Files
msd-core/get-shit-done/references/model-profiles.md
Tom Boucher d812c66020 feat(#3023): per-phase-type model map in .planning/config.json (#3030)
* feat(#3023): per-phase-type model map in .planning/config.json

Adds a new `models` block to .planning/config.json with six phase-type
slots (planning / discuss / research / execution / verification /
completion). Lets users express coarse tuning ("Opus for planning,
Sonnet for the rest") without learning the agent taxonomy.

Resolution precedence (highest → lowest):
  1. Per-agent `model_overrides[agent]`     (full IDs; targeted exception)
  2. Phase-type `models[phase_type]`         (NEW; tier alias)
  3. Profile table (`model_profile`)          (per-agent column)
  4. Runtime default

The three layers compose: `models` defaults a phase, `model_overrides`
carves an exception. Phase-type values are tier aliases (opus/sonnet/
haiku/inherit) so the runtime-resolution chain (#2517) stays correct
end-to-end without further branching.

Implementation:
- model-profiles.cjs: new AGENT_TO_PHASE_TYPE map + VALID_PHASE_TYPES
  set. Each agent in MODEL_PROFILES gets one phase-type assignment;
  tests assert coverage so adding a new agent without updating the
  table fails CI.
- core.cjs (resolveModelInternal): inserts phase-type tier lookup
  between per-agent override and profile-derived tier. Skips runtime
  resolution when the resolved tier is 'inherit' (was previously gated
  only on profile === 'inherit'; phase-type can now produce inherit
  independently).
- core.cjs (loadConfig): pass `parsed.models` through both code paths
  so resolveModelInternal can read it.
- config-schema.cjs + sdk/src/query/config-schema.ts: dynamic-pattern
  validator accepts only the six known phase-types; unknown slots
  rejected at config-set time.

Backward compat: configs without `models` behave exactly as today.

Tests (15 cases, all structural-IR — no stdout grep):
- Schema: AGENT_TO_PHASE_TYPE coverage, VALID_PHASE_TYPES exact match
- Resolver: phase-type alone; per-agent override beats phase-type;
  phase-type beats profile; issue's full example; "inherit"; empty
  block is no-op; no block is no-op
- Validation: each of the 6 slots accepted; unknown slot rejected;
  bare `models` (no slot) rejected

Verification:
- 15/15 pass on new regression test
- 6808/6808 full suite (5 net new), 0 fail
- lint-no-source-grep clean across 375 test files

Closes #3023

* docs(#3023): document `models` per-phase-type config in user-facing docs

Adds `models` block coverage to the three user-facing docs that ship
with each release:

1. docs/CONFIGURATION.md
   - New "Per-Phase-Type Models" section between "Per-Agent Overrides"
     and "Non-Claude Runtimes" with:
       * full example mixing models + model_overrides
       * phase-type → agent mapping table
       * resolution-precedence pseudocode
       * accepted values (tier alias only)
       * "When to use which" decision matrix
       * validation behavior + example error
   - Added `"models": {}` to the Full Schema snippet
   - Added a row for `models.<phase_type>` to the config keys table
     (next to model_profile_overrides for adjacency)

2. docs/FEATURES.md
   - Added a row for models.<phase_type> in the Configurable Settings
     table (right under model_profile)
   - Cross-link to CONFIGURATION.md for the full surface

3. docs/USER-GUIDE.md
   - New task-oriented "Tuning model cost by phase" section above
     "Using Non-Claude Runtimes" — leads with the concrete config
     and shows the override pattern (one-shot phase + targeted exception)
   - Cross-link to CONFIGURATION.md

Verification:
- 29/29 pass on config-schema-docs-parity + docs-update + new feature
  test (parity-check passes, so the config-schema entry I added in the
  feature commit is now matched by a docs row)
- 6808/6808 full suite pass
- lint-no-source-grep clean

Doc style follows the same pattern used by the existing model_profile,
model_overrides, and model_profile_overrides sections — example-led,
table-backed, cross-referenced. Each doc surfaces the feature at the
right depth (reference / settings table / task guide).

