Files
msd-core/get-shit-done/workflows/do.md
Quang Do d4767ac2e0 fix: replace /gsd: slash command format with /gsd- skill format in all user-facing content (#1579)
* fix: replace /gsd: command format with /gsd- skill format in all suggestions

All next-step suggestions shown to users were still using the old colon
format (/gsd:xxx) which cannot be copy-pasted as skills. Migrated all
occurrences across agents/, commands/, get-shit-done/, docs/, README files,
bin/install.js (hardcoded defaults for claude runtime), and
get-shit-done/bin/lib/*.cjs (generate-claude-md templates and error messages).
Updated tests to assert new hyphen format instead of old colon format.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: migrate remaining /gsd: format to /gsd- in hooks, workflows, and sdk

Addresses remaining user-facing occurrences missed in the initial migration:

- hooks/: fix 4 user-facing messages (pause-work, update, fast, quick)
  and 2 comments in gsd-workflow-guard.js
- get-shit-done/workflows/: fix 21 Skill() literal calls that Claude
  executes directly (installer does not transform workflow content)
- sdk/prompt-sanitizer.ts: update regex to strip /gsd- format in addition
  to legacy /gsd: format; update JSDoc comment
- tests/: update autonomous-ui-steps, prompt-sanitizer to assert new format

Note: commands/gsd/*.md frontmatter (name: gsd:xxx) intentionally unchanged
— installer derives skillName from directory path, not the name field.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(plan-phase): preserve --chain flag in auto-advance sync and handle ui-phase gate in chain mode

Bug 1: step 15 sync-flag check only guarded against --auto, causing
_auto_chain_active to be cleared when plan-phase is invoked without
--auto in ARGUMENTS even though a --chain pipeline was active. Added
--chain to the guard condition, matching discuss-phase behaviour.

Bug 2: UI Design Contract gate (step 5.6) always exited the workflow
when UI-SPEC was missing, breaking the discuss --chain pipeline
silently. When _auto_chain_active is true, the gate now auto-invokes
gsd-ui-phase --auto via Skill() and continues to step 6 without
prompting. Manual invocations retain the existing AskUserQuestion flow.

* fix: remove <sub>/clear</sub> pattern and duplicate old-format command in discuss-phase.md

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-04 07:24:31 -04:00

4.5 KiB

Analyze freeform text from the user and route to the most appropriate GSD command. This is a dispatcher — it never does the work itself. Match user intent to the best command, confirm the routing, and hand off.

<required_reading> Read all files referenced by the invoking prompt's execution_context before starting. </required_reading>

**Check for input.**

If $ARGUMENTS is empty, ask via AskUserQuestion:

What would you like to do? Describe the task, bug, or idea and I'll route it to the right GSD command.

Wait for response before continuing.

**Check if project exists.**
INIT=$(node "$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs" state load 2>/dev/null)

Track whether .planning/ exists — some routes require it, others don't.

**Match intent to command.**

Evaluate $ARGUMENTS against these routing rules. Apply the first matching rule:

If the text describes... Route to Why
Starting a new project, "set up", "initialize" /gsd-new-project Needs full project initialization
Mapping or analyzing an existing codebase /gsd-map-codebase Codebase discovery
A bug, error, crash, failure, or something broken /gsd-debug Needs systematic investigation
Exploring, researching, comparing, or "how does X work" /gsd-research-phase Domain research before planning
Discussing vision, "how should X look", brainstorming /gsd-discuss-phase Needs context gathering
A complex task: refactoring, migration, multi-file architecture, system redesign /gsd-add-phase Needs a full phase with plan/build cycle
Planning a specific phase or "plan phase N" /gsd-plan-phase Direct planning request
Executing a phase or "build phase N", "run phase N" /gsd-execute-phase Direct execution request
Running all remaining phases automatically /gsd-autonomous Full autonomous execution
A review or quality concern about existing work /gsd-verify-work Needs verification
Checking progress, status, "where am I" /gsd-progress Status check
Resuming work, "pick up where I left off" /gsd-resume-work Session restoration
A note, idea, or "remember to..." /gsd-add-todo Capture for later
Adding tests, "write tests", "test coverage" /gsd-add-tests Test generation
Completing a milestone, shipping, releasing /gsd-complete-milestone Milestone lifecycle
A specific, actionable, small task (add feature, fix typo, update config) /gsd-quick Self-contained, single executor

Requires .planning/ directory: All routes except /gsd-new-project, /gsd-map-codebase, /gsd-help, and /gsd-join-discord. If the project doesn't exist and the route requires it, suggest /gsd-new-project first.

Ambiguity handling: If the text could reasonably match multiple routes, ask the user via AskUserQuestion with the top 2-3 options. For example:

"Refactor the authentication system" could be:
1. /gsd-add-phase — Full planning cycle (recommended for multi-file refactors)
2. /gsd-quick — Quick execution (if scope is small and clear)

Which approach fits better?
**Show the routing decision.**
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► ROUTING
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

**Input:** {first 80 chars of $ARGUMENTS}
**Routing to:** {chosen command}
**Reason:** {one-line explanation}
**Invoke the chosen command.**

Run the selected /gsd-* command, passing $ARGUMENTS as args.

If the chosen command expects a phase number and one wasn't provided in the text, extract it from context or ask via AskUserQuestion.

After invoking the command, stop. The dispatched command handles everything from here.

<success_criteria>

  • Input validated (not empty)
  • Intent matched to exactly one GSD command
  • Ambiguity resolved via user question (if needed)
  • Project existence checked for routes that require it
  • Routing decision displayed before dispatch
  • Command invoked with appropriate arguments
  • No work done directly — dispatcher only </success_criteria>