* fix(#2903): use the command form that actually works in reader-facing docs Docs told readers to type the colon form, which no runtime registers -- 18 of 19 runtimes use slash-hyphen and the 19th uses shell-var -- so anyone copying an example got an unrecognized command. Swept 178 occurrences across 53 files, locale mirrors included so they do not re-diverge from English. The colon form is a source-authoring token, not a user-facing one: install-time converters key on it to produce the hyphen form runtimes actually register. So the sweep is scoped, and three things are deliberately left alone: - ADRs, which are a historical record; editing their prose falsifies what was written at the time. - The legacy release-notes archive, pending a maintainer decision on whether it follows the same historical carve-out. Excluding it keeps a later reversal additive rather than a revert. - Source artifacts under commands, workflows and agents, where the colon form is load-bearing. Rewriting those would break the installed-skill guarantee across every runtime -- the single largest hazard here. The plugin namespace form is a real, separate token and survives untouched. Adds a lint enforcing exactly that boundary, since the correct form genuinely differs by directory and nothing previously caught the drift. Also fixes a hardcoded colon form in the capability-matrix generator. The sweep alone would have left the generated matrix disagreeing with the template that produces it, so the fix is at the source and the output regenerated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2903): stop the sweep misquoting source frontmatter Adversarial review caught three lines where the sweep rewrote a citation of the literal YAML name: key from a source command file. That key genuinely is the colon form -- this change's own carve-out logic says source-authoring tokens keep it -- so the docs ended up misquoting the real files. One of the three is an acceptance-checklist assertion, which the sweep turned into a false statement. Restored the three citations to match their sources verbatim, surgically: where a line carried both a name: citation and a real reader-facing slash command, only the citation reverted and the command stayed corrected. The guard needed the same distinction, or it would have flagged the restoration and reddened the build: a gsd:<cmd> token preceded by name: is a citation of a source token and is now permitted. The exemption is deliberately narrow -- a bare gsd:<cmd> anywhere else still fails -- with a test pinning that narrowness. Also makes the detection case-insensitive. Review found /GSD:next slipped through silently; no such casing exists in the tree today, so this closes a latent gap rather than fixing a live one. Swept the whole tree for further corrupted citations: none beyond the three. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2903): retire the stale-next invariant and sweep next like every other command Maintainer decision on a genuine conflict between two contracts. Invariant #3054 banned the literal /gsd-next from user-facing docs because it named a retired workflow-advance command. But commands/gsd/next.md is a live command -- the state-aware smart-entry launcher -- and this issue requires docs to use the hyphen form every runtime actually registers. Both could not hold for this one command, so docs had been sidestepping the ban by keeping the colon form, which is exactly the defect this issue exists to remove. FEATURES.md already recorded the reassignment: the hyphen form "is not the retired workflow-advance command; it is reserved for the state-aware smart-entry launcher. Workflow advancement remains under /gsd-progress --next." With that reassignment the invariant's premise is obsolete and the guard now contradicts the documented command form, so it is retired with a comment recording why rather than deleted silently. next is now swept like every other command, and the earlier exemption added to the new guard is removed so nothing is special-cased. Four citations of the literal name: frontmatter key stay in colon form, because the source file really does carry name: gsd:next and a doc quoting it must reproduce it verbatim. Two of those lines were reworded to say which side is the frontmatter key and which is the slash command, since they previously conflated the two. Verified the retired scan would now genuinely fail against this tree -- the conflict was real and resolved, not dodged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#2903): backfill changeset pr number Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
19 KiB
Design: /gsd Smart Entry
Date: 2026-06-27
Status: Approved — ready for implementation planning
Origin: Adapted from the /gsd smart-entry wizard in open-gsd/gsd-pi, redesigned for gsd-core's markdown-first, multi-runtime architecture.
Summary
A /gsd-next command that acts as gsd-core's state-aware front door. It reads project + workflow state, classifies the user's situation, and presents a small menu of the right next actions — then dispatches to an existing command. The "smart" part is deterministic detection living in Node (a new gsd-tools smart-entry subcommand); the presentation is an idiomatic markdown command + workflow using AskUserQuestion with a --text fallback for non-Claude runtimes.
This is a launcher / router, not an executor. It never does the work itself.
