Files
msd-core/tests/ci-full-lane-sharding.test.cjs
sim 5039d49924 ci(#3057): shard the scoped Windows lane, the last unsharded one
The scoped Windows lane reached exactly 15m05s and was cancelled on four
consecutive shas of PR #3094. A job that exceeds timeout-minutes reports as
CANCELLED rather than FAILURE, which is why it first read as infrastructure
noise; the giveaway is that the duration equals the cap. The Required tests
rollup fans that job in, so it red-blocked merge while every other lane —
including all three sharded full-Windows shards — was green.

The trigger was a change to the shared test helper, which scopes the
install-heavy suites into the selected list. The lane normally runs about eight
minutes; with that list it does not fit. It was the only unsharded lane left in
this job, so it was the only one without headroom to absorb a large scoped
list.

Issue #869 hit this exact cliff on the sibling lane and named the durable answer
in its own follow-up: a timeout bump moves the cliff, sharding removes it.
#2952 then sharded the full lane. This finishes that work.

The runner already supports it — the shard partition is applied after scope
selection, so it composes with a selected file list rather than only with a
suite, and the partition is cost-weighted from the measured timings table. The
job name template already renders a shard suffix when one is present, so the
three entries name themselves. No individual matrix job is a required status
check; the rollup is, and it is name-independent, so renaming these jobs does
not touch branch protection.

timeout-minutes stays at 15. Each shard now does roughly a third of the work,
so the cap goes from binding to backstop without being raised.

The lane-shape tests were generalized rather than relaxed: the complete-shard-set
invariant now runs per sharded scope instead of only over the full lane, and
"only the full lane is sharded" became "targeted is the only unsharded lane". A
new assertion pins the shard through to the runner — without it the three shards
would each run the entire selected list, triple the cost and no speedup, and
every check would stay green.

No LANE_COSTS entry is added for the new shards. The only recorded cost for that
lane is the pre-sharding run that hit the cap, and inventing a post-sharding
number would be exactly the kind of unmeasured claim the rest of that table
avoids. The estimate and the reason are written down instead, to be replaced by
a real measurement.

