9faacc0c153a88f939ef07ced74d56dc468f0708
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
sim
|
7dd9e59f6b |
test(#3090): stop exempting violations under categories that do not fit
An allow-test-rule annotation citing a category that does not apply is worse than no annotation, because it reads as reviewed. Eight were confirmed by reading the assertions each one covered, and auditing the rest found five more plus one refutation — a converter test whose wording described the wrong mechanism while the covered assertion genuinely was deployed-text. The instructive one used the CANONICAL string for the same mistake: STATE.md command output labelled as a deployed artifact. A canonical string is not evidence the category fits, which is why normalising strings alone would have laundered the problem rather than fixed it. Every mapping the audit had inferred rather than code-verified was spot-checked before rewriting, and the ones that turned out not to fit were re-annotated rather than relabelled. Fourteen STATE.md assertions had a typed extractor available all along and now use it; their annotations came out because nothing needs exempting. Eight assertions genuinely need a production change first — CLI stdout and stderr with no structured mode — and are tagged pending-migration-to-typed-ir citing #3090, which is what that category is for. It had zero real uses before this, while one file carried a real citation to migration issue #2974 under a non-canonical tag. Six annotations covered assertions that do no text matching at all. An exemption for a violation that does not exist is noise that makes the real ones harder to audit; those are removed. atomic-write-coverage gains the annotation it always warranted — its own docstring describes a structural-regression-guard while the file carried none. Fifty-nine non-canonical strings across roughly thirty files are normalised, and the allow-test-rule allowlist is regenerated to match. 472 annotations became 463: every one now uses a canonical category, and the two remaining non-canonical strings are ESLint RuleTester fixtures, not annotations. Refs #3057 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
1008aabd31 |
fix(#2615): document the effortSurface axis in the host-integration matrix (#2698)
* fix(#2615): document the effortSurface axis in the host-integration matrix #2481 added `effortSurface` as the ninth negotiated `hostIntegration` axis and wrote documentation-sourced values into 18 descriptors, but never touched `docs/reference/host-integration-capability-matrix.md`. The matrix that ADR-1239 designates the cited source of truth had zero occurrences of the axis: no entry in the axes legend, and no row in any of the per-runtime tables. `src/host-integration.cts` states "every value is documented or explicitly 'undocumented'" — for this axis that was false for every runtime. Adds the legend entry (the `argv` / `none` / `undocumented` vocabulary, plus why there is deliberately no config-file member) and an `effortSurface` row to all 19 per-runtime tables. Every citation is carried over from #2481's own commit message, where the values were sourced: - claude argv -- `claude --help` documents `--effort <level>` - opencode argv -- `opencode run --help` documents `--variant` - codex argv -- `model_reasoning_effort` is a config.toml key, not a dedicated flag, so the generic `-c key=value` override is the only argv route (still argv) - 15 hosts undocumented -- their docs state no reasoning setting kimi-code is the nineteenth section (added by #2603 after #2481) and is the one runtime with no declared value. Its row and a Documentation-gaps entry record why rather than inventing one: Kimi Code documents `/effort` (alias `/thinking`), but only as an INTERACTIVE slash command — `-m, --model` is the only model-adjacent argv. Neither vocabulary member is accurate (`none` would deny a mechanism the host has, `argv` would claim one it does not expose), so closing that gap needs a vocabulary decision, which is a negotiation change and not a documentation one. The absent value already degrades closed exactly as the sentinel does. The regression test derives its runtime list from the registry rather than hardcoding it, so a runtime added later fails until its matrix row exists — the ratchet whose absence let #2481 add an axis with nothing catching the missing docs. Closes #2615 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QT3ibz5qJuDuGqpTGRYVGf * docs(#2615): honest citations for the undocumented rows; fix the four stale 8-axis lists Two findings from the orthogonal review of the first commit. 1. The 15 `undocumented` rows shared byte-identical text — "searched the runtime's official docs (see Sources consulted above)" — which is weaker than this file's own convention ("no authoritative doc — searched: <url>") and, worse, implies a per-host targeted search that did not happen: each section's Sources-consulted list was gathered for OTHER axes and contains no CLI-reference or reasoning-effort source. The rows now say plainly what the finding is — an ABSENCE established by #2481's cross-host survey — and cite that survey rather than implying a URL was checked per host. 2. Four normative docs still described "the eight negotiated axes" and omitted effortSurface entirely. The worst of them is docs/how-to/add-or-update-a-host-integration.md — the maintainer's own guide for onboarding a host, whose Step 2 axis table would have a maintainer reproduce exactly the gap #2615 exists to close. Also fixed: docs/reference/host-integration-interface.md (which calls itself the normative reference and had no effortSurface row at all), docs/how-to/author-a-host-plugin.md, docs/registries/README.md ("**exactly** the eight … axes keys"), and CONTEXT.md's matching EoS-registry sentence. Deliberately NOT changed, because they are historical records rather than current contract: docs/whats-new-1.7.0.md and docs/FEATURES.md's 1.7.0 entry (effortSurface shipped in 1.8.0 via #2481 — rewriting them would falsify the release history), ADR-1239's pre-amendment body (already superseded by its own "Amendment (2026-07-21): effortSurface axis (#2481)"), and ADR-1016's "original eight axes", which refers to a different axis set entirely. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QT3ibz5qJuDuGqpTGRYVGf * chore(#2615): backfill changeset PR number (#2698) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |