3146ff36aa
* fix(#3132): realign spec/plan/ui-phase workflow prose from retired covered/backstop-as-status to resolved+verification The edge-probe resolution model splits status (resolved|dismissed|unresolved) from verification (explicit|backstop). The workflow prose in three files still used the pre-re-cut covered/backstop-as-status vocabulary that validateResolution rejects. Swept all three prose surfaces: - spec-phase.md: Step 5.5 resolution options, --auto mode + log line, comment, Step 6 row list - plan-phase.md: lift rule (L778/L780), comments (L564/L706), quality gate (L826-827) - ui-phase.md: resolution loop (L391), --auto mode (L405-409), write-back format (L415) Added regression test in edge-probe-spec-phase-contract.test.cjs asserting the retired vocab is absent and resolved+verification is used instead. * chore(#3132): add changeset + emitted-drift ack for workflow vocab realignment * fix(#3132): update planner contract tests for resolved+verification vocabulary RR-02 and RR-03 tests asserted the old covered/backstop-as-status vocab. Updated to match the realigned prose (resolved edge → must_haves). * fix(#3132): fix specless-probe-fallback test assertion + merge duplicate ack Test assertion was too strict (expected auto-resolved + verification:explicit on same line). Split into two independent assertions. Merged plan-phase.md ack into existing #2658 fragment to resolve duplicate-path rule violation. * fix(#3132): use bare filenames in ack keys (size map keys are bare, not full paths) * fix(#3132): amend existing acks instead of duplicating — remove plan-phase from #2658, spec-phase from #3132, append #3132 reason to #0000 and #2650 * chore(#3132): backfill changeset PR number 3138 --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Changeset Fragments
This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.
Why
Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.
See #2975 for the full rationale.
Adding a fragment
node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
--type Fixed \
--pr 1234 \
--body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"
This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.
Format
---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.
Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.
Opting out
PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.
At release time
Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:
node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty
This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.
Archived fragments
.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.