diff --git a/.planning/phases/32.1-mcp-oauth-for-plugin-apps-declared-scopes-mcp-subject-on-con/32.1-REVIEW-DISPOSITION.md b/.planning/phases/32.1-mcp-oauth-for-plugin-apps-declared-scopes-mcp-subject-on-con/32.1-REVIEW-DISPOSITION.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a1bb9c63
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.planning/phases/32.1-mcp-oauth-for-plugin-apps-declared-scopes-mcp-subject-on-con/32.1-REVIEW-DISPOSITION.md
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+---
+phase: 32.1
+review: 32.1-REVIEW.md
+titles: json
+findings:
+  - id: CR-01
+    severity: critical
+    disposition: open
+    title: "An in-flight MCP allow recreates a consent the user just revoked"
+  - id: WR-01
+    severity: warning
+    disposition: open
+    title: "Clearing a declared scope does not stop `read` or `write` from implying it"
+  - id: WR-02
+    severity: warning
+    disposition: open
+    title: "`mcp_scopes` does not limit what an OAuth `read` or `write` grant can call"
+  - id: WR-03
+    severity: warning
+    disposition: open
+    title: "The consent backfill treats unusable tokens as live grants"
+  - id: WR-04
+    severity: warning
+    disposition: open
+    title: "Replacing a consent does not revoke refresh tokens that still carry the removed scopes"
+  - id: WR-05
+    severity: warning
+    disposition: open
+    title: "sm-user-plugin v0.1.16 does not require the framework version it uses"
+  - id: WR-06
+    severity: warning
+    disposition: open
+    title: "`/connect` can allow a stale request after `?request=` changes"
+open: 7
+total: 7
+recorded: 2026-10-28T16:03:08.042Z
+---
+
+# Phase 32.1: Code Review Disposition
+
+| Finding | Severity | Disposition | Source |
+|---------|----------|-------------|--------|
+| CR-01 | critical | open | - |
+| WR-01 | warning | open | - |
+| WR-02 | warning | open | - |
+| WR-03 | warning | open | - |
+| WR-04 | warning | open | - |
+| WR-05 | warning | open | - |
+| WR-06 | warning | open | - |
+
+Dispositions: `open` (recorded, not yet triaged), `fixed`, `skipped`, `deferred`.
+Set `deferred` by hand and put the reason in the Source cell; both are preserved. A `|` in the reason is kept as prose and escaped on the next run.
+Re-running the gate keeps every row it can. A row the current review no longer reports is kept and its Source cell flagged, so a finding does not leave this record silently. ONE exception: when a finding id is REUSED by a different finding, the earlier decision cannot keep a row — the id is taken — and it is dropped. A RECORDED decision (anything but `open`) is named on the console when that happens; a row still at `open` is replaced silently, because `open` records no decision to lose.