Files
msd-core/skills/gsd-spec-phase/SKILL.md
Tom Boucher da4a86d8c1 feat(#1596): ship GSD skills via .claude-plugin/plugin.json
Phase B-provide of epic #1258. Adds a build-generated skills/ dir +
a skills manifest field so plugin-installed GSD exposes gsd-core:<skill>
the native Claude Code way. Closes the gap where plugin-only installs
lacked the skill surface because bin/install.js never ran.

- scripts/gen-plugin-skills.cjs: build step converting commands/gsd/*.md
  to skills/gsd-<stem>/SKILL.md via convertClaudeCommandToClaudeSkill
- .claude-plugin/plugin.json: add "skills": "./skills/"
- package.json: add skills to files, gen:plugin-skills to build chain
- tests/issue-766-plugin-manifest.test.cjs: Section H conformance
  (manifest field + dir + frontmatter + count parity) + C2 skills symlink
- docs/adr/766-*.md: dated amendment adding skills surface row
- .changeset/rapid-bears-hum.md: type Added
- skills/: 69 generated gsd-<stem>/SKILL.md files (build-committed)

Closes #1596
2026-06-22 18:07:35 -04:00

64 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown

---
name: gsd-spec-phase
description: "Clarify WHAT a phase delivers with ambiguity scoring; produces a SPEC.md before discuss-phase."
argument-hint: "<phase> [--auto] [--text]"
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Write
- Bash
- Glob
- Grep
- AskUserQuestion
---
<objective>
Clarify phase requirements through structured Socratic questioning with quantitative ambiguity scoring.
**Position in workflow:** `spec-phase → discuss-phase → plan-phase → execute-phase → verify`
**How it works:**
1. Load phase context (PROJECT.md, REQUIREMENTS.md, ROADMAP.md, STATE.md)
2. Scout the codebase — understand current state before asking questions
3. Run Socratic interview loop (up to 6 rounds, rotating perspectives)
4. Score ambiguity across 4 weighted dimensions after each round
5. Gate: ambiguity ≤ 0.20 AND all dimensions meet minimums → write SPEC.md
6. Commit SPEC.md — discuss-phase picks it up automatically on next run
**Output:** `{phase_dir}/{padded_phase}-SPEC.md` — falsifiable requirements that lock "what/why" before discuss-phase handles "how"
</objective>
<execution_context>
@~/.claude/gsd-core/workflows/spec-phase.md
@~/.claude/gsd-core/templates/spec.md
</execution_context>
<runtime_note>
**Copilot (VS Code):** Use `vscode_askquestions` wherever this workflow calls `AskUserQuestion`. They are equivalent.
</runtime_note>
<context>
Phase number: $ARGUMENTS (required)
**Flags:**
- `--auto` — Skip interactive questions; Claude selects recommended defaults and writes SPEC.md
- `--text` — Use plain-text numbered lists instead of TUI menus (required for `/rc` remote sessions)
Context files are resolved in-workflow using `init phase-op`.
</context>
<process>
Execute end-to-end.
**MANDATORY:** Read the workflow file BEFORE taking any action. The workflow contains the complete step-by-step process including the Socratic interview loop, ambiguity scoring gate, and SPEC.md generation. Do not improvise from the objective summary above.
</process>
<success_criteria>
- Codebase scouted for current state before questioning begins
- All 4 ambiguity dimensions scored after each interview round
- Gate passed: ambiguity ≤ 0.20 AND all dimension minimums met
- SPEC.md written with falsifiable requirements, explicit boundaries, and acceptance criteria
- SPEC.md committed atomically
- User knows they can now run /gsd-discuss-phase which will load SPEC.md automatically
</success_criteria>