- Creates .planning/debug/[slug].md immediately on command - Continuous updates: file IS the debugging brain - Clear section rules: OVERWRITE (Current Focus, Resolution) vs APPEND (Evidence, Eliminated) - Survives /clear perfectly - resume from any interruption point - Scientific method: evidence → hypothesis → test → eliminate or confirm - Includes debugging reference files (mindset, hypothesis testing, investigation techniques) Closes #53, closes #44 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
9.3 KiB
You are the debugger. The user knows what's wrong (behavior), not why (root cause). Gather symptoms, then investigate autonomously.
**User = reporter. Claude = investigator.**The user knows:
- What they expected to happen
- What actually happened
- Any error messages they saw
- When it started / if it ever worked
The user does NOT know (and shouldn't be asked):
- What's causing the bug
- Which file has the problem
- What the fix should be
Ask about experience. Investigate the cause yourself.
@~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/debugging/debugging-mindset.md @~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/debugging/hypothesis-testing.md @~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/debugging/investigation-techniques.md @~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/debugging/verification-patterns.md @~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/debugging/when-to-research.md @~/.claude/get-shit-done/templates/DEBUG.md **First: Check for active debug sessions**ls .planning/debug/*.md 2>/dev/null | grep -v resolved
If active sessions exist:
Read each file's frontmatter to check status.
If status is NOT "resolved":
Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Resume?"
- question: "Active debug session found. Continue or start new?"
- options:
- "Resume [slug]" - Continue where we left off
- "Start new" - This is a different issue
- "Show status" - Show me current state first
If "Resume": Load file, go to resume_from_file
If "Start new": Continue to create_debug_file
If "Show status": Display Current Focus and Symptoms, ask again
If no active sessions:
Continue to create_debug_file
Generate slug from user input (lowercase, hyphens, max 30 chars).
mkdir -p .planning/debug
Create file with initial state:
---
status: gathering
trigger: "[verbatim $ARGUMENTS]"
created: [ISO timestamp]
updated: [ISO timestamp]
---
## Current Focus
hypothesis: none yet
test: none
expecting: none
next_action: gather symptoms from user
## Symptoms
expected:
actual:
errors:
reproduction:
started:
## Eliminated
[none yet]
## Evidence
[none yet]
## Resolution
root_cause:
fix:
verification:
files_changed: []
Write to .planning/debug/[slug].md
Now proceed to symptom_gathering.
CRITICAL: Update the debug file after each piece of information gathered.
1. Expected behavior:
Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Expected"
- question: "What should happen?"
- options: Contextual interpretations + "Let me describe"
After answer → Update Symptoms.expected in debug file
2. Actual behavior:
Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Actual"
- question: "What actually happens instead?"
- options: Common failure modes + "Let me describe"
After answer → Update Symptoms.actual in debug file
3. Error messages:
Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Errors"
- question: "Any error messages?"
- options:
- "Yes, I'll paste them"
- "Yes, but I don't have them handy"
- "No errors - fails silently"
- "Not sure"
After answer → Update Symptoms.errors in debug file
4. When it started:
Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Timeline"
- question: "When did this start?"
- options:
- "Never worked"
- "After a change"
- "Intermittent"
- "Not sure"
After answer → Update Symptoms.started in debug file
5. Reproduction:
Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Reproduce"
- question: "How do you trigger this?"
- options:
- "Specific steps" - I can describe them
- "Random" - Happens unpredictably
- "Always" - Every time I try
- "Not sure"
After answer → Update Symptoms.reproduction in debug file
6. Ready check:
Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Ready?"
- question: "Enough context to investigate?"
- options:
- "Start investigating"
- "I have more context"
If "I have more context" → receive it, update relevant field, ask again
If "Start investigating" → Update status to "investigating", proceed to investigation_loop
CRITICAL: Before EVERY action, update Current Focus. After EVERY finding, append to Evidence.
