Files
msd-core/docs/research/2026-05-12-skill-surface-budget.md
Tom Boucher ffd5370464 fix(#2903): use the command form that actually works in reader-facing docs (#3047)
* fix(#2903): use the command form that actually works in reader-facing docs

Docs told readers to type the colon form, which no runtime registers -- 18 of
19 runtimes use slash-hyphen and the 19th uses shell-var -- so anyone copying an
example got an unrecognized command. Swept 178 occurrences across 53 files,
locale mirrors included so they do not re-diverge from English.

The colon form is a source-authoring token, not a user-facing one: install-time
converters key on it to produce the hyphen form runtimes actually register. So
the sweep is scoped, and three things are deliberately left alone:

- ADRs, which are a historical record; editing their prose falsifies what was
  written at the time.
- The legacy release-notes archive, pending a maintainer decision on whether it
  follows the same historical carve-out. Excluding it keeps a later reversal
  additive rather than a revert.
- Source artifacts under commands, workflows and agents, where the colon form is
  load-bearing. Rewriting those would break the installed-skill guarantee across
  every runtime -- the single largest hazard here.

The plugin namespace form is a real, separate token and survives untouched.

Adds a lint enforcing exactly that boundary, since the correct form genuinely
differs by directory and nothing previously caught the drift.

Also fixes a hardcoded colon form in the capability-matrix generator. The sweep
alone would have left the generated matrix disagreeing with the template that
produces it, so the fix is at the source and the output regenerated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2903): stop the sweep misquoting source frontmatter

Adversarial review caught three lines where the sweep rewrote a citation of the
literal YAML name: key from a source command file. That key genuinely is the
colon form -- this change's own carve-out logic says source-authoring tokens keep
it -- so the docs ended up misquoting the real files. One of the three is an
acceptance-checklist assertion, which the sweep turned into a false statement.

Restored the three citations to match their sources verbatim, surgically: where a
line carried both a name: citation and a real reader-facing slash command, only
the citation reverted and the command stayed corrected.

The guard needed the same distinction, or it would have flagged the restoration
and reddened the build: a gsd:<cmd> token preceded by name: is a citation of a
source token and is now permitted. The exemption is deliberately narrow -- a bare
gsd:<cmd> anywhere else still fails -- with a test pinning that narrowness.

Also makes the detection case-insensitive. Review found /GSD:next slipped through
silently; no such casing exists in the tree today, so this closes a latent gap
rather than fixing a live one.

Swept the whole tree for further corrupted citations: none beyond the three.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2903): retire the stale-next invariant and sweep next like every other command

Maintainer decision on a genuine conflict between two contracts.

Invariant #3054 banned the literal /gsd-next from user-facing docs because it
named a retired workflow-advance command. But commands/gsd/next.md is a live
command -- the state-aware smart-entry launcher -- and this issue requires docs
to use the hyphen form every runtime actually registers. Both could not hold for
this one command, so docs had been sidestepping the ban by keeping the colon
form, which is exactly the defect this issue exists to remove.

FEATURES.md already recorded the reassignment: the hyphen form "is not the
retired workflow-advance command; it is reserved for the state-aware smart-entry
launcher. Workflow advancement remains under /gsd-progress --next." With that
reassignment the invariant's premise is obsolete and the guard now contradicts
the documented command form, so it is retired with a comment recording why
rather than deleted silently.

next is now swept like every other command, and the earlier exemption added to
the new guard is removed so nothing is special-cased.

Four citations of the literal name: frontmatter key stay in colon form, because
the source file really does carry name: gsd:next and a doc quoting it must
reproduce it verbatim. Two of those lines were reworded to say which side is the
frontmatter key and which is the slash command, since they previously conflated
the two.

