaps or exists)
• gsd-phase-researcher spawned with CONTEXT.md
• Existing plans checked
• gsd-planner spawned with CONTEXT.md + RESEARCH.md
• Plans created (PLANNING COMPLETE or CHECKPOINT handled)
• gsd-plan-checker spawned with CONTEXT.md
• Verification passed OR user override OR max iterations with user decision
• User sees status between agent spawns
• User knows next steps </success_criteria>