Implementation note (command name): the command-contract (ADR-0002) requires
name:to begsd:*orgsd-*prefixed; a bare/gsdis not expressible. The frontmatter is thereforename: gsd:next, surfacing as/gsd-next(filecommands/gsd/next.md, backed bygsd-core/workflows/smart-entry.md). The "smart entry" concept and behavior are unchanged; only the surfaced name differs from the original/gsdsketch.
Motivation
gsd-pi ships a /gsd smart-entry wizard — a state-aware menu that branches on detected project state (phase loop, blockers, stranded work) and surfaces one well-chosen set of options with a single recommended action. It is the command users run first. gsd-core has no equivalent front door: users must already know whether to reach for progress, plan-phase, execute-phase, quick, or new-project.
We want the same daily-driver feel — "run /gsd, get told what to do next" — without fighting gsd-core's nature. gsd-core is a markdown prompt framework installed into AI agents, not a Node CLI app. So gsd-pi's full-screen TUI and its imperative TypeScript branch tree do not port directly. What ports is the behavior: detect state → classify situation → offer contextual options → dispatch.
Resolved design decisions
These were chosen during brainstorming and are fixed inputs to this spec:
-
Approach: Hybrid. Detection + classification as a new
gsd-tools smart-entry --jsonsubcommand (deterministic, unit-tested in Node); presentation + dispatch as a markdown command + workflow that shells out to it via the existinggsd_runshim. This mirrors howgsd-core/workflows/do.mdalready drives tooling. Rationale: code-driven detection is reliable and testable; the markdown surface keeps multi-runtime reach (Codex, Gemini, Copilot) and adds zero dependencies. -
Priority: workflow routing ("what now?"). The wizard optimizes for the ongoing-work menu (gsd-pi's
showSmartEntry), not first-run onboarding (gsd-pi'sshowProjectInit). Onboarding routes to the existing/gsd-new-project, which already handles project detection and setup. We are not building an init wizard. -
Richness: phase + smart signals. The classifier branches on gsd-core's phase loop and richer gsd-pi-style signals (blocked/recover, idle/stranded, paused, complete). All 10 situations below are in scope.
-
Relationship to
/gsd-progress: complementary, not redundant./gsd-nextis the front door / launcher — a state-aware menu the user picks the next action from./gsd-progressremains the detailed situational report + auto-advance (--nextchaining)./gsd-nextwill frequently recommend/gsd-progress; it does not replace or deprecate it.
Non-goals
- No init/onboarding wizard.
/gsd-new-projectalready owns first-run project setup./gsd-nextroutes to it. - No new prompt/TUI library.
AskUserQuestion(Claude) +--textnumbered-list fallback (other runtimes) — matching repo convention. No inquirer/clack/ink. - No copy of gsd-pi's branch tree. gsd-pi's milestone/slice/task model does not exist here. The situation table is redesigned for gsd-core's phase loop (
.planning/). - No execution. Pure launcher. Picked action dispatches to an existing command and stops.
- No new state storage. Reads existing artifacts (
.planning/STATE.md,ROADMAP.md, git). Writes nothing.
Architecture
/gsd-next (commands/gsd/next.md — thin markdown dispatcher)
│
▼
workflow: gsd-core/workflows/smart-entry.md ◄── presentation + dispatch
│ step 1: resolve gsd_run shim
│ step 2: gsd_run smart-entry --json
│ step 3: render AskUserQuestion (or TEXT_MODE list)
│ step 4: show GSD ► ROUTING banner
│ step 5: dispatch + stop
▼
gsd-tools smart-entry --json ◄── NEW deterministic detection
│ reads: state-snapshot (.planning/STATE.md)
│ + .planning/ existence
│ + git status / branch / unpushed
│ + verify signals
│ emits: { situation, recommended, summary, actions[] }
▼
(existing command: progress / plan-phase / execute-phase / quick / ship …)
Two artifacts, one contract — the JSON shape in §"JSON contract". The workflow is thin because all branching logic lives in Node.
The classifier — gsd-tools smart-entry
New src/smart-entry.cts → compiled (build-at-publish, ADR-457) to gsd-core/bin/lib/smart-entry.cjs. Registered in gsd-tools.cjs as case 'smart-entry': (≈2 lines, delegating to smartEntry.run(cwd, { json: true }, raw)).
