docs(11.1): record code review disposition
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
phase: 11.1
|
||||
review: 11.1-REVIEW.md
|
||||
titles: json
|
||||
findings:
|
||||
- id: CR-01
|
||||
severity: critical
|
||||
disposition: open
|
||||
title: "`src=` and Go fences inside blockquotes or callouts bypass snippet verification but are still published as \"verified source\""
|
||||
- id: WR-01
|
||||
severity: warning
|
||||
disposition: open
|
||||
title: "An Example without `// Output:` is a reachability root, so code go test never runs is accepted as \"run\""
|
||||
- id: WR-02
|
||||
severity: warning
|
||||
disposition: open
|
||||
title: "Go sources excluded by build constraints pass the \"compiled by go test\" check"
|
||||
- id: WR-03
|
||||
severity: warning
|
||||
disposition: open
|
||||
title: "The `go doc` fallback accepts identifiers with the wrong case"
|
||||
- id: WR-04
|
||||
severity: warning
|
||||
disposition: open
|
||||
title: "`golang` fences (and other Go aliases) bypass the \"go fence needs src=\" policy"
|
||||
- id: WR-05
|
||||
severity: warning
|
||||
disposition: open
|
||||
title: "The command checker skips common shell forms, so unknown commands are published unchecked"
|
||||
- id: WR-06
|
||||
severity: warning
|
||||
disposition: open
|
||||
title: "Heading IDs can collide with theme element IDs, which breaks search on that page and produces invalid HTML"
|
||||
- id: WR-07
|
||||
severity: warning
|
||||
disposition: open
|
||||
title: "The walkthrough's hand-written files carry \"Code generated … DO NOT EDIT\" headers"
|
||||
- id: IN-01
|
||||
severity: info
|
||||
disposition: open
|
||||
title: "A failed write leaves an unmarked output directory that the next build refuses to clean"
|
||||
- id: IN-02
|
||||
severity: info
|
||||
disposition: open
|
||||
title: "`scanFences` treats 4-space-indented backticks as fenced code, which gives false positives and differs from goldmark"
|
||||
- id: IN-03
|
||||
severity: info
|
||||
disposition: open
|
||||
title: "`data-href` from `source_url` is HTML-escaped but its URL scheme is not checked"
|
||||
- id: IN-04
|
||||
severity: info
|
||||
disposition: open
|
||||
title: "Dead error branch and a nil request in serve.go"
|
||||
- id: IN-05
|
||||
severity: info
|
||||
disposition: open
|
||||
title: "Search highlighting uses offsets from `toLowerCase()` on the original string"
|
||||
- id: IN-06
|
||||
severity: info
|
||||
disposition: open
|
||||
title: "The gate's forbidden sweep treats grep errors as \"no hits\""
|
||||
- id: IN-07
|
||||
severity: info
|
||||
disposition: open
|
||||
title: "The gate depends on GNU-only tools"
|
||||
- id: IN-08
|
||||
severity: info
|
||||
disposition: open
|
||||
title: "The identifier checker cannot see several span forms"
|
||||
open: 16
|
||||
total: 16
|
||||
recorded: 2026-09-30T22:34:40.155Z
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Phase 11.1: Code Review Disposition
|
||||
|
||||
| Finding | Severity | Disposition | Source |
|
||||
|---------|----------|-------------|--------|
|
||||
| CR-01 | critical | open | - |
|
||||
| WR-01 | warning | open | - |
|
||||
| WR-02 | warning | open | - |
|
||||
| WR-03 | warning | open | - |
|
||||
| WR-04 | warning | open | - |
|
||||
| WR-05 | warning | open | - |
|
||||
| WR-06 | warning | open | - |
|
||||
| WR-07 | warning | open | - |
|
||||
| IN-01 | info | open | - |
|
||||
| IN-02 | info | open | - |
|
||||
| IN-03 | info | open | - |
|
||||
| IN-04 | info | open | - |
|
||||
| IN-05 | info | open | - |
|
||||
| IN-06 | info | open | - |
|
||||
| IN-07 | info | open | - |
|
||||
| IN-08 | info | open | - |
|
||||
|
||||
Dispositions: `open` (recorded, not yet triaged), `fixed`, `skipped`, `deferred`.
|
||||
Set `deferred` by hand and put the reason in the Source cell; both are preserved. A `|` in the reason is kept as prose and escaped on the next run.
|
||||
Re-running the gate keeps every row it can. A row the current review no longer reports is kept and its Source cell flagged, so a finding does not leave this record silently. ONE exception: when a finding id is REUSED by a different finding, the earlier decision cannot keep a row — the id is taken — and it is dropped. A RECORDED decision (anything but `open`) is named on the console when that happens; a row still at `open` is replaced silently, because `open` records no decision to lose.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user