Files
msd-core/gsd-core/templates/DEBUG.md
Tom Boucher f8b16d1874 enhance(#1960): add RCA branching (fishbone + AND-gate) to gsd-debugger (#2405)
* test(#1960): add failing-first RCA-branching contract + schema-invariant tests

Epic #1957 Phase 2A. Source-text-is-the-product contract tests (fishbone
>=2 categories, AND-gate, multi-cause root_cause, backward compat, reasoning
checkpoint candidate_causes+and_gate fields, debugger-philosophy single-cause
note, DEBUG template) plus behavioral schema-invariant checks on two fixtures:
two contributing causes (AND-gate yes) -> both recorded; single-cause
(AND-gate no) -> one root_cause, identical to today.

Failing-first: reference, agent edits, and template note do not yet exist.

* feat(#1960): add RCA branching (fishbone + AND-gate) to gsd-debugger

Epic #1957 Phase 2A. Guards against 5-Whys single-cause bias: before committing
root_cause, the debugger enumerates candidate causes across >=2 Ishikawa
categories (code/config/environment/data) and explicitly answers an AND-gate
question. When the AND-gate fires, every contributing cause is recorded, so a
multi-cause fix no longer recurs via the unaddressed second cause.
Resolution.root_cause may hold one OR a small set (additive; single-cause
sessions are byte-identical to today). The Structured Reasoning Checkpoint gains
candidate_causes + and_gate fields; debugger-philosophy.md adds the
single-cause-bias trap.

Full rules extracted to gsd-core/references/debugger-rca-branching.md (slim
Phase 2 routing + 2 checkpoint fields kept in the agent). INVENTORY + manifest +
agent-size baseline + install-parity goldens + AGENTS.md + DEBUG template updated.

* fix(#1960): address orthogonal review (AND-gate self-consistency, parity guard, narrowed claim, ripples)

- Reference: the collapse rule now enforces AND-gate self-consistency —
  and_gate=yes with a single confirmed cause is flagged as incomplete
  (return to Phase 3); a race/timing note clarifies such bugs bridge
  categories; the 'byte-identical' backward-compat claim narrowed to
  'root_cause shape unchanged; reasoning_checkpoint gains 2 fields in every
  session'.
- DEBUG.md: stale 'five-field' mirror prose -> seven-field (parallel-surface
  drift the reviewer flagged); new debug-session-management parity test pins
  the field-count claim to the gsd-debugger.md YAML keys (CRLF-safe).
- Scalar-assuming consumers of set-valued root_cause updated: session-manager
  compact summaries (319/332), diagnose-only return (1062), archive entry
  (1216), ROOT CAUSE FOUND return (1322).
- Test: added the AND-gate-yes/single-cause invariant + fixture; rephrased the
  fixture describe block honestly as a schema-invariant specification.
- Phase 2 bullet phrasing clarified ('at hypothesis formation, before the
  Phase 4 commit').

* test(#1960): parity regex accepts word-form count ('seven-field' or '7-field')

* test(#1960): parity regex counts array-valued YAML keys (no inline value)

* chore(#1960): backfill changeset pr number (PR #2405)
2026-07-18 13:42:58 -04:00

5.5 KiB

Debug Template

Template for .planning/debug/[slug].md — active debug session tracking.


File Template

---
status: gathering | investigating | fixing | verifying | awaiting_human_verify | resolved
trigger: "[verbatim user input]"
created: [ISO timestamp]
updated: [ISO timestamp]
---

## Current Focus
<!-- OVERWRITE on each update - always reflects NOW -->

hypothesis: [current theory being tested]
test: [how testing it]
expecting: [what result means if true/false]
next_action: [immediate next step — be specific, not "continue investigating"]
reasoning_checkpoint: null  <!-- populated before every fix attempt — see structured_returns -->
tdd_checkpoint: null  <!-- populated when tdd_mode is active after root cause confirmed -->

## Symptoms
<!-- Written during gathering, then immutable -->

expected: [what should happen]
actual: [what actually happens]
errors: [error messages if any]
reproduction: [how to trigger]
started: [when it broke / always broken]

## Eliminated
<!-- APPEND only - prevents re-investigating after /clear -->

- hypothesis: [theory that was wrong]
  evidence: [what disproved it]
  timestamp: [when eliminated]