Contract
- Pure detection → classification. No side effects. No writes. No
process.exit()(throwExitErrorper repo convention; therunMainwrapper translates exit codes). - Output modes:
--json(machine, used by the workflow) and default (human-readable summary line, forgsd-toolsusers / debugging). - Idempotent, fast, no network. Read-only filesystem +
gitcalls only. - Never throws in
--jsonmode when.planning/is absent — it returnssituation: "no-project"so the workflow always has a menu to render.
Inputs
| input | source | what we read |
|---|---|---|
| workflow state | gsd_run query state.load / cmdStateSnapshot |
current_phase, total_phases, current_plan, total_plans_in_phase, status, progress, blockers[], paused_at, last_activity, session |
| planning dir | filesystem at cwd | existence of .planning/, .planning/STATE.md, .planning/ROADMAP.md |
| git signals | git status --porcelain, git branch, git log @{u}.. (guarded) |
dirty tree, branch, unpushed commits |
| verify signals | filesystem | latest phase's verify report presence; STATUS: marker on most recent summary |
Git calls are guarded — any git error (not a repo, no upstream, detached HEAD) is swallowed and treated as "no git signal," never fatal.
Situations (priority order — first match wins)
This is the gsd-core analog of gsd-pi's phase enum. Evaluated top-down; the first matching row is the situation.
| # | situation | when (predicate over inputs) | recommended action |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | no-project |
.planning/ absent |
new-project |
| 2 | paused |
paused_at set (non-empty) |
resume-work |
| 3 | blocked |
blockers[] non-empty |
debug |
| 4 | verify-failed |
latest verify report STATUS: indicates failure/blocked |
verify-work |
| 5 | needs-first-phase |
STATE exists but total_phases ≤ 0 or no ROADMAP.md |
discuss-phase |
| 6 | planning |
status = planning (phase has no plan yet) |
plan-phase |
| 7 | executing |
status = executing / active |
execute-phase |
| 8 | verify-pending |
status = needs-verify / review-pending |
verify-work |
| 9 | idle-stranded |
clean tree + unpushed/stranded commits OR stale last_activity with committed-but-unshipped work |
ship |
| 10 | complete |
total_phases > 0 and current phase ≥ total and status = complete |
new-milestone |
| — | unknown |
fallback (no predicate matched) | progress |
Note on idle-stranded: this is the richest heuristic and the most likely to need tuning. Predicates: working tree clean AND (git log @{u}.. non-empty OR last_activity older than threshold with non-complete status). Threshold: 72h (configurable later via config; hardcoded for v1). If this proves brittle in testing it is the first situation to relax — but it is in scope per the richness decision.
Action set per situation
Each situation produces an ordered actions[] array. The recommended action is always first and carries recommended: true; the workflow shows the top 4 (AskUserQuestion cap). Every situation always includes progress ("Show progress") and quick ("Quick task") as escape hatches, and help is appended when room remains.
no-project → new-project*, map-codebase, quick, help
paused → resume-work*, progress, quick, help
blocked → debug*, verify-work, capture, progress
verify-failed → verify-work*, debug, code-review, progress
needs-first-phase→ discuss-phase*, plan-phase, quick, progress
planning → plan-phase*, discuss-phase, quick, progress
executing → execute-phase*, "progress --next", quick, code-review
verify-pending → verify-work*, code-review, "ship", progress
idle-stranded → ship*, complete-milestone, progress, capture
complete → new-milestone*, extract-learnings, quick, progress
unknown → progress*, "progress --next", quick, help
(* = recommended)
JSON contract (machine output, --json)
{
"situation": "executing",
"recommended": "execute-phase",
"summary": "Phase 2 of 5 · plan 1/3 · 60% · active",
"signals": {
"current_phase": 2,
"total_phases": 5,
"status": "executing",
"progress": 60,
"has_planning": true,
"git_dirty": false,
"paused": false,
"blockers": []
},
"actions": [
{ "id": "execute-phase", "label": "Continue executing phase 2", "command": "/gsd-execute-phase", "recommended": true },
{ "id": "progress-next", "label": "Advance to the next step", "command": "/gsd-progress --next", "recommended": false },
{ "id": "quick", "label": "Quick task", "command": "/gsd-quick", "recommended": false },
{ "id": "code-review", "label": "Review recent work", "command": "/gsd-code-review", "recommended": false }
]
}
situation,recommended,actions[]are the contract the workflow depends on.signalsis informational (shown in the summary banner); the workflow does not branch on it.summaryis a one-line human string; the workflow may show it verbatim or reformat.actions[].commandis the full slash command string the workflow dispatches, including flags (e.g./gsd-progress --next).
