Files
msd-core/gsd-core/workflows/new-milestone.md
Tom Boucher ff4a57b78c chore(#1671): migrate the remaining 13 LARGE/XL workflows to the fragment model — Phase 6.3 (#3030)
* chore(#2994): fragmentize progress.md forensic audit onto the fragment model

Extract the --forensic-gated forensic_audit step to
workflows/progress/steps/forensic-audit.md behind a section marker, and
repair progress.md's init line to forward --forensic so the atom is
actually true in production rather than only under direct CLI tests.

progress.md shrinks 32630 -> 27207 bytes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2994): fragmentize the four manifest-wired workflows

new-project, quick, new-milestone and progress each already had a
dedicated cmdInit* entry point but zero marked sections. Extract nine
gated bodies to workflows/<wf>/steps/ behind section markers and repair
each init line to forward its flags.

Fold --full into the discuss/research/validate facts inside cmdInitQuick
so the when= grammar never sees an OR, per the chunked-mode precedent.

Fixes found while working, per the no-defer rule:
- cmdInitProgress passed no phase info to buildSectionManifestField, so
  state:phase-mvp-mode was permanently false — an atom in the vocabulary
  whose fact could never be computed.
- the quick init router folded flag tokens into the free-text
  description, which the new forwarding would have corrupted.
- a #2508 dispatch note was nested inside quick.md's Agent(prompt=)
  fence, leaking orchestrator guidance into the subagent prompt.
- progress.md had a 3-vs-4 backtick outer-fence imbalance.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2994): fragmentize verify-work.md and admit state:ui-phase-active

Wire cmdInitVerifyWork to buildSectionManifestField — it was a dedicated
entry point that never emitted a manifest — and mark two sections.

state:ui-phase-active folds (plan:pre hooks include an active ui step) OR
(the phase dir holds a *-UI-SPEC.md) into one boolean in init.cts, so the
grammar still sees a single operator-free atom. The inner Playwright-MCP
check stays as prose inside the fragment: it is live session state and no
init seam can precompute it.

The MVP false-branch note is a real fallback, not redundant prose, so it
sits outside the marker — gating it away would delete the text needed
precisely when MVP mode is off.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#2994): follow moved workflow content in drift guards

Retarget every guard that asserted on content this branch moved into
workflows/<wf>/steps/, mirroring 815b3d897. Each retargeted assertion was
verified to still fail when its step file is blanked, so none was
weakened into vacuity.

Three assertions in verify-mvp-uat were genuinely red. Three more were
worse than red — passing for the wrong reason:
- quick-commit-boundary and worktree-cleanup anchored on indexOf('Step
  5.6'), which matched a later cross-reference and sliced 16069 chars
  that coincidentally held the asserted substrings. Replaced with an
  expandWorkflowSections helper that splices step content back in place.
- phase6-review-capabilities lost its end boundary and widened to EOF.
- playwright-ui-verify matched 'UI' in an unrelated bullet and 'fall
  back' in a subagent-dispatch line after the real content moved.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2994): fragmentize code-review and complete-milestone, admit three atoms

Add dedicated cmdInitCodeReview and cmdInitCompleteMilestone entry points
alongside the shared generic ones rather than modifying them — init.phase-op
and init.manager carry a CRITICAL blast radius (179 dependents, 24
processes) and stay byte-identical for their other callers.

Admit flag:--fix, state:fallow-enabled and state:git-create-tag, each with
a consuming section and a fact its own entry point computes.

Both sections had the resolver-in-body hazard: the fallow config-gate and
the git.create_tag check each sat inside the very block being gated, so
gating would have disabled the resolver that decides the gate. Both are
hoisted into init and the bodies now consume the resolved fact.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#2994): retarget code-review and milestone drift guards, fix two red tests

Retarget guards that asserted on content moved into steps/, proving
non-vacuity by blanking each step file and confirming failure.

Also fixes two genuinely red tests found while working, per the no-defer
rule:
- workflow-fragments' frozen-vocabulary lock was missing
  state:ui-phase-active, so commit 7ef7f8336 shipped red. Lint and build
  both passed over it, which is why neither is sufficient verification.
- code-review's quick.md capability-hook assertion carried a stale
  delimiter after the 18ff35d20 extraction.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2994): fragmentize autonomous.md and admit state:plan-strategy-converge

Five sections share one atom, the pattern plan-phase already uses for
flag:--research-phase. The atom folds --converge OR --cross-ai into a
single boolean in cmdInitAutonomous so the grammar stays operator-free.

cmdInitAutonomous is additive; init.milestone-op, init.manager and
init.phase-op are untouched and still consumed. The $PLAN_STRATEGY bash
resolver is deliberately retained — ungated local-planning bullets still
read it, so the init-side fact supplements it rather than replacing it.

converge-fail-fast required splitting one bash fence so the always-run
CONVERGENCE_ARGS construction stays outside the marker. All three
flag-absent fallbacks were left outside their markers.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2994): fragmentize review and discuss-phase-assumptions

Admit state:reviewer-instances-configured (two peripheral notes share it;
the core reviewer-lane dispatch stays unmarked — it is the workflow's
primary always-evaluated logic, not an optional branch) and
state:auto-advance-active, which folds --auto OR two config keys into one
boolean so the grammar stays operator-free.

discuss-phase-assumptions was the highest-risk edit in this PR. Its
auto_advance step is a full if/elif/else; gating it whole would have
deleted the flag-absent fallback needed exactly when --auto is off. Split
verified exact: resolvers 636-651 and the 'End here' fallback 668-669 both
stay outside the marker; only 653-667 is gated.

