fa41bfec5c
* test(#3942): failing-first suite for the emitted-drift ack commit trailer Binds 37 input classes from the phase test matrix to the behavior ADR-3942 specifies, before any of it exists. Stubs return benign empty values rather than throwing, deliberately: several rows assert that something DOES throw (cap overflow, uncomputable commit range), and a throwing stub would turn those green for the wrong reason and destroy the red. The two rows that carry the design's load: - merge-base semantics. The range is $(git merge-base base HEAD)..HEAD, not base..HEAD, because changedPaths comes from `git diff base...HEAD` (three dot). Two-dot would let the ack set and the change set disagree about which commits are this PR's. The fixture forks a topic branch, puts a trailer on each side, and asserts only the topic-side trailer is in range. - fail-closed on an uncomputable range. With fragments a depth-1 checkout passes VACUOUSLY, every fragment reading as brand-new. With trailers the range cannot be computed at all, and returning an empty set would silently disarm the gate, so it must throw. The fixture builds a genuine shallow clone rather than simulating one. Also covers the self-inflicted case: this change's own documentation quotes the trailer syntax, so an example landing at the end of a commit message would arm a live acknowledgment keyed on the literal placeholder text. Keys carrying angle brackets or whitespace are rejected. Authored per the phase artifacts 40-design.md and 50-test-matrix.md. Not yet run on the remote runner — this commit exists to be tested. Refs #3942 * chore(#3942): move the emitted-drift ack to a commit trailer Implements ADR-3942, superseding ADR-2719 section 3 and its #2789 amendment. Sections 1, 2 and 4-7 are retained: the conservation law is unchanged, only the storage of its escape hatch moved off the working tree. An acknowledgment explains one PR's ripple, and the moment that PR merges the ripple is in the base, so it can never clear anything again. It was stored in permanent shared state anyway, and every consequence of that mismatch had to be built and then maintained. The chain is #2789 -> #2914 -> #3078 -> #3842 -> #3823 -> #3875, each fix generating the next defect, ending in a scheduled sweeper whose own first PR could not merge itself. Added parseAckTrailers + renderAckTrailer (pure) and readAckTrailers (IO shell), reading Emitted-Drift-Ack-Hash: / Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: trailers over the merge-base range. tests/emitted-ack-trailer.test.cjs, 37 cases, written failing-first and confirmed red before any of this existed. Changed diffEmitted takes two structurally distinct key-space maps instead of one shared paths map. That closes a latent defect: the spaces were separated by convention only, so a growth key satisfied a hash lookup by naming coincidence. staleAcks now reports which space a key was declared in. REMEDIATION teaches the trailer, per space, with its example rendered through renderAckTrailer so the taught grammar cannot drift from what the parser accepts. Removed the sweep workflow, the guard-no-ack-on-next job, the standalone linter and its lint:ci entry, the fragment directory and its three spent fragments, the legacy single-file union, and the baseAck/spentAcks mechanism -- spentness is now structural, not computed. Two range properties carry the design and are pinned by tests rather than asserted: the range is merge-base scoped, matching git diff base...HEAD, so an already-merged trailer is out of range by construction; and an uncomputable range throws instead of reading as zero acknowledgments, which is the inverse of the fragment guard's vacuous pass. Three deliberate observable changes, each disclosed in the changeset: the unread runtime field is gone, the legacy file is no longer read, and cross-space excusal no longer works. Ten open PRs carry fragments and will meet a modify/delete conflict. Measured before landing and accepted deliberately; the one-line migration is in the PR body. Verified: lint:ci exit 0. Remote runner to follow on this exact sha. Refs #3942 * fix(#3942): silent trailer collapse, lost coverage, and an unbounded cap Six findings from the orthogonal review round, all fixed in place. BLOCKER -- two trailers of the same name on one commit collapsed silently. readAckTrailers built `separator=1d` where git needs `separator=%x1d`: the `separator=` value inside a %(trailers:...) placeholder is itself a pretty-format string, so the bare hex was emitted as two literal characters and the split on \x1d never matched. Two same-name trailers therefore joined into one value with errors empty -- the first reason absorbing the second entry's key. Silent truncation, the exact class MAX_ACK_TRAILERS throws to prevent. Confirmed with od -c against real git output before and after. The failing-first matrix did not catch it because its "both spaces coexist" row uses Hash plus Growth -- different trailer NAMES -- so the value separator was never exercised. Two regression tests now cover same-name trailers directly. Coverage recovered: normalizeAckReason and INVISIBLE stayed on the live path via parseAckTrailers but lost every test when the old suite was pruned. Back under test against the current surface -- all six invisible codepoints individually, whitespace collapse, trim, CRLF, and two seeded fast-check properties. Dropping any single codepoint now fails. MAX_ACK_TRAILERS counted raw trailers before