14 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Tom Boucher	86fa2917d7	enh(#3866): dispatch step and contribution hooks at verify:pre (#3869) ... * test(#3866): pin that verify:pre must dispatch every hook kind verify-work.md's verify_pre_hooks step dispatches only `kind == "gate"`, so getWiredKinds reports verify:pre -> {gate} and gen-capability-registry rejects any capability declaring a step or contribution there. The verify lane is therefore closed to capabilities that want to contribute to what UAT covers rather than refuse to let it start. Failing-first: the step, contribution, and exact-kind-set rows are RED; the pre-existing gate row is a green regression pin so the new arms cannot orphan the arm verify:pre already had. Refs #3866 * feat(#3866): dispatch step and contribution hooks at verify:pre verify_pre_hooks dispatched `kind == "gate"` only, so getWiredKinds reported verify:pre -> {gate} and gen-capability-registry's validateHooksWired rejected any capability declaring a step or contribution there. A capability could refuse to let UAT start; it could not contribute to what UAT covers. Add contribution and step arms mirroring execute:wave:post, deferring to references/loop-hook-dispatch.md and carrying its ref.command in-context validation guard ahead of any shell-use prose. A verify:pre step is advisory: it never blocks the start of UAT and an erroring step is routed by its own onError. The gate arm and its check guard are untouched. Give extract_tests an additive consumption seam for the artefacts those steps declare via the existing steps[].produces field -- no new registry field, no new ordering, no invented filename. Manifest-supplied artefact names are validated in-context against an allowlist and resolved only inside PHASE_DIR. With no producing step the derivation is unchanged, pinned by test rather than asserted in prose. Review findings folded in: the artefact-name allowlist (isolated adversarial pass), the artefact-shape contract and the seam-inertness tests (spec axis), and the reference/how-to split so one constraint has one source of truth (standards axis). Closes #3866 * chore(#3866): backfill changeset PR number --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>	2026-08-25 18:07:29 -04:00
0xdhx	0396d9cab1	enhance(#2483): stop the claude reviewer lane from inheriting CLAUDE.md + auto-memory (#2493) ... * enhance(#2483): env-guard the claude reviewer leg against CLAUDE.md injection The claude reviewer in workflows/review.md was a bare headless `claude -p` spawn run from the project cwd, so it inherited the invoking user's global CLAUDE.md, the project CLAUDE.md, and Claude Code auto-memory. That made it the only reviewer leg seeing anything beyond the prompt file. gather_context assembles PROJECT.md, the roadmap section, every PLAN file, CONTEXT.md, RESEARCH.md and REQUIREMENTS.md into the prompt before any reviewer runs; the gemini leg receives only that prompt and the codex leg runs --ephemeral. Beyond the measured ~4k tokens/spawn, the asymmetry cuts at the workflow's own premise: "independent review" meant something different for the claude leg than for the other two. Guard both dispatch lines with a per-invocation `env CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_CLAUDE_MDS=1`. `env`, never `export` — the flag must not leak into the orchestrating session (which may itself be Claude Code on the SELF_CLI="auto" path) or into any later spawn. review.md is the only claude -p call site in the installed tree, so this is two lines on one surface. The self-skip logic is untouched. * enhance(#2483): fix CRLF-fragile split and regenerate workflow baselines Two CI failures from the first push, both mine: 1. lint-tests: the new regression test split readFileSync content on a literal "\n". On a Windows git-autocrlf checkout that leaves a trailing "\r" on every line (local/no-crlf-fragile-split). Use .split(/\r?\n/). 2. golden-install-parity / workflow-size-budget / workflow-compat: editing gsd-core/workflows/review.md changes its content hash and byte size, and both are pinned in committed baselines. Regenerated via the repo's own generators (npm run size:baseline, npm run gen:golden). The regenerated diffs are review.md-only: exactly one hash line per golden-install-parity fixture and one size entry in workflow-size-baseline — no unrelated drift swept in. Full suite now green locally: 2113 pass, 0 fail, 3 skipped (run with HOME and CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR overridden to throwaway dirs; live profile verified untouched afterward). * enhance(#2483): adapt guard-test matcher to the effort-args dispatch reshape The effortSurface wiring (#2481) reshaped the bare-model dispatch to `claude $CLAUDE_EFFORT_ARGS -p -`; the invocation matcher's dash-first form could no longer see it, and the count assertion failed exactly as designed. The matcher now tolerates variable expansions between `claude` and its first literal flag. Negative-controlled both ways: a stripped guard and a deleted dispatch line each still fail. * enhance(#2483): also guard the claude leg against auto-memory injection CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_CLAUDE_MDS suppresses CLAUDE.md file loading; auto-memory is an independently-toggled mechanism with its own flag. Add CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_AUTO_MEMORY=1 to both dispatch lines, correct the docs/COMMANDS.md and changeset claims that credited the first flag with covering auto-memory, and extend the regression test to require both flags on every claude invocation (negative-controlled: 2/4 assertions fail with the new flag removed). * enhance(#2483): match the claude binary in command position, not argument position The line-oriented invocation matcher counted any line where the token `claude` was followed by a flag. #2589 (landed on next as 920a5f3f) reshaped the effort-args lookup from --host claude 2>/dev/null | jq -r '.effort_argv_string // ""' to --host claude --pick effort_argv_string which put a flag immediately after `claude` and made the config query read as a third claude dispatch, failing the count assertion. The defect class is a binary name in *argument* position being read as a command. Fixed at the class rather than the instance: tokenise the line and skip any `claude` whose preceding token is a flag. That also covers the latent sibling one line away in review.md (`command -v claude`), which escaped today only because its next token is a redirect. Negative-controlled four ways: stripping CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_AUTO_MEMORY=1 fails, stripping the whole env guard fails, adding a genuine third unguarded dispatch (`timeout 900 claude --output-format text -p -`) still fails — so the narrowing did not blind the matcher to reshapes, which is the property the count assertion exists for — and the pre-#2589 jq form of the lookup still passes, so the matcher is not pinned to today's base. * enhance(#2483): carry the claude reviewer's memory guard as declared lane data ADR-2782 Phase 5b replaced the hand-authored per-CLI dispatch legs in review.md with the declared lane table, so the two `env`-prefixed shell lines this PR previously added no longer have a surface to live on. The guard is reimplemented where the lane contract now lives. `SpawnInvoke` gains an optional `env`, the claude lane declares the pair, the resolver folds own string-valued entries into `SpawnPlan.env` (absent or empty resolves to null, so the runner has one shape to test), and the runner passes it to spawn. Production merges it OVER `process.env` into a fresh object for that one child, so nothing reaches the orchestrating session or any other lane in the run. Declared data rather than a handler (D6): the pairs are static per lane, which is precisely what the manifest vocabulary is for. The capability manifest carries the same field, because the lane-fidelity test compares manifest and descriptor over the union of `invoke`'s keys. The regression test is rewritten against the resolver and runner rather than review.md's text. It gains the property the source-text assertions could only approximate: that `process.env` is never mutated. Scope boundary, asserted rather than left in prose: `env` is not part of the trust-disclosure surface, which is safe only while no manifest body reaches the resolver — the registry's reviewer bodies contribute slugs to the parity check and execution resolves from `REVIEWER_LANES`. The new test fails first if that ever changes. * enhance(#2483): restate the guard's mechanism in the docs and changeset Both described the fix as two `env`-prefixed dispatch lines, which is the surface ADR-2782 Phase 5b removed. The user-visible behaviour is unchanged; the carrier is not, and a changeset that ships a description of a mechanism the tree does not have is a CHANGELOG entry nobody can verify against the code. * enhance(#2483): cover the production spawn wiring end to end The unit tests stop at the runner's `deps.spawn` seam — every one injects a spy. Production supplies that seam in `gsd-core/bin/gsd-tools.cjs` as a hand-written