* feat(#2790): consolidate 86 gsd-* skills to 59 — zero functional loss Closes #2790 - `capture.md` — absorbs add-todo (default), note (--note), add-backlog (--backlog), plant-seed (--seed), check-todos (--list) - `phase.md` — absorbs add-phase (default), insert-phase (--insert), remove-phase (--remove), edit-phase (--edit) - `config.md` — absorbs settings-advanced (--advanced), settings-integrations (--integrations), set-profile (--profile); settings.md retained as-is - `workspace.md` — absorbs new-workspace (--new), list-workspaces (--list), remove-workspace (--remove) - `update.md` — adds --sync (absorbs sync-skills) and --reapply (absorbs reapply-patches) - `sketch.md` — adds --wrap-up (absorbs sketch-wrap-up) - `spike.md` — adds --wrap-up (absorbs spike-wrap-up) - `map-codebase.md` — adds --fast (absorbs scan) and --query (absorbs intel) - `code-review.md` — adds --fix (absorbs code-review-fix) - `progress.md` — adds --next (absorbs next) and --do (absorbs do) join-discord, research-phase, session-report, from-gsd2, analyze-dependencies, list-phase-assumptions, plan-milestone-gaps autonomous.md: updated Skill(skill="gsd:code-review-fix") → Skill(skill="gsd:code-review", args="--fix --auto") to match the consolidated skill name - New: tests/enh-2790-skill-consolidation.test.cjs (48 tests) - Updated: 14 existing test files redirected from deleted command paths to their consolidated equivalents - docs/INVENTORY.md: Commands count 86→59, ghost rows removed, new consolidated rows added - docs/INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json: regenerated to match filesystem Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#2790): add CHANGELOG entry for skill consolidation * docs(#2790): update COMMANDS.md for 86→59 skill consolidation Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2790): address CodeRabbit review findings - CHANGELOG.md: add --next alongside --do in progress flag list - config.md: remove trailing space from --profile code span (MD038) - COMMANDS.md: add required descriptions to /gsd-phase examples; /gsd-phase without args errors, not interactive - COMMANDS.md: add --next and --do to /gsd-progress flags table + examples - test: convert content.includes('--reapply') to structural frontmatter parse; add allow-test-rule comment for workflow content assertions - test: replace redundant existsSync duplicate with assertion that verifies the full consolidated flag surface (--sync | --reapply) in argument-hint Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2790): restore reapply-patches workflow and strengthen test assertions - Create get-shit-done/workflows/reapply-patches.md: the #2790 consolidation deleted the 14K combined command+workflow file (reapply-patches.md) but update.md already referenced the workflow via execution_context_extended. Restoring it fixes a silent behavioral gap where --reapply had no workflow to load. Includes full three-way merge logic, hunk verification table (Step 4), and the Hunk Verification Gate (Step 5) that blocks cleanup until all user-added hunks are confirmed present in the merged output. - Fix update.md: /gsd-reapply-patches → /gsd-update --reapply (stale ref) - Fix reapply-verify-hunks.test.cjs: was checking existsSync(update.md) 8×; now points to the workflow file and asserts real behavioral content (Post-merge verification, Hunk presence check, Line-count check, backup reference, per-file tracking, structural ordering) - Fix reapply-patches.test.cjs: replace content.includes() stubs with frontmatter-parsed argument-hint assertions; replace 4 existsSync(update.md) no-ops with real assertions against the workflow content - Fix edit-phase.test.cjs: /gsd-edit-phase → /gsd-phase (COMMANDS.md now documents the consolidated command with --edit flag) - Fix next-safety-gates.test.cjs: split OR predicates into independent assertions — --next in progress.md and --force in next.md workflow - Fix workspace.test.cjs: add allow-test-rule comment for routing content checks (command routing text IS the deployed behavioral contract) - Fix bug-2439 test: strengthen pre-flight assertion to verify gsd-sdk is referenced (not just --profile) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: address CodeRabbit review findings (CR round 2) - INVENTORY.md: update sync-skills.md row to reference /gsd-update --sync instead of stale /gsd-sync-skills (absorbed in #2790) - enh-2380-sync-skills.test.cjs: align INVENTORY.md assertion with the corrected reference; was asserting the old /gsd-sync-skills name while the manifest test correctly asserted /gsd-update, creating conflicting expectations in the same suite - reapply-verify-hunks.test.cjs: add explicit notEqual(-1) assertions for all three anchors before the ordering check so a missing anchor produces a clear failure instead of a false positive (writeIdx=-1 < verifyIdx=5 is true) - bug-2439-set-profile-gsd-sdk-preflight.test.cjs: defer fs.readFileSync until after the existence assertion; eager describe-level read caused the suite to crash before the existence test could run, making it effectively dead code Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2790): address CR — INVENTORY routing + reapply test contract wording Two unresolved CodeRabbit findings (Major): - docs/INVENTORY.md: workflow-file table still pointed at obsolete /gsd-do, /gsd-next, /gsd-note, /gsd-add-todo, /gsd-add-backlog, /gsd-check-todos, /gsd-plant-seed slash commands. Re-route to the consolidated /gsd-progress (--next, --do) and /gsd-capture (--note, --backlog, --seed, --list) so the inventory is internally consistent. - tests/reapply-verify-hunks.test.cjs: 'verification tracks per-file status' asserted on phrasing that doesn't appear in reapply-patches.md (the 'per-file' substring only matched accidentally via 'sequential integer per file'). Switch to the actual contract text — Hunk Verification Table, one row per hunk per file, verified column. * test(#2790): update CR-INTEGRATION tests for consolidated --fix invocation After the merge of main (which carries #2843's hyphen-form fix), the consolidation in this branch absorbs gsd-code-review-fix into gsd-code-review as the --fix flag. Update the two CR-INTEGRATION tests that previously asserted on the standalone gsd-code-review-fix skill name to instead assert on a gsd-code-review invocation carrying --fix in its arg tokens. Tests still parse Skill() invocations structurally; only the asserted skill-name + arg-token shape changed. * test(#2790): scope success_criteria check to the <success_criteria> block CodeRabbit nitpick: 'success criteria includes verification' did a whole-file substring check, which can false-pass if the phrase appears elsewhere in the document. Extract the <success_criteria>...</success_criteria> block first via extractTagBlock() and assert against that scope only. * fix(#2790): post-rebase reconciliation with main - INVENTORY.md/JSON: add reapply-patches workflow row + bump count to 85 - autonomous.md: switch consolidated --fix invocation to hyphen Skill name - analyze-dependencies test: assert COMMANDS.md does NOT document the consolidated-away /gsd-analyze-dependencies entry (was: bare .includes()) * fix(#2790): address remaining CR findings — strengthen contract tests Doc-fixes: - INVENTORY.md: route transition.md & edit-phase.md rows to consolidated /gsd-progress --next and /gsd-phase --edit (was: deleted /gsd-next, /gsd-edit-phase) - config.md --profile branch: document #2439 pre-flight `command -v gsd-sdk` guard + install hint BEFORE the gsd-sdk invocation (closes opaque "command not found: gsd-sdk" regression path) Test discipline (no-source-grep contract): - bug-2439: replace bare `content.includes('gsd-sdk')` with structured parse of <context> block + --profile branch; assert pre-flight token, install hint, #2439 citation, and ordering vs gsd-sdk invocation - edit-phase: parse INVENTORY.md edit-phase.md row's "Invoked by" column and assert `/gsd-phase --edit` (not the deleted /gsd-edit-phase) - next-safety-gates: tighten `--next` documentation contract — require --next AND --force AND completeness routing (was OR-based, passed when only --next present) - reapply-patches: parse argument-hint flag list structurally; scan ALL <execution_context*> blocks for the @-include of reapply-patches.md; parse Hunk Verification Table header columns directly; locate Step 5 via heading parsing then assert (i) table reference, (ii) verified=no gate, (iii) STOP/halt directive, (iv) explicit absent-table halt path - workspace: parse frontmatter, tokenize argument-hint across multiple bracketed segments, parse @-include targets from <execution_context> rather than substring-matching the file body --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
391 lines
16 KiB
JavaScript
391 lines
16 KiB
JavaScript
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Tests for /gsd-edit-phase (#2617)
|
|
*
|
|
* Covers:
|
|
* - Command file and workflow file existence
|
|
* - Single-field edit instructions
|
|
* - Full-phase regeneration from clarified intent
|
|
* - Invalid depends_on blocks with clear error
|
|
* - Guarded edit of in_progress phase without --force
|
|
* - --force override of status guard
|
|
* - Invalid phase number produces clear error
|
|
* - Diff + confirmation before writing
|
|
* - Phase number and position are preserved
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const { describe, test } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('node:fs');
|
|
const path = require('node:path');
|
|
|
|
const ROOT = path.resolve(__dirname, '..');
|
|
|
|
// #2790: edit-phase.md was consolidated into phase.md as the --edit flag.
