* docs(#3186): record the disk-strict completion decision in ADR-3180 7.4 The maintainer decided #2957 on 2026-08-08: disk state is authoritative and a ROADMAP checkbox is a human annotation with no machine authority. Section 7.4 still carried the OPEN QUESTION and was marked blocked, so the contract said one thing and the tracker another. Recorded per section 7's own rule - a behavior not stated there is not decided, and amending a rule is an ADR amendment rather than a code change with a comment. The decision comment names Phase 4's PR as the carrier of this edit and makes it an acceptance criterion that the text be in the tree before implementation begins, so this lands first, alone, ahead of any code. Also clears the stale blocked-on-2957 row in the guard roster. * refactor(#3186): one shared phase-completion predicate, disk-strict isPhaseComplete in verification.cts becomes the single owner. It calls readVerificationStatus UNCONDITIONALLY - plan count is not a precondition - so a zero-plan phase with a passing VERIFICATION.md is complete. That is #3168: init gated the read on a plan count and synthesized a not_required sentinel, so phase.complete succeeded while init.manager reported incomplete for the same phase. The guard, built and run before scope was fixed per Amendment 3, found 9 re-derivations where the ADR named 3. Four were unnamed, including one in the prompt layer: mvp-phase.md ORed a ticked checkbox with disk status, which under disk-strict is the divergence itself. Per the #2957 decision, a ticked ROADMAP checkbox is a human annotation with no machine authority. The overrides in roadmap analyze and init manager are deleted rather than generalized; the user's checkbox stays in ROADMAP.md, only its authority goes. scanPhasePlans.completed and buildWorkstreamInventory are deliberately NOT folded - they answer 'are all plans summarized', which is a different question, and folding them would either over-report completion or invert the dependency direction between Phase 1's owner and this one. Verified on the remote runner. * fix(#3186): close seven review findings and record the missing-verdict rule The isolated review reproduced a write-path regression I introduced: migrating cmdRoadmapUpdatePlanProgress dropped its summaryCount>=planCount gate, so a phase with a fresh passing verification plus a newly-added unsummarized plan reported complete AND wrote a checkbox into ROADMAP.md while phase complete refused. The owner stays right per 7.4 - plan count is not a completion precondition - so the gate is restored at the write site as an explicit composition, mirroring the separate 2648 unexecuted-plan gate cmdPhaseComplete already carries. The spec axis was right that my 0.x-split reasoning was too permissive. The 2957 decision names buildStateFrontmatter as one of the three that must converge, and buildWorkstreamInventory combined a summaries-met local with verification data to decide the same verdict - Decision 4(c)'s named bypass, and it reproduced 3168 in a third surface. Both now route through the owner. The raw scanPhasePlans helper stays: it answers are-plans-summarized, which genuinely is a different question. Maintainer decision recorded in 7.4: a missing verdict is not a passing one, so an absent VERIFICATION.md means not complete everywhere. That retires 2645's verifier-disabled tolerance and inverts its Goodhart incentive - deleting the evidence now lowers completion instead of raising it. Guard hardened: block-form count gates and algebraic restatements are caught, and the header now discloses its remaining limits instead of overclaiming. Verified on the remote runner. * fix(#3186): route state sync through the owner and catch bare completed reads The matrix found 52 failures. 51 were fixtures asserting the old semantics: a phase with plans and summaries but no VERIFICATION.md used to count complete and correctly no longer does. Each fixture now carries a passing verification where that is what the test was actually about, rather than having its assertion weakened. The 52nd was a real 10th re-derivation the guard could not see. cmdStateSync destructured scanPhasePlans().completed directly - a bare field read, not a comparison - and used it as a completion verdict, so state sync and state json disagreed on completed_phases for identical disk state. Routed through the owner. Guard gains shape (d): any read of .completed off a scanPhasePlans() result outside plan-scan.cts, in chained, destructured and indirect forms, function scoped with no line window. It cannot tell a summaries-met read from a completion read - that is data flow - so it flags every one and requires a written-reason exemption, which is the same discipline shapes a-c already use. The blind spot is disclosed in the header rather than overclaimed. The emitted-attribution failure was also mine, not pre-existing: the mvp-phase.md checkbox-OR removal moves emitted bytes, acknowledged in tests/emitted-drift-acks. Verified on the remote runner. * test(#3186): give the nested-plans sync fixture a passing verification Last 3 matrix failures were one failure echoing up two describe levels. Phase 01-alpha had plans and summaries but no VERIFICATION.md, so under disk-strict completed stayed 0 and no Progress change was emitted - correct new behavior, not a regression. Added the passing verification rather than dropping the Progress expectation, so the test still covers what #3257 is about: that a nested plans/ layout is counted and not undercounted. Probe against the built lib confirms Progress: 0% -> 50% alongside Total Plans in Phase: 0 -> 3. * chore(#3186): backfill changeset PR number pr:0 placeholder replaced with the real number now that #3306 exists. --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
1877 lines
99 KiB
JavaScript
1877 lines
99 KiB
JavaScript
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
// Regression + projection coverage for the workstream-inventory module.
|
|
// #1913: status must be derived from authoritative shipped signals (milestone
|
|
// archive snapshot / ROADMAP SHIPPED marker), not trusted from the mutable
|
|
// STATE.md `Status` field.
|
|
|
|
const { describe, test, before, after } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('fs');
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
const { cleanup } = require('./helpers.cjs');
|
|
const { createFixture, seedWorkstream } = require('./fixtures/index.cjs');
|
|
const { buildWorkstreamInventory, isCompletedInventory, pickRollupWinners } = require('../gsd-core/bin/lib/workstream-inventory-builder.cjs');
|
|
const { inspectWorkstream } = require('../gsd-core/bin/lib/workstream-inventory.cjs');
|
|
const { VERIFIER_STATUSES } = require('../gsd-core/bin/lib/verification.cjs');
|
|
const { phaseKeyFromDir, phaseKeyFromProse, phaseKeyFromToken } = require('../gsd-core/bin/lib/phase-id.cjs');
|
|
const fc = require('fast-check');
|
|
|
|
const STALE_STATE = 'status: executing\n';
|
|
const IN_PROGRESS_ROADMAP =
|
|
'# Roadmap\n## Milestones\n- v2.0 Test — IN PROGRESS\n## Phases\n### Phase 1: Foo\n**Goal:** foo\n';
|
|
|
|
describe('#1913 — workstream status derived from authoritative shipped signals', () => {
|
|
let tmpDir;
|
|
before(() => { tmpDir = createFixture(); });
|
|
after(() => cleanup(tmpDir));
|
|
|
|
test('builder: milestoneShipped overrides a stale executing field (derived + conflict)', () => {
|
|
const inv = buildWorkstreamInventory({
|
|
name: 'ws-a',
|
|
projectDir: tmpDir,
|
|
workstreamDir: path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'workstreams', 'ws-a'),
|
|
phaseDirNames: [],
|
|
activeWorkstreamName: '',
|
|
phaseFilesCounts: [],
|
|
roadmapPhaseCount: 0,
|
|
stateProjection: { status: 'executing', current_phase: null, last_activity: null },
|
|
filesExist: { roadmap: true, state: true, requirements: true },
|
|
milestoneShipped: true,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status, 'milestone complete');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status_source, 'derived');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status_conflict, true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('builder: no shipped signal → field status, no conflict', () => {
|
|
const inv = buildWorkstreamInventory({
|
|
name: 'ws-b',
|
|
projectDir: tmpDir,
|
|
workstreamDir: path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'workstreams', 'ws-b'),
|
|
phaseDirNames: [],
|
|
activeWorkstreamName: '',
|
|
phaseFilesCounts: [],
|
|
roadmapPhaseCount: 0,
|
|
stateProjection: { status: 'executing', current_phase: null, last_activity: null },
|
|
filesExist: { roadmap: true, state: true, requirements: true },
|
|
milestoneShipped: false,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status, 'executing');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status_source, 'field');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status_conflict, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('inspectWorkstream: shipped archive snapshot + stale executing STATE → derived complete', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-archived' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), STALE_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), IN_PROGRESS_ROADMAP);
|
|
// Authoritative shipped signal: an archived milestone snapshot.
|
|
fs.mkdirSync(path.join(wsDir, 'milestones'), { recursive: true });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'milestones', 'v1.0-ROADMAP.md'), '# v1.0 archived\n');
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-archived', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv, 'inventory should be produced');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status, 'milestone complete');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status_source, 'derived');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status_conflict, true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('inspectWorkstream: ROADMAP SHIPPED marker + stale executing STATE → derived complete', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-shipped' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), STALE_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(
|
|
path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'),
|
|
'# Roadmap\n## Milestones\n<details><summary>✅ v1.0 MVP - SHIPPED 2026-06-01</summary>\n## Phases\n### Phase 1: Foo\n**Goal:** foo\n'
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-shipped', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv, 'inventory should be produced');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status, 'milestone complete');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status_source, 'derived');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status_conflict, true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('inspectWorkstream: no shipped signals + executing STATE → field status, no conflict', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-active' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), STALE_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), IN_PROGRESS_ROADMAP);
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-active', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv, 'inventory should be produced');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status, 'executing');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status_source, 'field');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status_conflict, false);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('isCompletedInventory — ADR-2207 status lifecycle', () => {
|
|
test('terminal "milestone complete" variants are completed', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(isCompletedInventory('1.0 milestone complete'));
|
|
assert.ok(isCompletedInventory('Milestone complete'));
|
|
assert.ok(isCompletedInventory('milestone complete'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('intermediate "All phases complete" is NOT completed (ADR-2207)', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(!isCompletedInventory('All phases complete'),
|
|
'All phases complete is an intermediate state — milestone not yet formally closed');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('archived is completed', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(isCompletedInventory('archived'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('active statuses are NOT completed', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(!isCompletedInventory('Ready to plan'));
|
|
assert.ok(!isCompletedInventory('In progress'));
|
|
assert.ok(!isCompletedInventory('Executing'));
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// #2562: progress/status must be DERIVED from on-disk artifacts scoped to the
|
|
// CURRENT milestone — never a project-lifetime "ever shipped anything" signal,
|
|
// never a denominator that silently drops declared-but-unscaffolded phases, and
|
|
// never counting a phase with a failing VERIFICATION verdict as complete.
|
|
describe('#2562 — progress/status scoped to the current milestone (derived from artifacts)', () => {
|
|
let tmpDir;
|
|
before(() => { tmpDir = createFixture(); });
|
|
after(() => cleanup(tmpDir));
|
|
|
|
const BUILDER_BASE = {
|
|
projectDir: '/tmp/ws-proj',
|
|
workstreamDir: '/tmp/ws-proj/.planning/workstreams/ws',
|
|
activeWorkstreamName: '',
|
|
stateProjection: { status: 'executing', current_phase: null, last_activity: null },
|
|
filesExist: { roadmap: true, state: true, requirements: true },
|
|
milestoneShipped: false,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// ── Defect 3: verification-gated completeness (builder unit) ─────────────────
|
|
// ADR-3180 §7.4 (#3186 review finding 3): `complete` is now the CALLER-
|
|
// computed owner verdict (`isPhaseComplete`), passed in per phase via
|
|
// `PhaseFilesCount.complete` — the builder no longer re-derives it from
|
|
// `verificationStatus` + counts. These builder-unit fixtures pass
|
|
// `complete` directly (mirroring what `workstream-inventory.cts` computes
|
|
// from a real `isPhaseComplete(phaseDir)` call in production); `verificationStatus`
|
|
// stays on the fixture only because the `PhaseFilesCount` type still carries
|
|
// it (informational, unconsumed by `status`).