Adds emitted-drift acks for the two files that grew — review.md (+55 B)
and autonomous.md (+737 B from 80799211c, which had none and would have
red-gated the push.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2994): fragmentize docs-update, update, transition and new-milestone Part A

Completes the 13-workflow rollout. Three of these had no init call at all
and gained a dedicated entry point plus their first gsd_run query line.

Admits state:is-monorepo and adds state:next-channel, state:workstream-active
and state:flat-mode. Vocabulary 26 -> 30 atoms.

Part A of new-milestone applies when NO workstream is active — the negation
of state:workstream-active. Rather than teach the grammar negation, which is
the Greenspun drift the frozen list exists to prevent, it gets a separate
positively-phrased atom whose fact is the inverse. Part B, which always runs,
stays outside the marker.

flag:--verify-only is deliberately NOT admitted: docs-update has no
contiguous purely-additive region for it, and an atom without a consuming
section is dead vocabulary. Evidence recorded in the slice report.

update.md reuses its existing resolved $GSD_TOOLS rather than prepending the
canonical preamble, which would have clobbered it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2994): stop automated-ui-verification re-resolving its own gate, retire dead vocabulary

Two defects the new tests caught.

The automated-ui-verification step re-ran gsd_run loop render-hooks and
recomputed UI_PHASE_ACTIVE inside a body that is only read when that fact
is already true — the circular self-disabling pattern this design forbids,
introduced by 3c654b168. cmdInitVerifyWork now exposes ui_phase_active and
the step consumes it. Its launcher preamble goes too: no gsd_run remains.
The Playwright-MCP check stays as prose — that is live session state.

Dead vocabulary predating this PR: flag:--full and state:needs-codebase-map
were admitted with a gate-1 claim that never materialized. flag:--full is
removed, redundant once quick folds it into discuss/research/validate.
state:needs-codebase-map gets the real consumer it always lacked, gating
new-project's codebase-map offer. Vocabulary 30 -> 29, and no atom is now
without a consuming section.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#2994): add the atom-admission, inversion and resolver-hoist gates

The two existing parity guards prove vocabulary/predicate symmetry but
never that a fact is computed — an atom no cmdInit* assembles evaluates
false forever. These close that hole:

- per-atom satisfiability for all 29 atoms, plus an anti-vacuity assertion
  so the loop cannot silently cover zero atoms
- dead-vocabulary check against the shipped manifest
- inversion guard: the flag-absent fallbacks in discuss-phase-assumptions
  and verify-work must stay outside their markers
- data-driven resolver-hoist guard over the shipped manifest, so a future
  extraction cannot reintroduce the circular class
- compound-fold coverage (--full, --cross-ai, --rc, config-only --auto)
- null-vs-[] degraded/computed distinction, and flag value shapes

Also repairs the frozen-vocabulary lock, which was stale and red for the
seven atoms earlier commits on this branch shipped.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(#2994): add changeset for the fragment-model rollout

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#2994): cite the issue on the two new allow-test-rule exemptions

ADR-456 requires an issue ref on the same line as the annotation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(#2994): correct the atom-count claims after retiring flag:--full

The vocabulary doc comments still said 30 entries; it is 29 since
flag:--full was removed as dead vocabulary.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2994): dedupe the phase-fallback block and harden --ws parsing

Review findings.

MAJOR: the three new init entry points each pasted a verbatim copy of the
guardedFindPhase/guardedGetRoadmapPhase fallback, taking the repo from four
copies to seven — DEFECT.GENERATIVE-FIX. Extracted applyRoadmapFallback and
folded six of the seven; each call site keeps its own field-set via a
closure. Duplication removed rather than papered over with a parity test.
cmdInitPhaseOp stays out: its fallback omits has_reviews, so it is not a
byte-identical copy, and it is CRITICAL-radius.

LOW, pre-existing: GSD_WS captured [^[:space:]]+ and expands unquoted, so a
workstream name holding glob metacharacters would expand against the
filesystem. Narrowed to [A-Za-z0-9._-]+. The unquoted expansion is kept —
it must word-split into two args and vanish when empty.

Also restores the vocabulary ordering convention, and fixes a masked test
bug the mandated run surfaced: the flag-forwarding guard checked only the
first init line per workflow, but new-milestone has two, so a real failure
was reporting exit 0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2994): drop the stale new-milestone emitted-drift ack

new-milestone.md was acked for a +406 B growth measured against an
intermediate commit. Net against origin/next it SHRANK by 8 bytes, so
nothing needed the ack and it explained nothing — which the differential
attribution check reports as a stale acknowledgment, not a pass.

update.md's entry stays: it genuinely grew +703 B.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2994): resolve the 15 failures from the full matrix run

All 15 were real and identical on both lanes.

REAL REGRESSION: autonomous.md hit 41479 chars against the #2196 guard's
40960 cap — a CHARS cap distinct from the LARGE tier byte cap, which the
five section stubs pushed it over. Extracted the 3a.5 UI Design Contract
body to references/; now 39968 chars, and the file nets -795 B vs base, so
its growth ack is deleted rather than left stale.

REAL DEFECT: docs referenced /gsd-transition, which is not a live
registered command. Reworded.

STALE FIXTURE: the emission byte-identity test hardcoded two marked
workflows; this branch legitimately marks fifteen. Fixture corrected — the
source was right.

