* chore: rename npm package + bin to @opengsd/gsd-core (functional) - package.json: name @opengsd/get-shit-done-redux → @opengsd/gsd-core, bin key get-shit-done-redux → gsd-core, repository/homepage/bugs URLs - package-lock.json: regenerated (npm install --package-lock-only) - tests/**, scripts/**, bin/**, .github/**, agents/**, commands/**, get-shit-done/bin/**, get-shit-done/workflows/**: applied the 4-rule replacement (scoped npm ref, GitHub repo path, bin/clone invocations) per #505 single-source refactor Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: sweep live references to @opengsd/gsd-core Update all live documentation (README.md + translations, docs/**, CONTRIBUTING.md, VERSIONING.md, SECURITY.md, CONTEXT.md, docs/CANARY.md) to reflect the renamed package and repository. Rules applied: - @opengsd/get-shit-done-redux → @opengsd/gsd-core (scoped npm name) - open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux → open-gsd/gsd-core (GitHub repo) - GSD-redux/get-shit-done-redux → open-gsd/gsd-core (stale badge org) - bare bin/clone refs → gsd-core CHANGELOG.md, docs/adr/**, docs/RELEASE-*.md, docs/research/**, and .changeset/** are preserved byte-identical. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: add negative lookbehind to slash-command regex in bug-2954 test The extractSlashReferences regex matched /gsd-core inside npm package URLs (@opengsd/gsd-core), producing a false /gsd:core command reference. Adding a negative lookbehind (?<![a-z]) excludes matches preceded by a letter, so only standalone /gsd-<cmd> and /gsd:<cmd> tokens are found. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#518): add changeset for package rename Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(#518): update package-identity expectations to the renamed coordinates The rebase regenerated the seam to @opengsd/gsd-core (bin gsd-core, repo open-gsd/gsd-core). The #498 seam tests assert deriveIdentity against the REAL package.json, so their expected literals must follow the rename. The drift-lint unit test is left as-is — its SEAM is a self-consistent fixture and its stale-literal detection cases would shift if altered; the live-repo scan in it already passes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
112 lines
6.4 KiB
Markdown
112 lines
6.4 KiB
Markdown
<purpose>
|
|
Analyze freeform text from the user and route to the most appropriate GSD command. This is a dispatcher — it never does the work itself. Match user intent to the best command, confirm the routing, and hand off.
|
|
</purpose>
|
|
|
|
<required_reading>
|
|
Read all files referenced by the invoking prompt's execution_context before starting.
|
|
</required_reading>
|
|
|
|
<process>
|
|
|
|
<step name="validate">
|
|
**Check for input.**
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Text mode (`workflow.text_mode: true` in config or `--text` flag):** Set `TEXT_MODE=true` if `--text` is present in `$ARGUMENTS` OR `text_mode` from init JSON is `true`. When TEXT_MODE is active, replace every `AskUserQuestion` call with a plain-text numbered list and ask the user to type their choice number. This is required for non-Claude runtimes (OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, etc.) where `AskUserQuestion` is not available.
|
|
If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty, ask via AskUserQuestion:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
What would you like to do? Describe the task, bug, or idea and I'll route it to the right GSD command.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Wait for response before continuing.
|
|
</step>
|
|
|
|
<step name="check_project">
|
|
**Check if project exists.**
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
_GSD_SHIM_NAME="gsd-tools.cjs"; _GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT="${RUNTIME_DIR:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)}"; GSD_TOOLS="${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/get-shit-done/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; if [ -f "$GSD_TOOLS" ]; then gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif command -v gsd-tools >/dev/null 2>&1; then GSD_TOOLS="$(command -v gsd-tools)"; gsd_run() { "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; else echo "ERROR: gsd-tools.cjs not found at $GSD_TOOLS and gsd-tools is not on PATH. Run: npx -y @opengsd/gsd-core@latest --claude --local" >&2; exit 1; fi
|
|
INIT=$(gsd_run query state.load 2>/dev/null)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Track whether `.planning/` exists — some routes require it, others don't.