The markdown layer
Command — commands/gsd/next.md (NEW)
Thin dispatcher, modeled on commands/gsd/progress.md and commands/gsd/help.md. Backed by gsd-core/workflows/smart-entry.md (named for the smart-entry classifier + gsd-tools smart-entry subcommand; does not collide with the existing workflows/next.md, which is the progress --next sub-workflow).
Frontmatter:
name: gsd:next(surfaces as/gsd-next; the command-contract requires agsd:*/gsd-*prefix — a bare/gsdis not expressible, see ADR-0002)description:"GSD smart entry — the state-aware front door. Reads your project state and routes you to the right next action."argument-hint: ""(no args for v1; reserved)effort: lowallowed-tools:Read, Bash, Glob, SlashCommand, AskUserQuestion- No
requires: [phase](unlikeprogress) — must work pre-project. <execution_context>→@~/.claude/gsd-core/workflows/smart-entry.md+@~/.claude/gsd-core/references/ui-brand.md
Body: a short <objective> stating this is a state-aware launcher, then <process> delegating entirely to the workflow. No inline logic.
Workflow — gsd-core/workflows/smart-entry.md (NEW)
Five steps. Must stay under 32 KiB (NEW_FILE_CAP) — lean, because all branching is in Node.
Step 1 — resolve (resolve the gsd_run shim): Copy the check_project-style shim-resolution block verbatim from gsd-core/workflows/do.md:29 (the long _GSD_SHIM_NAME resolver). This finds gsd-tools.cjs across all supported runtime homes. It is a proven, required block; do not paraphrase.
Step 2 — detect (run the classifier):
SNAPSHOT=$(gsd_run smart-entry --json 2>/dev/null)
Parse SNAPSHOT as JSON. If missing or unparseable → fall back to /gsd-progress (Step 5, with a one-line note "smart-entry unavailable — showing progress"). The agent never gets stuck.
Step 3 — present (render the menu):
TEXT_MODE handling copied verbatim from do.md:15 (set TEXT_MODE=true when --text in $ARGUMENTS or text_mode from init JSON is true; replace every AskUserQuestion with a numbered list).
Present via AskUserQuestion:
header: derived fromsituation(e.g.executing→ "Continue work").question: thesummaryline + "What next?"options: the first 4 ofactions[], label = actionlabel, recommended first. (AskUserQuestion shows the first option as recommended.)- Always allow the user to type a custom command ("Other" is provided automatically by the tool).
In TEXT_MODE: print summary, then a numbered list of all actions[] (not capped — text has no 4-option limit), ask the user to type a number.
Step 4 — display (routing banner): Copy the display step from do.md:77-89 verbatim — the GSD ► ROUTING banner showing input / routing-to / reason. Input here is the chosen label; routing-to is the chosen command.
Step 5 — dispatch: Invoke the chosen command. Pass $ARGUMENTS through if the user typed a custom command. Then stop — the dispatched command owns everything from here. (Same contract as do.md:91-99.)
TEXT_MODE / multi-runtime
The --text fallback is mandatory and is the reason we keep menus small and logic in Node. The fallback is copied from do.md, not reinvented.
Error handling
| failure | behavior |
|---|---|
gsd_run shim not found |
the shim block itself errors with the standard install hint (from do.md:29); not our concern |
smart-entry command missing (older gsd-core) |
workflow sees empty/unparseable output → falls back to /gsd-progress with a note |
smart-entry throws |
same: caught by the 2>/dev/null + parse check → fallback to /gsd-progress |
.planning/ absent |
smart-entry returns situation: "no-project" → menu offers new-project |
| git unavailable / not a repo | classifier swallows git errors; works without git signals |
AskUserQuestion unavailable (non-Claude) |
TEXT_MODE numbered list |
Invariant: /gsd always produces some actionable menu and never strands the user. The ultimate fallback is /gsd-progress, which is always safe and always exists.