object no test constructs, so the chain could be correct all the way to `SpawnPlan.env` and the merge could still be wrong or absent with the suite green. Deleting those four lines was the one mutation that left every other control silent. This runs the real `spawnSync` through `gsd-tools review-lane invoke`, with a `claude` shim on PATH that records the environment it was handed. It asserts both halves in one test: the pair arrives, and an unrelated inherited variable survives — a wiring that REPLACED the environment rather than merging over it would satisfy the first and break every lane's PATH and HOME. POSIX-only; mediating a Windows `.cmd` shim is a separate concern the repo already tests on its own. Noted rather than fixed: `timeout`, `killSignal`, `maxBuffer` and `shell: false` on that same object are equally uncovered. That is the epic's gap, not this change's, and closing it is not in scope here. * enhance(#2483): validate the invoke.env shape and register it as spawn-only `env` was the one spawn-invoke field with no shape enforcement: every sibling in `validateSpawnInvoke` is checked, and a manifest declaring `env` as an array, a string, a number, or an object with non-string values passed validation in silence. That matters more than an ordinary schema gap here, because `resolveLanePlan` DROPS a non-string value rather than coercing it — so an unvalidated manifest declares a pair that never reaches the spawn, which is the failure a memory guard can least afford. Two registrations, not one. `env` was also absent from `SPAWN_ONLY_INVOKE_FIELDS`, which is the list the openai-http arm rejects against — so `invoke.env` was accepted on a transport that issues an HTTP POST and has no child environment at all. It was the only spawn-shaped field accepted there; the other six each produce two errors. Self-found while sweeping the class, not raised in review. Keys are held to the portable POSIX environment-name grammar. That is a policy, not a claim about what an environment can hold: measured, only NUL is actually rejected by `spawnSync`, while `=`, a leading digit, a dash and a space are all carried through to the child (an `A=B` key arrives as the raw entry `A=B=value`). They are refused because a name outside the grammar is not portably addressable by the program meant to read it. `__proto__` is refused for a different and concrete reason. It passes that grammar and is a real own key once a manifest is JSON-parsed, but assigning it onto a plain accumulator goes through the inherited `__proto__` setter rather than creating an own property — and for the string values this field permits the setter is a no-op that does not even change the prototype. The pair would validate and then simply vanish before the spawn. (An environment CAN carry a literal `__proto__` entry; this is about the resolver's accumulator, and the error message says so.) Deliberately narrower than the sibling reserved-name guards in this file, which also reject `constructor`/`prototype`: those guard bracket lookups that resolve prototype members, whereas this reads via `Object.keys` plus an own-value read, where `constructor` assigns as an ordinary key the spawn could carry. `effortChannel` is deliberately left in neither field list: ADR-2782 D2 defines it for both transports, so it is shared rather than spawn-only. Reversion-controlled, three mutations, all three fire a named test: dropping `env` from the discriminator fails `httpTransportRejectsEnv`; removing the `__proto__` arm fails `envRejectsProtoKeyThatWouldSilentlyVanish`; disabling the block fails four. (#2483) * enhance(#2483): amend ADR-2782 D2 for the invoke.env vocabulary widening D2 records the spawn `invoke` shape as a closed vocabulary, and its Amendments section carries a dated entry for every prior widening (Phase 1 #2794, Phase 2 corrections #2795, Phase 5b #2799). This change extended that vocabulary in code without touching the ADR governing it, so the ADR contradicted the implementation — and the repo's own convention, recorded in CONTEXT.md, is that the ADR is amended in the same PR precisely because the prior widenings did it correctly. Adds the `invoke.env` row to the D2 table and a dated Amendments entry. The entry also corrects the authority this change cited. The source comment pointed at D6, which governs the closed `handler` enum — imperative behavior admitted first-party — and says nothing about the `invoke` field vocabulary. That is D2's territory, so the citation never covered the gap. Two claims are corrected rather than restated, both about the trust boundary that justifies leaving `env` out of the D5 disclosure signature: - The regression test does not enforce that boundary. On one forged lane it shows the resolver folds whatever it is handed, so a future path feeding it manifest lanes would not make any assertion in that test fail. Its comment claimed it "will fail first"; that was wrong, and both the comment and the ADR now say the boundary is a property of the production call chain instead. - The ADR is internally inconsistent on whether third-party manifest lanes execute at all: Consequences says adding a reviewer needs "no core patch", while `gsd-tools.cjs` rejects every slug absent from the first-party REVIEWER_LANES map. CONTEXT.md, `workflows/review.md` and the resolver's own header take the first view. #2483 did not create that inconsistency and does not resolve it; the entry records it rather than settling it in its own favour. (#2483) * enhance(#2483): document invoke.env in the capability-manifest reference ADR-2782 points capability and plugin authors at `docs/reference/capability-manifest.md` as where the lane vocabulary must be visible, and its `invoke` row enumerates the spawn sub-shape field by field. `env` was absent from that table while being part of the real shape, so the one document a third-party capability author would actually consult to learn the field exists did not mention it. Squarely Diataxis reference material — a field-by-field schema description — so it goes here rather than in the user-facing prose, which was already updated. States the constraints a manifest author can actually trip, and is explicit that the name grammar is a portability policy rather than an OS limit, so a reader does not take it for a claim about what an environment can hold. (#2483) * enhance(#2483): disclose and sign the reviewer lane's env and residual invoke fields `invoke.env` was undisclosed at install time. That was defensible while manifest lanes could not execute — the premise this PR's own ADR amendment recorded — and #2927/#3062 retired it: `routeReviewLane` now merges installed overlay `reviewer` bodies into its lane map via `mergeReviewerLanes`, which is a field-identical merge by ADR-2782 D1 and deliberately does not deep-validate. An overlay's whole `invoke` therefore reaches `resolveLanePlan`, and `env` reaches the spawned child. A consented third-party capability could set `NODE_OPTIONS=--require ./evil.js` on a reviewer lane with no install-time disclosure and no re-consent. The same file already decided what `env` means in a manifest: MCP servers fold it into the disclosure signature and render each key and value in the consent prompt, with an inline rationale naming this exact shape. Reviewer lanes get the identical treatment. `env` was the ninth unsigned invoke field, not the first. `defaultHost` (the manifest's OWN fallback egress host, used whenever the config key resolves to nothing), `path`, `outputChannel`/`outputArg`, `modelArg`, `effortChannel` and `modelDiscovery` all reach `resolveLanePlan` and none was bound. Enumerating a ninth name leaves the tenth open, so the lane signature carries a RESIDUAL of every other declared `invoke` key — the completeness backstop `rawConfig` already gives the MCP line (#1459 finding 5), and the "sign the whole object" remedy the recorded decision on this class prefers. `defaultHost` is also rendered: `resolvedHost` comes from user config, so a lane whose key is unset displayed "(unresolved …)" — which reads as "no destination" — while the runtime egresses the plan and review text to the address the manifest picked. D4.5 is preserved one level down: the extra element is appended ONLY when the lane declares something beyond the eight already-bound fields, so an env-free lane's signature stays byte-identical and no already-consented capability is re-prompted for a field it does not use. A lane that does declare one re-consents, which is the point. Execution-primitive env names are FLAGGED in the prompt, not refused in the validator. A denylist cannot be the boundary here: `PATH` alone is a complete execution primitive for a spawn lane and can never be refused, the child is an arbitrary third-party binary so the true set spans every interpreter's injection vars, and the MCP `env` this mirrors refuses nothing and discloses everything. Missing a name costs a quieter line, never a boundary. Refs #2483. * enhance(#2483): exercise the real overlay merge path in the guard test The test named for the manifest/first-party boundary did not test it. It built a forged