The rest were drift guards over the eight workflows the earlier sweep did
not cover, retargeted at where the content now lives with non-vacuity
proven by blanking each step file and confirming failure. The GSD_WS
forwarding guard was checked as a possible real break and is not one: the
charclass narrowing is intact and forwarding works end to end.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2994): drop the ack for a newly-added reference file

A new file's emitted ripple is attributable to the diff that adds it, so
the acknowledgment explained nothing and the differential check reports it
as stale. Removing the last entry removes the fragment — an empty one
signals nothing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2994): retarget the UI-contract guards and clear two transitive advisories

The §3a.5 extraction that brought autonomous.md under the #2196 char cap
moved its body to references/autonomous-ui-design-contract.md, so ten
guards in autonomous-ui-steps and check-ui-safety-gate were asserting it
against the host. Retargeted via a combined read, each proven non-vacuous
by blanking the reference file and confirming failure.

This class had already bitten twice on this branch because each sweep was
scoped to the workflows touched at that moment, so this one was
exhaustive: ~70 test files across all 13 workflows, zero further broken or
vacuous assertions found.

Also clears two high transitive advisories the matrix flagged on one lane
— fast-uri GHSA-7p8r-x3mc-p8w7 and three ip-address SSRF/trust-boundary
issues. Both pre-date this branch: package-lock.json was untouched until
now, so the production tree was byte-identical to the base. Lockfile-only,
package.json unchanged, verified against a real npm ci install.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2994): backfill changeset pr number to 3030

---------

Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 19:59:58 -04:00

38 KiB
Raw Blame History

Start a new milestone cycle for an existing project. Loads project context, gathers milestone goals (from MILESTONE-CONTEXT.md or conversation), updates PROJECT.md and STATE.md, optionally runs parallel research, defines scoped requirements with REQ-IDs, spawns the roadmapper to create phased execution plan, and commits all artifacts. Brownfield equivalent of new-project.

<required_reading>

Read all files referenced by the invoking prompt's execution_context before starting.

</required_reading>

<available_agent_types> Valid GSD subagent types (use exact names — do not fall back to 'general-purpose'):

  • gsd-project-researcher — Researches project-level technical decisions
  • gsd-research-synthesizer — Synthesizes findings from parallel research agents
  • gsd-roadmapper — Creates phased execution roadmaps </available_agent_types>

1. Load Context

Parse $ARGUMENTS before doing anything else:

  • --reset-phase-numbers flag → opt into restarting roadmap phase numbering at 1. If absent, keep the current behavior of continuing phase numbering from the previous milestone.
  • --ws <name> flag → active workstream scope, parsed into GSD_WS
  • remaining text, with --ws <name> stripped → use as milestone name if present, captured into MILESTONE_ARG

Parse GSD_WS and MILESTONE_ARG using the established idiom (see verify-work.md):

_GSD_SHIM_NAME="gsd-tools.cjs"; _GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT="${RUNTIME_DIR:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)}"; GSD_TOOLS="${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; if [ -f "$GSD_TOOLS" ]; then gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.claude/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.claude/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.codex/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.codex/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif command -v gsd-tools >/dev/null 2>&1; then GSD_TOOLS="$(command -v gsd-tools)"; gsd_run() { "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.claude}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.claude}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${HERMES_HOME:-$HOME/.hermes}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${HERMES_HOME:-$HOME/.hermes}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${CURSOR_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.cursor}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${CURSOR_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.cursor}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${GEMINI_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.gemini}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${GEMINI_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.gemini}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${COPILOT_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.copilot}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${COPILOT_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.copilot}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${WINDSURF_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.codeium/windsurf}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${WINDSURF_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.codeium/windsurf}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${AUGMENT_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.augment}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${AUGMENT_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.augment}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${TRAE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.trae}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${TRAE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.trae}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${QWEN_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.qwen}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${QWEN_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.qwen}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${CODEBUDDY_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.codebuddy}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${CODEBUDDY_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.codebuddy}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${CLINE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.cline}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${CLINE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.cline}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${GROK_AGENTS_HOME:-$HOME/.agents}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${GROK_AGENTS_HOME:-$HOME/.agents}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${ANTIGRAVITY_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.gemini/antigravity}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${ANTIGRAVITY_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.gemini/antigravity}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${OPENCODE_CONFIG_DIR:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/opencode}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${OPENCODE_CONFIG_DIR:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/opencode}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${KILO_CONFIG_DIR:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/kilo}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${KILO_CONFIG_DIR:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/kilo}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; else echo "ERROR: gsd-tools.cjs not found at $GSD_TOOLS and gsd-tools is not on PATH. Run: npx -y @opengsd/gsd-core@latest --claude --local" >&2; exit 1; fi; if [ -n "${CLAUDE_ENV_FILE:-}" ] && [ -n "${GSD_TOOLS:-}" ]; then printf "export PATH='%s':\"\$PATH\"\n" "${GSD_TOOLS%/*}" >> "$CLAUDE_ENV_FILE" 2>/dev/null || true; fi
GSD_WS=""
echo "$ARGUMENTS" | grep -qE -- '--ws[[:space:]]+[A-Za-z0-9._-]+' && GSD_WS=$(echo "$ARGUMENTS" | grep -oE -- '--ws[[:space:]]+[A-Za-z0-9._-]+')
MILESTONE_ARG=$(echo "$ARGUMENTS" | sed -E 's/--ws[[:space:]]+[A-Za-z0-9._-]+//g' | xargs)
RESPONSE_LANGUAGE=$(gsd_run query config-get response_language --default "" 2>/dev/null || echo "")
# #2994: EARLY, section-manifest-only init.new-milestone call — needed here
# (before Step 4) to gate the project-md-milestone-write section. This is
# DELIBERATELY separate from Step 7's full init.new-milestone call below,
# which must stay AFTER Step 6's phase archival/phases.clear so its
# phase_dir_count / roadmap_exists / latest_completed_milestone fields
# reflect POST-archival state — moving that call here would compute those
# fields too early and corrupt the roadmapper's phase-numbering context.
# init.new-milestone is a pure read (no mutation), so calling it twice is
# safe; only `section_manifest` is consumed from this early call.
INIT_EARLY=$(gsd_run query init.new-milestone)
if [[ "$INIT_EARLY" == @file:* ]]; then INIT_EARLY=$(cat "${INIT_EARLY#@file:}"); fi

GSD_WS must chain to every downstream routing suggestion in this workflow (Step 4's shared-file guard, and the /gsd:discuss-phase//gsd:plan-phase routing hints below) per the routing-propagation contract in references/workstream-flag.md — never let it silently drop.