Verified the retired scan would now genuinely fail against this tree -- the
conflict was real and resolved, not dodged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2903): backfill changeset pr number

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 13:23:44 -04:00

18 KiB
Raw Blame History

Skill surface budget — research memo

Date: 2026-05-12 Author: triage analysis for issue #3408 Status: Research input for ADR-0010 Reading time: ~15 min


1. Problem statement

Claude Code and other runtimes that surface skills enumerate every installed skill's name + description into the system prompt on every turn, inside an <available_skills> block. This block is capped by skillListingBudgetFraction — default 1% of the model's context window, ~2,000 tokens at 200k. When the combined descriptions exceed the cap, the harness silently truncates the tail. The reporter of #3408 has 135 installed skills across multiple plugins and observed dropped skills.

GSD's audited footprint:

Metric Value
Installed skills 66
Installed sub-agents 33 (not listed in <available_skills> — invoked via Task)
Total skill description chars 4,787
Estimated description tokens (÷4) ~1,196
Mean description length 72.5 chars
Description ceiling (enforced by scripts/lint-descriptions.cjs) 100 chars
GSD share of a 200k 1% budget ~60%

GSD on its own consumes roughly 60% of the default skill-listing budget. When the user stacks any other plugin of comparable size (the reporter's /doctor shows several), the budget is breached and skills get dropped. This is not a GSD-only problem, but GSD is the single biggest contributor in the typical install, so we are the natural place for ecosystem-wide remediation to start.

2. What's already in place

GSD has done one consolidation pass and shipped one install-time lever:

  • --minimal / --core-only install flag (bin/install.js:123, gsd-core/bin/lib/install-profiles.cjs). Stages a filtered copy of commands/gsd/ into a temp dir before each runtime-specific copy step. Reduces ~12k tokens of cold-start overhead to ~700.
  • MINIMAL_SKILL_ALLOWLIST — 6 skills: new-project, discuss-phase, plan-phase, execute-phase, help, update. Zero sub-agents in minimal.
  • Hard 100-char description budget, enforced in CI by scripts/lint-descriptions.cjs and npm run lint:descriptions.
  • gsd update (without --minimal) as the documented upgrade path from minimal → full.

The 100-char cap means shrinking descriptions further is not a viable lever — average is already 72.5 chars and the rare 99-char outliers exist because they earn their length (e.g. gsd-progress, gsd-inbox). Any future budget relief has to come from emitting fewer skills, not shorter ones.

3. Audit findings

3.1 Dependency topology (66 skills)

Hot nodes (counted by other-skill body references):

Rank Skill Callers Role
1 phase 38 Dispatcher to all phase-typed workflows
2 review 11 Review-output convergence
3 config 7 Project config display/edit
4 progress 5 Active-phase progress tracker
5 update 5 Upgrade path
6 discuss-phase 2 Main-loop step 1
6 execute-phase 2 Main-loop step 3
6 new-project 2 Bootstrap
6 plan-phase 2 Main-loop step 2

phase and review are the two skills whose absence would silently break dozens of others. phase is referenced by 38 other skills but is not in the current minimal allowlist — a latent gap worth raising. Confirm with a --minimal install + a /gsd-audit-fix invocation whether it still works.

3.2 Functional clusters

Greedy clustering by name + prose intent:

Cluster Skills Desc chars Desc tokens
core_loop 6 346 ~87
phase_variants (includes core_loop) 10 734 ~184
audit_review 11 772 ~193
milestone 4 292 ~73
research_ideate (sketch, spike, forensics, explore, graphify, ns-ideate) 6 482 ~121
workspace_state (pause, resume, workspace, workstreams, thread, capture, inbox) 7 496 ~124
docs 2 160 ~40
ui 2 122 ~31
ai_eval 2 179 ~45
ns_meta 6 315 ~79
utility (incl. health, stats, settings, cleanup, pr-branch, ship, undo, fast, quick, …) 23 1,714 ~429

The utility bucket is the heaviest single cluster (36% of description tokens) and is also the most heterogeneous — half of these likely run only once per project, not once per session. They're the prime candidates for an "advanced" or "opt-in" tier.

