b7b5c3712c
* test(#2762): chunked --reviews must replan, not no-op (outline marker + per-plan --reviews exception) * fix(#2762): chunked --reviews replans plans instead of skipping 100% + outline resume marker written to file Defect A: §8.5.1 outline resume-check greped for a marker the agent only RETURNED (never wrote to the file) → outline always re-ran (broke crash-resume). Fix: the outline agent writes ## OUTLINE COMPLETE into the file. Defect B: §8.5.2 per-plan resume-check skipped any plan with frontmatter, no --reviews exception → --reviews skipped 100% of plans (contradicted §6 'go straight to replanning'). Fix: gate the skip on --reviews being ABSENT. Crash-resume (non-reviews) still skips. Condensed adjacent §8.5 prose to keep plan-phase.md under the 94519B cap (net -33B). * chore(#2762): changeset fragment * chore(#2762): backfill changeset PR number (2887) --------- Co-authored-by: Test <test@example.com>
59 lines
2.9 KiB
JavaScript
59 lines
2.9 KiB
JavaScript
// allow-test-rule: structural-implementation-guard (#2762)
|
|
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
// Regression guard for #2762: /gsd-plan-phase --reviews was a silent no-op in chunked
|
|
// mode. Two defects in plan-phase.md §8.5:
|
|
// A. §8.5.1 outline resume-check greps for a marker the agent only RETURNED (never
|
|
// wrote to the file) → outline always re-ran/overwrote (broke crash-resume).
|
|
// B. §8.5.2 per-plan resume-check skipped any plan with frontmatter, with no
|
|
// --reviews exception → --reviews skipped 100% of plans (contradicted §6's
|
|
// "go straight to replanning" contract).
|
|
|
|
const { test } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('fs');
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
|
|
const MD = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'gsd-core', 'workflows', 'plan-phase.md');
|
|
const read = () => fs.readFileSync(MD, 'utf8');
|
|
|
|
test('§8.5.1 outline agent writes the resume marker into the file (#2762 defect A)', () => {
|
|
const src = read();
|
|
// The outline prompt must instruct writing ## OUTLINE COMPLETE into PLAN-OUTLINE.md
|
|
// (the §8.5.1 resume-check greps for it in the file).
|
|
const outlineSection = src.slice(src.indexOf('### 8.5.1'), src.indexOf('### 8.5.2'));
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/outline|PLAN-OUTLINE/i.test(outlineSection) && /End the file.*## OUTLINE COMPLETE|write.*## OUTLINE COMPLETE.*file/i.test(outlineSection.replace(/\s+/g, ' ')),
|
|
'the outline agent prompt must instruct writing ## OUTLINE COMPLETE into the file (the resume-check greps the file for it) (#2762)'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('§8.5.2 per-plan resume-check does NOT skip under --reviews (#2762 defect B)', () => {
|
|
const src = read();
|
|
const perPlanSection = src.slice(src.indexOf('### 8.5.2'));
|
|
// The resume-check bash must gate the skip on --reviews being ABSENT.
|
|
const bashMatch = perPlanSection.match(/PLAN_FILE=[\s\S]*?fi\s*\n/);
|
|
assert.ok(bashMatch, '§8.5.2 must contain the per-plan resume-check bash block');
|
|
const bash = bashMatch[0];
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/--reviews/.test(bash),
|
|
'the per-plan resume-check must reference --reviews so it does NOT skip when replanning with review feedback (#2762)'
|
|
);
|
|
// The skip must be conditional on --reviews being ABSENT (e.g. ARGUMENTS != *"--reviews"*).
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/!=\s*\*"--reviews"\*|!~.*--reviews|--reviews.*absent|not.*--reviews/i.test(bash),
|
|
'the resume-check skip must be gated on --reviews being ABSENT (so --reviews overwrites/replans) (#2762)'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('§8.5.2 crash-resume (non-reviews) still skips written plans (#2762 negative space)', () => {
|
|
const src = read();
|
|
const perPlanSection = src.slice(src.indexOf('### 8.5.2'));
|
|
const bashMatch = perPlanSection.match(/PLAN_FILE=[\s\S]*?fi\s*\n/);
|
|
const bash = bashMatch ? bashMatch[0] : '';
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/head -1.*grep.*\^---|frontmatter/i.test(bash + perPlanSection.slice(0, 400)),
|
|
'crash-resume (non-reviews) must still skip plans with valid frontmatter (resume safety preserved) (#2762)'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|