Files
msd-core/tests/no-bare-gsd-tools-command-position.test.cjs
Tom Boucher dd4f179672 feat(#3970): per-task external-tracker content-resolution seam (#4000)
* feat(#3970): per-task external-tracker content-resolution seam

Implements ADR-3646 (Phase 1, #3970): a `<task tracker-id="...">` attribute
plus a new optional `taskContentResolver` capability-manifest field let a
capability resolve a task's action/verify/acceptance-criteria/read_first/done
content from an external issue tracker instead of PLAN.md's inline body.

- src/plan-document.cts: parses the `tracker-id` attribute into `PlanTask.trackerId`
- src/task-content-resolution.cts: new leaf module — split/find/build/resolve,
  with a hard-halt (throw) contract on ambiguous/failed/timeout/malformed
  resolution, never a silent fallback to possibly-stale inline text
- src/task-command-router.cts: new `task resolve-content --plan --task-id --raw`
  CLI verb wiring the module into a real process exit code
- gsd-core/bin/lib/capability-validator.cjs: validates the new
  `taskContentResolver` manifest field (feature-role only, cross-capability
  trackerPrefix uniqueness)
- gsd-core/workflows/execute-plan.md, gsd-core/references/loop-hook-dispatch.md,
  docs/reference/capability-manifest.md: wire the seam into the per-task loop
  and document it as a new `execute:task` point outside the existing
  contribution/step/gate vocabulary (unconditional in autonomous mode)

Closes #3970

* fix(#3970): gate checkpoint tasks out of content resolution, close trackerPrefix grammar parity gap, cover path-traversal guard

Standards/Spec code-review pass on the task-content-resolution seam (ADR-3646
Phase 1) found three defects:

1. execute-plan.md's task-content-resolution bullet fired on any
   tracker-id-bearing task with no check that it wasn't type="checkpoint:*",
   contradicting ADR-3646 Decision 1 (a checkpoint task must never enter
   resolve-content). plan-document.cts already parses trackerId: null
   unconditionally for checkpoint tasks; only the workflow prose needed the
   fix, so the bullet now explicitly excludes checkpoint tasks.

2. task-content-resolution.cts's parseResolverDeclaration accepted any
   non-empty trackerPrefix with no grammar check, while capability-
   validator.cjs's KEBAB_RE enforces kebab-case at install time — a
   Generative Fix Divergence gap. Added the same grammar (as a literal
   regex, documented as intentionally not shared across the .cts/.cjs build
   boundary) plus a parity test asserting the two surfaces agree across a
   valid/invalid trackerPrefix table.

3. task-command-router.cts's routeResolveContent path-traversal guard on
   --plan had zero test coverage. Added a test exercising a
   ../../../etc/passwit-shaped path and asserting the USAGE rejection names
   the offending path.

* fix(#3970): sanitize resolver diagnostics and cap resolver timeoutMs

Two findings caught by an isolated security-review pass on the task
content resolution seam:

- ResolverFailedError/ResolverMalformedOutputError embedded raw,
  unsanitized subprocess stderr/stdout (attacker/model-influenced via
  the tracker-id argv token) into .message. A hostile or buggy resolver
  could smuggle a newline plus a forged "Error: " line, or terminal
  escape sequences, into a diagnostic io.cjs's error() writes verbatim
  to stderr. Fixed at the constructor (task-content-resolution.cts) via
  io.cjs's existing formatDiagnosticToken(), so every caller of
  resolveTaskContent gets a safe .message by construction.

- capability-validator.cjs's validateTaskContentResolverFields had no
  upper bound on taskContentResolver.invoke.timeoutMs, letting a
  manifest declare an effectively unbounded value and defeat the
  "bounded subprocess" design intent. Added a 120000ms ceiling specific
  to this field, without touching the shared isPositiveIntegerMs()
  helper (still used unbounded by the reviewer lane's timeoutFloorMs
  and probe timeoutMs).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#3970): fix gsd-test failures — stale prose allowlist line and stderr-vs-message assertion

gsd-test (remote dockerized matrix) came back red with 5 failures on this
PR; all five are real defects, fixed here.

- tests/no-bare-gsd-tools-command-position.test.cjs: PROSE_ALLOWLIST's
  execute-plan.md entry pointed at line 415, which ffc190df4's
  checkpoint-exclusion caveat (added near line 221) shifted down by one
  line. The actual "validated downstream by gsd-tools uat
  classify-coverage" descriptive mention now sits at line 416. Updated
  the allowlist entry's line number to match.

- tests/task-command-router-resolve-content.test.cjs: the path-traversal
  test asserted the outside-project-scope diagnostic against the thrown
  ExitError's own .message. io.cts's error() (ADR-3889) writes its
  human-readable message to fd 2 via writeAllSync and then throws a bare
  `new ExitError(1)` with no message argument — by design, so the
  exception carries no duplicate text and the thrown ExitError's message
  defaults to "process exit 1" (cli-exit.cts's ExitError constructor).
  Root cause was the test, not the source: task-command-router.cjs's
  outside-project-scope rejection already calls error() correctly and the
  diagnostic text is genuinely emitted, just on fd 2, not on the
  exception. Fixed the test to capture fd-2 writes (mirroring
  tests/estimate-calibrate.test.cjs's runCalibrateExpectError and this
  same file's own captureStdout for fd 1) and assert against the captured
  stderr text instead of err.message. This was masked locally because a
  manual `node -e` sanity check that only inspects the caught exception's
  .message cannot see what the real node:test run actually failed on.

Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: execute-plan.md — adds the ADR-3646 task-content-resolution bullet and checkpoint-exclusion caveat to the per-task execute loop; a real behavioral prose addition, not incidental bloat.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(#3970): backfill changeset PR number (pr:0 -> pr:4000)

---------

Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 13:17:04 -04:00

215 lines
11 KiB
JavaScript

// allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product (#2751)
'use strict';
// Regression guard for #2751: agents/*.md and gsd-core/workflows/*.md must not
// instruct an agent to invoke a BARE `gsd-tools <verb> <args>` command. The bare
// word fails with "command not found" on a shim-only install (no `gsd-tools`
// binary on PATH) — every such instruction must use the `gsd_run` resolver the
// same files already define. #725 fixed this only for the Codex install-
// conversion pipeline; the Claude-facing SOURCE shipped the bare calls verbatim
// until #2751 normalized them.
//
// A pure regex cannot perfectly distinguish an imperative ("Use `gsd-tools query
// commit` to commit") from a descriptive mention ("`gsd-tools query commit`
// returns an envelope") — both contain the same command phrase. So this guard
// scans for `gsd-tools <verb> <arg>` (the operative shape — a verb followed by
// its arguments) and subtracts a documented ALLOWLIST of known descriptive
// mentions that NAME the command without instructing literal invocation. Any
// site NOT in the allowlist is a new operative bare call and fails the gate.
//
// Verb coverage is derived LIVE from the gsd-tools host-command router
// (`gsd-core/bin/gsd-tools.cjs`) by reading the `'verb': routeHandler` / `verb:
// routeHandler` entries. This is deliberate — the original #2751 guard used a
// hand-maintained 6-verb list that silently false-passed `verify-summary` (the
// `verify` branch matched the prefix, then died on the hyphen), and missed
// `windows`, `worktree`, `smart-entry`, and `quick-tasks-append` entirely.
// Deriving the set from the router means a new verb registered there is covered
// here the moment it lands — no second list to keep in sync.
//
// Source-text guard: the deployed contract IS the markdown text the runtime
// loads. Scans FULL file text (the real hits lived in inline prose/table cells,
// not fenced bash blocks).
const { test } = require('node:test');
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
const fs = require('node:fs');
const path = require('node:path');
const ROOT = path.resolve(__dirname, '..');
const ROUTER_PATH = path.join(ROOT, 'gsd-core', 'bin', 'gsd-tools.cjs');
// #3809 widened this from agents/ + workflows/ to include gsd-core/references/,
// which was carrying 37 bare calls the guard simply never looked at.
//
// commands/ is deliberately NOT here, and that is a finding rather than an
// oversight. Its files cannot use the shared launcher the way workflows and agents
// do: tests/graphify-visualization.test.cjs extracts individual Step-3 shell chains
// and runs them standalone, so each fenced block needs its OWN preamble —