3.3 Consolidation ceiling

A second consolidation pass (collapsing all 10 *-phase skills into a single dispatcher) would save ~150 tokens at most, at the cost of making the user-facing slash commands less discoverable in the UI and complicating argument parsing. Pure consolidation has diminishing returns below the current 66-skill count; the next big saves come from changing what gets surfaced rather than how it's written.

4. Options

Each option is graded against five dimensions:

  • User UX: how surprising / how much new mental model
  • Implementation cost: relative dev effort
  • Dependency safety: risk of breaking cross-skill calls
  • Token savings: vs. current ~1,196 desc tokens
  • Anthropic dependency: whether platform changes are required

Option A — Expand install-time profiles (named feature flags)

Layer named profiles on top of the existing minimal/full binary:

gsd install --profile=core            # current --minimal (6 skills, 0 agents)
gsd install --profile=standard        # +phase, +review, +config, +progress (~14 skills)
gsd install --profile=full            # current default (66 skills, 33 agents)
gsd install --profile=core,audit,ui   # composable feature tags
Dimension Assessment
User UX Familiar pattern (Cargo features, Helm --set, Ansible tags). Picker prompt on interactive install.
Implementation cost Low. install-profiles.cjs already does the staging. Extend MINIMAL_SKILL_ALLOWLIST into a map of profile → set, add a --profile arg parser, add interactive AskUserQuestion.
Dependency safety Need a manifest declaring each skill's required-skills set, so a profile can't ship an orphan caller. Add as CI lint.
Token savings High — standard cuts ~70% of descriptions; named clusters give users granular control.
Anthropic dependency None.

Pros: ships unilaterally, leverages existing seam, low blast radius. Cons: install-time only — users on a "full" install can't shrink without reinstall.

Option B — Runtime enable/disable command

A /gsd-surface (or gsd surface CLI) command that toggles which skills are visible to the runtime without touching installed files:

/gsd-surface list                # show enabled/disabled
/gsd-surface disable ui audit    # hide a cluster
/gsd-surface profile standard    # apply a named profile

Implementation: write enable/disable state to ~/.claude/skills/<name>/SKILL.md.disabled (rename) or maintain a gsd-surface.json manifest the installer reads on every update.

Dimension Assessment
User UX Discoverable through /gsd-help. Lower commit than reinstall. Mirrors VS Code's enable/disable extension UX.
Implementation cost Medium. Need persistent state separate from install files, plus a re-apply loop on gsd update.
Dependency safety Same manifest requirement as Option A — disabling phase should warn that 38 skills depend on it.
Token savings High — user-driven; can match Option A's savings.
Anthropic dependency None for the rename approach. Cleaner if Anthropic supports a SKILL.disabled convention natively.

Pros: in-session adjustable, no reinstall friction. Cons: state lives outside the installer's idempotent model, so gsd update migrations get more complex.

Option C — Further skill consolidation

Collapse semantically related skills into a single dispatcher with sub-modes:

gsd-phase           → keeps existing
gsd-milestone {new|complete|summary|audit}        # was 4 skills (hypothetical)
gsd-research  {sketch|spike|forensics|explore}    # was 4 skills (hypothetical)
gsd-workspace {pause|resume|capture|inbox|thread} # was 5 skills (hypothetical)

(The hypothetical dispatchers above are written without the slash prefix to signal they are not shipped commands — Option C is a sketch, not a recommendation.)

Dimension Assessment
User UX Breaking change for muscle-memorized slash commands; needs aliases for ≥1 release cycle.
Implementation cost Medium-high. Argument-parsing inside each dispatcher; migration of cross-references in 30+ skill bodies; aliases; CHANGELOG entries.
Dependency safety High — every cross-reference in existing skill bodies needs rewriting. The audit graph (3.1) is the migration spec.
Token savings Moderate — ~200-300 tokens by collapsing the 13-15 named skills above into 3 dispatchers.
Anthropic dependency None.

Pros: also improves IA — the slash-command surface becomes more discoverable. Cons: breaks user habits, doesn't compose with A/B (you still want profiles after consolidating).