lane locally, handed it straight to `resolveLanePlan`, and asserted that `REVIEWER_LANES` did not contain it — so no assertion in it depended on the claim its name made, and a code path that fed manifest lanes to the resolver would not have made it fail. Its own comment said as much, and named the production chain as the real carrier of the guarantee: "gsd-tools.cjs builds its lane map solely from REVIEWER_LANES". That sentence is now false. #3062 merged overlay reviewer bodies into that map, so the test's premise and its subject both moved. The replacement routes through `mergeReviewerLanes` — the real helper the production path calls — and asserts the overlay lane is admitted, resolves, and carries its `env` into `SpawnPlan.env`. That makes the security property falsifiable instead of narrated. It then asserts what now backs it: the env is disclosed on the surface, rendered key and value in the consent prompt, flagged when the name is an execution primitive, and bound to the signature so a value change, an addition, or a removal each force re-consent. Three further cases, because the finding's generative half is what stops it recurring: the residual backstop is asserted against five fields including one that does not exist (`aFieldThatDoesNotExistYet`), so a future vocabulary widening cannot silently re-open this; a fully-enumerated lane is pinned to its original 8-tuple, which is what keeps the fix from re-prompting every consented capability; and an http lane's manifest-declared `defaultHost` is asserted to reach both the prompt and the signature. Reversion-controlled, seven mutations, all seven fail a named test: env dropped from the surface, the prompt's env line removed, the execution-primitive warning removed, the signature's extra element never appended, the residual emptied, the defaultHost line removed, and the declares-something test un-widened. The last of those was SILENT on its first run and its test was written in response, then the control re-run. Refs #2483. * enhance(#2483): correct the ADR amendment's manifest-lane premise The amendment argued `env` needed no D5 disclosure because a manifest's `invoke` fields never reach `resolveLanePlan`. That was true when written and #3062 retired it 22 hours after this branch's last commit: `routeReviewLane` now builds its lane map from `mergeReviewerLanes(REVIEWER_LANES, loadRegistry({includeInstalled: true}))`, and D1's no-translation-layer rule makes that a field-identical merge, so an overlay's whole `invoke` reaches the resolver and executes. The entry had named this exact trigger — "were manifest lanes ever made executable, `env` must join the disclosed surface in that change, and nothing here will trip if it does not." Nothing tripped. The premise is rewritten to current truth rather than annotated, because an ADR is read in fragments and a superseded paragraph left standing reads as live reasoning to the next author; a one-line dated tombstone points at git for the withdrawn text. The rewritten entry records four things the first draft could not: that the enumeration itself was the defect (`env` was the ninth unbound `invoke` field, and `defaultHost` and `path` are egress-relevant on their own), that the residual is what closes the class, that D4.5's byte-identical-signature property is preserved by appending the residual only when a lane declares something beyond the eight bound fields, and that consent — not shape validation — is the boundary, since no honest env denylist can exclude `PATH`. It also closes the internal inconsistency the previous entry could only record. This ADR, `CONTEXT.md`, `gsd-core/workflows/review.md` and `resolveLanePlan`'s own header all said overlay lanes reach the resolver while the runtime said otherwise; #3062 resolved that in the documents' favour, which is what makes the disclosure mandatory rather than defensive. Refs #2483. * enhance(#2483): record in the manifest reference that invoke fields are consent-bound `docs/reference/capability-manifest.md` is the field table ADR-2782 points capability authors at, and it described `invoke` purely as a schema. A third-party author reading it could not learn that everything they declare there is shown to the user at install and bound to the consent signature — which is exactly what they need to know now that an overlay reviewer lane executes (#2927/#3062). States the two things the schema alone cannot: that `env` and `defaultHost` are named in the consent prompt and the rest is covered by a residual, so any change to a declared `invoke` field forces re-consent; and that `env`'s validation is a portability policy rather than a safety boundary, since `PATH` is a complete execution primitive and cannot be refused. Names that are execution primitives are highlighted in the prompt instead. Refs #2483. * enhance(#2483): add a Security changeset for the reviewer-lane disclosure The existing fragment describes the enhancement this PR was opened for and stays as it is. The disclosure fix is a separate user-visible change of a different type: a capability declaring `invoke.env` or `invoke.defaultHost` will ask for consent once more, and users are entitled to read why in the changelog rather than discover it as an unexplained prompt. Type is `Security` rather than `Changed` because the entry describes a closed code-execution disclosure gap, not a behaviour adjustment. Refs #2483. * enhance(#2483): correct this round's own claim about who gets re-prompted Self-found while auditing the round's claims before publishing them. The changeset and the ADR entry both stated that a capability declaring `invoke.env` or `defaultHost` "will ask for consent once more". That is wrong, and it overstated the cost of the fix in the one direction a maintainer would have had to take on trust. A code change to `disclosureSignature` re-prompts nobody. `hasProjectConsent` matches on the recomputed bundle `contentHash` — the signature has not been the security binding since #1459 CB-1/CB-2 — and the upgrade path's `executableSetChanged(old, new)` compares two disclosures both computed by the CURRENT code, so widening the signature moves both sides of that comparison equally. First-party capabilities never reach the path at all: the install flow blocks a first-party id before trust evaluation. What the widening actually buys is forward-looking, and is the real argument for it: an upgrade whose manifest edits a declared `invoke` field now registers as an executable-surface change and re-consents, where before it could change what the lane runs in silence. Also measured and recorded, because the D4.5 property was stated more strongly than it deserved: of the twelve first-party reviewer capabilities, ZERO are in the byte-identical-signature class — every real lane declares at least `effortChannel`. The property is a guarantee about minimal lanes, not a description of the fleet, and the ADR now says so. Refs #2483. * enhance(#2483): sign and disclose the probe binary and the lane's outer fields Found by this round's own adversarial review, and it is the same defect one level out: the `invoke` residual cannot reach the lane body's OUTER fields, and `probeLane` SPAWNS `probe.binary` with `--help` before dispatch (`review-lane-runner.cts`, the `command-exists`/`command-capability` arms). An overlay naming an arbitrary probe binary therefore executes it — unsigned and undisclosed, exactly as `invoke.env` was, and reachable on the same #3062 path. The lane element now carries a second residual over the outer fields, and the probe binary is shown in the consent prompt when it differs from the dispatch binary — it is a program that runs, and the user is entitled to see it. TWO fields stay excluded, and that is a decision rather than an omission: `reviewsSection` and `timeoutFloorMs` are ADR-2782's cosmetic carve-outs (matrix A10/A13), where re-consenting would present a prompt carrying no security information. A test pins that they remain excluded, so a later widening cannot quietly reverse D4.5 while claiming to complete this fix. Also corrects a miscount introduced by the previous commit: the source comment said the enumeration had fallen behind by "seven fields" and omitted `fallbackModel`, while asserting `env` was the ninth. `resolveLanePlan` reads twelve `inv.