// graphify.md carries five on purpose, and collapsing them to one produces
// `gsd_run: command not found` (exit 127). tests/gsd-tools-path-refs.test.cjs
// (#1766) separately pins commands/gsd/workstreams.md to the literal string
// `gsd-tools query workstream.list`. Bringing commands/ under this guard therefore
// needs those two contracts reconciled first; it is not a scan-set widening.
//
// skills/ is absent for a different reason: it is generated from commands/ by
// scripts/gen-plugin-skills.cjs and pinned by lint:generated-sync, so guarding the
// source guards both, and scanning the generated mirror would double-report every
// future offender.
const SCAN_DIRS = [
'agents',
path.join('gsd-core', 'workflows'),
path.join('gsd-core', 'references'),
];
// Derive the verb set the bare-call guard matches against. Most top-level
// verbs live in the host-command router table as `'verb': routeHandler` entries
// (~70); this reads those dynamically so new router verbs are covered the moment
// they land. A handful of verbs are dispatched as FAMILIES (their own
// `command === 'verb'` arm, not a route-table entry): `query` (line ~2876),
// `intel`, `verify`, and `graphify`. These are stable, documented families, so
// they are supplemented explicitly here rather than parsed from the help string
// (whose prose mixes real verbs with English words like "for"/"output"/"working",
// producing noise). If a family verb is ever promoted into the route table the
// union dedupes harmlessly; if a NEW family verb is added it must be added here.
//
// Sorted longest-first so a hyphenated verb (`verify-summary`) is preferred over
// its prefix (`verify`) — the exact ordering bug that let `verify-summary` slip
// past a fixed 6-verb list during the first #2751 pass.
const FAMILY_DISPATCHED_VERBS = ['query', 'intel', 'verify', 'graphify'];
function readRouterVerbs() {
const src = fs.readFileSync(ROUTER_PATH, 'utf8');
const re = /(?:'([a-z][a-z-]*)'|([a-z][a-z-]*))\s*:\s*route[A-Z]\w*/g;
const verbs = new Set(FAMILY_DISPATCHED_VERBS);
let m;
while ((m = re.exec(src)) !== null) verbs.add(m[1] || m[2]);
return [...verbs].sort((a, b) => b.length - a.length);
}
const VERBS = readRouterVerbs();
// Operative shape: `gsd-tools <known-verb>` followed by whitespace and a real
// argument (the verb is NOT the close of a code span — there is a real arg
// after it). Restricting to KNOWN verbs (vs any `[a-z-]+` token) avoids
// false-flagging English prose like "gsd-tools through the ...".
const BARE_COMMAND_RE = new RegExp(
String.raw`(?:^|[^./A-Za-z0-9_-])gsd-tools\s+(` + VERBS.join('|') + String.raw`)\s+[^\s` + '`' + String.raw`]`
);
// Lines that legitimately embed `gsd-tools <verb> <arg>` but are descriptive, not
// command-position: they NAME the command (in prose / parenthetical examples /
// return-envelope descriptions) rather than instructing an agent to run the bare
// word. Keyed `file:line` so a rewording that moves the mention forces a conscious
// allowlist update rather than silently passing.
//
// Each entry MUST carry a one-line reason; the test prints the allowlist on
// failure so a reviewer can see exactly what is sanctioned.
const PROSE_ALLOWLIST = [
{ file: 'agents/gsd-executor.md', line: 795, reason: 'describes the SDK return envelope of `gsd-tools query commit`; not an instruction to run the bare word' },
{ file: 'agents/gsd-phase-researcher.md', line: 33, reason: 'package-legitimacy provenance rule names the command as the source of an OK verdict; descriptive' },
{ file: 'agents/gsd-roadmapper.md', line: 642, reason: 'parenthetical "e.g." naming SDK queries a user *could* run; not an agent instruction' },
{ file: 'agents/gsd-intel-updater.md', line: 40, reason: 'cross-platform note names the `gsd-tools intel <subcommand>` CLI surface descriptively ("CLI invocations go through..."); not an agent instruction' },
{ file: 'gsd-core/workflows/execute-plan.md', line: 416, reason: 'describes the downstream SDK validation step (`validated downstream by ...`); names the mechanism, does not instruct the agent to type it' },
];
// Resolver-snippet definition lines / probes that must never be flagged. A line
// is a resolver/probe definition when it assigns the shim name, probes PATH, or
