Files
msd-core/get-shit-done/templates/context.md
Lex Christopherson a7249ebe83 feat(discuss-phase): intelligent gray area analysis with scope guardrails
- Analyze phase to identify gray areas by category (UI, UX, Behavior, etc.)
- Present multi-select for user to choose which areas to discuss
- Deep-dive each selected area with focused questioning loop
- Explicit scope guardrail: clarify HOW, never expand WHAT
- Capture deferred ideas without acting on them
- Downstream awareness: CONTEXT.md feeds researcher and planner agents
- Template restructured for decisions (domain, decisions, discretion, deferred)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-16 10:11:17 -06:00

4.6 KiB

Phase Context Template

Template for .planning/phases/XX-name/{phase}-CONTEXT.md - captures implementation decisions for a phase.

Purpose: Document decisions that downstream agents need. Researcher uses this to know WHAT to investigate. Planner uses this to know WHAT choices are locked vs flexible.

Downstream consumers:

  • gsd-phase-researcher — Reads decisions to focus research (e.g., "card layout" → research card component patterns)
  • gsd-planner — Reads decisions to create specific tasks (e.g., "infinite scroll" → task includes virtualization)

File Template

# Phase [X]: [Name] - Context

**Gathered:** [date]
**Status:** Ready for planning

<domain>
## Phase Boundary

[Clear statement of what this phase delivers — the scope anchor. This comes from ROADMAP.md and is fixed. Discussion clarifies implementation within this boundary.]

</domain>

<decisions>
## Implementation Decisions

### [Category discussed, e.g., UI]
- [Specific decision made]
- [Another decision if applicable]

### [Category discussed, e.g., Behavior]
- [Specific decision made]

### Claude's Discretion
[Areas where user explicitly said "you decide" — Claude has flexibility here during planning/implementation]

</decisions>

<specifics>
## Specific Ideas

[Any particular references, examples, or "I want it like X" moments from discussion. Product references, specific behaviors, interaction patterns.]

[If none: "No specific requirements — open to standard approaches"]

</specifics>

<deferred>
## Deferred Ideas

[Ideas that came up during discussion but belong in other phases. Captured here so they're not lost, but explicitly out of scope for this phase.]

[If none: "None — discussion stayed within phase scope"]

</deferred>

---

*Phase: XX-name*
*Context gathered: [date]*

<good_examples>

# Phase 3: Post Feed - Context

**Gathered:** 2025-01-20
**Status:** Ready for planning

<domain>
## Phase Boundary

Display posts from followed users in a scrollable feed. Users can view posts and see engagement counts. Creating posts and interactions are separate phases.

</domain>

<decisions>
## Implementation Decisions

### UI
- Card-based layout, not timeline or list
- Each card shows: author avatar, name, timestamp, full post content, reaction counts
- Cards have subtle shadows, rounded corners — modern feel
- Show 10 posts initially, load more on scroll

### Behavior
- Infinite scroll, not pagination
- Pull-to-refresh on mobile
- New posts indicator at top ("3 new posts") rather than auto-inserting

### Empty State
- Friendly illustration + "Follow people to see posts here"
- Suggest 3-5 accounts to follow based on interests

### Claude's Discretion
- Loading skeleton design
- Exact spacing and typography
- Error state handling

</decisions>

<specifics>
## Specific Ideas

- "I like how Twitter shows the new posts indicator without disrupting your scroll position"
- Cards should feel like Linear's issue cards — clean, not cluttered
- No infinite scroll fatigue — maybe show "You're all caught up" after ~50 posts

</specifics>

<deferred>
## Deferred Ideas

- Commenting on posts — Phase 5
- Reaction picker (not just counts) — Phase 5
- Bookmarking posts — add to backlog

</deferred>

---

*Phase: 03-post-feed*
*Context gathered: 2025-01-20*

</good_examples>

**This template captures DECISIONS for downstream agents.**

The output should answer: "What does the researcher need to investigate? What choices are locked for the planner?"

Good content:

  • "Card-based layout, not timeline"
  • "Infinite scroll with pull-to-refresh"
  • "Show 10 posts initially"
  • "New posts indicator rather than auto-insert"

Bad content (too vague):

  • "Should feel modern and clean"
  • "Good user experience"
  • "Fast and responsive"
  • "Easy to use"

Sections explained:

  • Domain — The scope anchor. Copied/derived from ROADMAP.md. Fixed boundary.
  • Decisions — Organized by category (UI, UX, Behavior, etc.). Actual choices made.
  • Claude's Discretion — Explicit acknowledgment of what Claude can decide during implementation.
  • Specifics — Product references, examples, "like X but..." statements.
  • Deferred — Ideas captured but explicitly out of scope. Prevents scope creep while preserving good ideas.

After creation:

  • File lives in phase directory: .planning/phases/XX-name/{phase}-CONTEXT.md
  • gsd-phase-researcher uses decisions to focus investigation
  • gsd-planner uses decisions + research to create executable tasks
  • Downstream agents should NOT need to ask the user again about captured decisions