|
|
test('builder: SUMMARY≥PLAN but a human_needed verdict is NOT complete', () => {
|
|
const inv = buildWorkstreamInventory({
|
|
...BUILDER_BASE,
|
|
name: 'ws',
|
|
phaseDirNames: ['1-a', '2-b'],
|
|
phaseFilesCounts: [
|
|
{ directory: '1-a', planCount: 1, summaryCount: 1, inMilestone: true, verificationStatus: 'passed', complete: true },
|
|
{ directory: '2-b', planCount: 4, summaryCount: 4, inMilestone: true, verificationStatus: 'human_needed', complete: false },
|
|
],
|
|
roadmapPhaseCount: 2,
|
|
currentMilestonePhaseCount: 2,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(inv.phases.find(p => p.directory === '2-b').status, 'in_progress');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 50);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ADR-3180 §7.4 (#3186 review finding 3): disk-strict retires this
|
|
// tolerance. `isPhaseComplete` requires `verification.status === 'passed'`
|
|
// UNCONDITIONALLY — a 'missing' verdict (no `*-VERIFICATION.md`, e.g. a
|
|
// verifier-disabled project) is never complete, matching `roadmap analyze`
|
|
// / `init manager` / `phase complete` exactly. Disclosed in this phase's
|
|
// changeset.
|
|
test('builder: a missing verdict is NOT complete (verifier-off tolerance retired, disk-strict)', () => {
|
|
const inv = buildWorkstreamInventory({
|
|
...BUILDER_BASE,
|
|
name: 'ws',
|
|
phaseDirNames: ['1-a'],
|
|
phaseFilesCounts: [
|
|
{ directory: '1-a', planCount: 2, summaryCount: 2, inMilestone: true, verificationStatus: 'missing', complete: false },
|
|
],
|
|
roadmapPhaseCount: 1,
|
|
currentMilestonePhaseCount: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(inv.phases[0].status, 'in_progress');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ── Defect 2: denominator includes declared-but-unscaffolded phases (builder) ─
|
|
test('builder: current-milestone denominator counts a phase with no directory', () => {
|
|
const inv = buildWorkstreamInventory({
|
|
...BUILDER_BASE,
|
|
name: 'ws',
|
|
phaseDirNames: ['1-a', '2-b'], // phase 3 declared for the milestone but never scaffolded
|
|
phaseFilesCounts: [
|
|
{ directory: '1-a', planCount: 1, summaryCount: 1, inMilestone: true, verificationStatus: 'passed', complete: true },
|
|
{ directory: '2-b', planCount: 1, summaryCount: 1, inMilestone: true, verificationStatus: 'passed', complete: true },
|
|
],
|
|
roadmapPhaseCount: 2,
|
|
currentMilestonePhaseCount: 3,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(inv.roadmap_phase_count, 3);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 2);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 67, 'the dirless third phase keeps this below 100');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ── Defect 1: prior-milestone phases must not inflate the numerator (builder) ─
|
|
test('builder: completed prior-milestone dirs are excluded from the current rollup', () => {
|
|
const inv = buildWorkstreamInventory({
|
|
...BUILDER_BASE,
|
|
name: 'ws',
|
|
phaseDirNames: ['1-old', '2-cur'],
|
|
phaseFilesCounts: [
|
|
{ directory: '1-old', planCount: 3, summaryCount: 3, inMilestone: false, verificationStatus: 'passed', complete: true },
|
|
{ directory: '2-cur', planCount: 2, summaryCount: 0, inMilestone: true, verificationStatus: 'missing', complete: false },
|
|
],
|
|
roadmapPhaseCount: 2,
|
|
currentMilestonePhaseCount: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.total_plans, 2, 'only the current-milestone directory contributes plans');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ── inspectWorkstream integration (all three defects, end-to-end) ────────────
|
|
function writeWsPhase(wsDir, slug, { plans = 0, summaries = 0, verification } = {}) {
|
|
const dir = path.join(wsDir, 'phases', slug);
|
|
fs.mkdirSync(dir, { recursive: true });
|
|
for (let i = 1; i <= plans; i++) fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, `0${i}-PLAN.md`), '# plan\n');
|
|
for (let i = 1; i <= summaries; i++) fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, `0${i}-SUMMARY.md`), '# summary\n');
|
|
if (verification) fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, '01-VERIFICATION.md'), `---\nstatus: ${verification}\n---\n`);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const MS_STATE = 'milestone: v2.0\nstatus: executing\n';
|
|
// Milestone-grouped Progress table: v2.0 declares phases 3,4,5; 1,2 are shipped v1.0.
|
|
const MS_ROADMAP = [
|
|
'# Roadmap', '', '## Progress', '',
|
|
'| Phase | Milestone | Plans | Status | Done |',
|
|
'| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |',
|
|
'| 1. Old A | v1.0 | 2/2 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 2. Old B | v1.0 | 2/2 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 3. New A | v2.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 4. New B | v2.0 | 0/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
'| 5. New C | v2.0 | 0/1 | Not started | - |',
|
|
'',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
|
|
test('inspectWorkstream: prior-milestone dirs + a dirless current phase → not complete, not 100%', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-scope' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), MS_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), MS_ROADMAP);
|
|
writeWsPhase(wsDir, '1-old-a', { plans: 2, summaries: 2, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writeWsPhase(wsDir, '2-old-b', { plans: 2, summaries: 2, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writeWsPhase(wsDir, '3-new-a', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writeWsPhase(wsDir, '4-new-b', { plans: 1, summaries: 0 }); // in progress; phase 5 has NO dir
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-scope', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.roadmap_phase_count, 3, 'denominator = v2.0 phases {3,4,5}, incl. dirless 5');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 1, 'only phase 3; shipped v1.0 phases 1,2 excluded');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 33);
|
|
assert.notEqual(inv.status, 'milestone complete');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status, 'executing');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Reporter's minimal fixture (issue #2562): a FLAT Progress table (no Milestone
|
|
// column, so milestone scoping cannot engage) where phase 2 is declared as a
|
|
// table row only — no `### Phase 2` heading, no directory. The heading-only
|
|
// count sees just phase 1 and silently drops phase 2 from the denominator.
|
|
test('inspectWorkstream: flat Progress table — a table-only phase still counts in the denominator', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-flat' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), 'status: executing\n');
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), [
|
|
'# Roadmap', '', '## Phases', '', '### Phase 1: Foo', '**Goal:** foo', '',
|
|
'## Progress', '',
|
|
'| Phase | Plans Complete | Status | Completed |',
|
|
'| --- | --- | --- | --- |',
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 2. Bar | 0/1 | Not started | - |',
|
|
'',
|
|
].join('\n'));
|
|
writeWsPhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-flat', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.roadmap_phase_count, 2, 'table-only phase 2 must not vanish from the denominator');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.phases[0].status, 'in_progress', 'gaps_found verdict is not complete');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// A sub-phase inserted mid-milestone (`3.1-…`) has no Progress-table row. It
|
|
// inherits its parent's milestone and must land on BOTH sides of the rollup:
|
|
// numerator-only would let completed_phases exceed the denominator and cap
|
|
// back to 100%, reintroducing the very defect this issue is about.
|
|
test('inspectWorkstream: a dir-only sub-phase counts in BOTH numerator and denominator', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-subphase' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), MS_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), MS_ROADMAP);
|
|
// v2.0 declares 3,4,5. All three complete, PLUS a dir-only 3.1 still in progress.
|
|
writeWsPhase(wsDir, '3-new-a', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writeWsPhase(wsDir, '3.1-inserted', { plans: 2, summaries: 0 });
|
|
writeWsPhase(wsDir, '4-new-b', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writeWsPhase(wsDir, '5-new-c', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-subphase', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.roadmap_phase_count, 4, 'denominator = declared {3,4,5} + inherited 3.1');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 3);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 75, 'the in-progress sub-phase must hold this below 100');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.total_plans, 5, 'the sub-phase contributes its plans too');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('inspectWorkstream: a PRIOR-version snapshot does not mark the current milestone complete', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-prior-snap' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), MS_STATE); // current milestone = v2.0
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), MS_ROADMAP);
|
|
fs.mkdirSync(path.join(wsDir, 'milestones'), { recursive: true });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'milestones', 'v1.0-ROADMAP.md'), '# v1.0 archived\n');
|
|
writeWsPhase(wsDir, '3-new-a', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-prior-snap', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status, 'executing', 'v1.0 snapshot must not mark v2.0 complete');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status_source, 'field');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('inspectWorkstream: the CURRENT-version snapshot marks the milestone complete', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-cur-snap' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), MS_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), MS_ROADMAP);
|
|
fs.mkdirSync(path.join(wsDir, 'milestones'), { recursive: true });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'milestones', 'v2.0-ROADMAP.md'), '# v2.0 archived\n');
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-cur-snap', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status, 'milestone complete');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status_source, 'derived');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// #2562 review round 2 — every one of these is a DISTINCT way to reproduce this
|
|
// issue's own symptom ("milestone complete"/100% while phases are incomplete),
|
|
// introduced by deriving the two sides of the rollup from different phase-key
|
|
// derivations rather than from the phase-id owner module. Each test reddens when
|
|
// only its own fix is reverted.
|
|
describe('#2562 — milestone scoping boundaries (one phase-key derivation)', () => {
|
|
let tmpDir;
|
|
before(() => { tmpDir = createFixture(); });
|
|
after(() => cleanup(tmpDir));
|
|
|
|
function writePhase(wsDir, slug, { plans = 0, summaries = 0, verification } = {}) {
|
|
const dir = path.join(wsDir, 'phases', slug);
|
|
fs.mkdirSync(dir, { recursive: true });
|
|
for (let i = 1; i <= plans; i++) fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, `0${i}-PLAN.md`), '# plan\n');
|
|
for (let i = 1; i <= summaries; i++) fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, `0${i}-SUMMARY.md`), '# summary\n');
|
|
if (verification) fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, '01-VERIFICATION.md'), `---\nstatus: ${verification}\n---\n`);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function roadmapWithRows(rows) {
|
|
return [
|
|
'# Roadmap', '', '## Progress', '',
|
|
'| Phase | Milestone | Plans Complete | Status | Completed |',
|
|
'| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |',
|
|
...rows,
|
|
'',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const V2_STATE = 'milestone: v2.0\nstatus: executing\n';
|
|
|
|
// A zero-padded roadmap table against zero-padded directories. Deriving the
|
|
// table key with one regex and the directory key with another put `01` and `1`
|
|
// in different key spaces: NOTHING matched, every phase fell out of the
|
|
// milestone, and the rollup reported 0% while listing both phases complete.
|
|
test('zero-padded table rows match zero-padded directories', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-padded' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), roadmapWithRows([
|
|
'| 01. Alpha | v2.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 02. Beta | v2.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '01-alpha', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '02-beta', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-padded', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.roadmap_phase_count, 2);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 2, 'padded dirs must match padded table rows');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 100);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(inv.phases.map(p => p.status), ['complete', 'complete'],
|
|
'phases[] and the rollup must agree');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// The mirror image: an UNPADDED table against PADDED directories. Padding is a
|
|
// presentation choice on either side; one key function makes it irrelevant.
|
|
test('unpadded table rows match padded directories (and vice versa)', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-mixed-pad' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), roadmapWithRows([
|
|
'| 1. Alpha | v2.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 2. Beta | v2.0 | 0/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '01-alpha', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '02-beta', { plans: 1, summaries: 0 });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-mixed-pad', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.roadmap_phase_count, 2, 'the two phases must not double-count as four');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 50);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// A project-code-prefixed directory (`PROJ-05-…`). The bespoke `^0*(\d+…)`
|
|
// directory parser yielded null for these, excluding EVERY directory from the
|
|
// milestone and pinning the workstream at 0% forever.
|
|
test('project-code-prefixed directories are scoped, not excluded', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-projcode' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), roadmapWithRows([
|
|
'| PROJ-01. Shipped | v1.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| PROJ-05. Alpha | v2.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| PROJ-06. Beta | v2.0 | 0/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
// The prior-milestone directory is the discriminator: a phase key that never
|
|
// resolves collapses scoping to the whole roadmap, and PROJ-01 sneaks into
|
|
// the current rollup as a third completed phase.
