Files
msd-core/tests/thinking-partner.test.cjs
Tom Boucher 7c6f8005f3 test: destroy 9 config-schema.cjs/core.cjs source-grep tests, replace with behavioral config-set (#2696)
* test: destroy 9 config-schema.cjs/core.cjs source-grep tests, add behavioral config-set tests (#2691, #2693)

Replace source-grep theater with config-set behavioral tests:
- execute-phase-wave: config-set workflow.use_worktrees replaces VALID_CONFIG_KEYS grep
- inline-plan-threshold: delete redundant source-grep (behavioral test at L36 already covered it)
- plan-bounce: config-set for plan_bounce / plan_bounce_script / plan_bounce_passes replaces 3 key-presence greps
- code-review: config-set for code_review / code_review_depth replaces 2 greps; removes CONFIG_PATH constant
- thinking-partner: config-set features.thinking_partner replaces two greps (config-schema.cjs AND core.cjs)

Behavioral tests survive refactors (no path constants, no file reads). The config-schema.cjs →
core.cjs migration commit 990c3e64 happened because these tests groped source paths.

Add allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product annotations to legitimate product-content tests:
autonomous-allowed-tools, agent-frontmatter, agent-skills-awareness, bug-2334, bug-2346,
execute-phase-wave (MD reads), plan-bounce (workflow reads). Annotations explain WHY text
inspection is the right level of testing for AI instruction files.

Closes #2691
Closes #2693

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: address CodeRabbit findings on #2696

- agent-frontmatter.test.cjs: move allow-test-rule annotation from block comment
  to standalone // line comment so rule scanners can detect it
- thinking-partner.test.cjs: strengthen config-set test with config-get read-back
  assertion to verify the value was persisted, not just accepted (exit 0)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: tighten thinking_partner config assertion per CodeRabbit (#2696)

Replace config-get output substring check (includes('true') false-positive
risk) with a direct JSON read of .planning/config.json, asserting the
exact persisted value via strictEqual. This also validates the config file
was created, catching silent key-acceptance without persistence.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-25 10:50:54 -04:00

