Files
msd-core/commands/msd/spec-phase.md
Jakub Zych a9a7a328e6 refactor: hard-fork GSD -> MSD (Make Software Done)
Mechanical rename produced by scripts/msd-rename.cjs: gsd/Gsd/GSD -> msd/Msd/MSD
across contents and paths, upstream package/repo coordinates -> @golem15/msd-core
and golem15com/msd-core. Deep links into upstream history, sibling upstream
packages, the GSD-2 import feature, CHANGELOG.md and .changeset/ are kept as-is.

Hand edits on top: MSD block-letter banner and logos, LICENSE copyright line,
package/plugin identity, regenerated lockfile, install-tree fixtures, derived
registries and benchmark baseline; migration checksum baseline re-locked
(MSD keeps its own install state, so no install had applied the old sums);
sort-order and regex-escaped expectations in tests adjusted.
2026-10-06 01:47:40 +02:00

64 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown

---
name: msd:spec-phase
description: Clarify WHAT a phase delivers with ambiguity scoring; produces a SPEC.md before discuss-phase.
argument-hint: "<phase> [--auto] [--text]"
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Write
- Bash
- Glob
- Grep
- AskUserQuestion
requires: [discuss-phase, execute-phase, phase, plan-phase]
---
<objective>
Clarify phase requirements through structured Socratic questioning with quantitative ambiguity scoring.
**Position in workflow:** `spec-phase → discuss-phase → plan-phase → execute-phase → verify`
**How it works:**
1. Load phase context (PROJECT.md, REQUIREMENTS.md, ROADMAP.md, STATE.md)
2. Scout the codebase — understand current state before asking questions
3. Run Socratic interview loop (up to 6 rounds, rotating perspectives)
4. Score ambiguity across 4 weighted dimensions after each round
5. Gate: ambiguity ≤ 0.20 AND all dimensions meet minimums → write SPEC.md
6. Commit SPEC.md — discuss-phase picks it up automatically on next run
**Output:** `{phase_dir}/{padded_phase}-SPEC.md` — falsifiable requirements that lock "what/why" before discuss-phase handles "how"
</objective>
<execution_context>
@~/.claude/msd-core/workflows/spec-phase.md
@~/.claude/msd-core/templates/spec.md
</execution_context>
<runtime_note>
**Copilot (VS Code):** Use `vscode_askquestions` wherever this workflow calls `AskUserQuestion`. They are equivalent.
</runtime_note>
<context>
Phase number: $ARGUMENTS (required)
**Flags:**
- `--auto` — Skip interactive questions; Claude selects recommended defaults and writes SPEC.md
- `--text` — Use plain-text numbered lists instead of TUI menus (required for `/rc` remote sessions)
Context files are resolved in-workflow using `init phase-op`.
</context>
<process>
Execute end-to-end.
**MANDATORY:** Read the workflow file BEFORE taking any action. The workflow contains the complete step-by-step process including the Socratic interview loop, ambiguity scoring gate, and SPEC.md generation. Do not improvise from the objective summary above.
</process>
<success_criteria>
- Codebase scouted for current state before questioning begins
- All 4 ambiguity dimensions scored after each interview round
- Gate passed: ambiguity ≤ 0.20 AND all dimension minimums met
- SPEC.md written with falsifiable requirements, explicit boundaries, and acceptance criteria
- SPEC.md committed atomically
- User knows they can now run /msd:discuss-phase which will load SPEC.md automatically
</success_criteria>