|
|
// The COMMAND_PATH here now points to the consolidated command.
|
|
const COMMAND_PATH = path.join(ROOT, 'commands', 'gsd', 'phase.md');
|
|
const WORKFLOW_PATH = path.join(ROOT, 'get-shit-done', 'workflows', 'edit-phase.md');
|
|
|
|
// ─── File existence ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('edit-phase: file existence', () => {
|
|
test('commands/gsd/phase.md exists (absorbed edit-phase in #2790)', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(COMMAND_PATH), 'commands/gsd/phase.md should exist (consolidates edit-phase)');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('get-shit-done/workflows/edit-phase.md exists', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(WORKFLOW_PATH), 'get-shit-done/workflows/edit-phase.md should exist');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Command file structure ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('edit-phase: command file structure', () => {
|
|
test('consolidated phase.md has correct name frontmatter (#2790)', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(COMMAND_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(/^name:\s*gsd:phase/m.test(content), 'name should be gsd:phase (consolidated)');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('command file has description frontmatter', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(COMMAND_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(/^description:/m.test(content), 'should have description frontmatter');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('command file references edit-phase workflow', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(COMMAND_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('edit-phase.md'),
|
|
'command file should reference edit-phase workflow'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('command file documents --force flag (passed through --edit)', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(COMMAND_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('--edit') || content.includes('--force'), 'command file should document --edit flag (which supports --force)');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Workflow: single-field edit ─────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('edit-phase workflow: single-field edit', () => {
|
|
test('workflow instructs presenting current field values before editing', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const showsCurrentValues = (
|
|
/current\s+value/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/present.*current/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/display.*current/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/current_value/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(showsCurrentValues, 'workflow must present current field values before editing');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow supports editing specific fields individually', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const supportsIndividualFields = (
|
|
/specific\s+field/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/individual\s+field/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/edit.*field/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(supportsIndividualFields, 'workflow must support editing individual fields');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow covers title, goal, depends_on, requirements, success_criteria fields', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(/\btitle\b/i.test(content), 'workflow should mention title field');
|
|
assert.ok(/\bgoal\b/i.test(content), 'workflow should mention goal field');
|
|
assert.ok(/depends_on/i.test(content), 'workflow should mention depends_on field');
|
|
assert.ok(/requirements/i.test(content), 'workflow should mention requirements field');
|
|
assert.ok(/success_criteria/i.test(content), 'workflow should mention success_criteria field');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Workflow: full-phase regeneration ───────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('edit-phase workflow: full-phase regeneration', () => {
|
|
test('workflow supports regenerating all fields from clarified intent', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const supportsRegen = (
|
|
/regenerate/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/rewrite.*all/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/all.*from.*clarified/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/clarified.*intent/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(supportsRegen, 'workflow must support full regeneration from clarified intent');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow prompts user for clarified intent during full regeneration', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const promptsClarifiedIntent = (
|
|
/clarified?\s+intent/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/revised\s+intent/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/describe.*revised/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
promptsClarifiedIntent,
|
|
'workflow must prompt user for clarified intent during full regeneration'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Workflow: invalid depends_on ────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('edit-phase workflow: depends_on validation', () => {
|
|
test('workflow validates depends_on references against existing phases', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const validatesDepends = (
|
|