Option D — Lazy / on-demand descriptions (Anthropic ask)

Skills ship a 1-line teaser in the system prompt and the full description loads only when the model expresses interest (analogous to ToolSearch for deferred tools). Cuts per-skill listing cost to ~10 chars.

Dimension Assessment
User UX Invisible to users.
Implementation cost Low for GSD — add a teaser: frontmatter field. High for Anthropic — harness changes.
Dependency safety N/A (purely about listing).
Token savings ~85% of all skill-listing budget across the ecosystem.
Anthropic dependency Yes — platform feature.

This is the architecturally correct long-term answer. GSD can't ship it alone.

Option E — Per-plugin budget allocation (Anthropic ask)

Instead of one shared skillListingBudgetFraction, give each plugin a dedicated quota (e.g. proportional to declared skills.count × ceiling). Eliminates one greedy plugin starving others.

Dimension Assessment
User UX Invisible.
Implementation cost Low for GSD — declare quota in package.json / plugin manifest. Medium for Anthropic — quota arithmetic and tie-breaking in the harness.
Token savings Doesn't reduce total, but eliminates the silent-drop failure mode.
Anthropic dependency Yes.

Option F — Sub-plugins / split distribution

Publish GSD as multiple npm packages: get-shit-done-redux-core, get-shit-done-redux-milestones, get-shit-done-redux-research, etc. Users install only what they need.

Dimension Assessment
User UX Reasonable for advanced users; confusing for first-time installers. Needs a meta-package (get-shit-done-redux) that depends on the slim ones — analogous to VS Code extension packs.
Implementation cost High. Multi-package build pipeline, version sync across packages, changelog routing, install-script forking.
Dependency safety npm semver carries the contract; cross-package refs become real require() calls.
Token savings Same as Option A in practice — token savings come from choosing not to install, not from the package boundary.
Anthropic dependency None.

Pros: clean separation, follows npm-ecosystem norms. Cons: very high lift for the same token savings Option A delivers.

5. Recommendation

Adopt Option A (named install profiles) as ADR-0010, with Option B (runtime surface toggle) as a Phase-2 amendment. File Options D and E to Anthropic as platform asks.

Why this ordering:

  1. A reuses an existing seam. install-profiles.cjs is already the staging point; this is the lowest-risk way to ship meaningful relief in the next release.
  2. A is composable. Naming clusters as profiles is a forcing function for the dependency manifest, which we want anyway for the lint described in 3.1.
  3. B follows A naturally. Once profiles exist, the /gsd-surface command is "apply a profile to a live install plus persist deltas." Without A, B has no profiles to apply.
  4. C is independent and orthogonal. It can happen in parallel as IA cleanup; it should not block A.
  5. D and E are platform-level. GSD ships A regardless; D/E are documented as cooperative asks so Anthropic sees them in context.

6. Anthropic platform asks

Drafted for filing at https://docs.claude.com/feedback or similar channel; copy unchanged into the issue or feedback form.

Ask 1 — Native lazy skill descriptions

Skills currently emit name + description into every system prompt. For large plugin ecosystems (135+ skills on power-user installs) this overruns skillListingBudgetFraction and silently drops skills. Proposal: add a frontmatter teaser: field (≤40 chars) that ships in the listing, with the full description: loaded only when the model requests it (analogous to ToolSearch for deferred tools). Backwards-compatible: skills without teaser: keep current behavior.

Ask 2 — Per-plugin budget allocation

A single skillListingBudgetFraction shared across all installed plugins causes silent truncation when one plugin's skill set is large. Proposal: each plugin declares a soft quota in its manifest; the harness arbitrates fairness when total demand exceeds budget (e.g. proportional shrink, with a documented order — most-recently-installed last to be cut). Surface drops in /doctor output today; do not drop silently.

Ask 3 — Dependency-aware skill listing

Skills can call other skills (in GSD, the phase skill is referenced by 38 others). When the harness drops a skill from the listing, it has no way to know whether anything else relies on it. Proposal: optional frontmatter requires: [other-skill] so the harness keeps the closure of dependencies in the listing, or warns the user at install time that a dropped skill is reachable from a kept one.

