1b027298dc
* fix(#3481): resolve add-roadmap-evolution's phase from STATE.md, not a literal `?` `state add-roadmap-evolution` built its entry from the raw `--phase` flag alone, so omitting the flag persisted `- Phase ?` even when STATE.md's own frontmatter carried `current_phase` above the insertion point — the #3231 defect at a second call site. Roadmap-evolution entries are the permanent trail explaining why the roadmap changed shape; `Phase ?` makes that trail unattributable, and the command is mostly invoked from agents that do not know to pass `--phase`. The #3481 triage confirmed the #3231 sibling site (`add-decision`) was also still unfixed on next — both PRs that attempted it (#3232, #3347) were closed unmerged. This applies the #3347 treatment to both call sites: - Extracts the write-path phase-resolution ladder `cmdStatePrune` already ran — frontmatter `current_phase` → body `Current Phase` field → prose `Phase: X of Y` scoped to `## Current Position` — into a shared `resolveCurrentPhaseId`, and routes `cmdStateAddRoadmapEvolution`, `cmdStateAddDecision`, and `cmdStatePrune` through it. - Deliberately NOT routed through `resolveStatePhase` (#3208): its `matchCurrentPositionSection(body) ?? body` fallback widens the prose rung to the whole document when no `## Current Position` section exists, where the pipe-table fallback matches any historical `| Phase | N |` row (#1776). Read-path callers (snapshot/validate) report to a human; write-path callers persist durably, so they take the strict rung and render `?` instead of guessing. - The resolved id is returned as written, never parsed to a number (`11-01` and `04.1` are real ids). Prune still parses its own integer cutoff, so its behavior is byte-identical. - Explicit `--phase` still wins and its path is untouched — STATE.md is not even read. When no rung resolves, `?` is still written. Tests: per-call-site coverage for both commands — omitted `--phase` resolves (including a non-integer prose id), explicit `--phase` wins, and two counter-tests pinning the degraded verdict (nothing resolvable → `?`, and a historical `| Phase | 7 |` table row must NOT be adopted). Plus a static guard sweeping src/*.cts for the raw `phase || '?'` placeholder shape so a future call site cannot reintroduce the class. Fixes #3481 * chore(#3481): add changeset fragment for PR #3522 --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
GSD Core
Git. Ship. Done.
English · Português · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어
A light-weight meta-prompting, context engineering, and spec-driven development system for Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more.
What is GSD Core
GSD Core is a context-engineering and spec-driven development framework that drives AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Copilot, Cursor, and more) through a disciplined phase loop. It solves context rot — the quality degradation that accumulates as an AI fills its context window — by running all heavy research, planning, and execution work in fresh-context subagents while keeping your main session lean.
How it works
Each milestone repeats the same five-step loop, one phase at a time:
- Discuss — capture implementation decisions before anything is planned
- Plan — research, decompose, and verify the plan fits a fresh context window
- Execute — run plans in parallel waves; each executor starts with a clean 200k-token context
- Verify — walk through what was built; diagnose and fix before declaring done
- Ship — create the PR, archive the phase, repeat for the next one
Quickstart
npx @opengsd/gsd-core@latest
The installer prompts for your runtime (Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more) and whether to install globally or locally. The installer is required for cross-runtime compatibility — do not copy files from agents/ or commands/ directly.
On another runtime or without Node.js? See Install on your runtime.
Once installed, start a new project or onboard an existing repo:
/gsd-new-project # greenfield project
/gsd-onboard # existing codebase
New here? Follow Your first project for a guided walkthrough from install to first shipped phase, or Onboarding an existing codebase for brownfield setup.
Documentation
What's new in 1.7.0 → docs/whats-new-1.7.0.md
Tutorials — learning by doing:
How-to guides — task-focused recipes:
Reference — authoritative facts:
Explanation — concepts and design decisions:
Full index: docs/README.md. Other languages: 日本語 · 한국어 · Português · 简体中文.
Why it works
Most AI-coding setups fail at scale because context bloat silently degrades output quality, there is no shared memory between sessions, and nothing verifies that code actually works. GSD Core solves all three: heavy work runs in fresh subagents, structured artifacts like STATE.md and CONTEXT.md survive session boundaries, and the verify step walks through what was built and generates fix plans before a phase is declared done. See docs/explanation/context-engineering.md for the full reasoning.
Troubleshooting? See docs/how-to/recover-and-troubleshoot.md.
Community
| Project | Platform |
|---|---|
| gsd-opencode | Original OpenCode port |
| Discord | Community support |
Star History
License
MIT License. See LICENSE for details.
Claude Code is powerful. GSD Core makes it reliable.