* fix(#3023): mirror phase-type tier in resolveReasoningEffortInternal (CR Major)

CodeRabbit caught a real Codex correctness bug + 3 minor docs/test issues:

1. **Major (outside-diff)** — resolveReasoningEffortInternal in core.cjs
   derived its tier exclusively from the profile table, ignoring the
   models.<phase_type> override added in #3023. Failure mode on Codex:

     Config: model_profile=balanced, models.execution=opus, agent=gsd-executor
     resolveModelInternal:           tier=opus    → gpt-5.4
     resolveReasoningEffortInternal: tier=sonnet  → reasoning_effort=medium
                                                     ↑
                                                  WRONG — should be xhigh
                                                  (opus tier on Codex)

   The runtime received a mismatched (model, effort) pair. Mirrored the
   phase-type lookup from resolveModelInternal so both functions derive
   from the same tier source. 'inherit' phase-type returns null effort
   (no runtime entry maps to 'inherit'; let runtime decide).

2. Minor — .changeset/per-phase-type-models.md `pr: TBD` → `pr: 3030`.

3. Minor (outside-diff) — model-profiles.md "Resolution Logic" section
   omitted the new phase-type tier. Updated the 4-step block to a 5-step
   block including `models[phase_type]` between override and profile,
   plus a paragraph noting that `model` and `reasoning_effort` derive
   from the same tier source.

4. Nitpick — added 2 typo-safety tests:
   - models.research = "haiku3" (typo) → falls through to profile
   - models.research = "openai/gpt-5" (full ID) → falls through to profile
   Plus 5 new reasoning_effort tests covering the Major fix:
   - exported correctly
   - phase-type override flips both model AND effort to same tier
   - inherit phase-type returns null effort
   - per-agent override still bypasses phase-type for effort
   - claude runtime ignores models.* (no effort propagation)

Verification:
- 24/24 pass on regression test (15 original + 2 typo-safety + 5 effort + 2 outside-diff related)
- 6815/6815 full suite (7 net new from 6808)
- lint-no-source-grep clean

The reasoning_effort tests are written semantically (phase-type override
must produce the SAME effort as a profile-only opus config) rather than
hard-coding tier-specific effort strings, so changes to the runtime tier
map don't break them.

* fix(#3023): phase-type override beats profile=inherit (CR Major round 2)

CodeRabbit caught another precedence inversion: when
  { model_profile: 'inherit', models: { execution: 'opus' } }
both resolvers short-circuited on `profile === 'inherit'` BEFORE the
phase-type override could be honored. Result: model returned 'inherit'
and reasoning_effort returned null — both contradicting the documented
precedence where models[phase_type] wins over model_profile.

Fix in resolveModelInternal:
- Compute tier from phase-type FIRST. If phase-type is a valid alias,
  it wins. Otherwise, fall back to profile-derived tier OR 'inherit'
  (when profile === 'inherit').
- Gate the runtime-resolution branch on `tier !== 'inherit'` (was
  `profile !== 'inherit'`) so phase-type=opus can flip runtime mapping
  on even when profile=inherit.
- Gate the inherit-return on `tier === 'inherit'` (was
  `profile === 'inherit'`).

Fix in resolveReasoningEffortInternal:
- Remove the `if (profile === 'inherit') return null;` early-return.
- Compute tier from phase-type first, fall back to profile. If
  phase-type is explicitly 'inherit' OR the resolved tier is 'inherit',
  return null (no runtime entry maps to inherit).

