* test(#4590): add no-rendered-text-length-assert ESLint rule Enforces ADR-456's typed-surface mandate for one specific bug shape: a test assertion whose pass/fail depends on the length/substring content of a template literal that interpolates an OS-derived path (os.tmpdir(), os.homedir(), path.join/resolve/..., or a PATH_RETURNING_FNS resolver). Because macOS's default tmpdir prefix is longer than Linux's, such an assertion can pass on one runner and fail on another -- the defect class behind #4421's incident (git show 4e75b836e9), already fixed there by pinning to a typed field per ADR-456 Sec(c) before this rule existed to catch a recurrence. Two repo-wide sweeps against the real tests/ tree narrowed the rule to a sound scope: an initial design that traced call arguments (to approximate the historical incident's cross-file render-function shape) produced false positives on ordinary fs.readFileSync(path.join(...)) + assert.match patterns; a second design that matched any bare direct path-returning call produced 45 false positives on path suffix/prefix/non-emptiness checks. The shipped rule matches only a path-returning expression interpolated into a template literal, directly or via one identifier hop -- disclosed in the rule's own "Known boundaries" as not covering the literal cross-file incident shape, which would require tracing into a callee's body. Phase 1 of epic #4589 (CI test-matrix Linux-primary migration) -- Phase 2's safety argument depends on this class of OS-dependent test assertion being enforced going forward, not merely fixed once. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#4590): address code-review findings on no-rendered-text-length-assert Reletter the "Known boundaries" doc-comment list (a)-(e), fixing a gap left by an earlier edit pass and every stale cross-reference to it. Collapse isDirectPathTaint/isTaintedInterpolation's duplicated TemplateLiteral-walk into one recursive relationship (isTaintedInterpolation now delegates a nested-template-literal case back to isDirectPathTaint instead of re-implementing the .some() traversal) -- behavior unchanged, confirmed by re-running the repo-wide sweep (still zero false positives). Found by the Standards-axis /code-review pass on this PR. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
11 KiB
11 KiB