If response_language is set: All user-facing questions, prompts, and explanations in this workflow (including the "What do you want to build next?" prompt and seed-selection questions below) MUST be presented in {response_language}. Technical terms, code, file paths, and subagent prompts stay in English — only user-facing output is translated.

  • Read PROJECT.md (existing project, validated requirements, decisions)
  • Read MILESTONES.md (what shipped previously)
  • Read STATE.md (pending todos, blockers)
  • Check for MILESTONE-CONTEXT.md (from /gsd-discuss-milestone)

2. Gather Milestone Goals

If MILESTONE-CONTEXT.md exists:

  • Use features and scope from discuss-milestone
  • Present summary for confirmation

If no context file:

  • Present what shipped in last milestone

Text mode (workflow.text_mode: true in config or --text flag): Set TEXT_MODE=true if --text is present in $ARGUMENTS OR text_mode from init JSON is true. When TEXT_MODE is active, replace every AskUserQuestion call with a plain-text numbered list and ask the user to type their choice number. This is required for non-Claude runtimes (OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, etc.) where AskUserQuestion is not available.

  • Ask inline (freeform, NOT AskUserQuestion): "What do you want to build next?"
  • Wait for their response, then use AskUserQuestion to probe specifics
  • If user selects "Other" at any point to provide freeform input, ask follow-up as plain text — not another AskUserQuestion

2.5. Scan Planted Seeds

Check .planning/seeds/ for seed files that match the milestone goals gathered in step 2.

ls .planning/seeds/SEED-*.md 2>/dev/null

If no seed files exist: Skip this step silently — do not print any message or prompt.

If seed files exist: Read each SEED-*.md file and extract from its frontmatter and body:

  • Idea — the seed title (heading after frontmatter, e.g. # SEED-001: <idea>)
  • Trigger conditions — the trigger_when frontmatter field and the "When to Surface" section's bullet list
  • Planted during — the planted_during frontmatter field (for context)

Compare each seed's trigger conditions against the milestone goals from step 2. A seed matches when its trigger conditions are relevant to any of the milestone's target features or goals.

If no seeds match: Skip silently — do not prompt the user.

If matching seeds found:

--auto mode: Auto-select ALL matching seeds. Log: [auto] Selected N matching seed(s): [list seed names]

Text mode (TEXT_MODE=true): Present matching seeds as a plain-text numbered list:

Seeds that match your milestone goals:
1. SEED-001: <idea> (trigger: <trigger_when>)
2. SEED-003: <idea> (trigger: <trigger_when>)

Enter numbers to include (comma-separated), or "none" to skip:

Normal mode: Present via AskUserQuestion:

AskUserQuestion(
  header: "Seeds",
  question: "These planted seeds match your milestone goals. Include any in this milestone's scope?",
  multiSelect: true,
  options: [
    { label: "SEED-001: <idea>", description: "Trigger: <trigger_when> | Planted during: <planted_during>" },
    ...
  ]
)

After selection:

  • Selected seeds become additional context for requirement definition in step 9. Store them in an accumulator (e.g. $SELECTED_SEEDS) so step 9 can reference the ideas and their "Why This Matters" sections when defining requirements.
  • Unselected seeds remain untouched in .planning/seeds/ — never delete or modify seed files during this workflow.

3. Determine Milestone Version

  • Parse last version from MILESTONES.md
  • Suggest next version (v1.0 → v1.1, or v2.0 for major)
  • Confirm with user

3.5. Verify Milestone Understanding

Before writing any files, present a summary of what was gathered and ask for confirmation.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► MILESTONE SUMMARY
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

**Milestone v[X.Y]: [Name]**

**Goal:** [One sentence]

**Target features:**
- [Feature 1]
- [Feature 2]
- [Feature 3]

**Key context:** [Any important constraints, decisions, or notes from questioning]

AskUserQuestion:

  • header: "Confirm?"
  • question: "Does this capture what you want to build in this milestone?"
  • options:
    • "Looks good" — Proceed to write PROJECT.md
    • "Adjust" — Let me correct or add details

If "Adjust": Ask what needs changing (plain text, NOT AskUserQuestion). Incorporate changes, re-present the summary. Loop until "Looks good" is selected.

If "Looks good": Proceed to Step 4.

4. Update PROJECT.md

PROJECT.md is shared across workstreams (references/workstream-flag.md marks it # Shared in the directory diagram). This step has two independently-scoped parts — only Part A is workstream-guarded.

If section_manifest (from INIT_EARLY) is null or "project-md-milestone-write" is in its included list: read and execute gsd-core/workflows/new-milestone/steps/project-md-milestone-write.md. Otherwise (a workstream is active) skip — do not read the file; Part B below still runs regardless of GSD_WS.

Part B — Evolution structural repair (always runs, regardless of GSD_WS). ## Evolution is a shared, idempotent structural section, not workstream state — a pre-Evolution project must be backfilled whether or not a workstream is active, so this part is NOT covered by Part A's skip. Ensure the ## Evolution section exists in PROJECT.md. If missing (projects created before this feature), add it before the footer:

## Evolution

This document evolves at phase transitions and milestone boundaries.

