e1d661ece0
* feat(#3024): dynamic routing with failure-tier escalation Adds a `dynamic_routing` block to .planning/config.json that lets the resolver start agents on a cheap tier and escalate one tier up when the orchestrator detects a soft failure (verification inconclusive, plan-check FLAG, etc.). Solves the "pay Opus rates as insurance" anti-pattern by making escalation observed-quality-driven. Architecture: - AGENT_DEFAULT_TIERS map (light/standard/heavy) — every agent in MODEL_PROFILES declares a default tier; tests assert coverage so adding a new agent without updating the map fails CI. - nextTier(currentTier) helper — light → standard → heavy → heavy (heavy stays at heavy; can't go further). - resolveModelForTier(cwd, agentType, attempt) — new resolver. The orchestrator tracks the attempt counter and passes 0 for the first spawn, 1+ on escalation. The resolver caps internally at max_escalations so the orchestrator can blindly bump the counter. - Schema validation: dynamic_routing.enabled / escalate_on_failure / max_escalations / tier_models.<light|standard|heavy>. Unknown tiers and unknown sub-keys rejected at config-set time. - SDK schema mirror updated to keep CJS/SDK in lockstep (#2653). Resolution precedence (highest → lowest): 1. model_overrides[<agent>] (full IDs accepted) 2. dynamic_routing.tier_models[<tier>] (NEW; escalation-aware) 3. models[<phase_type>] (#3023 phase-type map) 4. model_profile (per-agent column) 5. Runtime default Backward compatibility: dynamic_routing is disabled by default (enabled: false or block omitted). resolveModelForTier short- circuits to resolveModelInternal in that case, so callers can adopt unconditionally without breaking existing behavior. This PR delivers the JS-layer infrastructure: schema + tier map + resolver. Orchestrator adoption (workflow markdown updates that detect soft failures and call resolveModelForTier with attempt+1) is incremental follow-up — verifier / plan-checker / integration- checker each adopt the protocol when ready. Tests (23 cases, all structural-IR — no stdout grep): - Schema invariants: AGENT_DEFAULT_TIERS coverage, VALID_AGENT_TIERS exact match, every assignment uses a valid tier - nextTier helper: light→standard→heavy→heavy, null on invalid input - Disabled mode: no block + enabled:false both no-op (back-compat) - Enabled mode: attempt=0 returns default tier model, attempt=1 escalates, beyond max_escalations caps, heavy agents stay heavy, default max_escalations=1 when omitted - Precedence: per-agent override beats dynamic_routing, dynamic_routing beats phase-type models - Validation: every settings key accepted, unknown tiers/sub-keys rejected, bare `dynamic_routing` rejected as config-set target Documentation: - get-shit-done/references/model-profiles.md — full reference section - docs/CONFIGURATION.md — full settings table + escalation flow - docs/USER-GUIDE.md — task-oriented "Cheap-by-default" section - docs/FEATURES.md — config row cross-link Verification: - 23/23 pass on regression test - 6843/6843 full suite (23 net new from 6820) - lint-no-source-grep clean (376 test files) - SDK schema mirror keeps CJS/SDK in sync per #2653 parity test Closes #3024 * fix(#3024): honor escalate_on_failure:false + 3 CR follow-ups CodeRabbit on PR #3031 (4 findings — 1 Major + 2 Minor + 1 Nitpick): 1. **Major (inline)** — get-shit-done/bin/lib/core.cjs:1668 resolveModelForTier ignored dynamic_routing.escalate_on_failure. When the user set it to false, escalation should be disabled, but the resolver only checked attempt/max_escalations. An orchestrator that always passes attempt+1 on retry would silently escalate despite the user opting out. Fix: gate effectiveAttempt on `dr.escalate_on_failure !== false` so false short-circuits every attempt back to the default tier. 2. **Minor (inline)** — docs/CONFIGURATION.md:123-126 The dynamic_routing rows in the Core Settings table had 4 cells instead of 5 (missing the Options column), breaking the table structure. Added explicit Options values for enabled / escalate_on_failure / max_escalations rows. 3. **Minor (outside-diff)** — references/model-profiles.md:179-195 "Resolution Logic" sketch was pre-#3024 and didn't include dynamic_routing in the precedence ladder. Updated to a 6-step block with dynamic_routing at step 3 (between override and phase-type). 