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, 'PROJ-01-shipped', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, 'PROJ-05-alpha', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, 'PROJ-06-beta', { plans: 1, summaries: 0 });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-projcode', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.roadmap_phase_count, 2, 'denominator = v2.0 phases only');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 1, 'prefixed dirs must scope, not be excluded outright');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 50);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// The load-bearing invariant of the whole fix, stated directly: however a
|
|
// roadmap decorates a phase reference (padding, project code, markdown
|
|
// emphasis, a `Phase ` label, trailing prose), the key it yields must equal
|
|
// the key its own directory yields. Every blocker above is an instance of
|
|
// this property failing.
|
|
test('property: a table cell and its directory always yield the same phase key', () => {
|
|
// Padding and project code are decoration and vary INDEPENDENTLY on the two
|
|
// sides — that independence is the point. Comparing an identically-decorated
|
|
// token against itself would pass vacuously.
|
|
fc.assert(fc.property(
|
|
fc.integer({ min: 1, max: 400 }),
|
|
fc.option(fc.integer({ min: 1, max: 99 }), { nil: null }),
|
|
fc.constantFrom('', '0', '00'),
|
|
fc.constantFrom('', '0', '00'),
|
|
fc.constantFrom('', 'PROJ-', 'CK-', 'MEM-'),
|
|
fc.constantFrom('', 'PROJ-', 'CK-', 'MEM-'),
|
|
fc.constantFrom('', '**', '`'),
|
|
fc.constantFrom('', 'Phase '),
|
|
fc.stringMatching(/^[a-z][a-z-]{0,20}$/),
|
|
(num, sub, cellPad, dirPad, cellCode, dirCode, emphasis, label, slug) => {
|
|
const suffix = sub === null ? '' : `.${sub}`;
|
|
const cell = `${emphasis}${label}${cellCode}${cellPad}${num}${suffix}. Some Name${emphasis}`;
|
|
const dir = `${dirCode}${dirPad}${num}${suffix}-${slug}`;
|
|
assert.equal(phaseKeyFromProse(cell), phaseKeyFromDir(dir),
|
|
`cell ${JSON.stringify(cell)} and dir ${JSON.stringify(dir)} must share a key`);
|
|
},
|
|
), { numRuns: 1000 });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// A blank Milestone cell must not silently delete the phase from BOTH sides of
|
|
// the calculation — that is how an unstarted phase vanished and the remaining
|
|
// completed one rounded the workstream to 100%.
|
|
test('a blank Milestone cell keeps the phase in the denominator', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-blank-cell' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), roadmapWithRows([
|
|
'| 1. Alpha | v2.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 2. Beta | | 0/1 | Not started | - |',
|
|
'| 3. Gamma | TBD | 0/1 | Not started | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-alpha', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-blank-cell', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.roadmap_phase_count, 3, 'unattributable rows degrade over-inclusively');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 33);
|
|
assert.notEqual(inv.progress_percent, 100);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// A bullet that merely NAMES the current version with a checkmark is prose
|
|
// about a phase, not a milestone verdict. Reading it as a shipped signal
|
|
// reproduces this issue's exact symptom.
|
|
test('a checkmarked bullet naming the version does NOT mark the milestone shipped', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-bullet-tick' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), [
|
|
roadmapWithRows([
|
|
'| 1. Alpha | v2.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 2. Beta | v2.0 | 0/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
]),
|
|
'## Plans',
|
|
'- [x] 03-01: Ship the v2.0 login endpoint ✅',
|
|
'',
|
|
].join('\n'));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-alpha', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '2-beta', { plans: 1, summaries: 0 });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-bullet-tick', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status, 'executing');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status_source, 'field');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 50);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// `\b` does not bound a version token: `.` is a non-word character, so a naive
|
|
// `\bv2\.0\b` matches inside `v2.0.1`. A shipped SIBLING patch release must not
|
|
// close the current milestone.
|
|
test('a shipped v2.0.1 heading does NOT mark v2.0 shipped', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-version-boundary' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), [
|
|
roadmapWithRows(['| 1. Alpha | v2.0 | 0/1 | In Progress | - |']),
|
|
'## v2.0.1 Patch — ✅ SHIPPED',
|
|
'',
|
|
].join('\n'));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-alpha', { plans: 1, summaries: 0 });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-version-boundary', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status, 'executing');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// `phaseKeyFromToken` strips leading zeros per hyphen-separated segment before
|
|
// `normalizePhaseName` runs — which is BEFORE that function strips the
|
|
// project-code prefix. lint-phase-id-drift exempts phase-id.cts by design, so
|
|
// it is silent here by construction; these cases are the coverage instead.
|
|
test('key derivation is symmetric across project codes and hyphenated ids', () => {
|
|
for (const [token, dir] of [
|
|
['CK-01', 'CK-01-x'],
|
|
['CK-1', 'CK-001-x'], // padding differs across the prefix
|
|
['M1-2', 'M1-2-x'],
|
|
['P0.3-2', 'P0.3-2-x'], // letter-prefixed leading segment, preserved verbatim
|
|
['01-02', '01-02-x'],
|
|
]) {
|
|
assert.equal(phaseKeyFromToken(token), phaseKeyFromDir(dir),
|
|
`token ${token} and dir ${dir} must share a key`);
|
|
}
|
|
// Known, PRE-EXISTING asymmetry, pinned so it is not "fixed" by accident:
|
|
// in a DIRECTORY a single-digit segment after the phase number is a slug
|
|
// word, not a sub-phase (#2043/#2232 — `extractPhaseToken`), so `M1-46-6-rs`
|
|
// is phase 46. A ROADMAP token `M1-46-6` has no slug and is phase 46-06.
|
|
// Unchanged by #2562: both sides behaved this way before.
|
|
assert.equal(phaseKeyFromToken('M1-46-6'), '46-06');
|
|
assert.equal(phaseKeyFromDir('M1-46-6-rs-x'), '46');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// The Builder's invariant throw is a contract assertion for external callers.
|
|
// `listWorkstreamInventories` loops every workstream with no try/catch, so a
|
|
// reachable throw would take down `workstream list`/`status`/`progress` for
|
|
// ALL workstreams — this pins that the real reader cannot construct one, with
|
|
// every adversarial shape at once.
|
|
test('inspectWorkstream cannot trip the Builder invariant', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-adversarial' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), roadmapWithRows([
|
|
'| 1. Prior | v1.0 | 2/2 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 01. Dupe | v2.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 2. Dirless | v2.0 | 0/1 | Not started | - |',
|
|
'| 3. Unattributed | | 0/1 | Not started | - |',
|
|
'| PROJ-04. Prefixed | v2.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-prior', { plans: 2, summaries: 2, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '01-dupe', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-dupe-stale', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '001-dupe-staler', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, 'PROJ-04-prefixed', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '3.1-inserted', { plans: 1, summaries: 0 });
|
|
|
|
let inv;
|
|
assert.doesNotThrow(() => { inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-adversarial', { active: null }); });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.ok(inv.completed_phases <= inv.roadmap_phase_count,
|
|
`numerator ${inv.completed_phases} must not exceed denominator ${inv.roadmap_phase_count}`);
|
|
assert.ok(inv.progress_percent < 100, 'incomplete phases must keep this below 100');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// A flat table earlier in the document must not shadow the milestone-grouped
|
|
// table that carries the attribution: every row would come back unattributed,
|
|
// be treated as current-milestone, and silently re-admit prior phases.
|
|
test('a milestone-grouped table wins over an earlier flat table', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-two-tables' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), [
|
|
'# Roadmap', '', '## Summary', '',
|
|
'| Phase | Plans Complete | Status | Completed |',
|
|
'| --- | --- | --- | --- |',
|
|
'| 1. Prior | 2/2 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 2. Alpha | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 3. Beta | 0/1 | Not started | - |',
|
|
'', '## Progress', '',
|
|
'| Phase | Milestone | Plans Complete | Status | Completed |',
|
|
'| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |',
|
|
'| 1. Prior | v1.0 | 2/2 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 2. Alpha | v2.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 3. Beta | v2.0 | 0/1 | Not started | - |',
|
|
'',
|
|
].join('\n'));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-prior', { plans: 2, summaries: 2, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '2-alpha', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-two-tables', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.roadmap_phase_count, 2, 'denominator = v2.0 phases {2,3}');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 1, 'the shipped v1.0 phase must stay out');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 50);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// An in-progress marker on the milestone heading always wins over a checkmark
|
|
// elsewhere on the same line — the active-wins rule the sectioniser applies.
|
|
test('an in-progress marker on the milestone heading beats a checkmark', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-active-wins' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), [
|
|
roadmapWithRows(['| 1. Alpha | v2.0 | 0/1 | In Progress | - |']),
|
|
'## v2.0 Launch — 🚧 IN PROGRESS (phase 1 scaffolded ✅)',
|
|
'',
|
|
].join('\n'));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-alpha', { plans: 1, summaries: 0 });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-active-wins', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status, 'executing');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status_source, 'field');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// The current milestone's OWN shipped heading is still honoured — the boundary
|
|
// fix must not cost the signal it exists to carry.
|
|
test('the current milestone\'s own shipped heading still marks it complete', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-own-heading' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), [
|
|
roadmapWithRows(['| 1. Alpha | v2.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |']),
|
|
'## v2.0 Launch — ✅ SHIPPED',
|
|
'',
|
|
].join('\n'));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-alpha', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-own-heading', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status, 'milestone complete');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status_source, 'derived');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Bug #2445's scenario: a stale directory colliding on phase number with a
|
|
// current one. Counting the numerator per-DIRECTORY while the denominator
|
|
// counts distinct PHASES pushed completed_phases past the denominator, where
|
|
// the old Math.min cap reported 100% and hid the unstarted phase.
|
|
test('a stale same-numbered directory does not double-count the numerator', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-dupe-dir' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), roadmapWithRows([
|
|
'| 1. Alpha | v2.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 2. Beta | v2.0 | 0/1 | Not started | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-alpha', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '01-alpha-old', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-dupe-dir', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.roadmap_phase_count, 2);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 1, 'two dirs, one phase');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 50, 'the unstarted phase 2 must stay visible');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// The builder is the pure seam: a caller that hands it an inconsistent pair
|
|
// must fail loudly rather than have Math.min round the contradiction to 100%.
|
|
test('builder: a numerator above the denominator throws instead of capping to 100%', () => {
|
|
assert.throws(() => buildWorkstreamInventory({
|
|
name: 'ws',
|
|
projectDir: '/tmp/ws-proj',
|
|
workstreamDir: '/tmp/ws-proj/.planning/workstreams/ws',
|
|
activeWorkstreamName: '',
|
|
stateProjection: { status: 'executing', current_phase: null, last_activity: null },
|
|
filesExist: { roadmap: true, state: true, requirements: true },
|
|
milestoneShipped: false,
|
|
phaseDirNames: ['1-a', '2-b', '3-c'],
|
|
phaseFilesCounts: [
|
|
{ directory: '1-a', phaseKey: '01', planCount: 1, summaryCount: 1, inMilestone: true, verificationStatus: 'passed', complete: true },
|
|
{ directory: '2-b', phaseKey: '02', planCount: 1, summaryCount: 1, inMilestone: true, verificationStatus: 'passed', complete: true },
|
|
{ directory: '3-c', phaseKey: '03', planCount: 1, summaryCount: 1, inMilestone: true, verificationStatus: 'passed', complete: true },
|
|
],
|
|
roadmapPhaseCount: 3,
|
|
currentMilestonePhaseCount: 2,
|
|
}), /invariant violated/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ADR-3180 §7.4 (#3186 review finding 3): the builder no longer hand-lists
|
|
// disqualifying verdicts itself (`FAILING_VERIFICATION_STATUSES` is
|
|
// retired) — it trusts the caller-supplied `complete` boolean entirely.
|
|
// The vocabulary pin now lives at the OWNER (`isPhaseComplete`,
|
|
// `complete: verification.status === 'passed'`), mirrored here for every
|
|
// verifier status other than 'passed'.
|
|
test('parity: every verifier status other than passed blocks completeness', () => {
|
|
const nonPassing = VERIFIER_STATUSES.filter(s => s !== 'passed');
|
|
assert.ok(nonPassing.length > 0, 'guard: the verifier must emit a non-passing status');
|
|
for (const status of nonPassing) {
|
|
const inv = buildWorkstreamInventory({
|
|
name: 'ws',
|
|
projectDir: '/tmp/ws-proj',
|
|
workstreamDir: '/tmp/ws-proj/.planning/workstreams/ws',
|
|
activeWorkstreamName: '',
|
|
stateProjection: { status: 'executing', current_phase: null, last_activity: null },
|
|
filesExist: { roadmap: true, state: true, requirements: true },
|
|
milestoneShipped: false,
|
|
phaseDirNames: ['1-a'],
|
|
phaseFilesCounts: [
|
|
{ directory: '1-a', phaseKey: '01', planCount: 1, summaryCount: 1, inMilestone: true, verificationStatus: status, complete: status === 'passed' },
|
|
],
|
|
roadmapPhaseCount: 1,
|
|
currentMilestonePhaseCount: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(inv.phases[0].status, 'in_progress', `verifier status "${status}" must not count complete`);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// The scoping reads the WORKSTREAM's ROADMAP/STATE pair, not the project root's.
|
|
// getMilestonePhaseFilter resolves via planningDir(cwd, ws); without the ws
|
|
// argument it falls back to GSD_WORKSTREAM, which a loop over workstreams
|
|
// cannot set per iteration.
|
|
test('scoping reads the workstream ROADMAP, not the project-root ROADMAP', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-not-root' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'ROADMAP.md'), [
|
|
'# Root Roadmap', '', '## v2.0 Root — ✅ SHIPPED', '', '### Phase 9: Root only', '**Goal:** root', '',
|
|
].join('\n'));
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'STATE.md'), 'milestone: v2.0\nstatus: milestone complete\n');
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), roadmapWithRows([
|
|
'| 1. Alpha | v2.0 | 0/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-alpha', { plans: 1, summaries: 0 });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-not-root', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status, 'executing', 'the ROOT roadmap\'s shipped v2.0 must not leak in');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.roadmap_phase_count, 1, 'root-only phase 9 must not join the denominator');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── The declared-but-empty current milestone ──────────────────────────────
|
|
//
|
|
// STATE.md's `milestone:` field updates the moment `/gsd-new-milestone` writes
|
|
// the heading; the Progress table and phase sections land later. In that
|
|
// window nothing attributes a phase to the current milestone. Scoping used to
|
|
// switch OFF there, and the fallback counted the project's ENTIRE phase
|
|
// history as both numerator and denominator — so a milestone with no work
|
|
// done reported 100% off its predecessors'. #2562's own symptom, other route.
|
|
//
|
|
// Three ROADMAP shapes reach it and each needs its own witness; the fourth is
|
|
// the legacy shape that must NOT be caught.
|
|
const V3_STATE = 'milestone: v3.0\nstatus: executing\n';
|
|
const PRIOR_ROWS = [
|
|
'| 1. Alpha | v1.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 2. Beta | v2.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
function seedTwoShippedPhases(name, roadmap) {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V3_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), roadmap);
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-alpha', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '2-beta', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
return wsDir;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The common shape: `## v3.0` exists but has no phases under it yet. The
|
|
// milestone filter DOES locate the section (setting versionScoped), then the
|
|
// zero-phase pass-all degrade resets versionScoped to false — erasing the only
|
|
// evidence that the milestone exists. versionSectionFound survives that reset.
|
|
test('a located-but-empty current milestone reports 0%, not its predecessors\' 100%', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedTwoShippedPhases('ws-empty-section', [
|
|
'# Roadmap', '',
|
|
'## v1.0', '', '### Phase 1: Alpha', '',
|
|
'## v2.0', '', '### Phase 2: Beta', '',
|
|
'## v3.0 — Next', '',
|
|
roadmapWithRows(PRIOR_ROWS),
|
|
].join('\n'));
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(wsDir));
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-empty-section', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 0, 'v1.0/v2.0 phases must not count toward v3.0');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.roadmap_phase_count, 0, 'v3.0 declares no phases');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 0, 'an unstarted milestone must never report 100%');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// No v3.0 section at all, but the ROADMAP versions its other milestones — so
|
|
// the filter reports missingExplicitVersion rather than a located section.
|
|
test('a current milestone absent from a versioned roadmap reports 0%', () => {
|
|
seedTwoShippedPhases('ws-absent-section', [
|
|
'# Roadmap', '',
|
|
'## v1.0', '', '### Phase 1: Alpha', '',
|
|
'## v2.0', '', '### Phase 2: Beta', '',
|
|
roadmapWithRows(PRIOR_ROWS),
|
|
].join('\n'));
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-absent-section', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Unversioned phase headings, but the Progress table attributes every row to
|
|
// another milestone. Neither filter flag fires; the table is the only witness.
|
|
test('a progress table attributing every row elsewhere reports 0%', () => {
|
|
seedTwoShippedPhases('ws-rows-elsewhere', [
|
|
'# Roadmap', '',
|
|
'### Phase 1: Alpha', '', '### Phase 2: Beta', '',
|
|
roadmapWithRows(PRIOR_ROWS),
|
|
].join('\n'));
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-rows-elsewhere', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// The boundary. A free-form ROADMAP attributes no versions at all: its rows
|
|
// parse unattributed, land in the current milestone, and must keep reporting
|
|
// 100%. readCurrentMilestoneVersion hands back a non-null version for nearly
|
|
// every project, so scoping on `currentVersion` alone would zero these out.
|
|
test('a legacy roadmap with no version attribution keeps its whole-roadmap count', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-legacy-freeform' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V3_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), [
|
|
'# Roadmap', '', '### Phase 1: Alpha', '', '### Phase 2: Beta', '',
|
|
'## Progress', '',
|
|
'| Phase | Plans Complete | Status |',
|
|
'| --- | --- | --- |',
|
|
'| 1. Alpha | 1/1 | Complete |',
|
|
'| 2. Beta | 1/1 | Complete |', '',
|
|
].join('\n'));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-alpha', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '2-beta', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-legacy-freeform', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 2, 'unattributed phases belong to the current milestone');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 100, 'legacy free-form projects must not regress to 0%');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Degrade direction: over-inclusive, never under. A phase scaffolded before
|
|
// the ROADMAP caught up is claimed by NO milestone, so the empty current one
|
|
// adopts it rather than dropping it from both sides of the rollup — hiding
|
|
// real work would be the same class of defect as inventing it.
|
|
test('a phase scaffolded before the roadmap catches up joins the empty milestone', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedTwoShippedPhases('ws-scaffold-first', [
|
|
'# Roadmap', '',
|
|
'## v1.0', '', '### Phase 1: Alpha', '',
|
|
'## v2.0', '', '### Phase 2: Beta', '',
|
|
'## v3.0 — Next', '',
|
|
roadmapWithRows(PRIOR_ROWS),
|
|
].join('\n'));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '3-gamma', { plans: 1, summaries: 0 });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-scaffold-first', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.roadmap_phase_count, 1, 'the unclaimed phase 3 is v3.0\'s, and its only one');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 0, 'it is started, not finished');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// The invariant throw at the builder fires on `completedPhases > denominator`.
|
|
// A scoped milestone with a zero denominator sits one bad exclusion away from
|
|
// crashing `workstream list` on every freshly-declared milestone — a worse
|
|
// failure than a wrong percentage. Pin that it stays a number.
|
|
test('a zero-denominator scoped milestone does not trip the rollup invariant', () => {
|
|
seedTwoShippedPhases('ws-zero-denominator', [
|
|
'# Roadmap', '', '## v3.0 — Next', '', roadmapWithRows(PRIOR_ROWS),
|
|
].join('\n'));
|
|
|
|
assert.doesNotThrow(() => inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-zero-denominator', { active: null }));
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-zero-denominator', { active: null });
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.phases.length, 2, 'the phases themselves stay listed, they just do not count');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// #2562 review round 4 — `status` was the one field still asserted from an
|
|
// un-cross-validated shipped marker: `progress_percent` derived from artifacts
|
|
// while `status` echoed the marker, so the two could contradict each other in a
|
|
// single payload. That IS this issue's symptom, reached through `status`.
|
|
//
|
|
// The cross-check differs by signal strength, and using one check for both
|
|
// regresses the archived case — see the builder comment. These four pin both
|
|
// halves plus the window where the STATE field re-asserts the refused claim.
|
|
describe('#2562 — a shipped marker its own artifacts contradict is not asserted as status', () => {
|
|
let tmpDir;
|
|
before(() => { tmpDir = createFixture(); });
|
|
after(() => cleanup(tmpDir));
|
|
|
|
const V2_STATE = 'milestone: v2.0\nstatus: executing\n';
|
|
const V2_SHIPPED_STATE = 'milestone: v2.0\nstatus: milestone complete\n';
|
|
// v2.0 declares phases 3 and 4. Rows survive archiving: `milestone complete`
|
|
// COPIES ROADMAP.md to the snapshot (milestone.cts:671-674) and never
|
|
// truncates the live file.
|
|
const V2_ROADMAP = shipped => [
|
|
'# Roadmap', '',
|
|
`## Milestone v2.0 — Two${shipped ? ' — ✅ SHIPPED' : ''}`, '',
|
|
'## Progress', '',
|
|
'| Phase | Milestone | Plans | Status | Done |',
|
|
'| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |',
|
|
'| 3. New A | v2.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 4. New B | v2.0 | 0/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
'',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
|
|
function writePhase(wsDir, slug, { plans = 0, summaries = 0, verification } = {}) {
|
|
const dir = path.join(wsDir, 'phases', slug);
|
|
fs.mkdirSync(dir, { recursive: true });
|
|
for (let i = 1; i <= plans; i++) fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, `0${i}-PLAN.md`), '# plan\n');
|
|
for (let i = 1; i <= summaries; i++) fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, `0${i}-SUMMARY.md`), '# summary\n');
|
|
if (verification) fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, '01-VERIFICATION.md'), `---\nstatus: ${verification}\n---\n`);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function writeSnapshot(wsDir) {
|
|
fs.mkdirSync(path.join(wsDir, 'milestones'), { recursive: true });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'milestones', 'v2.0-ROADMAP.md'), '# v2.0 archived\n');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test('a live-ROADMAP SHIPPED heading is refused while the milestone is incomplete', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-heading-lies' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), V2_ROADMAP(true));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '3-new-a', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '4-new-b', { plans: 1, summaries: 0 });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-heading-lies', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.notEqual(inv.status, 'milestone complete', 'phase 4 is unfinished — the heading is a claim, not a fact');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.milestone_shipped_unverified, true);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 50, 'status and percent must agree');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Nothing on disk contradicts the archive: `milestone complete` MOVES phase
|
|
// dirs into `milestones/v2.0-phases/` (milestone.cts:755-762) while leaving
|
|
// the Progress rows, so a correctly-archived milestone reads 0/2 by
|
|
// construction. Gating this on the completeness ratio — the obvious single
|
|
// fix — reddens here and strips `milestone complete` from every archived
|
|
// milestone in every project.
|
|
test('an archived snapshot survives its phase dirs being moved out (no ratio gate)', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-archived-clean' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), V2_ROADMAP(false));
|
|
writeSnapshot(wsDir); // phases/ is empty — the dirs are under milestones/v2.0-phases/
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-archived-clean', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status, 'milestone complete');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status_source, 'derived');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.milestone_shipped_unverified, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// The narrow predicate "a live dir that is itself unfinished" was NOT enough:
|
|
// here the live dir is COMPLETE and the unfinished phase 2 is declared with no
|
|
// directory, so nothing is live-and-unfinished and the marker sailed through,
|
|
// reproducing the reported symptom verbatim (`milestone complete` beside 50%).
|
|
// What makes the ratio meaningful again is simply that the archive is dirty —
|
|
// any in-milestone directory outliving it — so the check is the conjunction.
|
|
test('an archived snapshot is refused when a COMPLETE live dir sits beside a dirless phase', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-archived-dirty' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), V2_ROADMAP(false));
|
|
writeSnapshot(wsDir);
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '3-new-a', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' }); // complete, still live
|
|
// phase 4 is declared in the Progress table with NO directory
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-archived-dirty', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.roadmap_phase_count, 2, 'the dirless phase 4 stays in the denominator');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 50);
|
|
assert.notEqual(inv.status, 'milestone complete', 'status must not contradict the percentage');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.milestone_shipped_unverified, true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// `milestone complete` does not advance STATE's `milestone:` field
|
|
// (state-transition.cts:1335 writes status/last_activity only; :1224 is the
|
|
// separate new-milestone path), so a phase can be added or reopened while the
|
|
// shipped version is still current. That live dir DOES contradict the archive.
|
|
test('an archived snapshot is refused once a phase is reopened under it', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-archived-reopened' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), V2_ROADMAP(false));
|
|
writeSnapshot(wsDir);
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '4-new-b', { plans: 2, summaries: 1 }); // reopened after the archive
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-archived-reopened', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.notEqual(inv.status, 'milestone complete');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.milestone_shipped_unverified, true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// The refusal must not leak back in through the STATE field, which is
|
|
// operator-written and in this window commonly says the same thing.
|
|
test('a refused marker is not re-asserted by a STATE field claiming the same', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-field-echo' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_SHIPPED_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), V2_ROADMAP(true));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '3-new-a', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '4-new-b', { plans: 1, summaries: 0 });
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-field-echo', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(isCompletedInventory(inv.status), false, 'neither source may assert completion here');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.status_conflict, true, 'the field disagrees with the artifacts');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.milestone_shipped_unverified, true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// #2645 — deleting a *-VERIFICATION.md must never raise reported completion.
|
|
// #2562 gated completeness on the verdict READ FRESH from disk every call:
|
|
// "verifier ran gaps_found, report later deleted" and "verifier never ran"
|
|
// both read as the internal 'missing' sentinel, and only the fresh read was
|
|
// consulted — so deleting the evidence file alone was enough to silently
|
|
// raise completed_phases/progress_percent. The fix persists the last REAL
|
|
// verdict observed per phase key in a ledger file living at the WORKSTREAM
|
|
// level (`.verification-ledger.json`, sibling to STATE.md/ROADMAP.md),
|
|
// consulted only when the live read comes back 'missing'.
|
|
describe('#2645 — deleting a verification report must not raise completeness', () => {
|
|
let tmpDir;
|
|
before(() => { tmpDir = createFixture(); });
|
|
after(() => cleanup(tmpDir));
|
|
|
|
const FLAT_STATE = 'status: executing\n';
|
|
function flatRoadmap(rows) {
|
|
return [
|
|
'# Roadmap', '', '## Progress', '',
|
|
'| Phase | Plans Complete | Status | Completed |',
|
|
'| --- | --- | --- | --- |',
|
|
...rows,
|
|
'',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function writePhase(wsDir, slug, { plans = 1, summaries = 1, verification } = {}) {
|
|
const dir = path.join(wsDir, 'phases', slug);
|
|
fs.mkdirSync(dir, { recursive: true });
|
|
for (let i = 1; i <= plans; i++) fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, `0${i}-PLAN.md`), '# plan\n');
|
|
for (let i = 1; i <= summaries; i++) fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, `0${i}-SUMMARY.md`), '# summary\n');
|
|
if (verification) fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, '01-VERIFICATION.md'), `---\nstatus: ${verification}\n---\n`);
|
|
return dir;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function verificationFilePath(wsDir, slug) {
|
|
return path.join(wsDir, 'phases', slug, '01-VERIFICATION.md');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Row 1 — failing-first regression, the issue's own reproduction sequence.
|
|
test('deleting a gaps_found report after it was observed does not raise completeness (#2645)', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-gaps' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' });
|
|
|
|
const before1 = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-gaps', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(before1);
|
|
assert.equal(before1.phases[0].status, 'in_progress', 'gaps_found must not count as complete');
|
|
assert.equal(before1.completed_phases, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(before1.progress_percent, 0);
|
|
|
|
fs.unlinkSync(verificationFilePath(wsDir, '1-foo'));
|
|
|
|
const after1 = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-gaps', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(after1);
|
|
assert.equal(after1.phases[0].status, 'in_progress',
|
|
'deleting the failing report must not flip the phase to complete');
|
|
assert.equal(after1.completed_phases, 0, 'deleting evidence must never raise completed_phases');
|
|
assert.equal(after1.progress_percent, 0, 'deleting evidence must never raise progress_percent');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 2 — the other FAILING_VERIFICATION_STATUSES member.
|
|
test('deleting a human_needed report after it was observed does not raise completeness (#2645)', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-human' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'human_needed' });
|
|
|
|
inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-human', { active: null }); // observe while present
|
|
fs.unlinkSync(verificationFilePath(wsDir, '1-foo'));
|
|
|
|
const after = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-human', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(after);
|
|
assert.equal(after.phases[0].status, 'in_progress');
|
|
assert.equal(after.completed_phases, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(after.progress_percent, 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 3 — SUPERSEDED by ADR-3180 §7.4 (#3186, disk-strict): #2645's
|
|
// criterion 2 ("verifier-disabled projects must still reach 100%") is
|
|
// exactly the site-local tolerance disk-strict retires. `complete` now
|
|
// routes through the single canonical owner (`isPhaseComplete`), which
|
|
// requires `verification.status === 'passed'` UNCONDITIONALLY — a phase
|
|
// with NO `*-VERIFICATION.md` reads 'missing', never complete, regardless
|
|
// of how many plans it has summarized. Disclosed in this phase's
|
|
// changeset.
|
|
test('a phase that was never verified is NOT complete (disk-strict; #2645 criterion 2 retired)', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-never' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1 }); // no verification file, ever
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-never', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.phases[0].status, 'in_progress');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.progress_percent, 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 4 — SUPERSEDED by ADR-3180 §7.4: same on-disk shape as row 3 (no
|
|
// file), across TWO reads — disk-strict requires this to behave
|
|
// IDENTICALLY (never complete) both times, not just consistently.
|
|
test('a not-yet-verified phase reads NOT complete on every read (disk-strict; #2645 criterion 3 retired)', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-not-yet' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1 });
|
|
|
|
const first = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-not-yet', { active: null });
|
|
const second = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-not-yet', { active: null });
|
|
assert.equal(first.progress_percent, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(second.progress_percent, 0, 'a second read must not change the outcome');
|
|
assert.equal(second.phases[0].status, 'in_progress');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 5 — the FIRST half (a genuine re-verify counts) is unchanged. The
|
|
// SECOND half is SUPERSEDED by ADR-3180 §7.4: `isPhaseComplete` reads
|
|
// fresh off disk, UNCONDITIONALLY, with no memory — the ledger's "hold the
|
|
// newest real verdict after the file is deleted" behavior is structurally
|
|
// incompatible with a single owner that never consults a ledger. Deleting
|
|
// ANY `*-VERIFICATION.md` (passing or failing) now uniformly reads
|
|
// 'missing' → not complete, matching `roadmap analyze` / `init manager` /
|
|
// `phase complete` for the identical disk state. Disclosed in this
|
|
// phase's changeset.
|
|
test('a re-verified passed phase counts complete; deleting the report afterward is NOT complete (disk-strict; #2645 memory retired)', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-recover' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' });
|
|
inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-recover', { active: null }); // observe gaps_found
|
|
|
|
// Re-verify: overwrite the report with a passing verdict.
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(verificationFilePath(wsDir, '1-foo'), '---\nstatus: passed\n---\n');
|
|
const reverified = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-recover', { active: null });
|
|
assert.equal(reverified.phases[0].status, 'complete', 'a genuine re-verify must count');
|
|
|
|
// Delete the now-passing report — the owner reads fresh off disk every
|
|
// time; no ledger memory feeds into `complete` anymore, so this reads
|
|
// 'missing' → not complete, exactly like every other disk-strict
|
|
// consumer for the same disk state.
|
|
fs.unlinkSync(verificationFilePath(wsDir, '1-foo'));
|
|
const afterDelete = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-recover', { active: null });
|
|
assert.equal(afterDelete.phases[0].status, 'in_progress',
|
|
'disk-strict: a deleted verification file is never complete, regardless of what was previously observed');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 6 — criterion 4: the ledger must not live inside the phase directory
|
|
// whose file is the one being deleted.
|
|
test('ledger file lives outside the phase directory it protects (#2645, criterion 4)', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-location' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
const phaseDir = writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' });
|
|
inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-location', { active: null });
|
|
|
|
const ledgerPath = path.join(wsDir, '.verification-ledger.json');
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(ledgerPath), 'the ledger must be persisted somewhere');
|
|
assert.ok(!ledgerPath.startsWith(phaseDir + path.sep) && ledgerPath !== phaseDir,
|
|
'the ledger must not live inside the phase directory');
|
|
|
|
// Deleting the ENTIRE phase directory (not just the report) must not
|
|
// touch the ledger — this is what "not the same file" is protecting
|
|
// against in the realistic case.