/validate.*depends/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/depends.*valid/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/invalid.*depends/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/depends_on.*valid/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(validatesDepends, 'workflow must validate depends_on references');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow blocks write when depends_on references invalid phase', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const blocksInvalidRef = (
|
|
/invalid.*phase/i.test(content) &&
|
|
/exit|block|error/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(blocksInvalidRef, 'workflow must block write for invalid depends_on references');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow validates that depends_on does not reference the phase itself', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const preventsCircular = (
|
|
/not reference itself/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/circular/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/self-reference/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/itself/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(preventsCircular, 'workflow must prevent self-referencing depends_on');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Workflow: status guard ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('edit-phase workflow: in-progress/completed status guard', () => {
|
|
test('workflow checks phase status before allowing edit', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const checksStatus = (
|
|
/disk_status/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/phase.*status/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/status.*check/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(checksStatus, 'workflow must check phase status before allowing edit');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow refuses to edit in_progress phases without --force', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const refusesInProgress = (
|
|
/in.progress/i.test(content) &&
|
|
/--force/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(refusesInProgress, 'workflow must refuse in_progress edits without --force');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow refuses to edit completed phases without --force', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const refusesCompleted = (
|
|
/completed/i.test(content) &&
|
|
/--force/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(refusesCompleted, 'workflow must refuse completed phase edits without --force');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow allows edit with --force flag override', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const forcePath = content.match(/--force[\s\S]{0,300}/i);
|
|
assert.ok(forcePath, 'workflow must handle --force flag');
|
|
const forceSection = forcePath[0];
|
|
const allowsForce = (
|
|
/proceed|continue|allow|override/i.test(forceSection) ||
|
|
/force.*was.*passed/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/force.*passed/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(allowsForce, 'workflow must allow editing when --force is passed');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Workflow: invalid phase number ──────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('edit-phase workflow: invalid phase number', () => {
|
|
test('workflow produces clear error when phase number does not exist', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const handlesNotFound = (
|
|
/not.*found/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/phase.*not.*found/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/does not exist/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(handlesNotFound, 'workflow must error clearly when phase number does not exist');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow errors on missing phase number argument', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const handlesNoArg = (
|
|
/no.*argument/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/required/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/phase number required/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(handlesNoArg, 'workflow must error when phase number argument is missing');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Workflow: diff + confirmation ───────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('edit-phase workflow: diff and confirmation', () => {
|
|
test('workflow shows diff of changes before writing', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const showsDiff = (
|
|
/diff/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/proposed.*change/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/show.*change/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(showsDiff, 'workflow must show a diff of changes before writing');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow asks for confirmation before writing', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const asksConfirmation = (
|
|
/confirm/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/apply.*change/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/y\/n/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/yes.*no/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(asksConfirmation, 'workflow must ask for confirmation before writing');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow exits without writing if user declines', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const handlesDecline = (
|
|
/says.*n/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/user says.*n/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/if.*user.*n/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/exit.*without.*writing/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/without writing/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(handlesDecline, 'workflow must exit without writing if user declines confirmation');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Workflow: phase number and position preservation ────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('edit-phase workflow: phase number and position preservation', () => {