4. **Nitpick** — tests/feat-3024-dynamic-routing.test.cjs:189+ Tests used `if (lightAgent) { ... }` guards that silent-pass when AGENT_DEFAULT_TIERS drifts. Replaced all 5 conditional skips with `assert.ok(lightAgent, '...')` preconditions so a tier-mapping change surfaces as a test failure. Plus: 2 new regression tests for the Major fix: - escalate_on_failure:false caps every attempt at default tier - escalate_on_failure:true (explicit) still escalates normally Verification: - 25/25 pass on regression test (23 prior + 2 escalate_on_failure) - 6845/6845 full suite (2 net new) - lint-no-source-grep clean * docs(#3024): align precedence + add fence language tags (CR follow-up) CodeRabbit (3 minor): 1. docs/CONFIGURATION.md:691 — "Per-Phase-Type Models → Resolution precedence" was a 4-step block written pre-#3024; readers got contradictory rules between the per-phase-type section and the later dynamic_routing section. Updated to the same 5-step ladder with dynamic_routing at step 2, and noted that dynamic_routing is disabled by default so this section's behavior is unchanged when the kill-switch is off. 2. docs/CONFIGURATION.md:770 — escalation-flow code fence missing language tag (MD040). Added `text`. 3. references/model-profiles.md:184 — resolution-ladder code fence missing language tag (MD040). Added `text`. No code changes; docs only. Verification: regression test still 25/25. * docs(#3024): clarify precedence prose — five layers, not four (CR nitpick) CodeRabbit nitpick: the "Per-Phase-Type Models → Resolution precedence" prose said "The four layers compose..." but the ladder above lists five (including Runtime default). Also "dynamic_routing escalates per-attempt above all of them" misreads as suggesting dynamic_routing wins over model_overrides — actually overrides still win at step 1. Reworded top-down so the precedence direction is unambiguous: - model_profile = base - models = phase-level override - dynamic_routing = per-attempt escalation - model_overrides = per-agent exception (top) - runtime default = fallback No code changes; docs only. * docs(#3024): note escalate_on_failure:false in escalation-flow diagram (CR) CodeRabbit nitpick: the escalation-flow diagram in docs/CONFIGURATION.md described the soft-failure → respawn → tier_models[next_tier_up] path, but didn't surface the `dynamic_routing.escalate_on_failure: false` kill-switch right next to it. Users reading the flow diagram (which is the canonical place to understand attempt behavior) wouldn't see that the kill-switch overrides the soft-failure branch. Added a one-paragraph note immediately after the flow listing, before the tier-sequence example, so the kill-switch is visible exactly where users decide whether escalation will happen. No code changes; docs only.
GSD Documentation
Comprehensive documentation for the Get Shit Done (GSD) framework — a meta-prompting, context engineering, and spec-driven development system for AI coding agents.
Language versions: English · Português (pt-BR) · 日本語 · 简体中文
Documentation Index
| Document | Audience | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Contributors, advanced users | System architecture, agent model, data flow, and internal design |
| Feature Reference | All users | Feature narratives and requirements for released features (see CHANGELOG for latest additions) |
| Command Reference | All users | Stable commands with syntax, flags, options, and examples |
| Configuration Reference | All users | Full config schema, workflow toggles, model profiles, git branching |
| CLI Tools Reference | Contributors, agent authors | gsd-tools.cjs programmatic API for workflows and agents |
| Agent Reference | Contributors, advanced users | Role cards for primary agents — roles, tools, spawn patterns (the agents/ filesystem is authoritative) |
| User Guide | All users | Workflow walkthroughs, troubleshooting, and recovery |
| Context Monitor | All users | Context window monitoring hook architecture |
| Discuss Mode | All users | Assumptions vs interview mode for discuss-phase |
Quick Links
- What's new: see CHANGELOG for current release notes, and upstream README for release highlights
- Getting started: README → install →
/gsd-new-project - Full workflow walkthrough: User Guide
- All commands at a glance: Command Reference
- Configuring GSD: Configuration Reference
- How the system works internally: Architecture
- Contributing or extending: CLI Tools Reference + Agent Reference