**After each phase transition** (via `/gsd-transition`):
1. Requirements invalidated? → Move to Out of Scope with reason
2. Requirements validated? → Move to Validated with phase reference
3. New requirements emerged? → Add to Active
4. Decisions to log? → Add to Key Decisions
5. "What This Is" still accurate? → Update if drifted

**After each milestone** (via `/gsd:complete-milestone`):
1. Full review of all sections
2. Core Value check — still the right priority?
3. Audit Out of Scope — reasons still valid?
4. Update Context with current state

5. Update STATE.md

Reset STATE.md frontmatter AND body atomically via the SDK. This writes the new milestone version/name into the YAML frontmatter, resets status to planning, zeroes progress.* counters, and rewrites the ## Current Position section to the new-milestone template. Accumulated Context (decisions, blockers, todos) is preserved across the switch — symmetric with milestone.complete.

OUTGOING_MILESTONE=$(gsd_run query state.get milestone --raw 2>/dev/null || true)
printf '%s' "$OUTGOING_MILESTONE" > .planning/.gsd-outgoing-milestone 2>/dev/null || true
echo "Outgoing milestone (phase history archives under THIS version in step 6): ${OUTGOING_MILESTONE:-<unknown>}"
gsd_run query state.milestone-switch --milestone "v[X.Y]" --name "[Name]"

Capture the outgoing version now. The lines above read the current (previous) milestone version BEFORE the switch flips STATE.md's milestone: field to the new one, and persist it to .planning/.gsd-outgoing-milestone so Step 6 can consume it via a shell variable — do NOT transcribe the echoed value into a later command by hand. Step 6 reads that file back into --archive-version so the previous milestone's phase directories archive under <outgoing-version>-phases/, not the new one (#2288). Once state.milestone-switch runs, current-milestone state no longer holds the outgoing version, which is why it is captured here.

The resulting Current Position section looks like:

## Current Position

Phase: Not started (defining requirements)
Plan: —
Status: Defining requirements
Last activity: [today] — Milestone v[X.Y] started

Bug #2630: a prior version of this workflow rewrote the Current Position body manually but left the frontmatter pointing at the previous milestone, so every downstream reader (state.json, getMilestoneInfo, progress bars) reported the stale milestone until the first phase advance forced a resync. Always use the SDK handler above — do not hand-edit STATE.md here.

6. Cleanup and Commit

Delete MILESTONE-CONTEXT.md if exists (consumed).

Clear leftover phase directories from the previous milestone. Read the outgoing version persisted in Step 5 back into a shell variable and pass it as --archive-version so the archive lands under the previous milestone's label — the switch in Step 5 has already advanced current-milestone state, so without this override the archive would be mislabeled with the new version (#2288). Use the shell variable directly (quoted) — never hand-retype the captured value into the command, so untrusted STATE.md content cannot be re-parsed by the shell:

OUTGOING_MILESTONE=$(cat .planning/.gsd-outgoing-milestone 2>/dev/null || true)
if [ -n "$OUTGOING_MILESTONE" ]; then
  gsd_run query phases.clear --confirm --archive-version "$OUTGOING_MILESTONE"
else
  gsd_run query phases.clear --confirm
fi
rm -f .planning/.gsd-outgoing-milestone 2>/dev/null || true

If the captured file is empty or absent (a fresh project with no prior milestone), the fallback branch runs phases.clear --confirm with no override — it then uses current-milestone state, and a dated archive label only if no version label is resolvable at all. phases.clear rejects any --archive-version value that is not a plain version token (no path separators or ..), so a malformed capture fails loudly rather than writing outside the archive directory.

Stage the phase archive move + source removal so they land in the same commit as the milestone start (atomic — no orphaned uncommitted deletions, no un-archived dirs carried forward). phases.clear archives each non-999 dir to milestones/<version>-phases/; staging both dirs captures the new archive and the removals together (#1871).

git add .planning/milestones/ .planning/phases/ 2>/dev/null || true

Stage PROJECT.md in both modes. Step 4's Part A guard — not this commit — is what protects the shared ## Current Milestone heading (#2308): when a workstream is active Part A never writes it, so the only change PROJECT.md can carry here is Part B's idempotent ## Evolution backfill, which must be committed rather than stranded as a dangling edit. Do NOT reintroduce a [ -n "$GSD_WS" ] branch around this commit: GSD_WS is set in Step 1's shell and each step's bash block runs in its own shell (the same reason Step 5 round-trips OUTGOING_MILESTONE through a file), so such a guard reads an unset variable, always takes the flat-mode branch, and only appears to work.

gsd_run query commit "docs: start milestone v[X.Y] [Name]" --files .planning/PROJECT.md .planning/STATE.md

7. Load Context and Resolve Models

RESET_PHASE_NUMBERS_PARAM=""; if [[ "$ARGUMENTS" =~ (^|[[:space:]])--reset-phase-numbers([[:space:]]|$) ]]; then RESET_PHASE_NUMBERS_PARAM="--reset-phase-numbers"; fi
INIT=$(gsd_run query init.new-milestone $RESET_PHASE_NUMBERS_PARAM)
if [[ "$INIT" == @file:* ]]; then INIT=$(cat "${INIT#@file:}"); fi
AGENT_SKILLS_RESEARCHER=$(gsd_run query agent-skills gsd-project-researcher)
AGENT_SKILLS_SYNTHESIZER=$(gsd_run query agent-skills gsd-research-synthesizer)
AGENT_SKILLS_ROADMAPPER=$(gsd_run query agent-skills gsd-roadmapper)

Extract from init JSON: researcher_model, synthesizer_model, roadmapper_model, commit_docs, research_enabled, current_milestone, project_exists, roadmap_exists, latest_completed_milestone, phase_dir_count, phase_archive_path, agents_installed, missing_agents, project_path, roadmap_path, requirements_path, config_path, research_dir, milestones_path.