|
|
cleanup(phaseDir);
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(ledgerPath), 'removing the phase directory must not remove the ledger');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 7 — Bug #2445 dedup safety (winner SELECTION, still real): a stale
|
|
// duplicate directory sharing the same phase key must never be the one
|
|
// whose live verdict the rollup counts. SUPERSEDED for the DELETION half
|
|
// by ADR-3180 §7.4: `isPhaseComplete` reads the WINNING directory fresh
|
|
// off disk on every call, unconditionally — once its report is deleted,
|
|
// the winner's own live read is 'missing', so this phase key correctly
|
|
// stops counting as complete (no ledger memory left to "remember" the
|
|
// pre-deletion 'passed'). The winner-selection guarantee itself (the stale
|
|
// duplicate's gaps_found never contaminates the live directory's result)
|
|
// still holds and is still what this test pins.
|
|
test('a stale duplicate directory never contaminates the live directory (winner selection; #2645 memory retired)', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-dupe' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 2. Bar | 0/1 | Not started | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
// Stale leftover directory (older mtime), leftover gaps_found report.
|
|
const staleDir = writePhase(wsDir, '01-foo-old', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' });
|
|
const oldTime = new Date('2020-01-01T00:00:00Z');
|
|
fs.utimesSync(staleDir, oldTime, oldTime);
|
|
// Live/winning directory (newer mtime), currently passed.
|
|
const liveDir = writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
const newTime = new Date('2026-01-01T00:00:00Z');
|
|
fs.utimesSync(liveDir, newTime, newTime);
|
|
|
|
const before7 = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-dupe', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(before7);
|
|
assert.equal(before7.completed_phases, 1, 'the winning (newest) directory is passed — the stale duplicate never won selection');
|
|
|
|
// Delete the WINNING directory's report. Disk-strict: the winner's own
|
|
// live read is now 'missing', so this phase key stops counting complete
|
|
// — but it must NOT flip to the stale duplicate's gaps_found either
|
|
// (that would be a DIFFERENT bug: the stale directory winning selection).
|
|
fs.unlinkSync(path.join(liveDir, '01-VERIFICATION.md'));
|
|
|
|
const after7 = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-dupe', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(after7);
|
|
assert.equal(after7.completed_phases, 0,
|
|
'disk-strict: the winning directory\'s own deleted report is not complete — no ledger memory papers over it');
|
|
assert.equal(after7.phases.find(p => p.directory === '1-foo').status, 'in_progress');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 8 — boundary: an EXACT mtime tie between two same-keyed directories.
|
|
// The builder's own tie-break (`rollupDirByKey`) walks
|
|
// `[...phaseDirNames].sort()` and keeps the incumbent on a tie
|
|
// (first-in-sort-order wins, since only a STRICTLY newer mtime replaces
|
|
// it). SUPERSEDED for the deletion half by ADR-3180 §7.4 — see Row 7.
|
|
test('an exact mtime tie resolves the winner by sort order, matching the builder (#2645 memory retired)', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-tie' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
const tieTime = new Date('2025-06-01T00:00:00Z');
|
|
// '01-foo-a' sorts before '01-foo-b' — with equal mtimes, BOTH the
|
|
// builder's rollup and the winner selection must keep the incumbent
|
|
// '01-foo-a' (passed), never adopt '01-foo-b' (gaps_found).
|
|
const dirA = writePhase(wsDir, '01-foo-a', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'passed' });
|
|
fs.utimesSync(dirA, tieTime, tieTime);
|
|
const dirB = writePhase(wsDir, '01-foo-b', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' });
|
|
fs.utimesSync(dirB, tieTime, tieTime);
|
|
|
|
assert.doesNotThrow(() => inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-tie', { active: null }));
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-tie', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
// Deterministic, not "either is fine": the builder's own rollup counts
|
|
// exactly the sort-order incumbent (01-foo-a, passed) as complete.
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 1,
|
|
'the sort-order incumbent (01-foo-a, passed) must be the one the builder counts complete');
|
|
|
|
// Delete 01-foo-a's report (unlink bumps the directory's mtime — restore
|
|
// it to the exact tie value so the SECOND read still sees a genuine tie,
|
|
// not a newest-mtime win). Disk-strict: the incumbent's own live read is
|
|
// now 'missing', so completed_phases must drop to 0 — it must NOT flip
|
|
// to 01-foo-b's gaps_found winning selection instead (that would be the
|
|
// sort-order-disagreement bug this test also guards).
|
|
fs.unlinkSync(path.join(dirA, '01-VERIFICATION.md'));
|
|
fs.utimesSync(dirA, tieTime, tieTime); // restore the tie the unlink disturbed
|
|
const afterDelete = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-tie', { active: null });
|
|
assert.equal(afterDelete.completed_phases, 0,
|
|
'disk-strict: the sort-order incumbent\'s own deleted report is not complete, and 01-foo-b never wins selection instead');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 9 — SUPERSEDED by ADR-3180 §7.4 (#3186, disk-strict): the ledger's
|
|
// "replay the last real verdict after deletion" memory is retired —
|
|
// `isPhaseComplete` reads fresh off disk, unconditionally, every call.
|
|
// The property this test now pins is simpler and STRONGER than the
|
|
// #2645-era one: whatever sequence of REAL verdicts was observed, once
|
|
// the file goes missing the phase is NEVER complete — full stop, not
|
|
// "unless the last real verdict was passed/unknown". Disclosed in this
|
|
// phase's changeset.
|
|
test('property: after the report goes missing, the phase is NEVER complete regardless of prior history (disk-strict; #2645 memory retired)', () => {
|
|
const REAL_STATUSES = ['passed', 'gaps_found', 'human_needed', 'unknown'];
|
|
fc.assert(fc.property(
|
|
fc.array(fc.constantFrom(...REAL_STATUSES), { minLength: 1, maxLength: 6 }),
|
|
(sequence) => {
|
|
const wsName = `ws-2645-prop-${Math.random().toString(36).slice(2)}`;
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: wsName });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
const dir = writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1 });
|
|
const reportPath = path.join(dir, '01-VERIFICATION.md');
|
|
|
|
for (const status of sequence) {
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(reportPath, `---\nstatus: ${status}\n---\n`);
|
|
inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, wsName, { active: null }); // observe
|
|
}
|
|
fs.unlinkSync(reportPath);
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, wsName, { active: null });
|
|
assert.equal(inv.phases[0].status, 'in_progress',
|
|
`disk-strict: after observing ${JSON.stringify(sequence)} then deleting the report, the phase must never be complete`);
|
|
|
|
cleanup(wsDir);
|
|
},
|
|
), { numRuns: 25 });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 10 — CONTRIBUTING.md "Filesystem writes and installers": code that
|
|
// writes under `.planning` needs fault-injection coverage. A corrupted
|
|
// `.verification-ledger.json` (bad JSON, or valid JSON of the wrong shape)
|
|
// must degrade to "nothing remembered", never throw and never break the
|
|
// read-only commands this ledger is a side effect of.
|
|
test('a corrupted ledger file degrades to no memory instead of throwing (#2645)', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-corrupt-ledger' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' });
|
|
const ledgerPath = path.join(wsDir, '.verification-ledger.json');
|
|
|
|
// Not valid JSON at all.
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(ledgerPath, 'not json{{{');
|
|
assert.doesNotThrow(() => inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-corrupt-ledger', { active: null }));
|
|
|
|
// Valid JSON, wrong shape (array instead of object) — must also degrade,
|
|
// not partially trust it.
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(ledgerPath, '["gaps_found"]');
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-corrupt-ledger', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.phases[0].status, 'in_progress', 'the live gaps_found read still governs regardless of ledger corruption');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 10b — the path Row 10 does NOT exercise (a live report is present in
|
|
// both its cases, so the live read governs regardless of ledger state).
|
|
// With the report ALSO absent, a corrupt ledger must fail CLOSED — an
|
|
// unreadable/malformed ledger for an ADOPTED workstream (the ledger file
|
|
// exists) is treated as "present, no trustworthy entry", exactly like
|
|
// "present, no entry for this phase", NOT as "absent" (pre-adoption). This
|
|
// is the fail-open→fail-closed distinction the maintainer's review required.
|
|
test('a corrupted ledger with no live report fails closed instead of completing (#2645)', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-corrupt-no-report' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' });
|
|
const ledgerPath = path.join(wsDir, '.verification-ledger.json');
|
|
|
|
// Adopt the ledger for real (a genuine observation), matching the shape
|
|
// of an actually-used workstream, THEN corrupt it and remove the report —
|
|
// this is the realistic "ledger existed, now can't be trusted, AND the
|
|
// evidence that would let the live read cover for it is also gone" case.
|
|
const before = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-corrupt-no-report', { active: null });
|
|
assert.equal(before.completed_phases, 0, 'guard: starts correctly gated by the live gaps_found verdict');
|
|
|
|
fs.unlinkSync(path.join(wsDir, 'phases', '1-foo', '01-VERIFICATION.md'));
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(ledgerPath, 'not json{{{');
|
|
|
|
let inv;
|
|
assert.doesNotThrow(() => { inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-corrupt-no-report', { active: null }); });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.phases[0].status, 'in_progress',
|
|
'a corrupt ledger for an adopted workstream must fail closed, not silently permit completion');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 0, 'the percentage must not rise just because the ledger became unreadable');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 13 — "delete the ledger" case #1: the ledger file is removed, but
|
|
// the phase's report is STILL PRESENT and still fails verification. This
|
|
// must never raise completeness (the live read governs regardless of
|
|
// ledger presence), and the deletion must be SELF-HEALING: the very next
|
|
// read that observes the still-present real verdict recreates the ledger.
|
|
test('deleting only the ledger file (report still present) does not raise completeness and self-heals (#2645)', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-delete-ledger-only' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' });
|
|
const ledgerPath = path.join(wsDir, '.verification-ledger.json');
|
|
|
|
inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-delete-ledger-only', { active: null }); // adopt
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(ledgerPath), 'guard: the ledger must exist before deleting it is meaningful');
|
|
|
|
fs.unlinkSync(ledgerPath);
|
|
const afterLedgerDelete = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-delete-ledger-only', { active: null });
|
|
assert.equal(afterLedgerDelete.completed_phases, 0,
|
|
'the still-present gaps_found report must keep this gated regardless of the ledger');
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(ledgerPath), 'a read that observes a real verdict must recreate/self-heal the ledger');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 14 — SUPERSEDED by ADR-3180 §7.4 (#3186, disk-strict): the
|
|
// "prospective only" residual gap this row used to document (removing
|
|
// BOTH files reopens the pre-adoption 'absent' window, which USED to be
|
|
// allowed to complete because criteria 2/3 tolerated a never-verified
|
|
// phase) no longer exists — criteria 2/3 themselves are retired (Rows 3/4
|
|
// above). Deleting the report and/or the ledger, in any combination, now
|
|
// uniformly reads 'missing' → not complete. There is no residual gap left
|
|
// to disclose for this row.
