dae7f81482
* fix(#1528): drop next-phase guidance from security-blocked verify-work presentation When security enforcement blocks phase advancement (no SECURITY.md produced), the verify-work presentation told the user advancement was blocked but still offered `/gsd:plan-phase {next}` and `/gsd:execute-phase {next}`, competing with the current-phase fix. Remove those two next-phase lines so the blocked state routes only to the current-phase resolution (secure-phase, ui-review). The post-transition presentation — reached only after the completion contract passes — still offers next-phase planning, which is the correct place for it. Regression coverage added to tests/ui-review-next-guidance.test.cjs: the security-blocked block must not offer next-phase actions, and the post-completion block must still offer them. Regenerated workflow size baseline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#1528): add changeset for security-blocked next-phase fix Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(#1528): recapture golden-install-parity fixtures for verify-work.md change Rebased onto next; verify-work.md's installed hash changed across all 16 runtime fixtures. Diff confined to the single gsd-core/workflows/verify-work.md key per runtime. Assert mode 16/16 green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Tom Boucher <trekkie@nomorestars.com>
Changeset Fragments
This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.
Why
Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.
See #2975 for the full rationale.
Adding a fragment
node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
--type Fixed \
--pr 1234 \
--body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"
This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.
Format
---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.
Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.
Opting out
PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.
At release time
Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:
node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty
This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.
Archived fragments
.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.