|
|
test('workflow preserves phase number when writing back', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const preservesNumber = (
|
|
/number.*preserved/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/preserve.*number/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/position.*preserved/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/number and position/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(preservesNumber, 'workflow must preserve phase number and position');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('anti_patterns block renumbering', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const antiPatterns = content.match(/<anti_patterns>([\s\S]*?)<\/anti_patterns>/i);
|
|
assert.ok(antiPatterns, 'workflow should have anti_patterns section');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/renumber|number.*preserved|preserve.*number/i.test(antiPatterns[1]),
|
|
'anti_patterns must prohibit renumbering'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow writes phase back in place (replaces section, not full file)', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const inPlace = (
|
|
/in.*place/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/replace.*section/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/section.*replace/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/replace.*old.*section/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(inPlace, 'workflow must write phase back in place (section replacement)');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Workflow: STATE.md update ────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('edit-phase workflow: STATE.md roadmap evolution', () => {
|
|
test('workflow updates STATE.md Roadmap Evolution after edit', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const updatesState = (
|
|
/state\.add-roadmap-evolution/i.test(content) ||
|
|
/Roadmap Evolution/i.test(content)
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(updatesState, 'workflow must update STATE.md Roadmap Evolution after edit');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Docs registration ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('edit-phase: documentation registration', () => {
|
|
test('INVENTORY.md routes edit-phase workflow through consolidated /gsd-phase --edit (#2790)', () => {
|
|
// #2790 absorbed /gsd-edit-phase into /gsd-phase as the --edit flag. The
|
|
// workflow file (edit-phase.md) survives, but its "Invoked by" column must
|
|
// point at the consolidated command surface, not the deleted standalone.
|
|
const inventory = fs.readFileSync(
|
|
path.join(ROOT, 'docs', 'INVENTORY.md'),
|
|
'utf-8'
|
|
);
|
|
// Locate the edit-phase.md row in the Workflows table and assert the
|
|
// "Invoked by" column documents /gsd-phase --edit (not the deleted form).
|
|
const rowMatch = inventory.match(/^\|\s*`edit-phase\.md`\s*\|[^|]*\|\s*([^|]+?)\s*\|$/m);
|
|
assert.ok(rowMatch, 'docs/INVENTORY.md must contain an edit-phase.md workflow row');
|
|
const invokedBy = rowMatch[1];
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/\/gsd-phase\s+--edit/.test(invokedBy),
|
|
`edit-phase.md row must list "/gsd-phase --edit" as caller; got: "${invokedBy}"`
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!/\/gsd-edit-phase\b/.test(invokedBy),
|
|
`edit-phase.md row must not still cite the deleted /gsd-edit-phase command; got: "${invokedBy}"`
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('INVENTORY.md contains edit-phase.md workflow', () => {
|
|
const inventory = fs.readFileSync(
|
|
path.join(ROOT, 'docs', 'INVENTORY.md'),
|
|
'utf-8'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
inventory.includes('edit-phase.md'),
|
|
'docs/INVENTORY.md must contain edit-phase.md workflow row'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json contains /gsd-phase in commands (#2790: edit-phase absorbed into phase.md)', () => {
|
|
// #2790: /gsd-edit-phase was absorbed into /gsd-phase as the --edit flag.
|
|
// The manifest now records /gsd-phase instead of /gsd-edit-phase.
|
|
const manifest = JSON.parse(
|
|
fs.readFileSync(path.join(ROOT, 'docs', 'INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json'), 'utf-8')
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
manifest.families.commands.includes('/gsd-phase'),
|
|
'INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json must list /gsd-phase in commands (absorbed /gsd-edit-phase via #2790)'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json contains edit-phase.md in workflows', () => {
|
|
const manifest = JSON.parse(
|
|
fs.readFileSync(path.join(ROOT, 'docs', 'INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json'), 'utf-8')
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
manifest.families.workflows.includes('edit-phase.md'),
|
|
'INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json must list edit-phase.md in workflows'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('docs/COMMANDS.md documents /gsd-phase (absorbed /gsd-edit-phase via --edit flag, #2790)', () => {
|
|
const commands = fs.readFileSync(
|
|
path.join(ROOT, 'docs', 'COMMANDS.md'),
|
|
'utf-8'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
commands.includes('/gsd-phase'),
|
|
'docs/COMMANDS.md must document /gsd-phase (which absorbed /gsd-edit-phase via --edit flag in #2790)'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|