|
|
</step>
|
|
|
|
<step name="route">
|
|
**Match intent to command.**
|
|
|
|
Evaluate `$ARGUMENTS` against these routing rules. Apply the **first matching** rule:
|
|
|
|
| If the text describes... | Route to | Why |
|
|
|--------------------------|----------|-----|
|
|
| Starting a new project, "set up", "initialize" | `/gsd:new-project` | Needs full project initialization |
|
|
| Mapping or analyzing an existing codebase | `/gsd:map-codebase` | Codebase discovery |
|
|
| A bug, error, crash, failure, or something broken | `/gsd:debug` | Needs systematic investigation |
|
|
| Spiking, "test if", "will this work", "experiment", "prove this out", validate feasibility | `/gsd:spike` | Throwaway experiment to validate feasibility |
|
|
| Sketching, "mockup", "what would this look like", "prototype the UI", "design this", explore visual direction | `/gsd:sketch` | Throwaway HTML mockups to explore design |
|
|
| Wrapping up spikes, "package the spikes", "consolidate spike findings" | `/gsd:spike --wrap-up` | Package spike findings into reusable skill |
|
|
| Wrapping up sketches, "package the designs", "consolidate sketch findings" | `/gsd:sketch --wrap-up` | Package sketch findings into reusable skill |
|
|
| Exploring, researching, comparing, or "how does X work" | `/gsd:explore` | Socratic ideation and idea routing |
|
|
| Discussing vision, "how should X look", brainstorming | `/gsd:discuss-phase` | Needs context gathering |
|
|
| A complex task: refactoring, migration, multi-file architecture, system redesign | `/gsd:phase` | Needs a full phase with plan/build cycle |
|
|
| Planning a specific phase or "plan phase N" | `/gsd:plan-phase` | Direct planning request |
|
|
| Executing a phase or "build phase N", "run phase N" | `/gsd:execute-phase` | Direct execution request |
|
|
| Running all remaining phases automatically | `/gsd:autonomous` | Full autonomous execution |
|
|
| A review or quality concern about existing work | `/gsd:verify-work` | Needs verification |
|
|
| Checking progress, status, "where am I" | `/gsd:progress` | Status check |
|
|
| Resuming work, "pick up where I left off" | `/gsd:resume-work` | Session restoration |
|
|
| A note, idea, or "remember to..." | `/gsd:capture` | Capture for later |
|
|
| Adding tests, "write tests", "test coverage" | `/gsd:add-tests` | Test generation |
|
|
| Completing a milestone, shipping, releasing | `/gsd:complete-milestone` | Milestone lifecycle |
|
|
| A specific, actionable, small task (add feature, fix typo, update config) | `/gsd:quick` | Self-contained, single executor |
|
|
|
|
**Requires `.planning/` directory:** All routes except `/gsd:new-project`, `/gsd:map-codebase`, `/gsd:spike`, `/gsd:sketch`, and `/gsd:help`. If the project doesn't exist and the route requires it, suggest `/gsd:new-project` first.
|
|
|
|
**Ambiguity handling:** If the text could reasonably match multiple routes, ask the user via AskUserQuestion with the top 2-3 options. For example:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
"Refactor the authentication system" could be:
|
|
1. /gsd:phase — Full planning cycle (recommended for multi-file refactors)
|
|
2. /gsd:quick — Quick execution (if scope is small and clear)
|
|
|
|
Which approach fits better?
|
|
```
|
|
</step>
|
|
|
|
<step name="display">
|
|
**Show the routing decision.**
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
GSD ► ROUTING
|
|
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
|
|
**Input:** {first 80 chars of $ARGUMENTS}
|
|
**Routing to:** {chosen command}
|
|
**Reason:** {one-line explanation}
|
|
```
|
|
</step>
|
|
|
|
<step name="dispatch">
|
|
**Invoke the chosen command.**
|
|
|
|
Run the selected `/gsd-*` command, passing `$ARGUMENTS` as args.
|
|
|
|
If the chosen command expects a phase number and one wasn't provided in the text, extract it from context or ask via AskUserQuestion.
|
|
|
|
After invoking the command, stop. The dispatched command handles everything from here.
|
|
</step>
|
|
|
|
</process>
|
|
|
|
<success_criteria>
|
|
- [ ] Input validated (not empty)
|
|
- [ ] Intent matched to exactly one GSD command
|
|
- [ ] Ambiguity resolved via user question (if needed)
|
|
- [ ] Project existence checked for routes that require it
|
|
- [ ] Routing decision displayed before dispatch
|
|
- [ ] Command invoked with appropriate arguments
|
|
- [ ] No work done directly — dispatcher only
|
|
</success_criteria>
|