Files
msd-core/get-shit-done/workflows/do.md
Tom Boucher 79002a00cb chore(#518): rename npm package + bin to @opengsd/gsd-core (#519)
* chore: rename npm package + bin to @opengsd/gsd-core (functional)

- package.json: name @opengsd/get-shit-done-redux → @opengsd/gsd-core,
  bin key get-shit-done-redux → gsd-core, repository/homepage/bugs URLs
- package-lock.json: regenerated (npm install --package-lock-only)
- tests/**, scripts/**, bin/**, .github/**, agents/**, commands/**,
  get-shit-done/bin/**, get-shit-done/workflows/**:
  applied the 4-rule replacement (scoped npm ref, GitHub repo path,
  bin/clone invocations) per #505 single-source refactor

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: sweep live references to @opengsd/gsd-core

Update all live documentation (README.md + translations, docs/**,
CONTRIBUTING.md, VERSIONING.md, SECURITY.md, CONTEXT.md,
docs/CANARY.md) to reflect the renamed package and repository.

Rules applied:
- @opengsd/get-shit-done-redux → @opengsd/gsd-core (scoped npm name)
- open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux → open-gsd/gsd-core (GitHub repo)
- GSD-redux/get-shit-done-redux → open-gsd/gsd-core (stale badge org)
- bare bin/clone refs → gsd-core

CHANGELOG.md, docs/adr/**, docs/RELEASE-*.md, docs/research/**,
and .changeset/** are preserved byte-identical.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: add negative lookbehind to slash-command regex in bug-2954 test

The extractSlashReferences regex matched /gsd-core inside npm package
URLs (@opengsd/gsd-core), producing a false /gsd:core command reference.
Adding a negative lookbehind (?<![a-z]) excludes matches preceded by a
letter, so only standalone /gsd-<cmd> and /gsd:<cmd> tokens are found.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#518): add changeset for package rename

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#518): update package-identity expectations to the renamed coordinates

The rebase regenerated the seam to @opengsd/gsd-core (bin gsd-core, repo
open-gsd/gsd-core). The #498 seam tests assert deriveIdentity against the REAL
package.json, so their expected literals must follow the rename. The drift-lint
unit test is left as-is — its SEAM is a self-consistent fixture and its
stale-literal detection cases would shift if altered; the live-repo scan in it
already passes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-30 17:25:02 -04:00