Ask 4 — Disable/enable without uninstall

Today the only way to remove a skill from the listing is to delete its SKILL.md. Proposal: a .disabled suffix (e.g. SKILL.md.disabled) or a per-skill enabled: false frontmatter is treated as "not surfaced" by the harness. This lets plugins ship surface-toggle UIs (like our proposed /gsd-surface disable) without touching install state.

7. Implementation sketch (for the ADR)

Phase 1 — profiles (ships with ADR-0010):

  1. In gsd-core/bin/lib/install-profiles.cjs, replace the single MINIMAL_SKILL_ALLOWLIST constant with a PROFILES map. Each profile is the transitive closure over a base set, so standard includes core automatically.
  2. Add a requires: frontmatter field to every skill that calls another skill in its body. Add a lint check in scripts/lint-descriptions.cjs (or a sibling lint-skill-deps.cjs) that fails CI if a skill body references another skill that isn't in its requires list, and that fails if any profile would ship a skill whose requires aren't satisfied.
  3. Extend the bin/install.js argument parser: --profile=<name> (mutually exclusive with --minimal), --profile=core,audit for composition. Keep --minimal as an alias for --profile=core.
  4. Interactive install: if no --profile is given and no runtime/location is forced, present an AskUserQuestion-style picker. (Cowork analog already in the install flow.)
  5. gsd update re-applies the recorded profile from a small marker file (~/.claude/skills/.gsd-profile).

Phase 2 — runtime surface command (follow-up ADR or amendment):

  1. /gsd-surface command writes to the profile marker and re-runs the staging step for the active runtime.
  2. Once Anthropic ships Ask 4, switch from file-deletion to .disabled-suffix toggling.

8. Follow-ups outside this scope

  • Stale comment in install-profiles.cjs. The module-level header cites "86 skills + 33 agents" producing ~12k tokens. The audited count is 66 + 33 — a previous consolidation pass already happened. Update the comment in a parallel cleanup commit when ADR-0010 lands.
  • Audit JSON refresh. docs/research/data/2026-05-12-skill-audit.json is a one-shot snapshot. If we want it to stay current, wire the extraction script into scripts/ and run it on lint:skill-deps. Not a blocker.

9. Risks and unknowns

  • The phase dispatcher gap in the existing minimal allowlist. Confirm whether a fresh --minimal install + the documented main loop actually works end-to-end. If discuss-phase/plan-phase/execute-phase silently fall back to /gsd-phase, the minimal allowlist is currently broken. Track as a separate bug if confirmed.
  • Profile naming bikeshed. core / standard / full vs. minimal / recommended / everything vs. functional names (planning, audit, research). Settle in the ADR's Open Questions.
  • Discoverability of disabled skills. If gsd-audit-fix isn't surfaced, a user asking "audit my project" won't get it suggested. /gsd-help should list installed-but-not-surfaced skills with a one-line upgrade hint.
  • Telemetry blind spot. GSD doesn't currently know which skills users invoke, so "drop the long tail" is theoretical. Survey or self-reporting may be needed before drawing the standard profile line.

10. References

  • Issue: #3408
  • Existing seam: gsd-core/bin/lib/install-profiles.cjs
  • Description lint: scripts/lint-descriptions.cjs
  • Install dispatcher: bin/install.js:123 (mode parsing), bin/install.js:8167-8207 (minimal staging)
  • Audit data: docs/research/data/2026-05-12-skill-audit.json (per-skill dep graph, description sizes, and cluster mapping — reproducible from commands/gsd/ and agents/)
  • Prior ADRs: 0008 (Installer Migration Module) and 0009 (Shell Command Projection Module) — both touch the same install pipeline this proposal extends.
  • Ecosystem precedents: Cargo [features], npm optionalDependencies, VS Code extension packs, Homebrew taps, Helm chart values, Ansible role tags, Linux kernel make menuconfig tristate, systemd target activation.