*` fields and four were bound, so the number is eight. The comment now states the derivation rather than just the total. Reversion-controlled: emptying the outer residual fails "repointing the probe binary must force re-consent"; removing the render line fails its own named assertion. Refs #2483. * enhance(#2483): refuse execution-primitive env names as defence in depth Adopts the review's B5 after this round's own adversarial pass refuted my reason for declining it. I had argued a denylist was worthless because `PATH` can never be refused. That was wrong on the facts: no shipped reviewer manifest declares `PATH`, so it can be refused, and it is the most complete primitive in the set — repoint it at a directory holding a fake binary and the declared `invoke.binary` is irrelevant. A list that cannot be exhaustive can still close the highest-confidence, lowest-legitimacy routes. So the validator now rejects `PATH`, `NODE_OPTIONS`, `LD_PRELOAD`, `DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES`, `BASH_ENV`, `PYTHONPATH`, `PERL5OPT`, `RUBYOPT`, `GIT_SSH_COMMAND`, `JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS` and their siblings on a reviewer lane. A lane needing a specific executable declares an absolute `invoke.binary` instead of reshaping the child's environment. The comment states plainly that this is defence in depth and NOT the boundary — the boundary is install-time consent, which discloses every declared pair and binds it to the signature, so an unlisted name is still SEEN before it runs. That framing is load-bearing: a future reader who mistakes the denylist for the control will under-invest in the one that is, which is the failure mode I was trying to avoid by declining it outright. Two tests: the rejection itself across ten names, and a guard asserting no shipped reviewer capability declares a denied key — so if the list ever outgrows its evidence, that surfaces as a decision rather than a silent removal. Refs #2483. * enhance(#2483): fix two stale D5 enumerations elsewhere in the ADR The previous commit rewrote the amendment's premise but swept only the amendment. Two normative passages earlier in the same ADR still enumerated the old closed field list and now contradicted it: the `executableSetChanged` trigger list, and the split-binding note asserting the seven manifest-derived fields were "everything that is SHA-pinned". That is the failure the rewrite-don't-annotate rule exists to prevent, one section over — an ADR is read in fragments, and a fragment carries no supersession marker, so a reader landing on either passage would have taken the superseded enumeration as current. Both now name the residual as the mechanism rather than restating a list, which is also what stops them going stale the next time the vocabulary widens. Found by this round's adversarial review, which grepped the whole document rather than the section under edit. Refs #2483. * enhance(#2483): stop the probe disclosure claiming a spawn that does not happen The probe line added one commit ago rendered "probes by running: <binary> --help" for every lane. That is false for `kind: "command-exists"`, which only calls `hasBinary` — a PATH/filesystem scan that starts no process. Only `command-capability` spawns. A false statement in a consent prompt is worse than a missing one: the prompt is the surface a user is asked to trust, and this one overstated what a lane does. Worse, the test I wrote to prove the fix used `command-exists` — the kind that does NOT spawn — so it pinned the wrong claim and would have kept the error green forever. The surface now carries `probeKind` and the two kinds render differently: a spawn is described as a spawn, a presence check as a presence check. The test exercises both, and asserts the `command-exists` path never emits the spawn wording. Also corrects the field-count parenthetical to state its derivation unambiguously — `resolveLanePlan` reads thirteen `inv.*` fields including `env` (twelve before this PR), four were bound, so eight were unbound before `env` and nine including it. The bare "twelve" was true only of the pre-PR tree and read as a claim about the current one. And retires two comments that argued AGAINST the validator denylist this round then shipped. Leaving them would have handed the next reader the reasoning for removing it. Reversion-controlled: conflating the two probe kinds fails a named test. Refs #2483. * enhance(#2483): match the reviewer-lane env denylist case-insensitively The denylist added one commit ago compared exact case, so `Path`, `path`, `node_options` and `Node_Options` all passed it. Windows environment lookup is case-insensitive, so those reach the child as `PATH` and `NODE_OPTIONS` — the exact inputs the list names. An exactly-cased denylist is worse than none: it reads as a control while admitting the input it was written to refuse, and the next reader has no reason to doubt it. Members are stored uppercase and the key is folded before lookup; the name grammar already constrains keys to ASCII, so a plain fold is sufficient. Reversion-controlled: restoring the exact-case compare fails `envDenylistIsCaseInsensitive` on `Path`. Refs #2483. * enhance(#2483): correct the docs that still described the denylist as absent Both the ADR and the manifest reference still said `env` carries no denylist and that `PATH` "can never be refused" — written when that was this round's position, and left standing after the round reversed it. A reader landing on either passage would have taken the superseded argument as current, which is precisely the failure the rewrite-don't- annotate rule exists to prevent. Both now describe the denylist, name `PATH`'s inclusion and the case-insensitive match, and keep the limit explicit: the list cannot be complete against an arbitrary child and disclosure runs before validation, so consent remains the boundary. The ADR's byte-identical-signature claim is also corrected rather than softened. With the outer residual in place, a lane producing no residual is one the validator rejects — it declares no `flags`, `probe`, `emptyOutput`, `evidenceClass`, `requiresBinaries` or `promptBudgetKey`. So the property is about the ENCODING, not a claim that any real signature is unchanged, and it is not the argument for the change being safe. That argument is that consent binds to the bundle contentHash and no existing consent is invalidated at all. Refs #2483. * test(#2483): cover the three new lane disclosure fields in the injection-safety parity guard The PARITY test in section N exists to catch a renderer field that skips `renderValueForPrompt` (#3248). Its payload manifest is hand-maintained, so it covers the fields that existed when it was written — slug, binary, args, hostConfigKey, handler — and none of the fields this PR adds. This PR renders three further manifest-supplied values into consent-prompt lines: `invoke.env` (keys and values), `invoke.defaultHost` and `probe.binary`. The gap was silent rather than theoretical: with the lane env line reverted to the pre-#3248 raw form, the whole 948-test lane/capability/trust-disclosure suite stayed green. Two manifests, because the shapes render disjoint lines — `defaultHost` only on the openai-http branch, `env`/`probe` only where declared, and the probe line only when the probe binary differs from the dispatch binary. Non-vacuity is asserted on the typed disclosure object and on structural line counts, not by substring-matching rendered prose: CONTRIBUTING.md forbids raw text matching on test output, and this section's own header promises structural assertions only, so a prose match here would have made that promise false. Negative-controlled three ways against the merged tree, each producing exactly one named failure: env rendered raw, defaultHost rendered raw, probe binary rendered raw. * docs(#2483): extend the #3248 render-site comment to the fields this PR adds The comment enumerates every manifest-supplied value that must pass through `renderValueForPrompt`, and it stopped at `handler` — the reviewer-lane fields that existed when #3248 landed. This PR renders three more (`defaultHost`, the probe binary, and the env keys and values), so the list understated its own contract in the one place a future author would check before adding a fourth. A comment enumerating a closed set is a set that can silently fall behind the code it describes; the parity test added alongside is what makes the omission fail loudly rather than read as deliberate. --------- Co-authored-by: Tom Boucher <trekkie@nomorestars.com>	2026-08-11 17:42:41 -04:00
