* fix: replace /gsd: command format with /gsd- skill format in all suggestions All next-step suggestions shown to users were still using the old colon format (/gsd:xxx) which cannot be copy-pasted as skills. Migrated all occurrences across agents/, commands/, get-shit-done/, docs/, README files, bin/install.js (hardcoded defaults for claude runtime), and get-shit-done/bin/lib/*.cjs (generate-claude-md templates and error messages). Updated tests to assert new hyphen format instead of old colon format. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: migrate remaining /gsd: format to /gsd- in hooks, workflows, and sdk Addresses remaining user-facing occurrences missed in the initial migration: - hooks/: fix 4 user-facing messages (pause-work, update, fast, quick) and 2 comments in gsd-workflow-guard.js - get-shit-done/workflows/: fix 21 Skill() literal calls that Claude executes directly (installer does not transform workflow content) - sdk/prompt-sanitizer.ts: update regex to strip /gsd- format in addition to legacy /gsd: format; update JSDoc comment - tests/: update autonomous-ui-steps, prompt-sanitizer to assert new format Note: commands/gsd/*.md frontmatter (name: gsd:xxx) intentionally unchanged — installer derives skillName from directory path, not the name field. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(plan-phase): preserve --chain flag in auto-advance sync and handle ui-phase gate in chain mode Bug 1: step 15 sync-flag check only guarded against --auto, causing _auto_chain_active to be cleared when plan-phase is invoked without --auto in ARGUMENTS even though a --chain pipeline was active. Added --chain to the guard condition, matching discuss-phase behaviour. Bug 2: UI Design Contract gate (step 5.6) always exited the workflow when UI-SPEC was missing, breaking the discuss --chain pipeline silently. When _auto_chain_active is true, the gate now auto-invokes gsd-ui-phase --auto via Skill() and continues to step 6 without prompting. Manual invocations retain the existing AskUserQuestion flow. * fix: remove <sub>/clear</sub> pattern and duplicate old-format command in discuss-phase.md --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
4.5 KiB
<required_reading> Read all files referenced by the invoking prompt's execution_context before starting. </required_reading>
**Check for input.**If $ARGUMENTS is empty, ask via AskUserQuestion:
What would you like to do? Describe the task, bug, or idea and I'll route it to the right GSD command.
Wait for response before continuing.
**Check if project exists.**INIT=$(node "$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs" state load 2>/dev/null)
Track whether .planning/ exists — some routes require it, others don't.
Evaluate $ARGUMENTS against these routing rules. Apply the first matching rule:
| If the text describes... | Route to | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Starting a new project, "set up", "initialize" | /gsd-new-project |
Needs full project initialization |
| Mapping or analyzing an existing codebase | /gsd-map-codebase |
Codebase discovery |
| A bug, error, crash, failure, or something broken | /gsd-debug |
Needs systematic investigation |
| Exploring, researching, comparing, or "how does X work" | /gsd-research-phase |
Domain research before planning |
| Discussing vision, "how should X look", brainstorming | /gsd-discuss-phase |
Needs context gathering |
| A complex task: refactoring, migration, multi-file architecture, system redesign | /gsd-add-phase |
Needs a full phase with plan/build cycle |
| Planning a specific phase or "plan phase N" | /gsd-plan-phase |
Direct planning request |
| Executing a phase or "build phase N", "run phase N" | /gsd-execute-phase |
Direct execution request |
| Running all remaining phases automatically | /gsd-autonomous |
Full autonomous execution |
| A review or quality concern about existing work | /gsd-verify-work |
Needs verification |
| Checking progress, status, "where am I" | /gsd-progress |
Status check |
| Resuming work, "pick up where I left off" | /gsd-resume-work |
Session restoration |
| A note, idea, or "remember to..." | /gsd-add-todo |
Capture for later |
| Adding tests, "write tests", "test coverage" | /gsd-add-tests |
Test generation |
| Completing a milestone, shipping, releasing | /gsd-complete-milestone |
Milestone lifecycle |
| A specific, actionable, small task (add feature, fix typo, update config) | /gsd-quick |
Self-contained, single executor |
Requires .planning/ directory: All routes except /gsd-new-project, /gsd-map-codebase, /gsd-help, and /gsd-join-discord. If the project doesn't exist and the route requires it, suggest /gsd-new-project first.
Ambiguity handling: If the text could reasonably match multiple routes, ask the user via AskUserQuestion with the top 2-3 options. For example:
"Refactor the authentication system" could be:
1. /gsd-add-phase — Full planning cycle (recommended for multi-file refactors)
2. /gsd-quick — Quick execution (if scope is small and clear)
Which approach fits better?
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
GSD ► ROUTING
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
**Input:** {first 80 chars of $ARGUMENTS}
**Routing to:** {chosen command}
**Reason:** {one-line explanation}
Run the selected /gsd-* command, passing $ARGUMENTS as args.
If the chosen command expects a phase number and one wasn't provided in the text, extract it from context or ask via AskUserQuestion.
After invoking the command, stop. The dispatched command handles everything from here.
<success_criteria>
- Input validated (not empty)
- Intent matched to exactly one GSD command
- Ambiguity resolved via user question (if needed)
- Project existence checked for routes that require it
- Routing decision displayed before dispatch
- Command invoked with appropriate arguments
- No work done directly — dispatcher only </success_criteria>