* feat(gsd-tools): add compound init commands for workflow setup Adds 8 compound commands that return all context a workflow needs in one JSON blob, replacing 5-10 atomic calls per workflow: - init execute-phase: models, config, phase info, plan inventory - init plan-phase: models, workflow flags, existing artifacts - init new-project: models, brownfield detection, state checks - init new-milestone: models, milestone info - init quick: models, next task number, timestamps - init resume: file existence, interrupted agent - init verify-work: models, phase info - init phase-op: generic phase context Updated 8 workflows to use compound commands: - execute-phase, plan-phase, new-project, quick - resume-project, verify-work, discuss-phase Token savings: ~200 lines of bash setup replaced with single init calls. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(gsd-tools): add 4 new init commands and update files to use compound commands Add new compound init commands: - init todos - context for todo workflows - init milestone-op - context for milestone operations - init map-codebase - context for codebase mapping - init progress - context for progress workflow Update 24 files to use compound init commands instead of atomic calls: - 4 phase operation workflows (add-phase, insert-phase, remove-phase, verify-phase) - 5 todo/milestone workflows (add-todo, check-todos, audit-milestone, complete-milestone, new-milestone) - 6 misc workflows (execute-plan, map-codebase, pause-work, progress, set-profile, settings) - 6 agent files (gsd-executor, gsd-planner, gsd-phase-researcher, gsd-plan-checker, gsd-debugger, gsd-research-synthesizer) - 2 command files (debug, research-phase) - 1 reference file (planning-config) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(gsd-tools): add init to help output Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(verify-phase): correct expected init fields The workflow was referencing plans/summaries from init phase-op, but those fields come from ls command. Updated to reference has_plans and plan_count which are actually in phase-op output. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
5.3 KiB
name, description, argument-hint, allowed-tools
| name | description | argument-hint | allowed-tools | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gsd:research-phase | Research how to implement a phase (standalone - usually use /gsd:plan-phase instead) | [phase] |
|
Note: This is a standalone research command. For most workflows, use /gsd:plan-phase which integrates research automatically.
Use this command when:
- You want to research without planning yet
- You want to re-research after planning is complete
- You need to investigate before deciding if a phase is feasible
Orchestrator role: Parse phase, validate against roadmap, check existing research, gather context, spawn researcher agent, present results.
Why subagent: Research burns context fast (WebSearch, Context7 queries, source verification). Fresh 200k context for investigation. Main context stays lean for user interaction.
Phase number: $ARGUMENTS (required)Normalize phase input in step 1 before any directory lookups.
0. Initialize Context
INIT=$(node ~/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.js init phase-op "$ARGUMENTS")
Extract from init JSON: phase_dir, phase_number, phase_name, phase_found, commit_docs, has_research.
Resolve researcher model:
RESEARCHER_MODEL=$(node ~/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.js resolve-model gsd-phase-researcher --raw)
1. Validate Phase
grep -A5 "Phase ${phase_number}:" .planning/ROADMAP.md 2>/dev/null
If not found (phase_found=false): Error and exit. If found: Extract phase number, name, description.
2. Check Existing Research
ls .planning/phases/${PHASE}-*/RESEARCH.md 2>/dev/null
If exists: Offer: 1) Update research, 2) View existing, 3) Skip. Wait for response.
If doesn't exist: Continue.
3. Gather Phase Context
grep -A20 "Phase ${PHASE}:" .planning/ROADMAP.md
cat .planning/REQUIREMENTS.md 2>/dev/null
cat .planning/phases/${PHASE}-*/*-CONTEXT.md 2>/dev/null
grep -A30 "### Decisions Made" .planning/STATE.md 2>/dev/null
Present summary with phase description, requirements, prior decisions.
4. Spawn gsd-phase-researcher Agent
Research modes: ecosystem (default), feasibility, implementation, comparison.
<research_type>
Phase Research — investigating HOW to implement a specific phase well.
</research_type>
<key_insight>
The question is NOT "which library should I use?"
The question is: "What do I not know that I don't know?"
For this phase, discover:
- What's the established architecture pattern?
- What libraries form the standard stack?
- What problems do people commonly hit?
- What's SOTA vs what Claude's training thinks is SOTA?
- What should NOT be hand-rolled?
</key_insight>
<objective>
Research implementation approach for Phase {phase_number}: {phase_name}
Mode: ecosystem
</objective>
<context>
**Phase description:** {phase_description}
**Requirements:** {requirements_list}
**Prior decisions:** {decisions_if_any}
**Phase context:** {context_md_content}
</context>
<downstream_consumer>
Your RESEARCH.md will be loaded by `/gsd:plan-phase` which uses specific sections:
- `## Standard Stack` → Plans use these libraries
- `## Architecture Patterns` → Task structure follows these
- `## Don't Hand-Roll` → Tasks NEVER build custom solutions for listed problems
- `## Common Pitfalls` → Verification steps check for these
- `## Code Examples` → Task actions reference these patterns
Be prescriptive, not exploratory. "Use X" not "Consider X or Y."
</downstream_consumer>
<quality_gate>
Before declaring complete, verify:
- [ ] All domains investigated (not just some)
- [ ] Negative claims verified with official docs
- [ ] Multiple sources for critical claims
- [ ] Confidence levels assigned honestly
- [ ] Section names match what plan-phase expects
</quality_gate>
<output>
Write to: .planning/phases/${PHASE}-{slug}/${PHASE}-RESEARCH.md
</output>
Task(
prompt="First, read ~/.claude/agents/gsd-phase-researcher.md for your role and instructions.\n\n" + filled_prompt,
subagent_type="general-purpose",
model="{researcher_model}",
description="Research Phase {phase}"
)
5. Handle Agent Return
## RESEARCH COMPLETE: Display summary, offer: Plan phase, Dig deeper, Review full, Done.
## CHECKPOINT REACHED: Present to user, get response, spawn continuation.
## RESEARCH INCONCLUSIVE: Show what was attempted, offer: Add context, Try different mode, Manual.
6. Spawn Continuation Agent
<objective>
Continue research for Phase {phase_number}: {phase_name}
</objective>
<prior_state>
Research file: @.planning/phases/${PHASE}-{slug}/${PHASE}-RESEARCH.md
</prior_state>
<checkpoint_response>
**Type:** {checkpoint_type}
**Response:** {user_response}
</checkpoint_response>
Task(
prompt="First, read ~/.claude/agents/gsd-phase-researcher.md for your role and instructions.\n\n" + continuation_prompt,
subagent_type="general-purpose",
model="{researcher_model}",
description="Continue research Phase {phase}"
)
<success_criteria>
- Phase validated against roadmap
- Existing research checked
- gsd-phase-researcher spawned with context
- Checkpoints handled correctly
- User knows next steps </success_criteria>