* fix: change nyquist_validation default to true and harden absent-key skip conditions new-project.md never wrote the key, so agents reading config directly treated absent as falsy. Changed all agent skip conditions from "is false" to "explicitly set to false; absent = enabled". Default changed from false to true in core.cjs, config.cjs, and templates/config.json. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: enforce VALIDATION.md creation with verification gate and Check 8e Step 5.5 was narrative markdown that Claude skipped under context pressure. Now MANDATORY with Write tool requirement and file-existence verification. Step 7.5 gates planner spawn on VALIDATION.md presence. Check 8e blocks Dimension 8 if file missing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat: add W008/W009 health checks and addNyquistKey repair for Nyquist drift detection W008 warns when workflow.nyquist_validation key is absent from config.json (agents may skip validation). W009 warns when RESEARCH.md has Validation Architecture section but no VALIDATION.md file exists. addNyquistKey repair adds the missing key with default true value. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat: add /gsd:validate-phase command and gsd-nyquist-auditor agent Retroactively applies Nyquist validation to already-executed phases. Works mid-milestone and post-milestone. Detects existing test coverage, maps gaps to phase requirements, writes missing tests, debugs failing ones, and produces {phase}-VALIDATION.md from existing artifacts. Handles three states: VALIDATION.md exists (audit + update), no VALIDATION.md (reconstruct from PLAN.md + SUMMARY.md), phase not yet executed (exit cleanly with guidance). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat: audit-milestone reports Nyquist compliance gaps across phases Adds Nyquist coverage table to audit-milestone output when workflow.nyquist_validation is true. Identifies phases missing VALIDATION.md or with nyquist_compliant: false/partial. Routes to /gsd:validate-phase for resolution. Updates USER-GUIDE with retroactive validation documentation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * refactor: compress Nyquist prompts to match GSD meta-prompt density conventions Auditor agent: deleted philosophy section (35 lines), compressed execution flow 60%, removed redundant constraints. Workflow: cut purpose bloat, collapsed state narrative, compressed auditor spawn template. Command: removed redundant process section. Plan-phase Steps 5.5/7.5: replaced hedging language with directives. Audit-milestone Step 5.5: collapsed sub-steps into inline instructions. Net: -376 lines. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.2 KiB
Model Profiles
Model profiles control which Claude model each GSD agent uses. This allows balancing quality vs token spend.
Profile Definitions
| Agent | quality |
balanced |
budget |
|---|---|---|---|
| gsd-planner | opus | opus | sonnet |
| gsd-roadmapper | opus | sonnet | sonnet |
| gsd-executor | opus | sonnet | sonnet |
| gsd-phase-researcher | opus | sonnet | haiku |
| gsd-project-researcher | opus | sonnet | haiku |
| gsd-research-synthesizer | sonnet | sonnet | haiku |
| gsd-debugger | opus | sonnet | sonnet |
| gsd-codebase-mapper | sonnet | haiku | haiku |
| gsd-verifier | sonnet | sonnet | haiku |
| gsd-plan-checker | sonnet | sonnet | haiku |
| gsd-integration-checker | sonnet | sonnet | haiku |
| gsd-nyquist-auditor | sonnet | sonnet | haiku |
Profile Philosophy
quality - Maximum reasoning power
- Opus for all decision-making agents
- Sonnet for read-only verification
- Use when: quota available, critical architecture work
balanced (default) - Smart allocation
- Opus only for planning (where architecture decisions happen)
- Sonnet for execution and research (follows explicit instructions)
- Sonnet for verification (needs reasoning, not just pattern matching)
- Use when: normal development, good balance of quality and cost
budget - Minimal Opus usage
- Sonnet for anything that writes code
- Haiku for research and verification
- Use when: conserving quota, high-volume work, less critical phases
Resolution Logic
Orchestrators resolve model before spawning:
1. Read .planning/config.json
2. Check model_overrides for agent-specific override
3. If no override, look up agent in profile table
4. Pass model parameter to Task call
Per-Agent Overrides
Override specific agents without changing the entire profile:
{
"model_profile": "balanced",
"model_overrides": {
"gsd-executor": "opus",
"gsd-planner": "haiku"
}
}
Overrides take precedence over the profile. Valid values: opus, sonnet, haiku.
Switching Profiles
Runtime: /gsd:set-profile <profile>
Per-project default: Set in .planning/config.json:
{
"model_profile": "balanced"
}
Design Rationale
Why Opus for gsd-planner? Planning involves architecture decisions, goal decomposition, and task design. This is where model quality has the highest impact.
Why Sonnet for gsd-executor? Executors follow explicit PLAN.md instructions. The plan already contains the reasoning; execution is implementation.
Why Sonnet (not Haiku) for verifiers in balanced? Verification requires goal-backward reasoning - checking if code delivers what the phase promised, not just pattern matching. Sonnet handles this well; Haiku may miss subtle gaps.
Why Haiku for gsd-codebase-mapper? Read-only exploration and pattern extraction. No reasoning required, just structured output from file contents.
Why inherit instead of passing opus directly?
Claude Code's "opus" alias maps to a specific model version. Organizations may block older opus versions while allowing newer ones. GSD returns "inherit" for opus-tier agents, causing them to use whatever opus version the user has configured in their session. This avoids version conflicts and silent fallbacks to Sonnet.