If agents_installed is false: Display a warning before proceeding:

⚠ GSD agents not installed. The following agents are missing from your agents directory:
  {missing_agents joined with newline}

Subagent spawns (gsd-project-researcher, gsd-research-synthesizer, gsd-roadmapper) will fail
with "agent type not found". Run the installer with --global to make agents available:

  npx @opengsd/gsd-core@latest --global

Proceeding without research subagents — roadmap will be generated inline.

Skip the parallel research spawn step and generate the roadmap inline.

If section_manifest is null or "reset-phase-safety" is in its included list: read and execute gsd-core/workflows/new-milestone/steps/reset-phase-safety.md. Otherwise skip — do not read the file.

8. Research Decision

Check research_enabled from init JSON (loaded from config).

If research_enabled is true:

AskUserQuestion: "Research the domain ecosystem for new features before defining requirements?"

  • "Research first (Recommended)" — Discover patterns, features, architecture for NEW capabilities
  • "Skip research for this milestone" — Go straight to requirements (does not change your default)

If research_enabled is false:

AskUserQuestion: "Research the domain ecosystem for new features before defining requirements?"

  • "Skip research (current default)" — Go straight to requirements
  • "Research first" — Discover patterns, features, architecture for NEW capabilities

IMPORTANT: Do NOT persist this choice to config.json. The workflow.research setting is a persistent user preference that controls plan-phase behavior across the project. Changing it here would silently alter future /gsd:plan-phase behavior. To change the default, use /gsd:settings.

If user chose "Research first":

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► RESEARCHING
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

◆ Spawning 4 researchers in parallel... (each runs in a subagent — no output until they return, ~1–5 min; expected, not a freeze)
  → Stack, Features, Architecture, Pitfalls
mkdir -p .planning/research

Spawn 4 parallel gsd-project-researcher agents. Each uses this template with dimension-specific fields:

Common structure for all 4 researchers:

Model omission (#2517). Omit the model parameter entirely when the value it would carry (researcher_model, synthesizer_model, roadmapper_model) is "inherit" or empty. An empty value 404s on runtimes without native tier aliases — the default on non-Claude runtimes. Omitting it inherits the orchestrator's model. See @gsd-core/references/model-profile-resolution.md.

Agent(prompt="
<research_type>Project Research — {DIMENSION} for [new features].</research_type>

<milestone_context>
SUBSEQUENT MILESTONE — Adding [target features] to existing app.
{EXISTING_CONTEXT}
Focus ONLY on what's needed for the NEW features.
</milestone_context>

<question>{QUESTION}</question>

<files_to_read>
- {project_path} (Project context)
</files_to_read>

${AGENT_SKILLS_RESEARCHER}

<downstream_consumer>{CONSUMER}</downstream_consumer>

<quality_gate>{GATES}</quality_gate>

<!-- #2508 runtime-aware-dispatch -->

> **Runtime-aware dispatch (#2508 Phase 4).** GSD workflows dispatch specialized subagents by role. Before dispatching on a built-in-only runtime (kimi-code — three built-ins only), resolve the role to a built-in via `gsd_run query resolve-dispatch-type --requested <role> --raw`. On named-dispatch runtimes (Claude/OpenCode/…) the role is returned unchanged; on kimi-code it maps to `coder`/`explore`/`plan` by role-suffix. The persona rides `${AGENT_SKILLS_<ROLE>}` (Phase 3) regardless. See @gsd-core/references/runtime-aware-dispatch.md.

<output>
Write to: {research_dir}/{FILE}
Use template: ~/.claude/gsd-core/templates/research-project/{FILE}
</output>
", subagent_type="gsd-project-researcher", model="{researcher_model}", description="{DIMENSION} research")

Dimension-specific fields:

Field Stack Features Architecture Pitfalls
EXISTING_CONTEXT Existing validated capabilities (DO NOT re-research): [from PROJECT.md] Existing features (already built): [from PROJECT.md] Existing architecture: [from PROJECT.md or codebase map] Focus on common mistakes when ADDING these features to existing system
QUESTION What stack additions/changes are needed for [new features]? How do [target features] typically work? Expected behavior? How do [target features] integrate with existing architecture? Common mistakes when adding [target features] to [domain]?
CONSUMER Specific libraries with versions for NEW capabilities, integration points, what NOT to add Table stakes vs differentiators vs anti-features, complexity noted, dependencies on existing Integration points, new components, data flow changes, suggested build order Warning signs, prevention strategy, which phase should address it
GATES Versions current (verify with Context7), rationale explains WHY, integration considered Categories clear, complexity noted, dependencies identified Integration points identified, new vs modified explicit, build order considers deps Pitfalls specific to adding these features, integration pitfalls covered, prevention actionable
FILE STACK.md FEATURES.md ARCHITECTURE.md PITFALLS.md

ORCHESTRATOR RULE — CODEX RUNTIME: After calling all 4 researcher Agent() calls above, do NOT read research files or synthesize content independently while the subagents are active. Wait for all 4 researchers to complete before spawning the synthesizer. This prevents duplicate work and wasted context.

After all 4 complete, spawn synthesizer:

Agent(prompt="
Synthesize research outputs into SUMMARY.md.