Tests added (5 new):
- model: phase-type wins over profile=inherit (with explicit opus, with
  haiku for one phase + planner-without-slot still inheriting)
- model: profile=inherit + no models block → all agents inherit (no
  regression on existing inherit semantics)
- model: profile=inherit + models block but agent has no slot → that
  agent inherits, agents with slots get phase-type tier
- effort: phase-type opus + profile=inherit → produces opus-tier
  effort, NOT null (the original bug)

Verification:
- 27/27 pass on regression test (24 prior + 3 model + 1 effort)
- 6820/6820 full suite (5 net new)
- lint-no-source-grep clean

The effort test reads the expected value by running a profile-only opus
config and comparing — semantic check, not hard-coded effort string. So
runtime tier map changes don't break the test.
2026-05-02 13:19:15 -04:00

8.1 KiB

Model Profiles

Model profiles control which Claude model each GSD agent uses. This allows balancing quality vs token spend, or inheriting the currently selected session model.

Profile Definitions

Agent quality balanced budget adaptive inherit
gsd-planner opus opus sonnet opus inherit
gsd-roadmapper opus sonnet sonnet sonnet inherit
gsd-executor opus sonnet sonnet sonnet inherit
gsd-phase-researcher opus sonnet haiku sonnet inherit
gsd-project-researcher opus sonnet haiku sonnet inherit
gsd-research-synthesizer sonnet sonnet haiku haiku inherit
gsd-debugger opus sonnet sonnet opus inherit
gsd-codebase-mapper sonnet haiku haiku haiku inherit
gsd-verifier sonnet sonnet haiku sonnet inherit
gsd-plan-checker sonnet sonnet haiku haiku inherit
gsd-integration-checker sonnet sonnet haiku haiku inherit
gsd-nyquist-auditor sonnet sonnet haiku haiku inherit

Per-Phase-Type Model Map (#3023)

.planning/config.json accepts a coarse per-phase-type map under the models key. Use this when you want tuning at the phase level ("Opus for planning and execution, Sonnet for the rest") without learning the agent taxonomy.

{
  "model_profile": "balanced",
  "models": {
    "planning": "opus",
    "discuss": "opus",
    "research": "sonnet",
    "execution": "opus",
    "verification": "sonnet",
    "completion": "sonnet"
  },
  "model_overrides": {
    "gsd-codebase-mapper": "haiku"
  }
}

Phase-type → agent mapping

Phase type Agents
planning gsd-planner, gsd-roadmapper, gsd-pattern-mapper
discuss (reserved — no subagent today)
research gsd-phase-researcher, gsd-project-researcher, gsd-research-synthesizer, gsd-codebase-mapper, gsd-ui-researcher
execution gsd-executor, gsd-debugger, gsd-doc-writer
verification gsd-verifier, gsd-plan-checker, gsd-integration-checker, gsd-nyquist-auditor, gsd-ui-checker, gsd-ui-auditor, gsd-doc-verifier
completion (reserved — no subagent today)

Resolution precedence (highest to lowest)

  1. Per-agent model_overrides[agent] — full IDs accepted; targeted exceptions
  2. Phase-type models[phase_type] — tier alias only (opus / sonnet / haiku / inherit)
  3. Profile table — the per-agent column from the active model_profile
  4. Runtime default — when nothing else applies

Why two layers above the profile?

  • Profile is a global tier strategy (everyone runs balanced).
  • models is coarse phase-level tuning without learning agent names.
  • model_overrides is per-agent precision (e.g. force haiku on gsd-codebase-mapper for a fan-out).

The three layers compose: models defaults a phase, model_overrides carves an exception out of it.

Profile Philosophy

quality - Maximum reasoning power

  • Opus for all decision-making agents
  • Sonnet for read-only verification
  • Use when: quota available, critical architecture work

balanced (default) - Smart allocation

  • Opus only for planning (where architecture decisions happen)
  • Sonnet for execution and research (follows explicit instructions)
  • Sonnet for verification (needs reasoning, not just pattern matching)
  • Use when: normal development, good balance of quality and cost

budget - Minimal Opus usage

  • Sonnet for anything that writes code
  • Haiku for research and verification
  • Use when: conserving quota, high-volume work, less critical phases

adaptive — Role-based cost optimization

  • Opus for planning and debugging (where reasoning quality has highest impact)
  • Sonnet for execution, research, and verification (follows explicit instructions)
  • Haiku for mapping, checking, and auditing (high volume, structured output)
  • Use when: optimizing cost without sacrificing plan quality, solo development on paid API tiers

inherit - Follow the current session model

  • All agents resolve to inherit
  • Best when you switch models interactively (for example OpenCode or Kilo /model)
  • Required when using non-Anthropic providers (OpenRouter, local models, etc.) — otherwise GSD may call Anthropic models directly, incurring unexpected costs
  • Use when: you want GSD to follow your currently selected runtime model

Using Non-Claude Runtimes (Codex, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, Kilo)

When installed for a non-Claude runtime, the GSD installer sets resolve_model_ids: "omit" in ~/.gsd/defaults.json. This returns an empty model parameter for all agents, so each agent uses the runtime's default model. No manual setup is needed.

To assign different models to different agents, add model_overrides with model IDs your runtime recognizes:

{
  "resolve_model_ids": "omit",
  "model_overrides": {
    "gsd-planner": "o3",
    "gsd-executor": "o4-mini",
    "gsd-debugger": "o3",
    "gsd-codebase-mapper": "o4-mini"
  }
}

The same tiering logic applies: stronger models for planning and debugging, cheaper models for execution and mapping.

Using Claude Code with Non-Anthropic Providers (OpenRouter, Local)

If you're using Claude Code with OpenRouter, a local model, or any non-Anthropic provider, set the inherit profile to prevent GSD from calling Anthropic models for subagents:

# Via settings command
/gsd-settings
# → Select "Inherit" for model profile

# Or manually in .planning/config.json
{
  "model_profile": "inherit"
}

Without inherit, GSD's default balanced profile spawns specific Anthropic models (opus, sonnet, haiku) for each agent type, which can result in additional API costs through your non-Anthropic provider.

Resolution Logic

Orchestrators resolve model before spawning:

1. Read .planning/config.json
2. Check model_overrides for agent-specific override
3. If no override, check models[phase_type] for a phase-type tier
   (see §Per-Phase-Type Model Map for the agent → phase-type mapping)
4. If no phase-type slot, look up agent in profile table
5. Pass model parameter to Task call

The same precedence applies to reasoning_effort resolution on runtimes that support it (Codex), so model and reasoning_effort always derive from the same tier source — a models[phase_type] override flips both.

Per-Agent Overrides

Override specific agents without changing the entire profile:

{
  "model_profile": "balanced",
  "model_overrides": {
    "gsd-executor": "opus",
    "gsd-planner": "haiku"
  }
}

Overrides take precedence over the profile. Valid values: opus, sonnet, haiku, inherit, or any fully-qualified model ID (e.g., "o3", "openai/o3", "google/gemini-2.5-pro").

Switching Profiles

Runtime: /gsd-set-profile <profile>

Per-project default: Set in .planning/config.json:

{
  "model_profile": "balanced"
}

Design Rationale

Why Opus for gsd-planner? Planning involves architecture decisions, goal decomposition, and task design. This is where model quality has the highest impact.

Why Sonnet for gsd-executor? Executors follow explicit PLAN.md instructions. The plan already contains the reasoning; execution is implementation.

Why Sonnet (not Haiku) for verifiers in balanced? Verification requires goal-backward reasoning - checking if code delivers what the phase promised, not just pattern matching. Sonnet handles this well; Haiku may miss subtle gaps.

Why Haiku for gsd-codebase-mapper? Read-only exploration and pattern extraction. No reasoning required, just structured output from file contents.

Why inherit instead of passing opus directly? Claude Code's "opus" alias maps to a specific model version. Organizations may block older opus versions while allowing newer ones. GSD returns "inherit" for opus-tier agents, causing them to use whatever opus version the user has configured in their session. This avoids version conflicts and silent fallbacks to Sonnet.

Why inherit profile? Some runtimes (including OpenCode) let users switch models at runtime (/model). The inherit profile keeps all GSD subagents aligned to that live selection.