// assigns GSD_TOOLS / defines the gsd_run function — NOT merely when it contains
// the substring `gsd-tools.cjs` (which would blanket-exempt any prose that
// happens to name the file).
const EXCLUSION_RE = /_GSD_SHIM_NAME\s*=|command -v gsd-tools|\bGSD_TOOLS\s*=|gsd_run\s*\(\)\s*\{/;
function collectMdFiles(dir) {
const results = [];
let entries;
try { entries = fs.readdirSync(dir, { withFileTypes: true }); } catch { return results; }
for (const entry of entries) {
const full = path.join(dir, entry.name);
if (entry.isDirectory()) {
results.push(...collectMdFiles(full));
} else if (entry.isFile() && entry.name.endsWith('.md')) {
results.push(full);
}
}
return results;
}
function findBareCommandPositionCalls() {
const offenders = [];
for (const scanDir of SCAN_DIRS) {
const abs = path.join(ROOT, scanDir);
for (const file of collectMdFiles(abs)) {
// Normalize to forward slashes so the file:line PROSE_ALLOWLIST keys match
// identically on every OS — path.relative() returns backslash separators on
// Windows, which would defeat the allowlist lookup and false-flag the 6
// descriptive mentions (#2751 Windows CI failure).
const rel = path.relative(ROOT, file).split(path.sep).join('/');
const lines = fs.readFileSync(file, 'utf8').split(/\r?\n/);
for (let i = 0; i < lines.length; i += 1) {
const line = lines[i];
if (EXCLUSION_RE.test(line)) continue;
const match = line.match(BARE_COMMAND_RE);
if (!match) continue;
const loc = `${rel}:${i + 1}`;
const allowed = PROSE_ALLOWLIST.find((a) => a.file === rel && a.line === i + 1);
if (allowed) continue;
offenders.push({ loc, verb: match[1], text: line.trim() });
}
}
}
return offenders;
}
test('verb set was derived from the router (guards against a silent extraction regression)', () => {
// If the router is refactored so the `routeHandler` pattern no longer matches,
// VERBS would be empty and the bare-call guard below would false-pass
// everything. Sanity-bound it: a healthy router exposes many host verbs.
assert.ok(
VERBS.length > 40,
`Expected to derive >40 verbs from ${path.relative(ROOT, ROUTER_PATH)}, got ${VERBS.length}. ` +
'If the router table changed shape, update readRouterVerbs() so the guard keeps coverage.'
);
// Longest-first ordering is what lets verify-summary win over verify.
const sample = ['verify-summary', 'verify', 'query', 'intel', 'graphify', 'windows', 'worktree', 'smart-entry', 'commit', 'check'];
for (const v of sample) {
assert.ok(VERBS.includes(v), `expected verb '${v}' in derived set (router/family drift?)`);
}
});
test('no command-position bare gsd-tools <verb> survives in agents/ or workflows/ (#2751)', () => {
const offenders = findBareCommandPositionCalls();
assert.strictEqual(
offenders.length,
0,
'Bare `gsd-tools <verb> <args>` command-position calls must use the `gsd_run` ' +
'resolver (they fail with "command not found" on a shim-only install — #2751). ' +
`Found ${offenders.length} offender(s):\n` +
offenders.map((o) => ` ${o.loc} [${o.verb}] ${o.text}`).join('\n') +
'\n\nIf a hit is a descriptive prose mention (not an instruction to run the bare ' +
'word), add it to PROSE_ALLOWLIST in this test with a reason.'
);
});
test('every PROSE_ALLOWLIST entry still matches a real gsd-tools mention (no stale allowlist entries)', () => {
// An allowlist entry that no longer matches anything is stale — it was either
// fixed (remove it) or the line moved (update it). Either way it must not linger.
const stale = [];
for (const entry of PROSE_ALLOWLIST) {
const file = path.join(ROOT, entry.file);
let lines;
try { lines = fs.readFileSync(file, 'utf8').split(/\r?\n/); } catch (e) {
stale.push({ ...entry, problem: 'file missing' });
continue;
}
const line = lines[entry.line - 1];
if (!line || !BARE_COMMAND_RE.test(line) || EXCLUSION_RE.test(line)) {
stale.push({ ...entry, problem: 'line no longer matches a bare gsd-tools mention', actual: line ? line.trim() : '(line absent)' });
}
}
assert.strictEqual(
stale.length,
0,
'PROSE_ALLOWLIST has stale entries (the mentioned line no longer carries a bare ' +
'`gsd-tools <verb> <arg>` mention). Remove or update them:\n' +
stale.map((s) => ` ${s.file}:${s.line} — ${s.problem}${s.actual ? ` (actual: ${s.actual.slice(0, 80)})` : ''}`).join('\n')
);
});