Refs #3057

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-05 23:22:59 -04:00

305 lines
13 KiB
JavaScript

'use strict';
/**
* The full test lane and the scoped Windows lane are both sharded, and the
* coverage gate that sharding displaced is still wired in —
* .github/workflows/test.yml (#2952, #3057).
*
* The `scope: full` lane was the only unsharded lane in this file. It ran the
* entire unit suite under c8 on a single runner, grew past a 15-minute cap, and
* reddened `next` (#2952). Raising the cap treated the symptom; sharding is the
* shape fix, and it is the same answer #1212 reached for the Windows lane at
* the time.
*
* The `scope: windows` lane then hit the identical cliff itself: it reached
* exactly 15m05s and was CANCELLED on PR #3094, four shas in a row. Per #869's
* stated durable follow-up, it is now sharded three ways too (#3057), leaving
* `scope: targeted` as the only lane in this job with no shard.
*
* Sharding introduces two failure modes that stay GREEN while being wrong, so
* both are pinned here:
*
* 1. An incomplete shard set. If the matrix declares shards 1/3 and 2/3 but
* never 3/3, a third of the unit suite simply stops running and every check
* still passes. The partition MATH is already covered — completeness,
* disjointness, balance and determinism are asserted against selectShard in
* run-tests-harness.test.cjs (#1212), including a fast-check property. What
* is NOT covered there, and is asserted here, is that the WORKFLOW asks for
* a complete set: same denominator everywhere, numerators exactly 1..N.
*
* 2. A dropped coverage gate. A sharded run leaves each runner with a partial
* picture — shard 2 never executes shard 1's files, so those read 0%. The
* ≥70% gate therefore cannot live on the shards; it moved to `coverage-gate`,
* which merges every shard's raw V8 dumps. If that job silently stopped
* being required, coverage enforcement would vanish without any red check.
*/
const test = require('node:test');
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
const fs = require('node:fs');
const path = require('node:path');
const yaml = require('js-yaml');
const WORKFLOWS_DIR = path.join(__dirname, '..', '.github', 'workflows');
function loadWorkflow(name) {
return yaml.load(fs.readFileSync(path.join(WORKFLOWS_DIR, name), 'utf8'));
}
/**
* Parse an `i/n` shard spec into { index, total }, or null if malformed.
* Mirrors the grammar scripts/run-tests.cjs accepts for --shard.
*/
function parseShardSpec(spec) {
const m = /^(\d+)\/(\d+)$/.exec(String(spec));
if (!m) return null;
const index = Number(m[1]);
const total = Number(m[2]);
if (!Number.isInteger(index) || !Number.isInteger(total)) return null;
if (total < 1 || index < 1 || index > total) return null;
return { index, total };
}
/** True iff `specs` is exactly one complete shard set: same N, numerators 1..N. */
function isCompleteShardSet(specs) {
if (specs.length === 0) return false;
const parsed = specs.map(parseShardSpec);
if (parsed.some((p) => p === null)) return false;
const total = parsed[0].total;
if (parsed.some((p) => p.total !== total)) return false;
if (parsed.length !== total) return false;
const seen = new Set(parsed.map((p) => p.index));
return seen.size === total && [...seen].every((i) => i >= 1 && i <= total);
}
test('the full test lane is sharded and complete (#2952)', async (t) => {
const workflow = loadWorkflow('test.yml');
const include = workflow.jobs.test.strategy.matrix.include;
const fullLanes = include.filter((e) => e.scope === 'full');
const windowsLanes = include.filter((e) => e.scope === 'windows');
// The only lane in this job with no shard is `scope: targeted` — the fast,
// single-runner default lane. Both `full` and `windows` are sharded.
const shardedScopes = { full: fullLanes, windows: windowsLanes };
for (const [scope, lanes] of Object.entries(shardedScopes)) {
await t.test(`the \`scope: ${scope}\` lane is actually sharded, not a single runner`, () => {
assert.ok(lanes.length > 0, `expected at least one \`scope: ${scope}\` matrix entry`);
assert.ok(
lanes.length > 1,
`the \`scope: ${scope}\` lane is back to a single unsharded entry. That is `
+ 'the #2952/#3057 regression: the whole suite on one runner grows past '
+ 'its cap and reddens `next`.',
);
for (const lane of lanes) {
assert.ok(
lane.shard !== undefined,
`a \`scope: ${scope}\` matrix entry declares no shard: ${JSON.stringify(lane)}`,
);
}
});
await t.test(`the \`scope: ${scope}\` lane's declared shards form one complete set`, () => {
const specs = lanes.map((e) => e.shard);
assert.ok(
isCompleteShardSet(specs),
`the \`scope: ${scope}\` lane's shards ${JSON.stringify(specs)} are not a `
+ 'complete set. Every entry must share one denominator N and the '
+ 'numerators must be exactly 1..N — a missing numerator silently stops '
+ 'running that slice of the suite while every check stays green.',
);
});
}
await t.test('no other lane is sharded', () => {
for (const lane of include.filter((e) => e.scope !== 'full' && e.scope !== 'windows')) {
assert.equal(
lane.shard, undefined,
`lane ${JSON.stringify(lane)} declares a shard but is neither \`scope: full\` `
+ 'nor `scope: windows` — the targeted lane runs a selected file list, not '
+ 'a partition.',
);
}
});
await t.test('the scoped Windows shards are passed through to run-tests.cjs', () => {
const scopedStep = workflow.jobs.test.steps.find(
(s) => s.name === 'Run scoped tests',
);
assert.ok(scopedStep, 'no "Run scoped tests" step in the test job');
assert.match(
scopedStep.run, /matrix\.shard/,
'the "Run scoped tests" step does not reference matrix.shard, so the '
+ 'windows lane\'s three shards would each run the entire selected file '
+ 'list — N times the cost, no speedup.',
);
});
await t.test('each shard runs its own slice, not the whole suite', () => {
const unitStep = workflow.jobs.test.steps.find(
(s) => typeof s.run === 'string' && s.run.includes('test:coverage:unit:raw'),
);
assert.ok(unitStep, 'no step in the test job runs the raw unit coverage script');
assert.match(