112 lines
6.4 KiB
Markdown

<purpose>
Analyze freeform text from the user and route to the most appropriate GSD command. This is a dispatcher — it never does the work itself. Match user intent to the best command, confirm the routing, and hand off.
</purpose>
<required_reading>
Read all files referenced by the invoking prompt's execution_context before starting.
</required_reading>
<process>
<step name="validate">
**Check for input.**
**Text mode (`workflow.text_mode: true` in config or `--text` flag):** Set `TEXT_MODE=true` if `--text` is present in `$ARGUMENTS` OR `text_mode` from init JSON is `true`. When TEXT_MODE is active, replace every `AskUserQuestion` call with a plain-text numbered list and ask the user to type their choice number. This is required for non-Claude runtimes (OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, etc.) where `AskUserQuestion` is not available.
If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty, ask via AskUserQuestion:
```
What would you like to do? Describe the task, bug, or idea and I'll route it to the right GSD command.
```
Wait for response before continuing.
</step>
<step name="check_project">
**Check if project exists.**
```bash
_GSD_SHIM_NAME="gsd-tools.cjs"; _GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT="${RUNTIME_DIR:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)}"; GSD_TOOLS="${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/get-shit-done/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; if [ -f "$GSD_TOOLS" ]; then gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif command -v gsd-tools >/dev/null 2>&1; then GSD_TOOLS="$(command -v gsd-tools)"; gsd_run() { "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; else echo "ERROR: gsd-tools.cjs not found at $GSD_TOOLS and gsd-tools is not on PATH. Run: npx -y @opengsd/gsd-core@latest --claude --local" >&2; exit 1; fi
INIT=$(gsd_run query state.load 2>/dev/null)
```
Track whether `.planning/` exists — some routes require it, others don't.
</step>
<step name="route">
**Match intent to command.**
Evaluate `$ARGUMENTS` against these routing rules. Apply the **first matching** rule:
| If the text describes... | Route to | Why |
|--------------------------|----------|-----|
| Starting a new project, "set up", "initialize" | `/gsd:new-project` | Needs full project initialization |
| Mapping or analyzing an existing codebase | `/gsd:map-codebase` | Codebase discovery |
| A bug, error, crash, failure, or something broken | `/gsd:debug` | Needs systematic investigation |
| Spiking, "test if", "will this work", "experiment", "prove this out", validate feasibility | `/gsd:spike` | Throwaway experiment to validate feasibility |
| Sketching, "mockup", "what would this look like", "prototype the UI", "design this", explore visual direction | `/gsd:sketch` | Throwaway HTML mockups to explore design |
| Wrapping up spikes, "package the spikes", "consolidate spike findings" | `/gsd:spike --wrap-up` | Package spike findings into reusable skill |
| Wrapping up sketches, "package the designs", "consolidate sketch findings" | `/gsd:sketch --wrap-up` | Package sketch findings into reusable skill |
| Exploring, researching, comparing, or "how does X work" | `/gsd:explore` | Socratic ideation and idea routing |
| Discussing vision, "how should X look", brainstorming | `/gsd:discuss-phase` | Needs context gathering |
| A complex task: refactoring, migration, multi-file architecture, system redesign | `/gsd:phase` | Needs a full phase with plan/build cycle |
| Planning a specific phase or "plan phase N" | `/gsd:plan-phase` | Direct planning request |
| Executing a phase or "build phase N", "run phase N" | `/gsd:execute-phase` | Direct execution request |
| Running all remaining phases automatically | `/gsd:autonomous` | Full autonomous execution |
| A review or quality concern about existing work | `/gsd:verify-work` | Needs verification |
| Checking progress, status, "where am I" | `/gsd:progress` | Status check |
| Resuming work, "pick up where I left off" | `/gsd:resume-work` | Session restoration |
| A note, idea, or "remember to..." | `/gsd:capture` | Capture for later |
| Adding tests, "write tests", "test coverage" | `/gsd:add-tests` | Test generation |
| Completing a milestone, shipping, releasing | `/gsd:complete-milestone` | Milestone lifecycle |
| A specific, actionable, small task (add feature, fix typo, update config) | `/gsd:quick` | Self-contained, single executor |
**Requires `.planning/` directory:** All routes except `/gsd:new-project`, `/gsd:map-codebase`, `/gsd:spike`, `/gsd:sketch`, and `/gsd:help`. If the project doesn't exist and the route requires it, suggest `/gsd:new-project` first.
**Ambiguity handling:** If the text could reasonably match multiple routes, ask the user via AskUserQuestion with the top 2-3 options. For example:
```
"Refactor the authentication system" could be:
1. /gsd:phase — Full planning cycle (recommended for multi-file refactors)
2. /gsd:quick — Quick execution (if scope is small and clear)
Which approach fits better?
```
</step>
<step name="display">
**Show the routing decision.**
```
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
GSD ► ROUTING
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
**Input:** {first 80 chars of $ARGUMENTS}
**Routing to:** {chosen command}
**Reason:** {one-line explanation}
```
</step>
<step name="dispatch">
**Invoke the chosen command.**
Run the selected `/gsd-*` command, passing `$ARGUMENTS` as args.
If the chosen command expects a phase number and one wasn't provided in the text, extract it from context or ask via AskUserQuestion.
After invoking the command, stop. The dispatched command handles everything from here.
</step>
</process>
<success_criteria>
- [ ] Input validated (not empty)
- [ ] Intent matched to exactly one GSD command
- [ ] Ambiguity resolved via user question (if needed)
- [ ] Project existence checked for routes that require it
- [ ] Routing decision displayed before dispatch
- [ ] Command invoked with appropriate arguments
- [ ] No work done directly — dispatcher only
</success_criteria>