de78f2eef2
* docs(#2775): align package-legitimacy docs to the ADR-0656 registry-API gate security-model.md, USER-GUIDE.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, COMMANDS.md, FEATURES.md, and gsd-planner.md's STRIDE template (+ ja-JP mirrors) described the pre-ADR-0656 design: slopcheck as the install-or-degrade gate, with unavailability degrading every package to [ASSUMED]. ADR-0656 inverted this months ago — registry-API verdicts (npm/PyPI/ crates.io) are the gate; slopcheck is an optional escalate-only adapter that no shipped configuration wires. Verified every replacement claim against src/package-legitimacy.cts (checkPackages, classifyPackage, lookupNpm/lookupPypi/lookupCrates) via Memtrace before writing it, so the corrected prose matches the live implementation rather than restating the ADR from memory. Restored docs/explanation/security-model.md:79-84 (and its ja-JP mirror) to original wording after an orthogonal spec review caught that an earlier draft had edited the "Why WebSearch packages are always [ASSUMED]" paragraph — inside the range issue #2775 explicitly named as correct and to leave alone. The ja-JP mirror was missing the closing clause present in the corrected English original ("its absence leaves registry-API verdicts intact rather than downgrading everything to [ASSUMED]") — added for parity. This completes the ja-JP mirror the issue's acceptance criteria named explicitly. zh-CN/ko-KR/pt-BR (not named by #2775, but carrying the same stale design) get the mechanical portion of the same fix: command-string swaps, table headers, ARCHITECTURE.md diagram labels, and technical- term swaps that reuse a word already attested elsewhere in the same file (合法性/적법성/legitimidade for "legitimacy") — surrounding prose untouched. The remainder in those three locales — full-paragraph rewrites of the corrected degrade-path mechanism, deleted "External dependency" bullets, and "manually install slopcheck" code blocks — needs prose composed by a fluent speaker of each language and is filed as open-gsd/gsd-core#3002 with an exact file:line inventory. * test(#2775): acknowledge gsd-planner.md byte growth from the STRIDE-row fix agents/gsd-planner.md grew 14 bytes (49309 -> 49323) from the STRIDE supply-chain row correction (slopcheck -> package-legitimacy gate). Emitted agent/workflow files are byte-tracked; this fragment acknowledges the growth per tests/emitted-attribution.test.cjs's "differential attribution over the real tree" check. * docs(#2775): close ja-JP FEATURES.md gap; fix a ko-KR transliterated heading docs/ja-JP/FEATURES.md:2808 still read the katakana transliteration "スロップチェック verdict" in REQ-PKG-GATE-01 — invisible to a literal "slopcheck" grep, so it was missed when ja-JP parity was checked and declared complete. Corrected to "正当性判定" (legitimacy verdict), matching the term already established in ja-JP/explanation/ security-model.md and ja-JP/USER-GUIDE.md. This was the only remaining ja-JP gap; a full sweep for the transliterated form across docs/ja-JP/ now returns zero hits, and the ja-JP mirror is genuinely at parity. docs/ko-KR/USER-GUIDE.md:398's heading "슬롭체크 판정:" had the same transliteration problem. Fixed inline to "적법성 판정:", reusing the 적법성/legitimacy word already attested two lines below in the same table. A parallel sweep of zh-CN and pt-BR found no transliterated forms of "slopcheck" in either locale. The remaining transliterated occurrence in ko-KR (USER-GUIDE.md:406, the lead-in to the pip-install code block) needs prose composition like the rest of that block and is added to open-gsd/gsd-core#3002's inventory. * chore(#2775): backfill changeset PR number to 3010 --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Changeset Fragments
This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.
Why
Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.
See #2975 for the full rationale.
Adding a fragment
node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
--type Fixed \
--pr 1234 \
--body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"
This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.
Format
---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.
Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.
Opting out
PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.
At release time
Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:
node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty
This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.
Archived fragments
.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.