unitStep.run, /--shard \$\{\{ matrix\.shard \}\}/,
'the unit step does not pass matrix.shard through to run-tests.cjs, so '
+ 'every shard would run the ENTIRE suite — N times the cost, no speedup.',
);
});
await t.test('the aux suites are pinned to one shard that actually exists', () => {
// Pinning to a LIVE shard is the whole assertion. A pin to a shard the
// matrix no longer declares — say the count moves to 4 and these `if:`
// conditions keep naming 1/3 — means the aux suites stop running entirely
// while every check stays green. Checking only that some shard literal is
// present would not catch that, so the literal is resolved against the
// shards the matrix actually declares.
const declared = fullLanes.map((e) => String(e.shard));
const auxScripts = ['test:integration', 'test:security', 'test:install', 'test:slow'];
const pins = new Set();
for (const script of auxScripts) {
const step = workflow.jobs.test.steps.find(
(s) => typeof s.run === 'string' && s.run.includes(script),
);
assert.ok(step, `no step runs \`npm run ${script}\``);
const pin = /matrix\.shard == '([^']+)'/.exec(String(step.if));
assert.ok(
pin,
`the \`${script}\` step is not pinned to a single shard; it would run `
+ 'once per shard and multiply its cost for no extra signal.',
);
assert.ok(
declared.includes(pin[1]),
`the \`${script}\` step is pinned to shard '${pin[1]}', which the matrix `
+ `does not declare (${JSON.stringify(declared)}). That condition can `
+ 'never be true, so this suite would silently never run.',
);
pins.add(pin[1]);
}
assert.equal(
pins.size, 1,
`the aux suites are split across shards ${JSON.stringify([...pins])}; they `
+ 'are meant to run together on exactly one.',
);
});
});
test('the merged coverage gate survives sharding (#2952)', async (t) => {
const workflow = loadWorkflow('test.yml');
await t.test('a dedicated coverage-gate job exists and consumes the shards', () => {
const gate = workflow.jobs['coverage-gate'];
assert.ok(gate, '.github/workflows/test.yml declares no `coverage-gate` job');
assert.ok(
(gate.needs || []).includes('test'),
'coverage-gate must depend on `test` — it merges that job\'s shard artifacts',
);
const merges = gate.steps.some(
(s) => String(s.uses || '').includes('download-artifact')
&& s.with && s.with['merge-multiple'] === true,
);
assert.ok(
merges,
'coverage-gate does not download the shard artifacts with merge-multiple. '
+ 'Without every shard merged into one coverage/tmp, the gate scores a '
+ 'partial run: files no shard in hand executed read 0%.',
);
});
await t.test('both coverage thresholds are still enforced', () => {
const runs = workflow.jobs['coverage-gate'].steps
.map((s) => s.run).filter((r) => typeof r === 'string').join('\n');
const pkg = JSON.parse(
fs.readFileSync(path.join(__dirname, '..', 'package.json'), 'utf8'),
);
assert.match(
runs, /test:coverage:report/,
'coverage-gate never runs the coverage report+gate script — the >=70% '
+ 'lines / >=60% branches gate on gsd-core/bin/lib would be gone',
);
assert.match(
runs, /test:coverage:scripts-floor/,
'coverage-gate never enforces the >=55% scripts/ floor',
);
// The workflow calls npm scripts precisely so the thresholds are defined
// once. If a future edit inlines c8 into the YAML, the two surfaces can
// drift silently — the gate would still be green while measuring something
// other than what package.json says.
assert.match(
pkg.scripts['test:coverage:report'], /check-coverage-gate\.cjs/,
'test:coverage:report no longer runs check-coverage-gate.cjs',
);
assert.match(
pkg.scripts['test:coverage:scripts-floor'], /--lines 55/,
'test:coverage:scripts-floor no longer enforces 55%',
);
assert.match(
pkg.scripts['test:coverage:unit:raw'], /--suite unit/,
'test:coverage:unit:raw no longer runs the unit suite',
);
assert.doesNotMatch(
pkg.scripts['test:coverage:unit:raw'], /--shard/,
'the shard must come from the workflow matrix, not be baked into the script',
);
});
await t.test('required-tests fails when the coverage gate fails', () => {
const required = workflow.jobs['required-tests'];
assert.ok(
(required.needs || []).includes('coverage-gate'),
'required-tests does not depend on coverage-gate, so a red gate could not '
+ 'block a merge',
);
const summarize = required.steps[0];
assert.ok(
'COVERAGE_GATE_RESULT' in (summarize.env || {}),
'required-tests does not read needs.coverage-gate.result',
);
assert.match(
summarize.run, /coverage-gate did not pass/,
'required-tests never fails on a red coverage-gate — depending on a job '
+ 'without checking its result makes the dependency decorative',
);
});
await t.test('a skipped coverage gate is not treated as a failure', () => {
// coverage-gate is conditioned on product_changed, exactly like the test
// lane. A docs-only PR skips both; treating `skipped` as red would block
// every one of them.
assert.match(
workflow.jobs['required-tests'].steps[0].run,
/COVERAGE_GATE_RESULT" != "skipped"/,
'required-tests treats a skipped coverage-gate as a failure',
);
});
});
test('shard-spec parsing is exact at its boundaries (#2952)', () => {
assert.deepEqual(parseShardSpec('1/3'), { index: 1, total: 3 });
assert.deepEqual(parseShardSpec('3/3'), { index: 3, total: 3 });
assert.deepEqual(parseShardSpec('1/1'), { index: 1, total: 1 });
// index 0 is below the range, index total+1 above it.
assert.equal(parseShardSpec('0/3'), null);
assert.equal(parseShardSpec('4/3'), null);
assert.equal(parseShardSpec('1/0'), null);
assert.equal(parseShardSpec('1'), null);
assert.equal(parseShardSpec('a/3'), null);
assert.equal(parseShardSpec(''), null);
assert.equal(parseShardSpec(undefined), null);
// A complete set, and the three ways one stops being complete.
assert.equal(isCompleteShardSet(['1/3', '2/3', '3/3']), true);
assert.equal(isCompleteShardSet(['1/3', '2/3']), false, 'missing numerator');
assert.equal(isCompleteShardSet(['1/3', '2/3', '2/3']), false, 'duplicate numerator');
assert.equal(isCompleteShardSet(['1/3', '2/3', '3/4']), false, 'mixed denominator');
assert.equal(isCompleteShardSet([]), false, 'empty set');
});