8b4545f3c0
* feat(#3218): the prompt layer asks the CLI for plan counts Seven sites across four workflows counted plans with ls and wc -l instead of asking the CLI. A shell glob is not scanPhasePlans, so every fix that landed on the owner missed all seven: they counted superseded plans as live, reported zero for the nested plans layout, and missed loosely-named files. The 1762 figure of 30 plans and 24 summaries came from here. phase find is extended rather than a verb added - 3218 is an enhancement whose own checklist says it adds no new command, and CONTRIBUTING makes a new verb a feature needing approved-feature. It gains plan_count and summary_count for the live set and plan_count_all for the physical one, additively; the existing arrays are untouched. Both sets are exposed because the sites need different ones. Amendment 1 names two cases; three of these sites ask a third - did the planner write files to disk - and take the physical set, because a superseded plan is still a file the planner wrote. The progress.md dead route is fixed and was worse than the issue said. It read .plans and .summaries arrays that roadmap.analyze has never emitted, so the fallback always fired, both counts were always zero, and Route 0's resume-incomplete-phase check had never fired at all. The ratchet baseline is empty. Its own stale-entry check makes that self-enforcing. Verified on the remote runner. * test(#3218): acknowledge the workflow growth and update the stale guard The emitted-attribution gate named its own remedy, so it was followed rather than pre-guessed: four workflow files grew between 200 and 770 bytes because each replaced a shell glob with a find-phase call plus its jq extraction. plan-phase grew most - two sites, and it takes the physical count for its did-the-planner- write-files question. progress also carries the Route 0 dead-path fix. plan-phase-drift-guard asserted the literal old ls shape. Updated rather than deleted: what it protects is that a filesystem fallback exists and is reachable, and that is intact. It is not a regression - gsd_run is already load-bearing throughout plan-phase.md long before step 9, so the 9a and 11a fallback never existed to survive gsd_run being unavailable; it guards against the planner subagent's return hanging. Three ack sources collided with the new fragment, which the gate treats as a hard error rather than last-wins. Only the three colliding keys were removed, not the 421 spent entries, and two fragments left entryless were deleted per the convention that an empty fragment signals nothing. Verified on the remote runner. * docs(#3218): document the live and physical plan counts docs/CLI-TOOLS.md gains a find-phase counts section covering plan_count and summary_count for the live set against plan_count_all for the physical one, plus the null-not-zero not-found behavior. The live-versus-physical distinction is spelled out because a caller picking the wrong one gets a plausible number, which is the trap Amendment 1 records. Changeset leads with what a user sees: progress and execute-plan stop counting superseded plans as outstanding, a nested plans layout stops reporting zero, and Route 0 resume routing starts working after never having worked. No how-to. Nothing is enabled and nothing is sequenced - the user runs the same command and the number is simply correct. The one new distinction is field semantics, which is what a reference entry is for. * chore(#3218): backfill changeset PR number pr:0 placeholder replaced with the real number now that #3327 exists. --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Changeset Fragments
This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.
Why
Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.
See #2975 for the full rationale.
Adding a fragment
node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
--type Fixed \
--pr 1234 \
--body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"
This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.
Format
---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.
Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.
Opting out
PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.
At release time
Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:
node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty
This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.
Archived fragments
.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.