Testing
Per CONTRIBUTING: node:test + node:assert/strict, behavior assertions only, no source-grep tests.
tests/smart-entry.unit.test.cjs (NEW)
Fixture-driven: create temp dirs with crafted .planning/STATE.md + optional git repo, run the classifier, assert situation + recommended + action set. Cases (one per situation at minimum):
no-project— empty cwd → situationno-project, recommendednew-project, actions includemap-codebase.paused— STATE.md withpaused_atset → situationpaused, recommendedresume-work.blocked— STATE.md with blockers → situationblocked, recommendeddebug.verify-failed— latest summarySTATUS: blocked→ situationverify-failed.needs-first-phase— STATE.md present,total_phases: 0→ situationneeds-first-phase.planning/executing/verify-pending— respectivestatusvalues.idle-stranded— clean tree + unpushed commits → situationidle-stranded, recommendedship.complete— current ≥ total, status complete → situationcomplete, recommendednew-milestone.unknown— malformed state → situationunknown, recommendedprogress.- Priority ordering — a STATE.md that is both paused AND blocked resolves to
paused(earlier row wins). - JSON shape —
actions[].commandalways starts with/gsd:; exactly one action hasrecommended: true.
tests/gsd-workflow.structure.test.cjs (NEW)
Invariants over the markdown layer (these are structural/format assertions on shipped artifacts, not source-grep of logic — permitted since they test the contract the workflow exposes):
commands/gsd/next.mdexists with frontmattername: gsd:next, norequiresfield,allowed-toolsincludesAskUserQuestion.gsd-core/workflows/smart-entry.mdexists and is under 32 KiB (NEW_FILE_CAP).- Every
commandstring referenced by the classifier's action table resolves to a real existing slash command file incommands/gsd/(guard against dead routes). - The workflow contains the TEXT_MODE fallback clause and the shim-resolution block (contract assertions).
- The workflow dispatches exactly one command and then stops (no inline execution).
Coverage & baseline
- The new
.cjsenters thec8coverage gate (--lines 70 --branches 60). - After adding
workflows/smart-entry.md, runnpm run size:baselineto updatetests/workflow-size-baseline.json; justify the new entry in the PR.
File changes
| file | change | size budget |
|---|---|---|
src/smart-entry.cts |
NEW — detection + classifier; --json + human output |
— |
gsd-core/bin/lib/smart-entry.cjs |
generated by build:lib (gitignored) |
— |
gsd-core/bin/gsd-tools.cjs |
add case 'smart-entry': (~2 lines) |
— |
commands/gsd/next.md |
NEW — thin dispatcher command (name: gsd:next → /gsd-next) |
small |
gsd-core/workflows/smart-entry.md |
NEW — presentation + dispatch | < 32 KiB |
tests/smart-entry.unit.test.cjs |
NEW — classifier behavior | — |
tests/gsd-workflow.structure.test.cjs |
NEW — markdown-layer invariants | — |
tests/workflow-size-baseline.json |
regenerate via npm run size:baseline |
— |
docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-27-gsd-smart-entry-design.md |
this document | — |
No existing command or workflow is modified. No new npm dependencies.
Open questions for implementation
None blocking. Two noted for the implementer's judgment (not spec-level):
idle-strandedthreshold — 72h hardcoded for v1. If brittle in practice, relax to "unpushed commits only" (drop the staleness clause).- Action label wording — exact strings are an implementation/tuning detail; the contract is
id+command.
Success criteria
gsd-tools smart-entry --jsonclassifies all 10 situations +unknowncorrectly from fixtures./gsdin a real project shows a situation-appropriate menu and dispatches the chosen command./gsdpre-project offersnew-project./gsdworks under TEXT_MODE (noAskUserQuestion).- Any
smart-entryfailure falls back to/gsd-progresswithout erroring. - New workflow under 32 KiB;
size:baselineupdated; coverage gate passes. - No new dependencies; no existing command modified.