<files_to_read>
- {research_dir}/STACK.md
- {research_dir}/FEATURES.md
- {research_dir}/ARCHITECTURE.md
- {research_dir}/PITFALLS.md
</files_to_read>

${AGENT_SKILLS_SYNTHESIZER}

Write to: {research_dir}/SUMMARY.md
Use template: ~/.claude/gsd-core/templates/research-project/SUMMARY.md
Commit after writing.
", subagent_type="gsd-research-synthesizer", model="{synthesizer_model}", description="Synthesize research")

ORCHESTRATOR RULE — CODEX RUNTIME: After calling Agent() above, stop working on this task immediately. Do not read more files, edit code, or run tests related to this task while the subagent is active. Wait for the subagent to return its result. This prevents duplicate work, conflicting edits, and wasted context. Only resume when the subagent result is available.

Synthesizer output self-heal (#222) — verify SUMMARY.md materialized: The synthesizer's canonical output is .planning/research/SUMMARY.md on disk; its brief structured return (## SYNTHESIS COMPLETE plus a few ### confirmation lines) is NOT the file content. A known LLM false-refusal (issue #222) sometimes makes the agent return the full SUMMARY.md document inline — fabricating a write restriction (e.g. "the runtime is blocking file writes") — instead of writing the file. Prompt hardening alone does not fully eliminate it, so the orchestrator MUST absorb the failure deterministically before spawning gsd-roadmapper:

  1. Verify .planning/research/SUMMARY.md exists AND is substantive — non-empty, and free of any leftover <!-- gsd:write-continue --> continuation sentinel (which marks a truncated/incomplete write). You may validate with gsd_run verify-summary .planning/research/SUMMARY.md — it exits 0 regardless, so check its JSON passed field ("passed": false means missing or invalid), not the process exit code. If it passes, continue normally.
  2. If it is MISSING or invalid AND the synthesizer's return message contains the FULL SUMMARY.md document — recognizable by the template's top-level markers # Project Research Summary, ## Key Findings, ## Implications for Roadmap, and ## Sources, not merely the brief ## SYNTHESIS COMPLETE confirmation — the false-refusal fired: write that returned document to .planning/research/SUMMARY.md with the Write tool, then commit ALL research artifacts the synthesizer owns (it commits on behalf of the four researchers) with gsd_run query commit "docs: complete project research" --files .planning/research/ unless they are already committed. Log ⚠ #222 self-heal: synthesizer returned SUMMARY.md inline without writing it; orchestrator persisted the file.
  3. If it is MISSING or invalid AND the return is only a brief confirmation (no full SUMMARY document to recover), the synthesizer genuinely failed — surface the error and stop; do NOT spawn gsd-roadmapper against a missing or incomplete SUMMARY.md.

This guarantees gsd-roadmapper (which lists SUMMARY.md as required reading) never runs against a missing or truncated SUMMARY.md.

Display key findings from SUMMARY.md:

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► RESEARCH COMPLETE ✓
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

**Stack additions:** [from SUMMARY.md]
**Feature table stakes:** [from SUMMARY.md]
**Watch Out For:** [from SUMMARY.md]

If "Skip research": Continue to Step 9.

9. Define Requirements

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► DEFINING REQUIREMENTS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Read PROJECT.md: core value, current milestone goals, validated requirements (what exists).

If $SELECTED_SEEDS is non-empty (from step 2.5): Include selected seed ideas and their "Why This Matters" sections as additional input when defining requirements. Seeds provide user-validated feature ideas that should be incorporated into the requirement categories alongside research findings or conversation-gathered features.

If research exists: Read FEATURES.md, extract feature categories.

Present features by category:

## [Category 1]
**Table stakes:** Feature A, Feature B
**Differentiators:** Feature C, Feature D
**Research notes:** [any relevant notes]

If no research: Gather requirements through conversation. Ask: "What are the main things users need to do with [new features]?" Clarify, probe for related capabilities, group into categories.

Scope each category via AskUserQuestion (multiSelect: true, header max 12 chars):

  • "[Feature 1]" — [brief description]
  • "[Feature 2]" — [brief description]
  • "None for this milestone" — Defer entire category

Track: Selected → this milestone. Unselected table stakes → future. Unselected differentiators → out of scope.

Identify gaps via AskUserQuestion:

  • "No, research covered it" — Proceed
  • "Yes, let me add some" — Capture additions

Generate REQUIREMENTS.md:

  • v1 Requirements grouped by category (checkboxes, REQ-IDs)
  • Future Requirements (deferred)
  • Out of Scope (explicit exclusions with reasoning)
  • Traceability section (empty, filled by roadmap)

REQ-ID format: [CATEGORY]-[NUMBER] (AUTH-01, NOTIF-02). Continue numbering from existing.

Requirement quality criteria:

Good requirements are:

  • Specific and testable: "User can reset password via email link" (not "Handle password reset")
  • User-centric: "User can X" (not "System does Y")
  • Atomic: One capability per requirement (not "User can login and manage profile")
  • Independent: Minimal dependencies on other requirements

Present FULL requirements list for confirmation:

## Milestone v[X.Y] Requirements

### [Category 1]
- [ ] **CAT1-01**: User can do X
- [ ] **CAT1-02**: User can do Y

### [Category 2]
- [ ] **CAT2-01**: User can do Z

Does this capture what you're building? (yes / adjust)

If "adjust": Return to scoping.

