e81592878e
* feat(#2789): trim skill description anti-patterns; enforce 100-char budget - Trim descriptions in all commands/gsd/*.md files over 100 chars - Remove flag documentation from descriptions (belongs in argument-hint) - Remove Triggers: keyword stuffing - Add scripts/lint-descriptions.cjs — fails on descriptions > 100 chars - Add npm script: lint:descriptions - Add tests/enh-2789-description-budget.test.cjs Closes #2789 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#2789): add CHANGELOG entry for description budget lint * docs(#2789): update COMMANDS.md descriptions; add skill description standards note Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.5 KiB
name, description, argument-hint, allowed-tools
| name | description | argument-hint | allowed-tools | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gsd:spec-phase | Clarify WHAT a phase delivers with ambiguity scoring; produces a SPEC.md before discuss-phase. | <phase> [--auto] [--text] |
|
Position in workflow: spec-phase → discuss-phase → plan-phase → execute-phase → verify
How it works:
- Load phase context (PROJECT.md, REQUIREMENTS.md, ROADMAP.md, STATE.md)
- Scout the codebase — understand current state before asking questions
- Run Socratic interview loop (up to 6 rounds, rotating perspectives)
- Score ambiguity across 4 weighted dimensions after each round
- Gate: ambiguity ≤ 0.20 AND all dimensions meet minimums → write SPEC.md
- Commit SPEC.md — discuss-phase picks it up automatically on next run
Output: {phase_dir}/{padded_phase}-SPEC.md — falsifiable requirements that lock "what/why" before discuss-phase handles "how"
<execution_context>
@/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/spec-phase.md
@/.claude/get-shit-done/templates/spec.md
</execution_context>
<runtime_note>
Copilot (VS Code): Use vscode_askquestions wherever this workflow calls AskUserQuestion. They are equivalent.
</runtime_note>
Flags:
--auto— Skip interactive questions; Claude selects recommended defaults and writes SPEC.md--text— Use plain-text numbered lists instead of TUI menus (required for/rcremote sessions)
Context files are resolved in-workflow using init phase-op.
MANDATORY: Read the workflow file BEFORE taking any action. The workflow contains the complete step-by-step process including the Socratic interview loop, ambiguity scoring gate, and SPEC.md generation. Do not improvise from the objective summary above.
<success_criteria>
- Codebase scouted for current state before questioning begins
- All 4 ambiguity dimensions scored after each interview round
- Gate passed: ambiguity ≤ 0.20 AND all dimension minimums met
- SPEC.md written with falsifiable requirements, explicit boundaries, and acceptance criteria
- SPEC.md committed atomically
- User knows they can now run /gsd-discuss-phase which will load SPEC.md automatically </success_criteria>