## Evidence
<!-- APPEND only - facts discovered during investigation -->

- timestamp: [when found]
  checked: [what was examined]
  found: [what was observed]
  implication: [what this means]

## Resolution
<!-- OVERWRITE as understanding evolves -->

root_cause: [empty until found — may hold one OR a small set of contributing causes when the AND-gate fires; see gsd-core/references/debugger-rca-branching.md]
fix: [empty until applied]
verification: [empty until verified — holds the nested per-signal fix-acceptance guardrail record (map shape) when active; see gsd-core/references/debugger-fix-acceptance.md]
files_changed: []

<section_rules>

Frontmatter (status, trigger, timestamps):

  • status: OVERWRITE - reflects current phase
  • trigger: IMMUTABLE - verbatim user input, never changes
  • created: IMMUTABLE - set once
  • updated: OVERWRITE - update on every change

Current Focus:

  • OVERWRITE entirely on each update
  • Always reflects what Claude is doing RIGHT NOW
  • If Claude reads this after /clear, it knows exactly where to resume
  • Fields: hypothesis, test, expecting, next_action, reasoning_checkpoint, tdd_checkpoint
  • next_action: must be concrete and actionable — bad: "continue investigating"; good: "Add logging at line 47 of auth.js to observe token value before jwt.verify()"
  • reasoning_checkpoint: OVERWRITE before every fix_and_verify — seven-field structured reasoning record (hypothesis, confirming_evidence, falsification_test, fix_rationale, blind_spots, candidate_causes, and_gate) — see gsd-debugger.md Structured Reasoning Checkpoint
  • tdd_checkpoint: OVERWRITE during TDD red/green phases — test file, name, status, failure output

Symptoms:

  • Written during initial gathering phase
  • IMMUTABLE after gathering complete
  • Reference point for what we're trying to fix
  • Fields: expected, actual, errors, reproduction, started

Eliminated:

  • APPEND only - never remove entries
  • Prevents re-investigating dead ends after context reset
  • Each entry: hypothesis, evidence that disproved it, timestamp
  • Critical for efficiency across /clear boundaries

Evidence:

  • APPEND only - never remove entries
  • Facts discovered during investigation
  • Each entry: timestamp, what checked, what found, implication
  • Builds the case for root cause

Resolution:

  • OVERWRITE as understanding evolves
  • May update multiple times as fixes are tried
  • Final state shows confirmed root cause and verified fix
  • Fields: root_cause, fix, verification, files_changed

</section_rules>

Creation: Immediately when /gsd:debug is called

  • Create file with trigger from user input
  • Set status to "gathering"
  • Current Focus: next_action = "gather symptoms"
  • Symptoms: empty, to be filled

During symptom gathering:

  • Update Symptoms section as user answers questions
  • Update Current Focus with each question
  • When complete: status → "investigating"

During investigation:

  • OVERWRITE Current Focus with each hypothesis
  • APPEND to Evidence with each finding
  • APPEND to Eliminated when hypothesis disproved
  • Update timestamp in frontmatter

During fixing:

  • status → "fixing"
  • Update Resolution.root_cause when confirmed
  • Update Resolution.fix when applied
  • Update Resolution.files_changed

During verification:

  • status → "verifying"
  • Update Resolution.verification with results
  • If verification fails: status → "investigating", try again

After self-verification passes:

  • status -> "awaiting_human_verify"
  • Request explicit user confirmation in a checkpoint
  • Do NOT move file to resolved yet

On resolution:

  • status → "resolved"
  • Move file to .planning/debug/resolved/ (only after user confirms fix)

<resume_behavior>

When Claude reads this file after /clear:

  1. Parse frontmatter → know status
  2. Read Current Focus → know exactly what was happening
  3. Read Eliminated → know what NOT to retry
  4. Read Evidence → know what's been learned
  5. Continue from next_action

The file IS the debugging brain. Claude should be able to resume perfectly from any interruption point.

</resume_behavior>

<size_constraint>

Keep debug files focused:

  • Evidence entries: 1-2 lines each, just the facts
  • Eliminated: brief - hypothesis + why it failed
  • No narrative prose - structured data only

If evidence grows very large (10+ entries), consider whether you're going in circles. Check Eliminated to ensure you're not re-treading.

</size_constraint>