* feat(3081): auto-trim review prompts for small-context model reviewers Adds review.max_prompt_tokens and review.max_prompt_tokens_per_reviewer config keys. When configured, the /gsd-review workflow deterministically trims the assembled prompt before sending to each reviewer (drop CONTEXT → RESEARCH → REQUIREMENTS; head-shrink PROJECT.md; tail-truncate PLANs proportionally; reserve disclosure-note tokens upfront). Trim metadata is recorded in REVIEWS.md frontmatter. Reviewer is skipped with a warning if even the minimum review set exceeds the budget. Closes #3081 * fix(3081): register prompt-budget in SDK query registry and update inventory manifest review.md references `gsd-sdk query prompt-budget` at three call sites, but the command had no handler in the SDK registry — failing the registry-integration drift-guard test on all 6 CI matrix legs. Added a native TypeScript SDK handler (sdk/src/query/prompt-budget.ts) that ports the applyBudget logic from the CJS module, registered it in DOMAIN_STATIC_CATALOG, and regenerated docs/INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json to include the new cli_modules/prompt-budget.cjs entry. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(3081): bump ws to 8.20.1 and allowlist prompt-budget sibling pair Two additional CI failures after the registry fix: 1. ws moderate CVE (GHSA-58qx-3vcg-4xpx, uninitialized memory disclosure): The advisory covers ws >=8.0.0 <8.20.1. Both root and sdk/package.json pinned ^8.20.0 which resolved to 8.20.0. Bumped both to 8.20.1 to clear the npm audit drift-guard test (bug-3588-npm-audit-clean.test.cjs). 2. lint-shared-module-handsync detected the new prompt-budget.ts / prompt-budget.cjs sibling pair without an allowlist entry. Added a cooperatingSiblings entry to scripts/shared-module-handsync-allowlist.json with classification and justification matching the established pattern. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(3081): align prompt-budget skip semantics across CJS and SDK dispatch paths Replace brittle `[ $EXIT -eq 2 ]` guards with `[ $EXIT -ne 0 ]` in all three local-reviewer blocks (Ollama, LM Studio, llama.cpp) in workflows/review.md. Any non-zero exit from prompt-budget now triggers a skip with a descriptive warning — exit 2/11 prints "budget too small", any other non-zero prints "unexpected exit code". This ensures the SDK bridge dispatch path (exit 11 via GSDError(Blocked)) triggers the same skip as the CJS path (exit 2). The SDK handler (sdk/src/query/prompt-budget.ts) already writes both metadata and prompt files before throwing, so no change needed there. The Ollama block also gains the missing OLLAMA_SKIP guard so the reviewer invocation is actually skipped (previously the block only suppressed the OLLAMA_PROMPT_FILE update but still ran the curl invocation). SDK integration path (hardFailed via GSDError(Blocked) → exit 11) is covered by handler unit tests in tests/prompt-budget.test.cjs; no gsd-sdk-*.test.cjs exercising the full bridge dispatch for this command exists yet — that gap remains and is documented here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix prompt-budget trim ordering and review guard follow-ups * perf: optimize prompt-budget and dedup reviewer trim workflow * fix(3708): drop source-grep theater tests to satisfy lint-no-source-grep All four test files added in commit 2df566ed were pure source-grep theater: they read .cjs / .ts / .md source files and asserted that specific string literals were present or absent. None exercised runtime behaviour. Deleted: - tests/gsd-tools-memory-optimizer.test.cjs — 7 includes() on gsd-tools.cjs - tests/prompt-budget-hotpath-optimizer.test.cjs — includes() on prompt-budget.cjs + .ts - tests/prompt-budget-io-optimizer.test.cjs — includes() on prompt-budget.ts + gsd-tools.cjs - tests/review-workflow-budget-dedup.test.cjs — includes() on review.md Behavioural coverage for the prompt-budget feature already exists in tests/prompt-budget.test.cjs and tests/prompt-budget-cli.test.cjs (also added by this PR). No replacement tests needed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(3708): correct budget-pressure threshold and minSet accounting Two bugs in applyBudget caused premature trimming and false hard-fails: 1. UNNEEDED_TRIM: budgetUnderPressure compared baseTokens against effectiveBudget - NOTE_RESERVE_TOKENS, triggering trim pressure 80 tokens before the budget was actually exceeded. Fix: compare against effectiveBudget directly; NOTE_RESERVE_TOKENS are still reserved in contentBudget once real pressure is confirmed. 2. FALSE_HARDFAIL: minSet included NOTE_RESERVE_TOKENS unconditionally, treating the note as mandatory even when no trim would occur and no note would be injected. Fix: exclude NOTE_RESERVE_TOKENS from minSet; a prompt that fits untrimmed needs no note and must not hard-fail. Both fixes applied in CJS and TypeScript implementations. Two regression tests added (cycles 11 and 12) that reproduce each case behaviorally. --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
45 lines
1.4 KiB
JavaScript
45 lines
1.4 KiB
JavaScript
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
const { describe, test } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('node:fs');
|
|
const path = require('node:path');
|
|
|
|
const SDK_PROMPT_BUDGET = path.join(
|
|
__dirname,
|
|
'..',
|
|
'sdk',
|
|
'src',
|
|
'query',
|
|
'prompt-budget.ts'
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
describe('prompt-budget sdk parity (optimizer)', () => {
|
|
test('trim order keeps plan truncation ahead of context/research drops', () => {
|
|
const src = fs.readFileSync(SDK_PROMPT_BUDGET, 'utf8');
|
|
|
|
const planIdx = src.indexOf('// Trim step 2: proportional plan truncation');
|
|
const contextIdx = src.indexOf('// Trim step 3: drop context');
|
|
const researchIdx = src.indexOf('// Trim step 4: drop research');
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(planIdx > -1, 'expected step 2 proportional plan truncation marker');
|
|
assert.ok(contextIdx > -1, 'expected step 3 context drop marker');
|
|
assert.ok(researchIdx > -1, 'expected step 4 research drop marker');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
planIdx < contextIdx && contextIdx < researchIdx,
|
|
'expected trim order: plan truncation -> context drop -> research drop'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('final over-budget hard-fail guard is present', () => {
|
|
const src = fs.readFileSync(SDK_PROMPT_BUDGET, 'utf8');
|
|
|
|
assert.match(
|
|
src,
|
|
/if\s*\(\s*estimatedTokens\s*>\s*effectiveBudget\s*\)/,
|
|
'expected final estimatedTokens > effectiveBudget guard'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|