Tom Boucher	653f95e39f	chore(#2801): remove the hostBehaviors.reviewerCli deprecated alias (#3272) ... * test(#2801): failing-first suite for the hostBehaviors.reviewerCli alias removal Inverts the Phase 5a rows that assert the derived legacy alias still contributes a reviewer slug, and adds the removal-warning coverage the alias's exit needs (ADR-2782 D9). RED against unmodified production code, by design: the six shipped manifests still declare the key and collectReviewerWarnings emits nothing for hostBehaviors. Refs #2801 * chore(#2801): remove the hostBehaviors.reviewerCli deprecated alias ADR-2782 D9, Phase 7 — the final phase of epic #2782. The derived legacy alias survived one release (Phase 5a shipped in 1.9.0; 1.9.1 and 1.10.0 have since gone out), so it goes. A declared reviewer body is now the only route onto the reviewer roster. - deriveReviewerSlugs no longer reads runtime.hostBehaviors.reviewerCli - the key is stripped from the six manifests that carried it; each already declares a reviewer body whose slug equals its capability id, so the derived roster is unchanged at the same twelve slugs - collectReviewerWarnings emits a presence-based, non-fatal removal notice for any manifest still declaring the key, reaching both the build-time registry generation and the third-party overlay load path. The check runs before the reviewer-body early-return, because the manifest it exists for is the alias-only one that has no body. - hostBehaviors stays an open, unvalidated bag for its other 59 keys; this adds one keyed removal notice, not general validation Refs #2801 * refactor(#2801): give the reviewer-warning channel a typed IR Review finding: the new tests asserted with String#includes() on the warning prose, which CONTRIBUTING.md's 'Prohibited: Raw Text Matching on Test Outputs' bans in favor of a typed intermediate representation. Adds the IR beside the renderer rather than replacing it, which is the shape that section prescribes and bin/verify-reapply-patches.cjs already models: - REVIEWER_WARNING, a frozen code enum - REMOVED_REVIEWER_CLI_FIELD, so the emitting site and its test share one symbol instead of duplicating a literal - collectReviewerWarningRecords(cap), returning typed records collectReviewerWarnings(cap) keeps its exact string[] contract as a thin map over the records, so both production consumers are untouched. Every section-K row now asserts on record.code/field/capId and none on the rendered message. Locks the code surface, asserts the renderer stays one-to-one with the records, and migrates the pre-existing Phase 2 test on the same channel off prose matching. Refs #2801 * test(#2801): invert the section F alias fall-through regression row Caught by the remote runner: 2 unique failures on both Node lanes out of 31,692. tests/reviewer-lane-declarations.test.cjs section F — Phase 5a's isolated-security-review regressions — asserted that a blank reviewer.slug falls through to the hostBehaviors.reviewerCli alias rather than dropping the lane. That is the direct inverse of this phase's contract. The original rationale held only while the alias existed. With it gone there is nothing to fall through to: a blank body is not a declaration, and a declaration is the only route onto the roster. Inverted rather than deleted — the row carries the adversarial-review provenance for the slug trim, and removing a security regression guard to make a change pass is backwards. The duplicate row added earlier in section C is dropped instead; section F is its canonical home. Also corrects two count strings Phase 5b left at eleven while asserting twelve, which would misreport on failure. Refs #2801 * docs(#2801): give the removed reviewerCli flag a migration path The Reference edit alone satisfied CI — a file under docs/ moved, so lint-docs-required.cjs was green — while the task-oriented quadrant said nothing about the removal. A maintainer whose lane had just gone silent would have found the field documented as removed and no page telling them what to do about it. Adds a migration section to the how-to: the symptom, the verbatim warning they will see, the before/after manifest, and the note to keep the reviewer slug equal to the capability id so existing review.default_reviewers entries and --<slug> flags survive. Refs #2801 * chore(#2801): backfill changeset pr number to 3272 * feat(#2801): close the runtime.hostBehaviors vocabulary ADR-1016 closes twelve descriptor axes and rejects an open escape hatch in the descriptor. It never mentioned runtime.hostBehaviors, and that silence was read as permission: 59 keys across 18 manifests, 39 of them set by a single capability, validated by nothing. The reference docs went further and attributed the open seam to ADR-1016, which does not mention the field at all. KNOWN_HOST_BEHAVIORS enumerates the vocabulary. An undeclared key yields a non-fatal UNKNOWN_HOST_BEHAVIOR record on the same D4.3 channel as the alias removal notice, reaching both build-time generation and overlay install. Warning, never error, for the reason this phase exists: an error would hard-break an out-of-tree descriptor carrying a bespoke key with no deprecation window, which is what reviewerCli was given a release to avoid. Escalation is a separate decision. reviewerCli is excluded from the unknown-key sweep so it keeps its own notice with the migration pointer rather than drawing two records. A parity test binds the vocabulary to the shipped manifests in both directions, and a second asserts no shipped capability draws a notice, so the closure is provably inert in-tree. Records the decision and the miscitation as an ADR-1016 amendment. Refs #2801 * fix(#2801): bound and sanitize the unknown-key diagnostics Two findings from an isolated adversarial review of the closure commit, both proven by execution rather than asserted. MAJOR, introduced by the closure: the new Object.keys(hostBehaviors) sweep had no ceiling. An installed third-party manifest is bounded only by MANIFEST_MAX_BYTES, and an 8.69MB manifest with 800,000 keys produced 800,000 records and ~139MB of message text, retained for the registry's lifetime in OverlayMeta.diagnostics. Now capped at ten records plus a summary carrying omittedCount, mirroring capability-loader's existing slice(0,3) idiom. The same manifest now yields 11 records and 1748 chars. MINOR, newly reachable: manifest-supplied key names were interpolated raw. Unlike cap.id, which validateCapability gates on KEBAB_RE before these diagnostics run, hostBehaviors keys have no grammar check anywhere, so ANSI escapes and CRLF reached stderr and OverlayMeta.warnings intact. New describeKey replaces C0/C1 controls and clips at 80 chars. The file already had describeValue for this and applied it only to values. Both fixes land on the pre-existing reviewer.* sweep too — it carried the identical pair, and fixing only the new copy would leave the same defect one screen from its own fix. Refs #2801 --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>	2026-08-09 19:18:56 -04:00
Tom Boucher	f96cb44f85	enhance(#3248): disclose capability skills as an instruction surface (#3253) ... * test(#3248): failing-first suite for instruction-surface disclosure 28 matrix rows from 50-test-matrix.md. Rows requiring the new Disclosure.instructionSurfaces field fail today; rows 18-20/23-25 (the ADR-2363 D4 signature invariants) pass today by construction because the current code never reads skills/agents at all, and stand as regression guards for the implementation commit. Refs #3248 * feat(#3248): disclose capability skills and agents as an instruction surface ADR-2363 D5. A capability whose only contribution was skills disclosed nothing at install: summarizeDisclosure early-returned "ships no executable surfaces (declarative only)" because hasExecutable was false, while each SKILL.md body landed verbatim in the agent's instruction context. discloseExecutableSurfaces gains a fifth, NON-executable class, instructionSurfaces, collecting declared skills/agents stems through the same safeCollect wrapper as the four existing collectors, so a hostile value degrades only this class and the function stays total for any manifest shape. Nothing existing is edited: the collectors, hasExecutable, disclosureSignature and missingArtifacts are untouched. get_impact rates the symbol CRITICAL at 196 affected, which is why the design is strictly additive. D4 is implemented by omission and pinned rather than left incidental: adding, changing or removing skills/agents leaves disclosureSignature byte-identical, so no stored consent record is perturbed and no spurious re-consent fires. ADR-2782's conditional-append trick is deliberately NOT reused - it worked because no manifest could declare a reviewer body before that class existed, whereas skills predate this one, so a conditional append would re-sign every already-consented skill-bearing capability. The renderer is extracted as summarizeInstructionSurfaces and called from BOTH branches of summarizeDisclosure. Appending only at the end would never render for skill-only capabilities - the ones that need it - since those take the early return. That branch's "declarative only" claim is now conditional on there being no instruction surface either. The renderer iterates rather than spreading into push, so an unbounded stem count cannot throw RangeError, and tolerates the bare {} the CLI edge passes via `res.disclosure || {}`. Scope note: #3248's prose says "skill stems"; ADR-2363 D3 classifies instruction surfaces as "skills, agents". Shipping skills alone would leave an ADR deliverable owned by no phase, and the epic has no Phase 2. Agents are the same shape at no extra cost. Narrowing back is a two-line change. Ratifies ADR-2363 (Proposed -> Accepted) and adds the owed ADR-1244 back-link. Closes #3248 * fix(#3248): escape consent-prompt values and narrow disclosure to skills Two review findings, both of which made the previous commit wrong. BLOCKER (isolated adversarial review). Every manifest-supplied value interpolated into a consent-prompt line was rendered unescaped. Those lines are joined with \n and written RAW to stderr on the needs-consent path (capability-command-router -> cli-exit runMain), so a stem carrying a newline forged additional lines indistinguishable from genuine GSD disclosure text, and an ANSI escape could clear or rewrite lines already printed. That defeats the informed-consent guarantee this change exists to provide, and is a prompt-injection