* feat(#2982): extend no-source-grep lint to catch var-binding readFileSync.includes() The base lint (scripts/lint-no-source-grep.cjs) only catches readFileSync(...).<text-method>() chained directly. The much more common var-binding form escapes it: const src = fs.readFileSync(p, 'utf8'); // 50 lines later if (src.includes('foo')) {} // ← still grep, lint missed it Scan of the test suite found ~141 files using this pattern. Implementation built TDD per #2982 with structured-IR assertions: scripts/lint-no-source-grep-extras.cjs - detectVarBindingViolations(src) — pure detector, two passes: pass 1 collects vars bound from readFileSync, pass 2 finds any <var>.<includes|startsWith|endsWith|match|search>( on those vars. - detectWrappedAssertOkMatch(src) — flags assert.ok(<expr>.match(...)) which escapes the assert.match rule. - VIOLATION enum exposes stable codes for tests to assert on. scripts/lint-no-source-grep.cjs - Wires the new detectors into the existing per-file check; one additional violation row per file with the first 3 sample tokens. tests/bug-2982-lint-var-binding.test.cjs - 13 tests, all assertions on typed VIOLATION enum / structured records. Covers all 5 text-match methods, multi-var, no-bind, string literal (must NOT trigger), wrapped assert.ok(.match), and assert.match (must NOT double-flag). Migration backlog (#2974 expanded scope): - 42 files annotated `// allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product` (legitimate — they read .md/.json/.yml files whose deployed text IS the product) - 3 files annotated `// allow-test-rule: pending-migration-to-typed-ir [#2974]` (read .cjs/.js source — clear migration debt) - 95 files annotated `pending-migration-to-typed-ir [#2974]` with `Per-file review may reclassify as source-text-is-the-product during migration` (mixed — manual review under #2974) After this lands the lint reports 0 violations on main; new violations in PRs surface immediately. Closes #2982 Refs #2974 * test(#2982): fix truncated test name per CR The label ended with a bare '(' from a copy-paste mishap. Now reads 'does NOT flag .matchAll(...) — matchAll is not match, so assert.ok(.matchAll(...)) is not flagged'. * chore(#2982): add changeset fragment for PR #2985 * chore(#2982): add changeset fragment for PR #2985
120 lines
5.3 KiB
JavaScript
120 lines
5.3 KiB
JavaScript
// allow-test-rule: pending-migration-to-typed-ir [#2974]
|
|
// Tracked in #2974 for migration to typed-IR assertions per CONTRIBUTING.md
|
|
// "Prohibited: Raw Text Matching on Test Outputs". Per-file review may
|
|
// reclassify some entries as source-text-is-the-product during migration.
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Regression test for bug #2516
|
|
*
|
|
* When `.planning/config.json` has `model_profile: "inherit"`, the
|
|
* `init.execute-phase` query returns `executor_model: "inherit"`. The
|
|
* execute-phase workflow was passing this literal string directly to the
|
|
* Task tool via `model="{executor_model}"`, causing Task to fall back to
|
|
* its default model instead of inheriting the orchestrator model.
|
|
*
|
|
* Fix: the workflow must document that when `executor_model` is `"inherit"`,
|
|
* the `model=` parameter must be OMITTED from Task() calls entirely.
|
|
* Omitting `model=` causes Claude Code to inherit the current orchestrator
|
|
* model automatically.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
const { test, describe } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('fs');
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
|
|
const WORKFLOW_PATH = path.join(
|
|
__dirname,
|
|
'..',
|
|
'get-shit-done',
|
|
'workflows',
|
|
'execute-phase.md'
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
describe('bug #2516: executor_model "inherit" must not be passed literally to Task()', () => {
|
|
test('workflow file exists', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(WORKFLOW_PATH), 'get-shit-done/workflows/execute-phase.md should exist');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow contains instructions for handling the "inherit" case', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(WORKFLOW_PATH), 'get-shit-done/workflows/execute-phase.md should exist');
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const hasInheritInstruction =
|
|
content.includes('"inherit"') &&
|
|
(content.includes('omit') || content.includes('Omit') || content.includes('omitting') || content.includes('Omitting'));
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
hasInheritInstruction,
|
|
'execute-phase.md must document that when executor_model is "inherit", ' +
|
|
'the model= parameter must be omitted from Task() calls. ' +
|
|
'Found "inherit" mention: ' + content.includes('"inherit"') + '. ' +
|
|
'Found omit mention: ' + (content.includes('omit') || content.includes('Omit'))
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow does not instruct passing model="inherit" literally to Task', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(WORKFLOW_PATH), 'get-shit-done/workflows/execute-phase.md should exist');
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
// The workflow must not have an unconditional model="{executor_model}" template
|
|
// that would pass "inherit" through. It should document conditional logic.
|
|
const hasConditionalModelParam =
|
|
content.includes('inherit') &&
|
|
(
|
|
content.includes('Only set `model=`') ||
|
|
content.includes('only set `model=`') ||
|
|
content.includes('Only set model=') ||
|
|
content.includes('omit the `model=`') ||
|
|
content.includes('omit the model=') ||
|
|
content.includes('omit `model=`') ||
|
|
content.includes('omit model=')
|
|
);
|
|
const lines = content.split('\n');
|
|
const hasLiteralInheritInTask = lines.some(line => {
|
|
if (!/model\s*=\s*["']inherit["']/.test(line)) return false;
|
|
// Exclude instructional/explanatory lines that document what NOT to do
|
|
return !/\b(not|NOT|don'?t|do not|DO NOT|never|NEVER)\b/.test(line);
|
|
});
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!hasLiteralInheritInTask,
|
|
'execute-phase workflow must not pass literal "inherit" string to Task() model parameter'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
hasConditionalModelParam && !hasLiteralInheritInTask,
|
|
'execute-phase.md must conditionally omit model= when executor_model is "inherit", never pass it literally. ' +
|
|
'The unconditional model="{executor_model}" template would pass the literal ' +
|
|
'string "inherit" to Task(), which falls back to the default model instead ' +
|
|
'of the orchestrator model (root cause of #2516).'
|
|
);
|
|
// Guard against a future contributor adding an unconditional model="{executor_model}"
|
|
// template alongside the conditional docs — that would pass "inherit" literally to Task().
|
|
const hasUnsafeTemplate = lines.some(line => {
|
|
if (!/model\s*=\s*['"]\{executor_model\}['"]/.test(line)) return false;
|
|
return !/\b(not|NOT|do not|DO NOT|don'?t|never|NEVER|omit)\b/i.test(line);
|
|
});
|
|
assert.ok(!hasUnsafeTemplate,
|
|
'execute-phase.md must not contain an unconditional model="{executor_model}" template — ' +
|
|
'it would pass "inherit" literally to Task() when executor_model is "inherit"'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow documents that omitting model= causes inheritance from orchestrator', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(WORKFLOW_PATH), 'get-shit-done/workflows/execute-phase.md should exist');
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const hasInheritanceExplanation =
|
|
content.includes('inherit') &&
|
|
(
|
|
content.includes('orchestrator model') ||
|
|
content.includes('orchestrator\'s model') ||
|
|
content.includes('inherits the') ||
|
|
content.includes('inherit the current')
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
hasInheritanceExplanation,
|
|
'execute-phase.md must explain that omitting model= causes Claude Code to ' +
|
|
'inherit the current orchestrator model — this is the mechanism that makes ' +
|
|
'"inherit" work correctly.'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|