de-duplication, so one trailer carried forward across rebased commits counted once per commit and could throw on a legitimate branch. Now counts distinct entries; 100 identical repeats dedupe to one. diffEmitted validated baseline, current and changedPaths but not the new ackHash/ackGrowth, so a bad shape raised an unhandled TypeError instead of an error verdict -- the same defect shape this file documents for #2778. Docs: CONTRIBUTING and TESTING-SUITES were rewritten only in their first sections; the later passages still taught fragments, git rm and the deleted guard, contradicting the new text directly above them. Finished. Also extends lint-removed-but-needed to exempt docs/adr and docs/research. That gate fails on any docs mention of a file deleted in the same diff, which makes it impossible to document a deletion in the PR performing it -- an ADR's whole job is naming what it retired. Exemption is narrow and comes with a test proving the gate still fires for a live consumer elsewhere under docs/. A guard that cannot fail is worse than no guard. Maintainer-approved. CONTEXT.md names the retired machinery by role rather than by filename: its generated projection lands in docs/, which that gate does scan. Adds docs/how-to/acknowledge-emitted-drift.md. The required docs set is Reference and Explanation, so the task quadrant can be empty with every gate green -- and this change has a real multi-step journey, including the fragment migration ten open PRs now need. lint:ci exit 0. Refs #3942 * docs(#3942): correct the duplicate-trailer rule in CONTRIBUTING Both axes of the code review independently flagged the same passage, without seeing each other's output. It claimed two declarations of the same key are always "a hard, loudly-reported error, not a silent last-wins". That is only half true, and the missing half is the one contributors hit: identical declarations -- same key, same reason -- dedupe silently, because a trailer legitimately survives a rebase and reappears on every rebased commit. Failing there would red a branch for doing nothing wrong, which is exactly why the dedup exists. Only a same-key/different-reason pair errors, and that one is a genuine ambiguity about which explanation holds. As written, the paragraph told a contributor that a rebase-carried trailer breaks the gate -- the opposite of the behavior. CONTEXT.md's parallel entry already stated it correctly; this brings CONTRIBUTING into line. Doc-only, root-level markdown. Refs #3942 * chore(#3942): backfill changeset PR number to 3954 --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
GSD Core
Git. Ship. Done.
English · Português · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어
A light-weight meta-prompting, context engineering, and spec-driven development system for Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more.
What is GSD Core
GSD Core is a context-engineering and spec-driven development framework that drives AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Copilot, Cursor, and more) through a disciplined phase loop. It solves context rot — the quality degradation that accumulates as an AI fills its context window — by running all heavy research, planning, and execution work in fresh-context subagents while keeping your main session lean.
How it works
Each milestone repeats the same five-step loop, one phase at a time:
- Discuss — capture implementation decisions before anything is planned
- Plan — research, decompose, and verify the plan fits a fresh context window
- Execute — run plans in parallel waves; each executor starts with a clean 200k-token context
- Verify — walk through what was built; diagnose and fix before declaring done
- Ship — create the PR, archive the phase, repeat for the next one
Quickstart
npx @opengsd/gsd-core@latest
The installer prompts for your runtime (Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more) and whether to install globally or locally. The installer is required for cross-runtime compatibility — do not copy files from agents/ or commands/ directly.
On another runtime or without Node.js? See Install on your runtime.
Once installed, start a new project or onboard an existing repo:
/gsd-new-project # greenfield project
/gsd-onboard # existing codebase
New here? Follow Your first project for a guided walkthrough from install to first shipped phase, or Onboarding an existing codebase for brownfield setup.
Documentation
What's new in 1.7.0 → docs/whats-new-1.7.0.md
Tutorials — learning by doing:
How-to guides — task-focused recipes:
Reference — authoritative facts:
Explanation — concepts and design decisions:
Full index: docs/README.md. Other languages: 日本語 · 한국어 · Português · 简体中文.
Why it works
Most AI-coding setups fail at scale because context bloat silently degrades output quality, there is no shared memory between sessions, and nothing verifies that code actually works. GSD Core solves all three: heavy work runs in fresh subagents, structured artifacts like STATE.md and CONTEXT.md survive session boundaries, and the verify step walks through what was built and generates fix plans before a phase is declared done. See docs/explanation/context-engineering.md for the full reasoning.
Troubleshooting? See docs/how-to/recover-and-troubleshoot.md.
Community
| Project | Platform |
|---|---|
| gsd-opencode | Original OpenCode port |
| Discord | Community support |
Star History
License
MIT License. See LICENSE for details.
Claude Code is powerful. GSD Core makes it reliable.