vector against any agent that reads the stderr text to decide whether to retry with --yes. The hole was not unique to the new class - hook event/script, command family/module/router, every MCP field, and every reviewer-lane field were equally unescaped. Fixing only the new one would have created the generative-fix divergence this repo tracks, so renderValueForPrompt is applied to all five classes through one helper, guarded by a parity test that fails if a future class skips it. Escaping is identity for ordinary names, so no well-formed manifest's output changes. The disclosure OBJECT stays verbatim - only the rendered LINE is escaped - because the signature and every consumer reasoning about identity depend on the declared value. NARROWED to skills only. The previous commit also collected agents, arguing ADR-2363 D3 classifies instruction surfaces as "skills, agents". Verified against staging: stageSkillsForRuntimeAsSkills takes a registry and unions third-party skills in via readInstalledCapabilitySkill, while stageAgentsForRuntimeWithConverter takes only a source directory and has no registry-aware path. Third-party agents are never staged into the instruction context, so disclosing them would have put a false claim in a security prompt - worse than the scope creep two reviewers flagged it as. D3's classification stands; D5 now records that Phase 1 implements the skills half and that whether agents should be staged at all is an open maintainer question. Also reverts the premature ADR-2363 ratification. The previous commit flipped it to Accepted and asserted "#3248 merged" while this branch IS #3248 and is unmerged. Status returns to Proposed, and the ADR-1244 back-link - owed only on ratification - is withdrawn. Adds the fast-check property suite CLAUDE.md requires and the direct precedent (reviewer-trust-disclosure) already had: totality, D4 signature invariance, D3 hasExecutable invariance, and renderer totality over adversarial manifests. Refs #3248 * chore(#3248): correct changeset scope claim and backfill pr number The fragment was written against the pre-narrowing commit and still advertised 'skills and agents'. 4d26887e narrowed disclosure to skills only - third-party agents are never staged into the instruction context - but did not touch the fragment, so the release notes would have carried a claim the code does not implement. Also backfills pr:0 -> 3253 and names the prompt-escaping fix, which is user-visible and was absent from the original body. Changeset-only; no code or test changed, so the gsd-test pass recorded for 4d26887e still describes this tree's behavior. Refs #3248 --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>	2026-08-09 13:52:29 -04:00
Tom Boucher	ffd5370464	fix(#2903): use the command form that actually works in reader-facing docs (#3047) ... * fix(#2903): use the command form that actually works in reader-facing docs Docs told readers to type the colon form, which no runtime registers -- 18 of 19 runtimes use slash-hyphen and the 19th uses shell-var -- so anyone copying an example got an unrecognized command. Swept 178 occurrences across 53 files, locale mirrors included so they do not re-diverge from English. The colon form is a source-authoring token, not a user-facing one: install-time converters key on it to produce the hyphen form runtimes actually register. So the sweep is scoped, and three things are deliberately left alone: - ADRs, which are a historical record; editing their prose falsifies what was written at the time. - The legacy release-notes archive, pending a maintainer decision on whether it follows the same historical carve-out. Excluding it keeps a later reversal additive rather than a revert. - Source artifacts under commands, workflows and agents, where the colon form is load-bearing. Rewriting those would break the installed-skill guarantee across every runtime -- the single largest hazard here. The plugin namespace form is a real, separate token and survives untouched. Adds a lint enforcing exactly that boundary, since the correct form genuinely differs by directory and nothing previously caught the drift. Also fixes a hardcoded colon form in the capability-matrix generator. The sweep alone would have left the generated matrix disagreeing with the template that produces it, so the fix is at the source and the output regenerated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2903): stop the sweep misquoting source frontmatter Adversarial review caught three lines where the sweep rewrote a citation of the literal YAML name: key from a source command file. That key genuinely is the colon form -- this change's own carve-out logic says source-authoring tokens keep it -- so the docs ended up misquoting the real files. One of the three is an acceptance-checklist assertion, which the sweep turned into a false statement. Restored the three citations to match their sources verbatim, surgically: where a line carried both a name: citation and a real reader-facing slash command, only the citation reverted and the command stayed corrected. The guard needed the same distinction, or it would have flagged the restoration and reddened the build: a gsd:<cmd> token preceded by name: is a citation of a source token and is now permitted. The exemption is deliberately narrow -- a bare gsd:<cmd> anywhere else still fails -- with a test pinning that narrowness. Also makes the detection case-insensitive. Review found /GSD:next slipped through silently; no such casing exists in the tree today, so this closes a latent gap rather than fixing a live one. Swept the whole tree for further corrupted citations: none beyond the three. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2903): retire the stale-next invariant and sweep next like every other command Maintainer decision on a genuine conflict between two contracts. Invariant #3054 banned the literal /gsd-next from user-facing docs because it named a retired workflow-advance command. But commands/gsd/next.md is a live command -- the state-aware smart-entry launcher -- and this issue requires docs to use the hyphen form every runtime actually registers. Both could not hold for this one command, so docs had been sidestepping the ban by keeping the colon form, which is exactly the defect this issue exists to remove. FEATURES.md already recorded the reassignment: the hyphen form "is not the retired workflow-advance command; it is reserved for the state-aware smart-entry launcher. Workflow advancement remains under /gsd-progress --next." With that reassignment the invariant's premise is obsolete and the guard now contradicts the documented command form, so it is retired with a comment recording why rather than deleted silently. next is now swept like every other command, and the earlier exemption added to the new guard is removed so nothing is special-cased. Four citations of the literal name: frontmatter key stay in colon form, because the source file really does carry name: gsd:next and a doc quoting it must reproduce it verbatim. Two of those lines were reworded to say which side is the frontmatter key and which is the slash command, since they previously conflated the two. Verified the retired scan would now genuinely fail against this tree -- the conflict was real and resolved, not dodged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#2903): backfill changeset pr number Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-04 13:23:44 -04:00
Tom Boucher	557d46984e	docs(#2782): how-to for declaring a reviewer lane in a capability (#2906) ... * docs(#2782): how-to for declaring a reviewer lane in a capability ADR-2782 shipped the Reviewer Lane capability surface in 1.9.0, but the only documentation was reference (capability-manifest.md) and rationale (ADR-2782). A capability author had no task-oriented path from "I have a review CLI" to "/gsd:review invokes it". Adds docs/how-to/ship-a-reviewer-lane.md: role selection, the spawn and openai-http worked examples, federated config ownership, the review-lane query surface as the verification step, what the install disclosure and egress-host re-verification mean for the author, and the data-only boundary with the two named CLIs that do not fit today. Also corrects the manifest reference's `invoke` row, which understated three enums against the shipped validator: promptChannel omitted `argv`, effortChannel omitted `env`, and the openai-http sub-shape plus the required-with-file-arg `outputArg` were undocumented entirely. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#2782): correct four claims found by the two orthogonal reviews Security review (1 major, 2 minor): - "a reserved slug" implied the gsd-/anthropic- namespace rule, which guards the capability id, not reviewer.slug. The slug guard is isReservedName (__proto__/constructor/prototype), a prototype-pollution barrier. Both rules are now stated and kept apart. - Added ADR-2782 D5's own caveat verbatim: disclosure and host pinning make the channel visible, pinned and revocable, not safe, and consent-at-install is a weaker gate for a standing egress channel than for a hook. - Named integrity/SHA pinning and engines.gsd as the controls that make the disclosure tamper-evident and the version range enforceable. Correctness review (1 major, 1 minor): - Claimed a name collision is "a hard failure at install". It is not. installCapability never runs validateCrossCapability; the check runs in loadRegistry, and a colliding overlay is dropped from acceptedMap with a warning while the install reports success. Documented as the quiet failure mode it is, with the symptom to look for. - The feature-only field list omitted hooks and activationKey, both of which FEATURE_FIELDS_FORBIDDEN_ON_REVIEWER rejects. Both worked examples re-validated against validateCapability() -> []. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#2782): restore Kimi Code to the cross-AI reviewer list set-up-cross-ai-review.md named eleven reviewers; twelve lanes ship. The kimi-code lane (added by #2718, declared as manifest data by #2798) was never added here — the same roster-drift class as #2781, which #2800's parity gate covers for COMMANDS.md and FEATURES.md but not for how-to prose. Also points readers at the declared-lane model rather than a static list: the roster is now generated, a capability can ship its own lane, and `gsd-tools review-lane sections` answers "what do I actually have". Verified against the twelve declared bodies in capabilities/*/capability.json. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#2782): use the invocation form the runtime descriptors actually declare The new guide used /gsd:review. Nothing in this repo produces that form. - capability-validator VALID_COMMAND_STYLES is {slash-hyphen, shell-var}; there is no colon/namespaced style in the vocabulary at all. - 18 of 19 runtime capabilities declare commandStyle "slash-hyphen", claude included; codex is "shell-var". Every artifactLayout prefix is "gsd-". - A plain-file command install never namespaces, so .claude/commands/ gsd-review.md is typed /gsd-review. - The Claude Code plugin surface would namespace on plugin.json "name", which is "gsd-core" -- so the plugin form would be /gsd-core:review. The commands/gsd/ subdirectory is cosmetic and contributes nothing to the invoked name. So /gsd:review is neither the installed form nor the plugin form. Uses /gsd-review, matching set-up-cross-ai-review.md and the 18 descriptors. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#2782): state that lane listing is not wired yet The guide could describe authoring, validating, and installing a lane but implied a publishing path that does not exist. Neither discoverability catalog can accept one: a Community Capability Registry entry requires a non-empty loopExtensionPoints plus hookKinds, and a role:"reviewer" capability is forbidden from declaring steps/contributions/gates, so both fields are unsatisfiable rather than merely unset. The EoS Registry is ADR-1239 host integrations, which a lane is not. The registry schema predates the reviewer role by 17 days (#2182 Jul 11, ADR-2782 Jul 28) and registry-schema.cjs has zero occurrences of "reviewer". Tracked for a 1.9.x point release by #2904. Says so explicitly, and tells authors NOT to file a loop extension point they do not use to get past validation -- a schema satisfiable only by lying is one that will be lied to. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#2782): backfill PR number and fix the changeset invocation form pr: 0 -> 2906. Also corrects /gsd:review -> /gsd-review in the fragment body. The fragment renders into CHANGELOG.md, which is a reader-facing docs surface and is never passed through the install-time converter -- so the colon form would ship the #2903 drift into a permanent release artifact. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#2907): propagate the invocation-form fix and restore lane order Two findings from an isolated review of the post-review delta. - docs/README.md and develop-a-capability.md still said /gsd:review in the cross-links added for the new guide. The form was corrected in the guide itself but not in the two entries pointing at it, leaving three docs making the same claim in two different forms. - set-up-cross-ai-review.md inserted Kimi Code between Antigravity and Ollama. REVIEWER_LANES is ordered by write_reviews order and kimi-code is 12th, appended after llama_cpp; the prose list mirrored declaration order before this change and now does again. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Test <test@example.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-31 07:25:01 -04:00
Tom Boucher	7372d99a26	enhance(#2800): derive reviewer flag lists and gate reviewer lane docs across locales (#2882) ... * chore(#2800): derive reviewer flag lists and gate reviewer lane docs across locales The reviewer lane roster was hand-enumerated across five documentation surfaces and three workflow files that had drifted apart: --kimi-code was missing from all four translated COMMANDS.md mirrors, --coderabbit from every workflow forwarding list, and --antigravity from FEATURES.md. Adds checkReviewerDocsParity, a second pure gate deliberately separate from checkReviewerLaneParity so a stale doc cannot make the runtime checker look red. Workflows now derive their flag lists from a new review-lane flags query instead of hand-enumerating them, which also retires the unanchored grep that matched --agy inside --antigravity. Documents the previously absent reviewer body and hostBehaviors field in the capability manifest reference. Closes #2800 Closes #2781 Closes #2272 * fix(#2800): key the docs parity table arm on first-cell position Review found the flag arm was file-scoped, so the forwarding row that lists every flag in its third cell satisfied it on its own. Deleting a lane's own reviewer-table row -- the #2781 regression this gate exists to prevent -- therefore passed undetected. Arm 4 keys on the FIRST table cell, which separates a lane row from the forwarding row structurally and in every locale. Regression test included. * fix(#2800): shape-filter the flags subcommand output All three consumers read review-lane flags through an unquoted command substitution so the output word-splits into loop items. Phase 2 admits third-party overlay lanes, so an overlay flag containing whitespace would inject a second loop item and one containing a glob would expand against the cwd. Emit only well-formed flags so neither reaches the shell. * fix(#2800): remove the regex length ceiling and count only prose mentions Review found two real defects in the docs parity gate. The never-throws contract was false: building a RegExp from a declared flag or section title throws SyntaxError past ~100k chars, and Phase 2 admits overlay lanes whose declared strings are untrusted in length. Every one of these matches is literal, so String.includes replaces the regex outright, which also deletes escapeLiteral and the llama.cpp escaping it existed for. Arm 1 was context-blind: a flag mentioned only inside a fenced example or a commented-out row counted as documented. Both are stripped before matching. Also advertises all 13 lane flags in the argument-hint and corrects a stale eleven-lane count in the slug grammar note. * test(#2800): repoint the convergence suite off deleted workflow text The derived flag loop deleted the literal per-flag grep lines four tests matched on. Two of those failed loudly. The behavioral and property tests failed SILENTLY instead: their end marker no longer resolved, so the parse block extracted empty and both passed vacuously, and the property test's gsd_run stub had a no-op default that hid it. All now share one extractor and execute the real deployed block through a gsd_run shim backed by the actual binary. The whitelist assertions become an anti-parity check: re-adding a hand-written flag list must fail. Also repairs two vacuous cases in the docs parity suite. The unreadable-doc test called its own mock rather than the reader, and the integration test bounded nothing, so a doc losing its marker would have been silently skipped and still passed green. * fix(#2800): run the derived flag loop after the launcher preamble The remote matrix caught a real runtime bug, not a test artifact. In autonomous.md and plan-review-convergence.md the launcher preamble that defines gsd_run lives in a separate, LATER bash fence than the derived loop. Each fence is its own shell, so gsd_run was undefined where the loop ran: the command substitution yielded nothing and zero reviewer flags would have been forwarded. Worse than the drift this epic fixes, and silent. The whole CONVERGENCE_ARGS construction moves as one unit, because the --max-cycles append sits between the loop and the preamble and would otherwise have run against an uninitialized variable and then been dropped by the relocated initializer. Also documents all 13 lane flags in help/modes/full.md, which the repo gates bidirectionally against each command's argument-hint. * test(#2800): repoint the two converge suites off deleted flag literals Both asserted workflow.includes('--codex') against the hand-enumerated list the derived loop removed. They now assert the derivation itself, keep --all and --text (convergence controls, still literal), and add an anti-parity guard so re-adding a hardcoded list fails. The lost pass-through proof is replaced with a real one: every flag the tests used to hardcode is asserted present in the actual roster emitted by the binary, which is the property the old assertion was protecting. * test(#2800): acknowledge the workflow byte growth from the derived flag loop * chore(#2800): backfill changeset pr number to 2882 * fix(#2800): strip HTML comments to a fixed point in the parity gate CodeQL js/incomplete-multi-character-sanitization (high) on PR #2882: the single-pass <!