Commit requirements:

gsd_run query commit "docs: define milestone v[X.Y] requirements" --files .planning/REQUIREMENTS.md

10. Create Roadmap

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► CREATING ROADMAP
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

◆ Spawning roadmapper... (runs in a subagent — no output until it returns, ~1–5 min; expected, not a freeze)

Starting phase number:

  • If --reset-phase-numbers is active, start at Phase 1
  • Otherwise, continue from the previous milestone's last phase number (v1.0 ended at phase 5 → v1.1 starts at phase 6)
Agent(prompt="
<planning_context>
<files_to_read>
- {project_path}
- {requirements_path}
- {research_dir}/SUMMARY.md (if exists)
- {config_path}
- {milestones_path}
</files_to_read>

${AGENT_SKILLS_ROADMAPPER}

</planning_context>

<instructions>
Create roadmap for milestone v[X.Y]:
1. Respect the selected numbering mode:
   - `--reset-phase-numbers` → start at Phase 1
   - default behavior → continue from the previous milestone's last phase number
2. Derive phases from THIS MILESTONE's requirements only
3. Map every requirement to exactly one phase
4. Derive 2-5 success criteria per phase (observable user behaviors)
5. Validate 100% coverage
6. Write files immediately (ROADMAP.md, STATE.md, update REQUIREMENTS.md traceability)
7. Return ROADMAP CREATED with summary

Write files first, then return.
</instructions>
", subagent_type="gsd-roadmapper", model="{roadmapper_model}", description="Create roadmap")

ORCHESTRATOR RULE — CODEX RUNTIME: After calling Agent() above, stop working on this task immediately. Do not read more files, edit code, or run tests related to this task while the subagent is active. Wait for the subagent to return its result. This prevents duplicate work, conflicting edits, and wasted context. Only resume when the subagent result is available.

Handle return:

If ## ROADMAP BLOCKED: Present blocker, work with user, re-spawn.

If ## ROADMAP CREATED: Read ROADMAP.md, present inline:

## Proposed Roadmap

**[N] phases** | **[X] requirements mapped** | All covered ✓

| # | Phase | Goal | Requirements | Success Criteria |
|---|-------|------|--------------|------------------|
| [N] | [Name] | [Goal] | [REQ-IDs] | [count] |

### Phase Details

**Phase [N]: [Name]**
Goal: [goal]
Requirements: [REQ-IDs]
Success criteria:
1. [criterion]
2. [criterion]

Ask for approval via AskUserQuestion:

  • "Approve" — Commit and continue
  • "Adjust phases" — Tell me what to change
  • "Review full file" — Show raw ROADMAP.md

If "Adjust": Get notes, re-spawn roadmapper with revision context, loop until approved. If "Review": Display raw ROADMAP.md, re-ask.

Commit roadmap (after approval):

gsd_run query commit "docs: create milestone v[X.Y] roadmap ([N] phases)" --files .planning/ROADMAP.md .planning/STATE.md .planning/REQUIREMENTS.md

After roadmap approval, scan pending todos against the newly approved phases. For each todo whose scope matches a phase, tag it with resolves_phase: N in its YAML frontmatter.

Check for pending todos:

PENDING_TODOS=$(ls .planning/todos/pending/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -50)

If no pending todos exist: Skip this step silently.

If pending todos exist:

Read the approved ROADMAP.md and extract the phase list: phase number, phase name, goal, and requirement IDs.

For each pending todo, compare:

  • The todo's title and area frontmatter fields
  • The todo body (Problem and Solution sections)

Against each phase's:

  • Phase goal
  • Requirement IDs and descriptions

Match criteria (best-effort — do not over-match): A todo is considered resolved by a phase if the phase's goal or requirements directly describe implementing the same feature, area, or capability as the todo. Narrow, specific todos with concrete scopes are the best candidates. Vague or cross-cutting todos should be left unlinked.

For each matched todo, add resolves_phase: [N] to the YAML frontmatter block (after the existing fields):

---
created: [existing]
title: [existing]
area: [existing]
resolves_phase: [N]
files: [existing]
---

Only modify todos that have a clear, confident match. Leave unmatched todos unmodified.

If any todos were linked:

gsd_run query commit "docs: tag [count] pending todos with resolves_phase after milestone v[X.Y] roadmap" --files .planning/todos/pending/*.md

Print a summary:

◆ Linked [N] pending todos to roadmap phases:
  → [todo title] → Phase [N]: [Phase Name]
  (Leave [M] unmatched todos in pending/)

11. Done

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► MILESTONE INITIALIZED ✓
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

**Milestone v[X.Y]: [Name]**

| Artifact       | Location                    |
|----------------|-----------------------------|
| Project        | `.planning/PROJECT.md`      |
| Research       | `.planning/research/`       |
| Requirements   | `.planning/REQUIREMENTS.md` |
| Roadmap        | `.planning/ROADMAP.md`      |

**[N] phases** | **[X] requirements** | Ready to build ✓

## ▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}

**Phase [N]: [Phase Name]** — [Goal]

`/clear` then:

`/gsd:discuss-phase [N] ${GSD_WS}` — gather context and clarify approach

Also: `/gsd:plan-phase [N] ${GSD_WS}` — skip discussion, plan directly

<success_criteria>

  • PROJECT.md updated with Current Milestone section (skipped when a workstream is active — shared file, see Step 4)
  • STATE.md reset for new milestone
  • MILESTONE-CONTEXT.md consumed and deleted (if existed)
  • Research completed (if selected) — 4 parallel agents, milestone-aware
  • Requirements gathered and scoped per category
  • REQUIREMENTS.md created with REQ-IDs
  • gsd-roadmapper spawned with phase numbering context
  • Roadmap files written immediately (not draft)
  • User feedback incorporated (if any)
  • Phase numbering mode respected (continued or reset)
  • All commits made (if planning docs committed)
  • Pending todos scanned for phase matches; matched todos tagged with resolves_phase: N
  • User knows next step: /gsd:discuss-phase [N] ${GSD_WS}

Atomic commits: Each phase commits its artifacts immediately. </success_criteria>