|
|
test('deleting the report AND the ledger together is still NOT complete (disk-strict; #2645 residual gap closed)', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-delete-both' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' });
|
|
const ledgerPath = path.join(wsDir, '.verification-ledger.json');
|
|
|
|
inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-delete-both', { active: null }); // adopt + observe gaps_found
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(ledgerPath));
|
|
|
|
fs.unlinkSync(path.join(wsDir, 'phases', '1-foo', '01-VERIFICATION.md'));
|
|
fs.unlinkSync(ledgerPath);
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-delete-both', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.phases[0].status, 'in_progress',
|
|
'disk-strict: removing both files still reads \'missing\' — never complete, regardless of ledger adoption state');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 11 — fault injection per CONTRIBUTING.md: read-only target directory
|
|
// / partial write failure. Monkeypatch `fs.writeFileSync` to throw only for
|
|
// the ledger's WRITE TARGET (delegating everything else to the real
|
|
// implementation, since STATE.md/ROADMAP.md/phase files also go through
|
|
// the same fs module) — `inspectWorkstream` must still return a valid
|
|
// inventory rather than propagating the write failure. Restored via
|
|
// `t.after()` (never `try/finally` in a test body — CONTRIBUTING.md:344 —
|
|
// and never `chmod 0o000`, which root bypasses in CI).
|
|
//
|
|
// #2645 review: the write target is the ledger's TEMP file
|
|
// (`<ledgerPath>.<pid>.tmp`), not `ledgerPath` itself — the write is
|
|
// atomic (temp file + rename, #2645 review). Matching only the exact
|
|
// final path here made this mock a no-op once atomicity landed (the real
|
|
// write always succeeded, so the assertion that follows failed): fixed to
|
|
// match anything starting with `ledgerPath`, which covers the temp file
|
|
// regardless of its exact suffix.
|
|
test('a write failure on the ledger file does not break inspectWorkstream (#2645)', (t) => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-write-fail' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' });
|
|
const ledgerPath = path.join(wsDir, '.verification-ledger.json');
|
|
|
|
const originalWriteFileSync = fs.writeFileSync;
|
|
fs.writeFileSync = (targetPath, ...rest) => {
|
|
if (typeof targetPath === 'string' && targetPath.startsWith(ledgerPath)) {
|
|
throw new Error('injected: simulated read-only target directory');
|
|
}
|
|
return originalWriteFileSync(targetPath, ...rest);
|
|
};
|
|
t.after(() => { fs.writeFileSync = originalWriteFileSync; });
|
|
|
|
let inv;
|
|
assert.doesNotThrow(() => { inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-write-fail', { active: null }); });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.phases[0].status, 'in_progress', 'the inventory is still correct even though persistence failed');
|
|
assert.ok(!fs.existsSync(ledgerPath), 'the failed write must not have left a partial/corrupt ledger file');
|
|
const leftoverTmp = fs.readdirSync(wsDir).filter(name => name.startsWith('.verification-ledger.json.') && name.endsWith('.tmp'));
|
|
assert.deepEqual(leftoverTmp, [], 'a failed temp-file write must not leave an orphaned temp file behind');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 12 — the read-side counterpart: a read failure on the ledger path
|
|
// specifically (e.g. permission denied) must also degrade rather than
|
|
// throw, and must not mask the live on-disk verdict for THIS call.
|
|
test('a read failure on the ledger file does not break inspectWorkstream (#2645)', (t) => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-read-fail' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' });
|
|
const ledgerPath = path.join(wsDir, '.verification-ledger.json');
|
|
// Seed a ledger entry via a real (unmocked) observation first.
|
|
inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-read-fail', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(ledgerPath), 'guard: the ledger must exist before the read-failure case is meaningful');
|
|
|
|
const originalReadFileSync = fs.readFileSync;
|
|
fs.readFileSync = (targetPath, ...rest) => {
|
|
if (typeof targetPath === 'string' && targetPath === ledgerPath) {
|
|
throw new Error('injected: simulated permission denied');
|
|
}
|
|
return originalReadFileSync(targetPath, ...rest);
|
|
};
|
|
t.after(() => { fs.readFileSync = originalReadFileSync; });
|
|
|
|
let inv;
|
|
assert.doesNotThrow(() => { inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-read-fail', { active: null }); });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
// The ledger read failed (treated as 'corrupt', not 'absent', since the
|
|
// file DOES exist) — this workstream has adopted the ledger, so this
|
|
// falls CLOSED. The report is still live on disk with a real
|
|
// (non-missing) gaps_found verdict though, so the phase is correctly
|
|
// in_progress from the LIVE read regardless — the fail-closed path isn't
|
|
// even reached for this phase (its live read isn't 'missing').
|
|
assert.equal(inv.phases[0].status, 'in_progress');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 15 — CONTRIBUTING.md fault-injection: broken symlink. `readFileSync`
|
|
// FOLLOWS symlinks, so a broken symlink at the ledger path reports the
|
|
// SAME `ENOENT` as genuine absence via errno alone — `readVerificationLedger`
|
|
// disambiguates with `lstatSync` (which does NOT follow symlinks) before
|
|
// concluding `'absent'`. This is the realistic worst case: the durable
|
|
// memory is unreadable AND there is no live report to fall back on.
|
|
test('a broken symlink at the ledger path fails closed instead of falling open to pre-adoption (#2645)', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-broken-symlink' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' });
|
|
const ledgerPath = path.join(wsDir, '.verification-ledger.json');
|
|
|
|
const before = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-broken-symlink', { active: null }); // adopt
|
|
assert.equal(before.completed_phases, 0, 'guard: gated by the live gaps_found verdict');
|
|
|
|
fs.unlinkSync(path.join(wsDir, 'phases', '1-foo', '01-VERIFICATION.md'));
|
|
fs.unlinkSync(ledgerPath);
|
|
fs.symlinkSync(path.join(wsDir, 'does-not-exist-target'), ledgerPath);
|
|
|
|
let inv;
|
|
assert.doesNotThrow(() => { inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-broken-symlink', { active: null }); });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.phases[0].status, 'in_progress',
|
|
'a broken symlink is evidence something existed — it must fail closed, not fall open to pre-adoption behavior');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 0, 'the percentage must not rise because the ledger became a broken symlink');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 15b — pins the lstat fail-closed fix specifically. The broken-symlink
|
|
// disambiguation in `readVerificationLedger` calls `fs.lstatSync` after
|
|
// `fs.readFileSync` reports `ENOENT`, to tell "genuinely absent" from "a
|
|
// symlink entry exists, its target does not". A REVIEW caught that the
|
|
// `catch` around that `lstatSync` call originally treated ANY lstat
|
|
// failure as proof of absence — but only `lstatSync` ITSELF reporting
|
|
// `ENOENT` is genuine proof; a DIFFERENT lstat failure (a raced permission
|
|
// change, a path component that became inaccessible between the two
|
|
// calls, …) is not evidence the file was never there, and must fail
|
|
// CLOSED like every other path in that function. Double-fault both calls
|
|
// to pin this: `readFileSync` throws `ENOENT` (as it does for a genuinely
|
|
// missing path or file), `lstatSync` throws something else (`EACCES`) —
|
|
// this combination is impossible to produce with a real filesystem state
|
|
// (if the path is genuinely gone, `lstatSync` reports `ENOENT` too), so it
|
|
// is monkeypatched directly rather than constructed on disk; this is what
|
|
// "a future edit could re-widen that catch and fall open again silently"
|
|
// means without a test — the double-fault CANNOT be exercised any other
|
|
// way. Restored via `t.after()`.
|
|
test('a non-ENOENT lstat failure during broken-symlink disambiguation fails closed, not open (#2645)', (t) => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-lstat-double-fault' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' });
|
|
const ledgerPath = path.join(wsDir, '.verification-ledger.json');
|
|
|
|
const before = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-lstat-double-fault', { active: null }); // adopt
|
|
assert.equal(before.completed_phases, 0, 'guard: gated by the live gaps_found verdict');
|
|
fs.unlinkSync(path.join(wsDir, 'phases', '1-foo', '01-VERIFICATION.md'));
|
|
|
|
const originalReadFileSync = fs.readFileSync;
|
|
const originalLstatSync = fs.lstatSync;
|
|
fs.readFileSync = (targetPath, ...rest) => {
|
|
if (typeof targetPath === 'string' && targetPath === ledgerPath) {
|
|
throw Object.assign(new Error('injected: simulated missing ledger'), { code: 'ENOENT' });
|
|
}
|
|
return originalReadFileSync(targetPath, ...rest);
|
|
};
|
|
fs.lstatSync = (targetPath, ...rest) => {
|
|
if (typeof targetPath === 'string' && targetPath === ledgerPath) {
|
|
throw Object.assign(new Error('injected: simulated raced permission fault'), { code: 'EACCES' });
|
|
}
|
|
return originalLstatSync(targetPath, ...rest);
|
|
};
|
|
t.after(() => {
|
|
fs.readFileSync = originalReadFileSync;
|
|
fs.lstatSync = originalLstatSync;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
let inv;
|
|
assert.doesNotThrow(() => { inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-lstat-double-fault', { active: null }); });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.phases[0].status, 'in_progress',
|
|
'a non-ENOENT lstat failure is not proof of absence — it must fail closed (corrupt), not fall open (absent)');
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 0, 'the percentage must not rise because of an ambiguous double-fault read');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 16 — CONTRIBUTING.md fault-injection: missing/uncreatable parent
|
|
// directory for the write side. Monkeypatch `fs.mkdirSync` to throw only
|
|
// for the workstream directory (delegating everything else), simulating a
|
|
// parent directory `writeVerificationLedger` cannot ensure exists.
|
|
test('an uncreatable parent directory on write does not break inspectWorkstream (#2645)', (t) => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-no-parent-dir' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' });
|
|
const ledgerPath = path.join(wsDir, '.verification-ledger.json');
|
|
|
|
const originalMkdirSync = fs.mkdirSync;
|
|
fs.mkdirSync = (targetPath, ...rest) => {
|
|
if (typeof targetPath === 'string' && targetPath === wsDir) {
|
|
throw new Error('injected: simulated missing/uncreatable parent directory');
|
|
}
|
|
return originalMkdirSync(targetPath, ...rest);
|
|
};
|
|
t.after(() => { fs.mkdirSync = originalMkdirSync; });
|
|
|
|
let inv;
|
|
assert.doesNotThrow(() => { inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-no-parent-dir', { active: null }); });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.phases[0].status, 'in_progress', 'the live report still governs even though persistence failed');
|
|
assert.ok(!fs.existsSync(ledgerPath), 'a write that could not ensure its directory must not leave a ledger file');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 17 — CONTRIBUTING.md fault-injection: rename failure and temp-file
|
|
// cleanup, now applicable because the write is atomic (temp file + rename,
|
|
// #2645 review). Monkeypatch `fs.renameSync` to throw only for the ledger's
|
|
// rename — the temp file must be written, the rename must fail, and the
|
|
// orphaned temp file must be cleaned up rather than accumulating.