--...--> strip can leave a live <!-- behind, so a join-trick construction smuggles a commented-out row past the gate and it counts as documented. Not an injection risk here since nothing is rendered, but it is the exact false pass this helper exists to prevent. Strips to a fixed point, then treats any surviving opener as unterminated so the multi-line branch closes it on a later line. Terminates because every pass strictly shortens the string. * test(#2800): pin the comment-smuggling regression with a real reproducer The obvious fixture for this class does not reproduce it: <!--<!---->--> leaves a dangling --> rather than a live <!--, and is caught either way, so it would have passed with and without the fix. The join-trick construction (<!- + <!--DUMMY--> + -...-->), the <scr<script>ipt> shape, genuinely regresses on the single-pass strip and is what the test now uses. --------- Co-authored-by: Test <test@example.com>	2026-07-30 19:14:13 -04:00
Tom Boucher	5695522d5f	feat(#2096): migrate Antigravity onto EoS declarative adapter + permission-writer + MCP companion (ADR-1239) ... Fold all antigravity literal branches into descriptor-driven reads: getConfigDirFromHome (→ configHome.kind 'dot-home-nested'), projectLocalHookPrefix (→ hostBehaviors.hookPathStyle 'raw'), applyAgentPathRewrites (→ noPathRewrite), getProjectInstructionFile (→ projectInstructionFile 'GEMINI.md'); removed the dead inline convertClaudeAgentToAntigravityAgent branch + dead isAntigravity destructures (antigravity is already on the descriptor-agents path). subagentToolkit flipped undocumented→full (Context7: antigravity.google/docs/cli/features); namedDispatch/nested/maxDepth/backgroundDispatch stay undocumented. Byte-identical golden parity for all 16 runtimes. UPGRADE 1 (permission-writer): permissionWriter 'antigravity' + configureAntigravityPermissions merges a scoped permissions.allow block (GSD's own tree + hooks) into Antigravity's settings.json — non-destructive, idempotent, symmetric uninstall. Added to VALID_PERMISSION_WRITERS + the FinishPermissionWriter union. UPGRADE 2 (MCP companion): configureAntigravityMcpConfig writes mcp_config.json registering the gsd-core companion MCP server (Gemini-successor mcpServers schema, best-effort — raw schema unpublished). Both writers dispatch from finishInstall. settings.json is golden-excluded (HOOK_CONFIG_FILES); mcp_config.json (portable, no absolute paths) is golden-tracked → only antigravity.json changes. Tests: declarative-reference-antigravity extended (source-grep guard across 4 modules, fail-closed for the 4 undocumented sub-axes, validator acceptance) + antigravity-upgrades (permission-writer + mcp_config live-install, idempotency, user-preservation). Matrix + ADR-1016 + capability-manifest + CONTEXT.md + connect-gsd-mcp-server docs updated; changeset (Changed). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-11 03:07:01 -04:00
Tom Boucher	ab04916682	feat(#2095): migrate Kimi CLI onto EoS imperative adapter + native hook-bus + background dispatch (ADR-1239) ... Fold all runtime==='kimi'/isKimi logic branches into descriptor-driven hostBehaviors (localInstallDeferred, verificationStyle, agentManifestStyle, reapplyCommand, doneBannerStyle) + add 'kimi' to _DESCRIPTOR_AGENTS_RUNTIMES. Kimi's skills/kimi-agents dispatch was already descriptor-driven (converter-by- name + kimi-agents kind). Zero isKimi/runtime==='kimi' branches remain. UPGRADE 1 (native hook bus): new hooksSurface 'kimi-hooks-toml' + a marker- delimited config.toml [[hooks]] emitter (buildKimiHooksTomlBlock/writeKimiHooksToml in runtime-hooks-surface.cts; resolveKimiHooksTomlDir in runtime-homes.cts). GSD's lifecycle hooks now wire into Kimi's native ~/.kimi/config.toml (Context7- confirmed path) at SessionStart/PreToolUse/Stop/PreCompact/SubagentStart/ SubagentStop — kimi becomes a hooks/ consumer (the 3 && !isKimi exclusion guards removed). config.toml holds absolute install paths so it's golden-excluded via an exact relative-path (.kimi/config.toml), not a basename (which would blind Codex's config.toml). New hooksSurface value added to the closed enum in capability-validator + runtime-config-adapter-registry. UPGRADE 2 (background dispatch): flip dispatch.backgroundDispatch true (Kimi's Agent tool takes run_in_background; root agent already gets the Agent tool), so negotiation no longer flattens dispatch. subagentToolkit stays 'undocumented' per AC (coder/explore/plan have distinct tool policies). MCP transport explicitly deferred (no installer-driven MCP for any runtime). Golden: only kimi.json changes (hooks/ scripts now installed); all 15 others + claude-local byte-identical (kilo/zcode keep their own exclusions). Tests: kimi-imperative-reference (adapter/axes/fail-closed/hostBehaviors + source-grep guard) + kimi-upgrades (config.toml [[hooks]] SessionStart + marker idempotency + backgroundDispatch negotiation). CONTEXT.md glossary + matrix + how-to updated; changeset (Added). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-11 00:53:34 -04:00
Tom Boucher	a3d3c2a445	refactor(#1756): derive getDirName from a documented runtime.localConfigDir descriptor axis (#1757) ... ADR-1239 Phase B (parent #1679). getDirName was a hand-maintained 15-branch if-chain mapping each runtime to its local content-rewrite dot-dir. Relocate those values into a documented runtime.localConfigDir descriptor field; derive getDirName from registry.runtimes[id].runtime.localConfigDir (fallback .claude). - 16 capability.json gain runtime.localConfigDir (byte-identical values) - capability-validator.cjs requires it (non-empty dot-dir); registry regenerated - docs/reference/capability-manifest.md documents the field + the three divergent values (copilot=.github, antigravity=.agents, kimi=.kimi-code) - drift-guard test: golden value map + key-set equality both ways Byte-identical install output for all 16 runtimes (golden-parity harness #1730). Closes #1756 Co-authored-by: review-bot <review-bot@gsd> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-26 12:44:09 -04:00
Tom Boucher	02c6491e61	docs(#1464): fix ADR-1244 capability doc set — followable tutorials, overlay-model + install tutorial, set/fragment/runtimeCompat reference, accuracy fixes	2026-06-20 13:02:24 -04:00
Tom Boucher	08d1c57d6e	fix(#1460): verify-or-reject capability --integrity per source; confine hook commands to the bundle ... Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-20 09:10:04 -04:00
Rezolv	dcceb1a004	fix(#1441): antigravity resolver prefers GSD-owned dir over first-existing (#1442) ... * fix(#1441): antigravity resolver prefers GSD-owned dir over first-existing resolveConfigHomeFromDescriptor's dot-home-nested probe returned the first bare-existing candidate, so a CLI user (~/.gemini/antigravity-cli) who also had the IDE's ~/.gemini/antigravity dir was silently shadowed to the legacy dir (probed first). Regression from #217 — pre-#217 returned ~/.gemini/antigravity unconditionally. Add an optional probeMarker (gsd-core/VERSION) to the dot-home-nested descriptor: a two-pass probe prefers the candidate GSD installed into, then bare existence, then probe[0]. Behavior is byte-identical when probeMarker is absent (windsurf etc. unaffected). Adds detectAntigravityDirAmbiguity() for installer/operator guidance on already-misinstalled users (auto-relocation ruled out per ADR-0008's single-configDir migration bound). Regression tests fail before / pass after: coexistence + marker-priority cases, end-to-end through the registry descriptor. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JU2WB23JLE3QTysPXuFJjB * chore(#1441): add changeset for antigravity resolver fix Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JU2WB23JLE3QTysPXuFJjB	2026-06-18 21:47:18 -04:00
Tom Boucher	f52a7a5f77	feat(#1245): add capability ecosystem ADR, PRD, and developer documentation (#1248) ... Phase 0 of the Capability Ecosystem epic (#1244): the design record and the third-party-author documentation set, with no runtime or code changes. - docs/adr/1244-capability-ecosystem.md — architecture decision record (amends/extends ADR-857 Decisions 7 & 8) - docs/prd/1244-capability-ecosystem.md — product requirements - Diataxis docs: tutorial, how-to (publish/import/version/remove), reference (manifest schema, /gsd:capability command, capability matrix), explanation (trust model); cross-links added to develop-a-capability.md Refs #1244 Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-14 17:51:43 -04:00