Phase 1: Initial evidence gathering
Update Current Focus:
hypothesis: gathering initial evidence
test: examining error context and relevant code
expecting: clues about failure point
next_action: [specific next action]
- If errors exist in Symptoms → search codebase for error text
- Identify relevant code area from symptoms
- Read relevant files COMPLETELY
- Run app/tests to observe behavior firsthand
After EACH finding → Append to Evidence:
- timestamp: [now]
checked: [what]
found: [what]
implication: [what this means]
Phase 2: Form hypothesis
Based on evidence, form SPECIFIC, FALSIFIABLE hypothesis.
Update Current Focus:
hypothesis: [specific theory]
test: [how you'll test it]
expecting: [what proves/disproves it]
next_action: [immediate next step]
Phase 3: Test hypothesis
Execute the test. ONE hypothesis at a time.
Append result to Evidence.
Phase 4: Evaluate
If CONFIRMED:
- Update Resolution.root_cause with evidence
- Update status to "fixing"
- Proceed to
fix_and_verify
If ELIMINATED:
- Append to Eliminated section:
- hypothesis: [what was wrong] evidence: [what disproved it] timestamp: [now] - Form new hypothesis based on evidence
- Return to Phase 2
Context management:
After significant investigation (5+ evidence entries), check if context is heavy. If so, ensure Current Focus is fully updated and suggest: "Context filling up. Safe to /clear - run /gsd:debug to resume."
**Resume investigation from debug file**Read the full debug file.
Announce:
Resuming: [slug]
Status: [status]
Current hypothesis: [from Current Focus]
Evidence gathered: [count]
Eliminated: [count] hypotheses
Continuing from: [next_action]
Based on status:
- "gathering" → Continue
symptom_gatheringfrom where left off - "investigating" → Continue
investigation_loopfrom Current Focus - "fixing" → Continue
fix_and_verify - "verifying" → Continue verification
The file tells you exactly where you were.
**Apply fix and verify**Update status to "fixing".
1. Implement minimal fix
Update Current Focus:
hypothesis: [confirmed root cause]
test: applying fix
expecting: symptoms resolved
next_action: implement fix in [files]
Make the SMALLEST change that addresses root cause.
Update Resolution.fix with what was changed and why. Update Resolution.files_changed with modified files.
2. Verify
Update status to "verifying".
Update Current Focus:
hypothesis: fix resolves issue
test: reproducing original symptoms
expecting: symptoms no longer occur
next_action: verify fix
Test against original Symptoms:
- Does expected behavior now occur?
- Are errors gone?
- Does reproduction no longer trigger issue?
If verification FAILS:
- Append finding to Evidence
- Update status back to "investigating"
- Root cause was wrong or incomplete
- Return to
investigation_loop
If verification PASSES:
- Update Resolution.verification with how verified
- Proceed to
archive_session
Update status to "resolved".
mkdir -p .planning/debug/resolved
mv .planning/debug/[slug].md .planning/debug/resolved/
Commit:
git add -A
git commit -m "fix: [brief description from Resolution.fix]
Root cause: [from Resolution.root_cause]
Debug session: .planning/debug/resolved/[slug].md"
Report:
Debug complete.
Root cause: [root_cause]
Fix: [fix]
Files: [files_changed]
Session archived: .planning/debug/resolved/[slug].md
Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Next"
- question: "What now?"
- options:
- "Continue working" - Back to /gsd:progress
- "Test more" - Verify related functionality
- "Done" - End session
<update_rules> Section update rules (from template):
| Section | Rule | When |
|---|---|---|
| Frontmatter.status | OVERWRITE | Each phase transition |
| Frontmatter.updated | OVERWRITE | Every file update |
| Current Focus | OVERWRITE | Before every action |
| Symptoms | IMMUTABLE | After gathering complete |
| Eliminated | APPEND | When hypothesis disproved |
| Evidence | APPEND | After each finding |
| Resolution | OVERWRITE | As understanding evolves |
CRITICAL: Update the file BEFORE taking action, not after. If context resets mid-action, the file shows what was about to happen. </update_rules>
<success_criteria>
- Debug file created IMMEDIATELY on command
- File updated after EACH piece of information
- Current Focus always reflects NOW
- Evidence appended for every finding
- Eliminated prevents re-investigation
- Can resume perfectly from any /clear
- Root cause confirmed with evidence before fixing
- Fix verified against original symptoms </success_criteria>