|
|
test('a rename failure during the atomic ledger write cleans up the temp file (#2645)', (t) => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-rename-fail' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), FLAT_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), flatRoadmap([
|
|
'| 1. Foo | 1/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-foo', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' });
|
|
const ledgerPath = path.join(wsDir, '.verification-ledger.json');
|
|
|
|
const originalRenameSync = fs.renameSync;
|
|
fs.renameSync = (src, dest) => {
|
|
if (typeof dest === 'string' && dest === ledgerPath) {
|
|
throw Object.assign(new Error('injected: simulated rename failure'), { code: 'EPERM' });
|
|
}
|
|
return originalRenameSync(src, dest);
|
|
};
|
|
t.after(() => { fs.renameSync = originalRenameSync; });
|
|
|
|
let inv;
|
|
assert.doesNotThrow(() => { inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-rename-fail', { active: null }); });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.phases[0].status, 'in_progress', 'the live report still governs even though persistence failed');
|
|
assert.ok(!fs.existsSync(ledgerPath), 'a failed rename must not leave a ledger file at the final path');
|
|
const leftoverTmp = fs.readdirSync(wsDir).filter(name => name.startsWith('.verification-ledger.json.') && name.endsWith('.tmp'));
|
|
assert.deepEqual(leftoverTmp, [], 'a failed rename must not leave an orphaned temp file behind');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 18 — BLOCKER regression, and THIS IS THE ONLY ROW THAT PROVES IT
|
|
// END TO END. `pickRollupWinners` (`workstream-inventory-builder.cts`) is
|
|
// the SINGLE shared implementation both `buildWorkstreamInventory`'s
|
|
// `rollupDirByKey` and `inspectWorkstream`'s ledger-winner selection now
|
|
// call. An earlier version of the ledger selection was a SEPARATE
|
|
// hand-written copy that omitted the `includeItem` (milestone-scoping)
|
|
// filter — so in a scoped workstream, a stale OUT-of-milestone directory
|
|
// sharing a phase key with the live IN-milestone one, with a newer mtime
|
|
// (plausible after a checkout/rebase resets mtimes), could win the
|
|
// LEDGER's selection while losing the BUILDER's. `isLedgerWinner` would
|
|
// then be false for the live directory, so deleting ITS
|
|
// `*-VERIFICATION.md` would never consult the ledger — reopening #2645's
|
|
// hole for the phase that actually counts toward `completed_phases`,
|
|
// reachable with a plain `rm`, no ledger tampering.
|
|
//
|
|
// This test constructs that EXACT collision directly — one synthetic key
|
|
// shared by two entries, one included (in-milestone) and one excluded
|
|
// (out-of-milestone), the excluded one given the larger mtime — and
|
|
// proves `pickRollupWinners` applies the filter BEFORE comparing mtimes.
|
|
//
|
|
// Row 19 (below) does NOT reproduce this same-key collision through the
|
|
// real `phaseKeyFromDir` / `isDirInCurrentMilestone` pipeline — extensive
|
|
// probing (documented in `10-diagnosis.md`'s "Fourth note") found no
|
|
// directory-naming pair that shares a rollup key while diverging in
|
|
// milestone membership under the CURRENT roadmap-parser implementation;
|
|
// every membership-determining path collapses to the same phase-number
|
|
// extraction the rollup key already uses. Row 19 instead pins a narrower,
|
|
// real, DISTINCTLY-keyed guarantee (an out-of-milestone phase's verdict is
|
|
// never written into the ledger at all) — genuinely useful coverage, but
|
|
// NOT a substitute for this row: it does not exercise the collision path,
|
|
// and the pre-fix code would have passed it too.
|
|
test('pickRollupWinners: an excluded (out-of-milestone) item can never win over an included one, even with a newer mtime (#2645)', () => {
|
|
const liveInMilestone = { key: 'shared', mtimeMs: 100, inMilestone: true, label: 'live' };
|
|
const staleOutOfMilestone = { key: 'shared', mtimeMs: 999999, inMilestone: false, label: 'stale' }; // far newer mtime, but excluded
|
|
const scoped = true;
|
|
|
|
const winners = pickRollupWinners(
|
|
[liveInMilestone, staleOutOfMilestone], // pre-sorted input, as both real call sites provide
|
|
(item) => item.key,
|
|
(item) => item.mtimeMs,
|
|
(item) => !(scoped && item.inMilestone === false),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(winners.get('shared'), liveInMilestone,
|
|
'the excluded stale directory must never win the key, regardless of its mtime advantage');
|
|
assert.equal(winners.get('shared').label, 'live');
|
|
|
|
// The mirror image, sorted the OTHER way — order-of-iteration must not
|
|
// matter once the filter is applied; only inclusion + mtime should.
|
|
const winnersReversed = pickRollupWinners(
|
|
[staleOutOfMilestone, liveInMilestone],
|
|
(item) => item.key,
|
|
(item) => item.mtimeMs,
|
|
(item) => !(scoped && item.inMilestone === false),
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(winnersReversed.get('shared'), liveInMilestone);
|
|
|
|
// Unscoped (scoped=false): the exclusion never engages, so the newer
|
|
// mtime wins normally — pinning that the filter is scoping-conditional,
|
|
// not an unconditional "in-milestone always wins" rule.
|
|
const unscoped = false;
|
|
const winnersUnscoped = pickRollupWinners(
|
|
[liveInMilestone, staleOutOfMilestone],
|
|
(item) => item.key,
|
|
(item) => item.mtimeMs,
|
|
(item) => !(unscoped && item.inMilestone === false),
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(winnersUnscoped.get('shared'), staleOutOfMilestone,
|
|
'when scoping is off, the plain newest-mtime rule applies with no exclusion');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Row 19 — NOT the collision blocker (see Row 18's comment — this does
|
|
// not reproduce it and the pre-fix code would pass this too). What this
|
|
// DOES cover: in a genuinely SCOPED workstream (roadmap has a Milestone
|
|
// column, STATE.md carries `milestone:`), a DISTINCTLY-keyed
|
|
// out-of-milestone phase's real verdict must never be written into the
|
|
// ledger at all — proving the REAL `inspectWorkstream` read/write path
|
|
// threads `scoped`/`inMilestone` into the ledger write gate correctly, end
|
|
// to end, for the (much more common) non-colliding case. `1-old` (v1.0)
|
|
// and `2-new` (v2.0) are DIFFERENT phase keys, not a shared one.
|
|
test('milestone scoping: a distinctly-keyed out-of-milestone phase is never written into the ledger (#2645)', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-2645-scoped-ledger' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), 'milestone: v2.0\nstatus: executing\n');
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), [
|
|
'# Roadmap', '', '## Progress', '',
|
|
'| Phase | Milestone | Plans Complete | Status | Completed |',
|
|
'| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |',
|
|
'| 1. Old | v1.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
'| 2. New | v2.0 | 1/1 | In Progress | - |',
|
|
'',
|
|
].join('\n'));
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '1-old', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' }); // prior milestone
|
|
writePhase(wsDir, '2-new', { plans: 1, summaries: 1, verification: 'gaps_found' }); // current milestone
|
|
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-2645-scoped-ledger', { active: null });
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
// Guard: confirm scoping is actually active and phase 1 really is
|
|
// excluded from the rollup — otherwise this test would not exercise
|
|
// anything.
|
|
assert.equal(inv.roadmap_phase_count, 1, 'guard: denominator = v2.0 phases only, scoping is active');
|
|
|
|
const ledgerRaw = fs.readFileSync(path.join(wsDir, '.verification-ledger.json'), 'utf-8');
|
|
const ledger = JSON.parse(ledgerRaw);
|
|
assert.ok(!('01' in ledger) && !('1' in ledger),
|
|
'the out-of-milestone phase (1-old) must never be written into the ledger, regardless of its key form');
|
|
assert.ok(('02' in ledger) || ('2' in ledger),
|
|
'the in-milestone phase (2-new) must be recorded normally');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
// #3057 B3: inspectWorkstream surfaces an indeterminate staleness check
|
|
//
|
|
// readVerificationStatus's internal staleness check can fail (fs /
|
|
// scanPhasePlans / clock error). Pre-#3057 B3 wiring, that failure was
|
|
// dropped here — `liveVerificationStatus` used only `.status` — so nothing
|
|
// could ever distinguish "checked; nothing is stale" from "could not check".
|
|
// `WorkstreamInventory`'s own return shape has no per-phase verification
|
|
// detail to carry this on, so it is surfaced via the SAME injectable
|
|
// stderr-diagnostic seam #3057 B4 added to cmdGitBaseBranch (see
|
|
// tests/git-base-branch.test.cjs), never via a change to `phases[]`/
|
|
// `completed_phases` — the rollup routing must stay byte-identical.
|
|
// ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('#3057 B3: inspectWorkstream — verification staleness-check indeterminate is surfaced', () => {
|
|
let tmpDir;
|
|
before(() => { tmpDir = createFixture(); });
|
|
after(() => cleanup(tmpDir));
|
|
|
|
const V2_STATE = 'milestone: v2.0\nstatus: executing\n';
|
|
|
|
function roadmapWithRows(rows) {
|
|
return [
|
|
'# Roadmap', '', '## Progress', '',
|
|
'| Phase | Milestone | Plans Complete | Status | Completed |',
|
|
'| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |',
|
|
...rows,
|
|
'',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Writes a verified phase directory with a deterministic (never-stale) mtime ordering. */
|
|
function writeVerifiedPhase(wsDir, slug) {
|
|
const dir = path.join(wsDir, 'phases', slug);
|
|
fs.mkdirSync(dir, { recursive: true });
|
|
const summaryPath = path.join(dir, '01-SUMMARY.md');
|
|
const verificationPath = path.join(dir, '01-VERIFICATION.md');
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, '01-PLAN.md'), '# plan\n');
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(summaryPath, '# summary\n');
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(verificationPath, '---\nstatus: passed\n---\n');
|
|
// Deterministic mtime ordering — never rely on write-order clock ties.
|
|
const older = new Date('2026-01-01T00:00:00.000Z');
|
|
const newer = new Date('2026-01-01T00:01:00.000Z');
|
|
fs.utimesSync(summaryPath, older, older);
|
|
fs.utimesSync(verificationPath, newer, newer);
|
|
return { summaryPath, verificationPath };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test('an fs failure inside the staleness check writes a stderr diagnostic; the rollup is UNCHANGED', (t) => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-3057-b3-fault' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), roadmapWithRows([
|
|
'| 1. Alpha | v2.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
const { summaryPath, verificationPath } = writeVerifiedPhase(wsDir, '1-alpha');
|
|
const origStatSync = fs.statSync;
|
|
|
|
t.mock.method(fs, 'statSync', function injectedStaleCheckFault(target, ...args) {
|
|
const targetPath = String(target);
|
|
if (targetPath === verificationPath || targetPath === summaryPath) {
|
|
throw new Error('injected stat failure (#3057 B3)');
|
|
}
|
|
return origStatSync.call(fs, target, ...args);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const calls = [];
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-3057-b3-fault', {
|
|
active: null,
|
|
writeDiagnostic: (message, meta) => { calls.push({ message, meta }); },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
// Pre-existing no-throw fail-open routing is UNCHANGED: the rollup counts
|
|
// exactly what it would without the injected fault.
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 1, 'rollup routing unchanged');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(calls.length, 1, 'an indeterminate staleness check must write exactly one diagnostic');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(calls[0].meta.phaseDir, '1-alpha', 'diagnostic meta should name the affected phase directory');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(calls[0].meta.reason, 'staleCheckIndeterminate', 'diagnostic meta should carry a stable reason');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('a completed staleness check that finds nothing stale writes NO diagnostic', () => {
|
|
const wsDir = seedWorkstream(tmpDir, { name: 'ws-3057-b3-ok' });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'STATE.md'), V2_STATE);
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(wsDir, 'ROADMAP.md'), roadmapWithRows([
|
|
'| 1. Alpha | v2.0 | 1/1 | Complete | - |',
|
|
]));
|
|
writeVerifiedPhase(wsDir, '1-alpha');
|
|
|
|
const calls = [];
|
|
const inv = inspectWorkstream(tmpDir, 'ws-3057-b3-ok', {
|
|
active: null,
|
|
writeDiagnostic: (message, meta) => { calls.push({ message, meta }); },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(inv);
|
|
assert.equal(inv.completed_phases, 1);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(calls.length, 0, 'a completed, non-stale check must not write any diagnostic');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|