* test(#2978): roadmap validate must perform structural validation Failing-first: roadmap validate returns {"warnings":[]} (exit 0) for every input — empty file, garbage, missing file, truncated frontmatter — because it performs no structural validation and its one opt-in check (W021 milestone- prefix) is off by default. Six cases: empty, garbage, missing, truncated frontmatter, well-formed (no false positive), BOM-prefixed (not corruption). * fix(#2978): add structural validation to roadmap validate roadmap validate returned {"warnings":[]} (exit 0) for every input — empty file, garbage, missing file, truncated frontmatter — because it performed no structural validation and its one opt-in check (W021 milestone-prefix) is off by default. A verb named validate that cannot produce a negative result provides false assurance. Add four structural checks, each producing a coded warning {code, message}: - V001: file missing/unreadable (was silent success) - V002: empty/whitespace-only - V003: malformed frontmatter (unterminated --- fence; BOM-tolerant per #3057) - V004: no recognizable phase entries (no ### Phase N: heading) Keep the existing W021 milestone-prefix check as-is. Exit non-zero via ExitError(1) when warnings are non-empty, per the documented contract ('exits non-zero on any error or warning'). Well-formed roadmaps (incl. BOM-prefixed, CRLF) still validate cleanly with warnings: [] and exit 0. * test(#2978): update W021 tests for non-zero exit on warnings Two existing W021 tests asserted roadmap validate exits 0 even with warnings ('roadmap validate should exit 0 even with warnings') — that was the bug. #2978 made validate exit non-zero on any warning (per its documented contract). Updated both mismatch-case tests to expect success===false and parse the JSON output from the failure path (stdout is written before the ExitError throw). * chore(#2978): add changeset fragment * chore(#2978): backfill changeset PR number 3092 --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
GSD Core
Git. Ship. Done.
English · Português · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어
A light-weight meta-prompting, context engineering, and spec-driven development system for Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more.
What is GSD Core
GSD Core is a context-engineering and spec-driven development framework that drives AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Copilot, Cursor, and more) through a disciplined phase loop. It solves context rot — the quality degradation that accumulates as an AI fills its context window — by running all heavy research, planning, and execution work in fresh-context subagents while keeping your main session lean.
How it works
Each milestone repeats the same five-step loop, one phase at a time:
- Discuss — capture implementation decisions before anything is planned
- Plan — research, decompose, and verify the plan fits a fresh context window
- Execute — run plans in parallel waves; each executor starts with a clean 200k-token context
- Verify — walk through what was built; diagnose and fix before declaring done
- Ship — create the PR, archive the phase, repeat for the next one
Quickstart
npx @opengsd/gsd-core@latest
The installer prompts for your runtime (Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more) and whether to install globally or locally. The installer is required for cross-runtime compatibility — do not copy files from agents/ or commands/ directly.
On another runtime or without Node.js? See Install on your runtime.
Once installed, start a new project or onboard an existing repo:
/gsd-new-project # greenfield project
/gsd-onboard # existing codebase
New here? Follow Your first project for a guided walkthrough from install to first shipped phase, or Onboarding an existing codebase for brownfield setup.
Documentation
What's new in 1.7.0 → docs/whats-new-1.7.0.md
Tutorials — learning by doing:
How-to guides — task-focused recipes:
Reference — authoritative facts:
Explanation — concepts and design decisions:
Full index: docs/README.md. Other languages: 日本語 · 한국어 · Português · 简体中文.
Why it works
Most AI-coding setups fail at scale because context bloat silently degrades output quality, there is no shared memory between sessions, and nothing verifies that code actually works. GSD Core solves all three: heavy work runs in fresh subagents, structured artifacts like STATE.md and CONTEXT.md survive session boundaries, and the verify step walks through what was built and generates fix plans before a phase is declared done. See docs/explanation/context-engineering.md for the full reasoning.
Troubleshooting? See docs/how-to/recover-and-troubleshoot.md.
Community
| Project | Platform |
|---|---|
| gsd-opencode | Original OpenCode port |
| Discord | Community support |
Star History
License
MIT License. See LICENSE for details.
Claude Code is powerful. GSD Core makes it reliable.