* fix(#2825): gsd-code-fixer honors workflow.use_worktrees; never rm -rf a reparse point
gsd-code-fixer was the only writer that hand-rolled a git worktree inside the
agent prompt and the only one that never read workflow.use_worktrees. With the
setting explicitly false, --fix still created worktrees; the fresh worktree had
no node_modules, so runs improvised a teardown whose `rm -rf` followed a Windows
junction into the REAL node_modules (silent data loss, 3x observed).
Defect 1: gate setup_worktree + its cleanup tail on workflow.use_worktrees
(same gsd_run query config-get read the four sibling workflows use). When false:
edit/commit in the main checkout (wt='.', no temp branch, no sentinel, no cleanup).
Defect 2: forbid rm -rf on a possible reparse point in the spec — never fall
through to a destructive remove; on failure, stop and surface the error.
Defect 3: REVIEW-FIX records where verification ran (main checkout vs worktree).
The transactional worktree path (#2839/#2990/#2686) is unchanged when worktrees
are enabled. Docs-parity guards in tests/code-review.test.cjs bind the spec to
the fix.
* chore(#2825): backfill changeset PR 2905
* fix(#2825): drop stale agents/gsd-code-fixer.toml ack + spent entries (emitted-attribution)
gsd-test failed: agents/gsd-code-fixer.toml is a STALE ack here — that TOML was
changed by #2834 (now in next), not this PR. The 4 base-carried acks
(autonomous/discuss-phase-assumptions/next/plan-phase) are spent/inert.
---------
Co-authored-by: Test <test@example.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5d0fd4dc53)
3aabb0f441