207 lines
8.5 KiB
JavaScript

const { describe, test } = require('node:test');
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
const { runGsdTools, createTempProject, cleanup } = require('./helpers.cjs');
const GSD_ROOT = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'get-shit-done');
describe('Thinking Partner Integration (#1726)', () => {
// Reference doc tests
describe('Reference document', () => {
const refPath = path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'references', 'thinking-partner.md');
test('thinking-partner.md exists', () => {
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(refPath), 'references/thinking-partner.md should exist');
});
test('documents all 3 integration points', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(refPath, 'utf-8');
assert.ok(content.includes('### 1. Discuss Phase'), 'should document Discuss Phase integration');
assert.ok(content.includes('### 2. Plan Phase'), 'should document Plan Phase integration');
assert.ok(content.includes('### 3. Explore'), 'should document Explore integration');
});
test('documents keyword tradeoff signals', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(refPath, 'utf-8');
assert.ok(content.includes('"or"'), 'should list "or" as keyword signal');
assert.ok(content.includes('"versus"'), 'should list "versus" as keyword signal');
assert.ok(content.includes('"tradeoff"'), 'should list "tradeoff" as keyword signal');
assert.ok(content.includes('"pros and cons"'), 'should list "pros and cons" as keyword signal');
assert.ok(content.includes('"torn between"'), 'should list "torn between" as keyword signal');
});
test('documents structural tradeoff signals', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(refPath, 'utf-8');
assert.ok(content.includes('2+ competing options'), 'should list competing options signal');
assert.ok(content.includes('which is better'), 'should list "which is better" signal');
assert.ok(content.includes('reverses a previous decision'), 'should list decision reversal signal');
});
test('documents when NOT to activate', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(refPath, 'utf-8');
assert.ok(content.includes('When NOT to activate'), 'should document non-activation cases');
assert.ok(content.includes('already made a clear choice'), 'should mention clear choices');
});
test('feature is opt-in with default false', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(refPath, 'utf-8');
assert.ok(content.includes('Default: `false`'), 'should document default as false');
assert.ok(content.includes('opt-in'), 'should describe feature as opt-in');
});
test('documents design principles', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(refPath, 'utf-8');
assert.ok(content.includes('Lightweight'), 'should list Lightweight principle');
assert.ok(content.includes('Opt-in'), 'should list Opt-in principle');
assert.ok(content.includes('Skippable'), 'should list Skippable principle');
assert.ok(content.includes('Brief'), 'should list Brief principle');
assert.ok(content.includes('Aligned'), 'should list Aligned principle');
});
test('explore integration deferred to #1729', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(refPath, 'utf-8');
assert.ok(content.includes('#1729'), 'should reference issue #1729 for explore integration');
});
});
// Config tests
describe('Config integration', () => {
test('config-set accepts features.thinking_partner', () => {
// Exercises VALID_CONFIG_KEYS membership and KNOWN_TOP_LEVEL acceptance in one call.
// Replaces two source-grep tests that read config-schema.cjs and core.cjs (see #2691).
const tmpDir = createTempProject();
try {
const setResult = runGsdTools('config-set features.thinking_partner true', tmpDir);
assert.ok(setResult.success, `config-set should accept features.thinking_partner: ${setResult.error}`);
const configPath = path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'config.json');
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(configPath), 'config-set should create .planning/config.json');
const config = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(configPath, 'utf-8'));
assert.strictEqual(
config.features?.thinking_partner,
true,
'config-set should persist features.thinking_partner=true'
);
} finally {
cleanup(tmpDir);
}
});
});
// Workflow integration tests
// After #2551 progressive-disclosure refactor, the thinking-partner block
// moved into the per-mode files (default.md, advisor.md) since the prompt
// is mode-specific (only fires inside discuss_areas, after a user answer).
describe('Discuss-phase integration', () => {
function readDiscussFamily() {
const candidates = [
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'workflows', 'discuss-phase.md'),
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'workflows', 'discuss-phase', 'modes', 'default.md'),
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'workflows', 'discuss-phase', 'modes', 'advisor.md'),
];
return candidates
.filter(p => fs.existsSync(p))
.map(p => fs.readFileSync(p, 'utf-8'))
.join('\n');
}
test('discuss-phase.md contains thinking partner conditional block', () => {
const content = readDiscussFamily();
assert.ok(
content.includes('Thinking partner (conditional)'),
'discuss-phase workflow family should contain thinking partner conditional block'
);
});
test('discuss-phase references features.thinking_partner config', () => {
const content = readDiscussFamily();
assert.ok(
content.includes('features.thinking_partner'),
'discuss-phase workflow family should reference the config key'
);
});
test('discuss-phase references thinking-partner.md for signal list', () => {
const content = readDiscussFamily();
assert.ok(
content.includes('references/thinking-partner.md'),
'discuss-phase workflow family should reference the signal list doc'
);
});
test('discuss-phase offers skip option', () => {
const content = readDiscussFamily();
assert.ok(
content.includes('No, decision made'),
'discuss-phase workflow family should offer a skip/decline option'
);
});
});
describe('Plan-phase integration', () => {
test('plan-phase.md contains thinking partner conditional block', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'workflows', 'plan-phase.md'),
'utf-8'
);
assert.ok(
content.includes('Thinking partner for architectural tradeoffs (conditional)'),
'plan-phase.md should contain thinking partner conditional block'
);
});
test('plan-phase references features.thinking_partner config', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'workflows', 'plan-phase.md'),
'utf-8'
);
assert.ok(
content.includes('features.thinking_partner'),
'plan-phase.md should reference the config key'
);
});
test('plan-phase scans for architectural tradeoff keywords', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'workflows', 'plan-phase.md'),
'utf-8'
);
assert.ok(
content.includes('"architecture"'),
'plan-phase.md should list architecture as a keyword'
);
assert.ok(
content.includes('"approach"'),
'plan-phase.md should list approach as a keyword'
);
assert.ok(
content.includes('"alternative"'),
'plan-phase.md should list alternative as a keyword'
);
});
test('plan-phase offers skip option', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'workflows', 'plan-phase.md'),
'utf-8'
);
assert.ok(
content.includes("No, I'll decide"),
'plan-phase.md should offer a skip/decline option'
);
});
test('plan-phase block is between step 11 and step 12', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'workflows', 'plan-phase.md'),
'utf-8'
);
const step11Idx = content.indexOf('## 11. Handle Checker Return');
const thinkingIdx = content.indexOf('Thinking partner for architectural tradeoffs');
const step12Idx = content.indexOf('## 12. Revision Loop');
assert.ok(step11Idx < thinkingIdx, 'thinking partner block should come after step 11');
assert.ok(thinkingIdx < step12Idx, 'thinking partner block should come before step 12');
});
});
});